Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

[Maradontia]

This whole shitshow reminds me of how old I am and how for many Trumpers this is Babby's First Election. They are rapidly overtaking SJWs in entitled snowflake status. Ive been through enough elections and had candidates that I voted for lose and the only other time I saw this utterly insane screeching was from SJWs when Trump won.

Take off the MAGA hats and put on the Pussy Hats.

They could republish this cartoon, just by changing the donkey to an elephant, Trump to Biden and Russia to Fraud Election

View attachment 1776649

Did you forget the "Obama doesn't have a birth certificate!" years?

Obama totally fooled the election commission, and the DNC, and the RNC. But don't worry, Trump. sheriff Arpaio, and ORLY Taitz are on the case.

 

[Esophagus]

They're trying to stop the spread of misinformation after seeing what happened to Facebook.

You're a complete fucking retard if you think Facebook and the rest of the tech giants give a shit about "misinformation".

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

You're a complete fucking retard if you think Facebook and the rest of the tech giants give a shit about "misinformation".

They do when congress gets over there ass about it

 

[Terrifik]

They do when congress gets over there ass about it

Tgats if they want certain narrative push like toxic gamers & communist hate speech

You're a complete fucking retard if you think Facebook and the rest of the tech giants give a shit about "misinformation".

They meant to controll the narrative but being too obvious just keeps push 1984 jokes to surface

even though josh/null keep talking about when 230 gets repealled youtube will be happy when less work is needed work to controll the narrative .

 

[Esophagus]

They do when congress gets over there ass about it

Oh, I'm sorry. You see, I got confused by your original message:

They're trying to stop the spread of misinformation after seeing what happened to Facebook.

I assumed you must have meant that tech giants like Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, etc. are benevolent and care about what their viewers look at. What you should have said was:

They're trying to stop the spread of naughty words that big brother don't want you to talk about after seeing what happened to Facebook.

There, fixed it for you!

 

[Tim Buckley]

They do when congress gets over there ass about it

But I thought it was just a circus with absolutely no possible outcome against the "president elect" and the absolute truths the media says about it, why would they even care?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

But I thought it was just a circus with absolutely no possible outcome against the "president elect" why would they even care?

What? We're talking about social media companies vs congress.

Facebook is getting cucked by congress because of "fake news" spread on their site. Google/Alphabet, seeing this, realizes that Youtube could also get cucked in the same way. In response, they decide to nip it in the bud before it gets to that point.

 

[Gorillad Cheese]

and this is precisely why I was worried enough about the attempt to pack the court that I voted for cheetos don over vermin supreme.
People were redefining this notion so fucking hard while they were simultaneously advocating for the original, intended meaning. I don't think Biden himself really sees this as a great idea, but he's hardly a bulwark to the loons who might be retarded enough to try to blow out the kneecaps of the judiciary by inflating it to 15 seats on the SCOTUS.

I swear if the asspained retardmonkeys throw the senate special elections, the dems get a 50-seat split, and the progtards whip up a social media frenzy for packing that the rest of the gizzards just go along with - I really will say that manchildren blew up the ol' USA in butthurt.

Manchin has already gone on record saying that he opposes courtpacking, and I'm willing to bet that Sinema and King would also vote against it if it ever came up. Dems' hopes of courtpacking died with Cunningham, Gideon, and Greenfield.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Tgats if they want certain narrative push like toxic gamers & communist hate speech

They meant to controll the narrative but being too obvious just keeps push 1984 jokes to surface

even though josh/null keep talking about when 230 gets repealled youtube will be happy when less work is needed work to controll the narrative .

Indeed, and it might get instead the result of creating a Streisand effect. I guess Bitchute, Lbry, Dailymotion, etc... will become more popular.

Timcast posted a vlog about this.

One Youtuber posted that quote who was worth to save for posterity.

UMCorian
"When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say." - Tyrion.

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

Manchin has already gone on record saying that he opposes courtpacking, and I'm willing to bet that Sinema and King would also vote against it if it ever came up. Dems' hopes of courtpacking died with Cunningham, Gideon, and Greenfield.

It's just something that I don't at all want to even take the risk with, however narrow, of a "fall in line you will do this or we will rip the pork from your state" moment.

 

[Gorillad Cheese]

The catch-22 of Laches -> It's Too Late! would be plenty more damning if it was all the more. The PA legislature would have to explain why it didn't pass legislation to undo the PASC's decision for one - being told they had no standing due to a lack of damages to make a case wouldn't prevent them from explicitly legislating the move out.

It's also that much of the damages are hypothetical - "we can never really know how much fraud there was or was not, but doesn't this make it totally possible that some fraud may have happened? Isn't it theoretically possible that lots and lots of fraud has occurred? With such a possibility, we have to annul the vote." Their attempts in the lower courts with what paltry testimony they gave (most of their sworn affidavits were used in fucking committee hearings, which do fuckall but let you grandstand on a camera) and with the IRREFUTABLE!!!! video """""""evidence""""""" tended to get chucked because it was a case built on hearsay and conjuecture, with theoretical damage - and which fell apart once the defendants explained items of the videos and the testimonies.

Notwithstanding that most of the "DAMNING PROOF!" was conjecture, to which one could provide a plausible explanation that was itself conjecture - so was it any surprise that when an election official provides an official explanation, the plaintiff's response was largely either to ignore it and push on or to say "they're lying"?

If you filed your case earlier and it was dismissed for lack of standing, then laches clearly would not apply. Keep in mind that laches is an equitable doctrine applied on a case-by-case basis depending on the balance of equities. If they had challenged the mail-in voting statute beforehand and the case were dismissed for lack of standing, then it would be an extremely strong argument against applying laches now. They fucked up by waiting until after the election to challenge the statute.

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

If you filed your case earlier and it was dismissed for lack of standing, then laches clearly would not apply. Keep in mind that laches is an equitable doctrine applied on a case-by-case basis depending on the balance of equities. If they had challenged the mail-in voting statute beforehand and the case were dismissed for lack of standing, then it would be an extremely strong argument against applying laches now. They fucked up by waiting until after the election to challenge the statute.

The impression that I've been getting is that the legislature purportedly wanted to file suit against the SC at points between their 2019 ruling and the current moment, and that it was frequently dismissed for lacking standing. The question would be asked why there wouldn't instead just have been a vote in the legislature to reverse the change, but idk - maybe the idea was that the PA SC being challenged in the court would deter their doing something similar again.

Were no challenges made between 2019 to 2020 regarding the PA SC decision? Such that they literally just started after Trump lost? That'd make their argument even more bloody pathetic.

 

[Maradontia]

Oh, I'm sorry. You see, I got confused by your original message:

I assumed you must have meant that tech giants like Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, etc. are benevolent and care about what their viewers look at. What you should have said was:

There, fixed it for you!

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW! Social media isn't helping me lie about the election! Trump won because I wanted him to win!

 

[FatalTater]

Due to the sun trying to kill us, the Northern Lights may be visible a lot further south.
Can we take that as a sign that the universe wants us to be less retarded?

https://www.thrillist.com/news/nation/northern-lights-forecast-december-2020-aurora-borealis

https://archive.vn/aNVcJ

 

[BlackDragoons]

Trump is the first president to try and sue for presidency.

 

[Vecr]

Trump is the first president to try and sue for presidency.

Not exactly, Bush did so, though he had won at that point anyway as was just getting re-counts stopped.

 

[PaleTay]

They do when congress gets over there ass about it

China, not congress.

 

[BlackDragoons]

Not exactly, Bush did so, though he had won at that point anyway as was just getting re-counts stopped.

He did sue, but not the levels Trump has hit. Nor had Bush gotten the states involved.

 

[Norvic]

Apparently Rush Limbaugh was ranting today about how he thinks the neo-confederates who signed up to Trump's folly are all going to secede from the union.

1. Why the fuck is Rush Limbaugh not dead yet?
2. Why is Rush Limbaugh wasting the last days of his life simping for Trump?
3. Haha, they should totally do that. I'd fucking love to see the neo-confederate states of America appoint Trump their God Emperor in perpetuity. Just don't let them have any of the nukes please.

 

[Techpriest]

Apparently Rush Limbaugh was ranting today about how he thinks the neo-confederates who signed up to Trump's folly are all going to secede from the union.

1. Why the fuck is Rush Limbaugh not dead yet?
2. Why is Rush Limbaugh wasting the last days of his life simping for Trump?
3. Haha, they should totally do that. I'd fucking love to see the neo-confederate states of America appoint Trump their God Emperor in perpetuity. Just don't let them have any of the nukes please.

The US nuke stocks in the country are located mostly Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota. These are where the ICBM wings are. There's probably some wherever the B2's are located out of, and almost every CBG probably carries nuclear weapons in their stocks. The real treasure trove is in Seattle though, as that's where the major SSBN base in the US is.