- Joined
- Jan 7, 2023
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A really underrated quality, and something not spoken of nearly enough. Men don't need to be resilient because biologically they're replaceable. One moid dies, the world goes on as before, another one will be along shortly. One women dies, and at minimum there's a whole chain of family members impacted.Women are also extremely resilient
Headphones are great for this. You don’t have to have any music playing from them so you can remain aware of your surroundings if you want. Make sure to get cheap ones for this in case someone tries to yank them off your head and run off with them.I want one of those. Normalise those. Normalise a LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE sign.
Look at the bright side you arent working service industry and have to deal with people like this daily.snip
One of the main complaints of men is how fast women move on. You can divorce her in three months she would have her life back on track with new guy and mald about it.Women are also extremely resilient because life is harder for them and they have to develop the skills to get back up and keep going, while taking care of others simultaneously, early on. Men aren't half as resilient so they give up sooner.
Hey I'm sure there is a single man that is a better parent than some moms.But ofc men's right retards will say that single men make better parents than single moms.
Which pooner is that?Hey I'm sure there is a single man that is a better parent than some moms.
Because even though they are "single" there is still a woman looking after the child, be it a female relative, new partner or just a woman looking out for the child's well being. Single moms are single in the truest sense of the word, women do not have that luxury because men see raising another man child as cucked and also the woman has to watch out for predators looking to date her in order to access her kids. It's not the win MRAs think it is, it just proves a random woman is safer to bring around your kids than a random man.But ofc men's right retards will say that single men make better parents than single moms.
That's because you're not retarded. They PRETEND to compartmentalize but no they don't. That's why they all try to merge it into that cringe 24/7 crap with collars and use such specific language. "Impact play" is such chickenshit weasel words. "His dick gets hard when he slaps and punches me." It's not choking or "breath play" it's strangulation as in "he has rewired his brain to only orgasm as he strangles me."I've always had trouble believing that such behaviors didn't also spill into the day-to-day relationship and that it only stays in the bedroom.
I was referring specifically to societies that were around at the time different portions of the Bible were written but yeah abortion has always existed and is documented in almost every society (I'm sure sometime somewhere you could find an exception)Abortion was even commonplace in colonial America, and it was perfectly legal for a woman to take herbal remedies. Family planning had to be taken seriously because childbirth could be a death sentence for the mother and it was important that she could breastfeed her child up to a reasonable age (milk dries out when the woman becomes pregnant).
I do commend you for making more an an effort than 95% of men and I hope you have fun and learn something even if you don't get your PP touched.>Me spying on the thread
View attachment 6478771
Moid here, I'm going to see if this intel is good, will report back in a few months. I've already scoped out a local spot with different kinds of fun classes. I didn't even know places like this existed near me until I went searching.
These religious perverts are all about ownership. Fathers own their daughters, which is why this man can confidently say shit about "we'd be having the baby" if his daughter ended up pregnant through rape, because it's not *her* body/baby, she belongs to HIM, and therefore, so does the baby. It's got fuck all to do with protecting poor innocent babies and everything to do with making sure your possession knows her place. And one day he will generously give his possession to another religious nutjob who will treat her body as though it were his own, because it is.RE the father’s forcing a 10 y/o to give birth to a baby is cucked. The “give birth to her rapists baby” line doesn’t sit right with me because it implies ownership over the woman that a rapist automatically gets because her womb is occupied, which is exactly what rapists want. It’s a baby that’s the product of rape.
I don’t disagree with the overall conclusions but I’m not a fan of the rhetoric as the mainstay argument. To combat specific viewpoints it has a place but I think people are getting lost in the weeds.
And on the occasions you find a moid who can handle that, he still expects the children to have his surname. I don't care what historical bullshit he comes out with to justify it, the fetus spent 9 months in a woman's body, they're much more hers than they are his. You want the whole family to have matching names, I'll fetch the name change form for you.On a slightly related tangent, I recently had a conversation about changing surnames after marriage; I said that if I ever did get married then I wouldn't bother changing my name because because a) what's the point and b) why the fuck SHOULD I be expected to, when no one would expect my hypothetical husband to do likewise? Ofc I was then hit with the "bUt yOu AlReAdY hAvE a MaN's SuRnAme" argument, and yeh that's true but if I had to choose which man to "belong" to, am I going to pick the man who has been there for me since the day I was born, worked his ass off to support his family, and will STILL drop everything at a moment's notice to help his daughters even though they're both grown women, or some moid who would easily cheat on me/ beat me/ insert abuse of your choice here? It's a real brain tickler.
I unfortunately worked with a moid like this who hadn't seen his son in Christ knows how long ("muh crazy ex" no mate it's because you have a domestic violence charge for attacking his mother) who would mald and seethe to anyone who would listen about how she had started using double-barrelling the child's surname to include hers.And on the occasions you find a moid who can handle that, he still expects the children to have his surname. I don't care what historical bullshit he comes out with to justify it, the fetus spent 9 months in a woman's body, they're much more hers than they are his. You want the whole family to have matching names, I'll fetch the name change form for you.
Yeah it definitely has a place in combating those viewpoints, I just think people mainly on Xitter are getting too deep into it and forgetting the full connotations. So I was just throwing that out there.These religious perverts are all about ownership. Fathers own their daughters, which is why this man can confidently say shit about "we'd be having the baby" if his daughter ended up pregnant through rape, because it's not *her* body/baby, she belongs to HIM, and therefore, so does the baby. It's got fuck all to do with protecting poor innocent babies and everything to do with making sure your possession knows her place. And one day he will generously give his possession to another religious nutjob who will treat her body as though it were his own, because it is.
On a slightly related tangent, I recently had a conversation about changing surnames after marriage; I said that if I ever did get married then I wouldn't bother changing my name because because a) what's the point and b) why the fuck SHOULD I be expected to, when no one would expect my hypothetical husband to do likewise? Ofc I was then hit with the "bUt yOu AlReAdY hAvE a MaN's SuRnAme" argument, and yeh that's true but if I had to choose which man to "belong" to, am I going to pick the man who has been there for me since the day I was born, worked his ass off to support his family, and will STILL drop everything at a moment's notice to help his daughters even though they're both grown women, or some moid who would easily cheat on me/ beat me/ insert abuse of your choice here? It's a real brain tickler.
Moids only care about equality when it means pretending they have an equal claim to a child. Grew and birthed a full baby and society at large pretends ejaculating one time is just as significant. Then they want 50:50 custody even when the newborn is breastfeeding, which is law by the way they used to make exceptions for breastfeeding but not anymore. (Context, I hope people know the whole courts favouring mothers thing is false. When men bother to pursue for custody, they get it.)I don't care what historical bullshit he comes out with to justify it, the fetus spent 9 months in a woman's body, they're much more hers than they are his.