Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I'm trying not to PL, but I keep running into a problem at work that relates to this, I think.

I'll have a new female student, and she'll have a little brother. The female students have to hide their supplies, and "get into" their sisters' stuff, and tear it up. And sometimes, they end up keeping their stuff at a relative's house. But this is bad for me, because it makes them forget their things when they come over, or it keeps them from practicing altogether.

So what happens?

They quit.

The parents say they, "really want to keep learning" with me, but they can't because the little brother ruins it. But instead of trying to tame their hellish boys, they end up punishing their daughters by pulling them from my lessons.
(And, I mean, this hurts my bottom line, too.)

It's driving me insane to notice! The girls are always meek, quiet, sweet, and their brothers come in like a damn tornado. Why are they seemingly just letting the boys off the hook for being assholes to their sisters!

Why do they push for emotional maturity, and meekness in girls, but then just let the boys act like they're raised by wolves!
View attachment 5262246

I'm not advocating for hitting or beating children. That doesn't solve anything, and just teaches them they violence solves things.
I'm genuinely baffled and frustrated about it.


I'm pretty sure my boss is only giving me entry-level students, too, and giving the upper-level learners to my male coworkers. Because we can only teach little babies. But that's just my own anger, ringing in my ears.
They need beatings, but we're living in an era where beatings are taboo.
 
My local zoo has like a charm school for young male rhinos, where they keep them away from females and train them and teach them to get used to and not be afraid of transport crates, and to get out all their aggression on toys like punchbags and tyres. Then when they're a bit older and have learnt to behave, they're put into the breeding programmes and get to meet the females.
Lots of human cultures have something similar, or used to: boys will go on their first hunt or do some sort of training or community service as a rite of passage, and then they're a full member of the tribe or recognised as an adult afterwards. I wonder if there's something to that. Not necessarily going and hunting a mammoth or whatever they did in the old days, but going to an all boys' school or something like Scouts would be good for them. And the teaching could be tailored to help boys learn and keep their interest without alienating them or wasting the girls' time by disrupting their schooling. I used to be in favour of mixed schools and went to one myself, but I can see a lot of things wrong with it in hindsight.
 
The adage is that girls are mature for their age, so we’re taught to be lenient. It completely removes the responsibility the boys have to learn to behave. Teach boys to listen to the girls instead of making the girls put up with the boys.
You're right, but where did this notion even come from? Why did we, as a society, decide that we need to burden girls with this shit?

Is this why we're seeing jokes about being a "feral rat girl" and the like? Because it's girls finally going feral, like we deserve?

They need beatings, but we're living in an era where beatings are taboo.
No. I was beat, and now I post here!
 
My local zoo has like a charm school for young male rhinos, where they keep them away from females and train them and teach them to get used to and not be afraid of transport crates, and to get out all their aggression on toys like punchbags and tyres. Then when they're a bit older and have learnt to behave, they're put into the breeding programmes and get to meet the females.
Lots of human cultures have something similar, or used to: boys will go on their first hunt or do some sort of training or community service as a rite of passage, and then they're a full member of the tribe or recognised as an adult afterwards. I wonder if there's something to that. Not necessarily going and hunting a mammoth or whatever they did in the old days, but going to an all boys' school or something like Scouts would be good for them. And the teaching could be tailored to help boys learn and keep their interest without alienating them or wasting the girls' time by disrupting their schooling. I used to be in favour of mixed schools and went to one myself, but I can see a lot of things wrong with it in hindsight.
Sex segregated schools are mega gay
 
I wonder if there's something to that. Not necessarily going and hunting a mammoth or whatever they did in the old days, but going to an all boys' school or something like Scouts would be good for them. And the teaching could be tailored to help boys learn and keep their interest without alienating them or wasting the girls' time by disrupting their schooling. I used to be in favour of mixed schools and went to one myself, but I can see a lot of things wrong with it in hindsight.
There've been studies about the children who come out of single-sex schools.
I thought this was interesting;
For example, two studies controlling for socioeconomic background, parental education and/or religion found that, in early to middle adulthood, single-sex school graduates reported less satisfactory marriage outcomes (e.g., less happy marriage, higher rate of divorce) than coeducational school graduates [11,42]. One study found that 10th grade students from single-sex schools reported lower satisfaction with other-gender friends than students from coeducational schools [43].
It sounds like a boys-only school makes them worse, like they hate women more.

...then I just remembered a completely different study, about how little girls doubt themselves around 6-8yo. And maybe we should separate them.
Specifically, 6-year-old girls are less likely than boys to believe that members of their gender are “really, really smart.” Also at age 6, girls begin to avoid activities said to be for children who are “really, really smart.” These findings suggest that gendered notions of brilliance are acquired early and have an immediate effect on children’s interests.
I hate it. (:_(
 
Throwback to the time I came back from a week or so long vacation to work and learned that some male intern had used the computer I usually worked with. No biggie theoretically since we had way too little equipment and had to share or switch all the time, so that I didn't mind. What I did mind however was that he apparently just used it to watch porn, with all of it still in the search history (and yes, it was hentai).

I reported it and of course nothing was done about it and for the rest of the time I worked there I had to live with the knowledge that someone may or may not have coomed on my workspace.

At least jack off in a toilet stall using your phone or something, ugh.
 
My local zoo has like a charm school for young male rhinos, where they keep them away from females and train them and teach them to get used to and not be afraid of transport crates, and to get out all their aggression on toys like punchbags and tyres. Then when they're a bit older and have learnt to behave, they're put into the breeding programmes and get to meet the females.
Lots of human cultures have something similar, or used to: boys will go on their first hunt or do some sort of training or community service as a rite of passage, and then they're a full member of the tribe or recognised as an adult afterwards. I wonder if there's something to that. Not necessarily going and hunting a mammoth or whatever they did in the old days, but going to an all boys' school or something like Scouts would be good for them. And the teaching could be tailored to help boys learn and keep their interest without alienating them or wasting the girls' time by disrupting their schooling. I used to be in favour of mixed schools and went to one myself, but I can see a lot of things wrong with it in hindsight.
There's a similar thing with wild elephants. Oftentimes, young bull elephants are very violent and will disrupt villages and such. So folks have been bringing in older male elephants to those areas and what appears to happen is that the elder ones teach them to not be retarded and the youth calms down and stops acting retarded.
 
There's a similar thing with wild elephants. Oftentimes, young bull elephants are very violent and will disrupt villages and such. So folks have been bringing in older male elephants to those areas and what appears to happen is that the elder ones teach them to not be retarded and the youth calms down and stops acting retarded.
There's a thread in Q&A right now where all the regular suspects who constantly make incel-tier posts on this site and try to shit up this thread admit they have no male role models in their life. Men are failing their sons and the blame is of course put entirely on women.

There's many studies that show children learn from their parents relationship how they are supposed to treat the opposite sex and what to expect. Women with abusive or absent fathers go to seek out abusive men because they have never been shown what a healthy relationship is supposed to be like and how they deserve to be treated.

Men with abusive fathers go on to abuse women and I guess men with no fathers at all just never learn how to relate to a woman at all despite being raised by single mothers they just never learn how to get along with a woman in a romantic sense, they only see women as the motherly oppressor who says no to things they would like to do (first mommy says "No, you can't get an xbox" then Stacy says "No, I will not have sex with you"). It really explains why they think we live in some gynocratic society or whatever bullshit. They only ever had a woman be an authority figure over them and never as a friend or romantic partner. That's my armchair diagnosis anyways.
 
They need beatings, but we're living in an era where beatings are taboo.
As someone who works in retail, I can honestly say I've gone from "A spanking where you explain what they did wrong is enough" to "Just slap the fucking brat straight in the mouth" real quick. Honestly, the first option is still the most sensible, but people don't even do that now, they're too chickenshit. So they let their children run wild.
 
All men smell bad.
Nah women stink just as bad, I used work in a hotel bathroom with some of the fanciest ladies around. And lemme tell you women even the hottest can let out stinks just as bad as any man. A cute blonde girl came out afterwards one day almost embarrassed at what she had produced In the porcelain throne and lemme tell you as I had to clean it was the most rancid, sulfuric shit stench I was unfortunate to ever come across.

The bins were also filled with tampons and used diapers that I had clean out and it was disgusting, lemme tell you you women are just as capable as being as rank as any man.
 
Nah women stink just as bad, I used work in a hotel bathroom with some of the fanciest ladies around. And lemme tell you women even the hottest can let out stinks just as bad as any man. A cute blonde girl came out afterwards one day almost embarrassed at what she had produced In the porcelain throne and lemme tell you as I had to clean it was the most rancid, sulfuric shit stench I was unfortunate to ever come across.

The bins were also filled with tampons and used diapers that I had clean out and it was disgusting, lemme tell you you women are just as capable as being as rank as any man.
Man is surprised that women poop once again. The difference is women clean themselves afterwards.
 
The state of the bathrooms I’ve seen would suggest otherwise.
Idk why I have to explain to you the difference between cleaning yourself and cleaning a bathroom. I know that cleaning a bin that tampons have been left in all day is rough, but what exactly does that have to do with the personal hygiene of the woman who left it behind? I've seen some weird shit on women's toilets which I assume mostly is done by drug addicts, but that doesn't change the fact that women come out a bathroom clean and smelling good, even if the bathroom itself doesn't, while men don't even wipe their butt or wash their hands and just let piss drop in their underwear.
 
There's a thread in Q&A right now where all the regular suspects who constantly make incel-tier posts on this site and try to shit up this thread admit they have no male role models in their life. Men are failing their sons and the blame is of course put entirely on women.

There's many studies that show children learn from their parents relationship how they are supposed to treat the opposite sex and what to expect. Women with abusive or absent fathers go to seek out abusive men because they have never been shown what a healthy relationship is supposed to be like and how they deserve to be treated.

Men with abusive fathers go on to abuse women and I guess men with no fathers at all just never learn how to relate to a woman at all despite being raised by single mothers they just never learn how to get along with a woman in a romantic sense, they only see women as the motherly oppressor who says no to things they would like to do (first mommy says "No, you can't get an xbox" then Stacy says "No, I will not have sex with you"). It really explains why they think we live in some gynocratic society or whatever bullshit. They only ever had a woman be an authority figure over them and never as a friend or romantic partner. That's my armchair diagnosis anyways.
Back in the 90s, we called them deadbeat dads, and we shat on them. Nowadays, people call it "fatherless behavior", as if having some mongoloid who got divorced for a reason, or some piece of shit criminal who doesn't even want to look after his kids will help. This comes off most acutely when you see the usual suspects talk about how black women bad black society so feminized, while saying nothing about the piece of shit men in the black community who would rather fuck around, spread disease, and fuck other men on the downlow than be any sort of functional human being.

I used to think men could learn from women like their mothers. Now I realize I was wrong. The misogyny is too hard-coded too young. Men do need male role models, because moidlets are little fucking retards who will only listen to another Y chromosoid.
Nah women stink just as bad, I used work in a hotel bathroom with some of the fanciest ladies around. And lemme tell you women even the hottest can let out stinks just as bad as any man. A cute blonde girl came out afterwards one day almost embarrassed at what she had produced In the porcelain throne and lemme tell you as I had to clean it was the most rancid, sulfuric shit stench I was unfortunate to ever come across.

The bins were also filled with tampons and used diapers that I had clean out and it was disgusting, lemme tell you you women are just as capable as being as rank as any man.
Male learns that poopoopeepee, even from a hot woman is uh oh stinky.

Shit stinks. That's not the same as all the horror stories of males who can't even be assed to clean their shitstained underwear.
 
Idk why I have to explain to you the difference between cleaning yourself and cleaning a bathroom. I know that cleaning a bin that tampons have been left in all day is rough, but what exactly does that have to do with the personal hygiene of the woman who left it behind? I've seen some weird shit on women's toilets which I assume mostly is done by drug addicts, but that doesn't change the fact that women come out a bathroom clean and smelling good, even if the bathroom itself doesn't, while men don't even wipe their butt or wash their hands and just let piss drop in their underwear.
Yeah we can be gross but so many men fetishised the idea of women cleanliness when that isn’t the case at all. Women can also exaggerate the traits of rugged manly grossness like that we shit or fart a lot more which simply is not true. I am often disgusted by any bodily functions and do my best to try and remain clean. This idea that either sex is more clean or have a certain way about them is simply nonsense. Besides deep down we’re all ugly under the surface, men and women can suck and be great in different ways, hating an entire axis of people that comprise 50% of the worlds population is stupid and pointless.
 
1687121933756.png
I wonder how many of these guys are total normies irl with a wife and kids that you would meet in the grocery store and then they go home to write sick shit like this on the internet.
 
Back