Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%

  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%

  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%
  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's infuriating to watch these retard "journalists(?)" on MSM outlets go on and on about how terrible of a president Trump is and how he's divided this country. They really do love to say that.

If anyone has divided the country, it's exactly the MSM. The race baiting, the fear mongering, the non-stop shit talking about Trump. It's always something, it never ends. Many Americans watch CNN, ABC, MSNBC, etc. and think they're getting the news when in all actuality, they're being brainwashed if they haven't completely been already.

These so-called news channels have completely gone off the rails and have absolutely no self awareness. I just listened to this old bag bring up that bullshit story about Trump insulting veterans and how they're losers for getting injured (that's not even a good or believable story) and she even acknowledged that it came from an anonymous source but that didn't change the fact that he said it. WHAT.

It's_All_So_Tiresome.png
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Donny Cheese, XtrmGamr719, EvaBraunsGhost and 43 others
Invoke-Mimikatz said:
None are unlikely, in fact most are more than likely. NV looks set, so MI and WI make a win. Anything Penn = win. All those would match the expected pre election results. NC and GA are more wildcards, but not even needed now that AZ is in the books.
Click to expand...
inception_state said:
People with money on the line are still 2/3 Trump. I doubt Biden is coming back in Georgia or North Carolina, so it'll come down to whether Trump can hold his lead in PA/WI/MI.
Click to expand...
Is there something I'm missing from both of you. According to this https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/elections/live-results-2020-us-presidential-election MI has 71-80% votes counted and WI > 99%. They are at 52% and 51% for Trump respectively. Both seem to be settled for Trump therefore, no? The way I'm reading it if NV and AZ go for Biden as they seem to be, then Biden still has to get PA to win. Getting any of the other undeclared states except possibly Alaska, seems unlikely. I'm reading these results right, yes?


Second Hand Syringe said:
I don't think the country can handle too many elections like this before things really start to fall apart in terms of decreased security and poor economic performance. The socio-economic and polictial divisions are growing and unless the US gov't can get a handle on the active sedition and corruption that's occurring things won't soon improve. There's a difference between protesting and monkey wrenching the system with the goal of overthrowing the government - yet the media has people so worked up and turned around that the otherwise obvious line between peaceful protest and riot is obscured for many people. The problem, imo, stems from corruption on all sides in government and industry (e.g., corporate media). The only difference between the USA and a place like Vietnam or Mexico when it comes to corruption is that Americans cost more and are better at disguising it. Rooting out the poor quality people from government is next to impossible so I'm not sure how the problem could ever be solved in time, but I think it's probably one of the first steps required if one wanted to make America great again.
Click to expand...
If Trump remains president then I hope a big focus of his second term will be shoring up democratic processes and rules to protect against subversion of democracy in the future. The American people don't trust their media, they don't trust electoral process and they don't trust their intelligence agencies. And sadly, evidence exists to show they're right on all these fronts. Trump can't make everything great, but if he can help fix the institutions then those who follow him might.

Goddess Jabba said:
Well in many countries, the candidate who wins the most votes wins, so why shouldn't that be the case in America?
Click to expand...
Aside from historical reasons - that it wouldn't be the agreement under which independent states agree to form a political union, it would likely lead to most of America feeling disenfranchised. The president of the entire union would be elected by New York and California. If you see the individual unit of democracy as the person and you probably do then sure, popular vote makes sense. But the founders, any many others, view the unit of democracy to be communities. Consider that, there is merit to viewing it as such. After all, one community dominating all the others leads to a total breakdown - those communities will rightly want out. They will, rightly, see no reason for participation. A country is an arbitrary thing so why should community X consider themselves to be grouped in with community Y if they have no control. Electoral College is a way of resolving that problem - it says communities are allowed to exist.

String Boy said:
Remember when she tried to shrug off criticism by saying it was all a joke? What's the joke Kathy?
Click to expand...
The joke is that one on the left is still the looker.
Puerto Pollo said:
Sorry for asking again but the internet is so full of outrage that there's no real answer: is everyone but Pennsylvania still counting votes?
Click to expand...
PA is still counting. As fast as they can fill them in.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Rivalo, muh_moobs, GlobohomoSapiens and 3 others
Dom Cruise said:
The divide between rural areas and cities is so hilariously stark that we may as well do something like that.

Is there even a single conservative US city?
Click to expand...

www.bloomberg.com

Mapping How America's Metro Areas Voted in 2016

The geography of the 2016 election is spiky.
www.bloomberg.com www.bloomberg.com
​

​

Large Metros with the Biggest Vote Share for Trump​

Rank​
Metro​
Trump Vote Share​
1​
Birmingham-Hoover, AL​
58.6%​
2​
Oklahoma City, OK​
58.5%​
3​
Jacksonville, FL​
56.6%​
4​
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN​
56.1%​
5​
Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN​
55.8%​
6​
Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI​
53.7%​
7​
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN​
51.7%​
8​
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX​
51.3%​
9​
Pittsburgh, PA​
50.2%​
10​
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC​
50.1%​
The above table shows the top 10 large metros that went for Trump. The largest cities that Trump won in were Sunbelt metro areas and Rustbelt metro areas. In the Sunbelt, he won majorities in Birmingham, Oklahoma City, Jacksonville, Nashville, Dallas, and Charlotte. In the Rustbelt, he won majorities in Cincinnati, Grand Rapids, Indianapolis, and Pittsburgh.

Trump also took a plurality of the vote in Louisville (49.8 vs. Clinton’s 45.1 percent), Tampa (49.3 vs. 46.3 percent), Phoenix (48.6 vs. 44.5 percent), Houston (48.5 vs. 47.5 percent), San Antonio (48.4 vs. 47.2 percent), St. Louis (48.0 vs. 46.9 percent), and Kansas City (48.0 vs. 45.9 percent.)

Trump took huge shares of the vote in smaller Sunbelt metros—especially in the South—such as Morristown (77.3 percent), Tennessee; Amarillo (76.9 percent) and Midland, Texas (75.4 percent); Houma, Louisiana (74.7 percent); Dalton, Georgia (74.4 percent); Joplin, Missouri (74.4 percent); and Decatur, Alabama (73.8 percent).

He also won by substantial margins in smaller Rustbelt metros such as Altoona (71.5 percent), Chambersburg (70.6 percent), and Williamsport, Pennsylvania (69.7 percent); Parkersburg (71.1 percent), Huntington (67.6 percent), Weirton-Steubenville (66.7 percent), and Wheeling (66.6 percent), West Virginia; and Kokomo (64.3 percent), Elkhart (63.8 percent), and Terre Haute, Indiana (61.7 percent).
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Celebrate Nite, ddlloo, Aberforth and 9 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back