I've been very against the BLM/Antifa riots during a pandemic, too. But you gotta be really ignorant to think that Trump isn't responsible for a terrible covid response. You can still support Trump and admit he fucked up the covid response.
Sure, that was never my point though so turning it around would be disingenuous, which I don't put past anyone. I'm just pointing out the absurdity of the argument and the obvious self deception. He has a narrative he wants to believe, and because of that will disregard any information that doesn't support shutting everything down because of the virus.
So you are applying a death estimate from June to a total case estimate from October? You really are stupid, no wonder you hate science. Or you are just trying to be clever and intentionally making the denominator bigger.
Obviously the left does not give a fuck about anyone's safety. Forget about them spreading covid, theyre literally burning down buildings with people still inside. They found a corpse like 2 months later huddled up in a corner of a building that was burned down by democratic rioters.
I say we can trust them, but the percentage calculation used is not how you go about doing it. You suck at stats is what I am saying.
I don't believe he is uniquely responsible. Early on when he was trying to shut down international travel everyone called him xenophobic and politicians were literally telling people to go out and eat in Chinatown to show bad orange man that we're not scared.
Well, there have been those who said that this election is just to flush out all the stuff with Trump. And there are those who'll use some stuff to get Kamala in office by saying Biden is "unfit for office". I think every Democrat knows that this is about removing Trump, and the time for petty squabbles about the future of their party is for after the election is over and done with.
Isn't predicting the weather and studying illnesses two different playing fields?
Oh yeah I nearly forgot what this thread is originally supposed to be about
You're quite literally saying to trust them but don't trust information from them if it doesn't make you right. You're beyond helping because your chosen end to the argument is to prove yourself intelligent and correct. When whatever qualifier for evidence you expect is met, you'll change your argument to fit that too.
Don't you love political discussion on this site?
Trump's "shutting down the travel" thing was stupid because the virus was already all over the world (and in the US) at that point. Italy was having terrible caseloads, too, yet he didn't stop flights from there. It was just closing the barn door after the bull has already left.
No, I am saying we shouldn't trust your calculations because you're a dumbass who doesn't understand statistics. You can't take a numerator from June and then use a denominator from October. That's intentionally making the percentage way lower. It's really not a hard concept.
COVID response is part of political discussion and arguably one of the biggest deciding factors in how people will vote this election.
And when the numbers are all in and official with whatever stamp of approval you're seeking, and they're as low as everyone here is stating, you'll say, "can't we all just be glad that we made it through these trying times? We're still here aren't we? It's better to have been safe than sorry!" as a large portion of those people are jobless and poor because of ill-informed lock downs that you push for.
