Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
On the topic of abortion, I sometimes peruse r/regretfulparents. I've never wanted kids nor do I have any lest I be the next virgin mary, but it scratches the same itch as watching a car wreck in a way. Especially seeing stories about the male children. Of course there's fathers in there whining that they have to care for their spawn but it's notably male children that are the violent ones, while at most the female children scream and cry when they don't get their way. This one in particular caught my attention having always advocated for the euthanasia of sped moids. They're always violent, and sexually violent at that and his father is aware of it.
View attachment 6474817
Having been the victim of two "high functioning" sped moids in middle school, both resorting to violence (and rape threats) when I turned them down, I hope OP's tard finds a way to off itself before it can reach puberty. The gall to leave this beast with its mother knowing what its capable of. Someone needs to remind him of this site's namesake.
Now, I am not advocating for anything, but this made me think about a theory (again, just an unsupported theory) I've read on Ovarit (?) - that some moms of ''trans kids'' trooned their sons, because they observed those tard kids are violent and likely will become rapists too, and there is no other legal (and socially acceptable in some places) way to deal with the situation, until SOMETHING happens. So they had the kid put on blockers to ensure the physical aspect of their sexuality will be gone and the boys themselves will loudly demand ball chop.
This, of course, requires the kid is not too tard to become ''trans''.
 
Screenshot_20241001-115918.png
Hmmm, Irina seems like a weird character, I wonder what else she posts on her social media.

Screenshot 2024-10-01 at 18.53.39.png
Screenshot 2024-10-01 at 18.55.05.png
Marvellous.
 
Correct.

BDSM is just getting off on violence and control.

When I was much younger, I made the mistake of dating someone in the community. In addition to getting off on violence they're also all porn addicted comers. You don't get that far into a fetish like that without years of porn addiction leading up to it.
"Vanilla shaming" and similar positions held by pornsick men and bedroom pick mes have been a sociological disaster. There is nothing wrong with missionary, there is nothing wrong with not wanting to be choked or slapped or having some fat moid fart in your face and then piss on you so that he can get off. Yet for decades there's been this bizarre campaign to convince women that they're boring at sex and their partners will leave them for a freak unless they have a dozen kinks, enjoy getting choked, beg for anal sex, domme their men, and agree to threesomes. Which, surprise, almost always pleases the man and not the woman.

Yes, of course kinky women exist. But there's a difference been acknowledging their existence and putting them on a pedestal so that they can gloat about how much better and interesting they are than "vanilla women" because they enjoy getting throatfucked and getting their hair yanked during anal or whatever, and men can keep pretending there isn't anything odd or alarming about getting off at the sight of a woman sobbing and in pain. In fact those were revealed to be some of Peter Madsen's kinks before he killed a woman.
 
Btw the same guys will bring up the meme that women don't understand what "on average" means, but will use porn accounts or some obvious grifters to generalize women behaviour.
"I watch porn all day, that's how I know all women are whores" - every misogynist ever

If you ever see a man saying things like "Women are whores" "The average woman has sex with 100 men in her first year of college" "Women ride the cock carousel" etc etc. then you already know he's a porn addict who can't tell porn apart from reality.
 
Wait till you hear about their conspiracy about SIDS being a cover up for women smothering their babies and that the medical system is in league with women and it's some weird open secret. They don't believe in post partum depression and think it's a made up diagnosis to give women an easy out for their baby killing. Not understanding that sometimes it's a brain stem issue or just that babies are extremely retarded and sometimes forget how to breath and die.
I had a man actually tell me SIDS was a conspiracy BUT he thought that the women were smothering their kids due to postpartum psychosis/depression. Marginally less retarded as he was recognizing that postpartum mental illness is a thing but I still laughed in his face. Infants are fragile and sometimes something vital in their bodies just stops working shortly after birth. Same thing happens with puppies and kittens yet no one thinks that's a conspiracy.
 
I had a man actually tell me SIDS was a conspiracy BUT he thought that the women were smothering their kids due to postpartum psychosis/depression. Marginally less retarded as he was recognizing that postpartum mental illness is a thing but I still laughed in his face. Infants are fragile and sometimes something vital in their bodies just stops working shortly after birth. Same thing happens with puppies and kittens yet no one thinks that's a conspiracy.
Imagine telling this to a parent whos kid died from sids or just chocked in sleep by their own vomit while they were watching them. I wanna see the recording of the idiot getting pummeled to death by the father .
 
Are we still doing our regular series of "Moids, Why The Fuck Can They Not Control Themselves In Public"?

I have another supermarket encounter today. Firstly: it is the middle of the day, I am in the fucking supermarket, why the fuck would I be in any way looking for dick. Dick is not in the Aldi specialbuys this week. I will not be getting a Tesco clubcard offer on dick. I am in the fucking supermarket buying fucking groceries. Leave me the fuck alone.
But I feel the need to add what I was wearing, because honest to God, how is it not possible to signal clearly to moids that I am not receptive to any offer of dick. I do not want your phone number, I do not want to have 'warm chatter' with you, do not fucking attempt to touch me, I do not want your sexual advances.

Screenshot 2024-10-01 at 19.42.15.png


IT'S LITERALLY A FUCKING ANKLE LENGTH BROWN SMOCK LIKE HOW CAN I LOOK LESS INTERESTED IN MOID APPROACHES

i was also wearing an enormous shapeless brown cardigan for warmth BUT NO THE MOID WAS NOT DETERRED

I even had my certificate of ownership, I mean my rings, on. Who the fuck is telling moids to cruise housewives in the supermarket ffs
 
But I feel the need to add what I was wearing, because honest to God, how is it not possible to signal clearly to moids that I am not receptive to any offer of dick.
I dress very "masculine", i.e. baggy button up shirts, cargo shorts or other knee length shorts, high top sneakers and the like. I never have my hair down, I don't wear makeup or jewelry, and my legs have been unshaven for the better part of two years. I am the most dyke-coded straight woman in the dairy aisle and I will still have moids approach me or needlessly put their hand on my back or shoulders when brushing past when there's plenty of room. These are the same beings that will fuck a dead lizard, they absolutely do not care what you're wearing or if there's a ring on the hand.
 
men in positions of power
groyper squatch planet for John Lujan.png
He is where he belongs now.
I wouldn't wish it upon anyone to be conceived in a one night stand, a BDSM orgy, a furry convention. The parents would be hedonistic strangers who don't give a fuck about each other. If you can see what is wrong with these lifestyles, you should also be able to see why a child shouldn't be born and raised in that environment.
Tell the anti-aborties the gubmint is going to take away their kids and force them to be raised by furries -- What's that you say? A terrible idea? I agree, you dumb motherfucker😹
Are we still doing our regular series of "Moids, Why The Fuck Can They Not Control Themselves In Public"?

I have another supermarket encounter today. Firstly: it is the middle of the day, I am in the fucking supermarket, why the fuck would I be in any way looking for dick. Dick is not in the Aldi specialbuys this week. I will not be getting a Tesco clubcard offer on dick. I am in the fucking supermarket buying fucking groceries. Leave me the fuck alone.
But I feel the need to add what I was wearing, because honest to God, how is it not possible to signal clearly to moids that I am not receptive to any offer of dick. I do not want your phone number, I do not want to have 'warm chatter' with you, do not fucking attempt to touch me, I do not want your sexual advances.

View attachment 6476879

IT'S LITERALLY A FUCKING ANKLE LENGTH BROWN SMOCK LIKE HOW CAN I LOOK LESS INTERESTED IN MOID APPROACHES

i was also wearing an enormous shapeless brown cardigan for warmth BUT NO THE MOID WAS NOT DETERRED

I even had my certificate of ownership, I mean my rings, on. Who the fuck is telling moids to cruise housewives in the supermarket ffs

I dress very "masculine", i.e. baggy button up shirts, cargo shorts or other knee length shorts, high top sneakers and the like. I never have my hair down, I don't wear makeup or jewelry, and my legs have been unshaven for the better part of two years. I am the most dyke-coded straight woman in the dairy aisle and I will still have moids approach me or needlessly put their hand on my back or shoulders when brushing past when there's plenty of room. These are the same beings that will fuck a dead lizard, they absolutely do not care what you're wearing or if there's a ring on the hand.
I hate that [even though I realize it is to drive the point home just exactly how 'not asking for it' you are] anyone has to make this point in the first place.
 
Who the fuck is telling moids to cruise housewives in the supermarket ffs
I'm fairly sure it's just a power thing.

Retail workers and nurses get the worst of this since they're not exactly in a position to tell grandpa to go fuck himself and stick a fork in an electrical outlet while he's at it. If they want continued employment, that is.

Creepy old fuckers have become a huge problem in hospitals and nursing homes.
 
My strategy for avoiding unwanted interactions with unknown males is to be closer to 50 than 40. It doesn't hurt that I also keep my "Kanye mean-mug" on in public so I look as scary and un-fuck-with-able as possible. Bums don't even ask me for change anymore. It's glorious. Hang in there, one day you too will be able to go about your business virtually unseen by scrote eyes.
 
These will be the same retards that will sperg out when a tiktok of fully clothed white women doing a dance routine.
There’s a TikTok of a Muslim Somali woman dancing very mildly with no hijab. Her next post was her crying & beaten to fuck by her male relatives, hijab in place. Moids are all same.
———
I like this image because you can take it two ways. As a pooner or trooner.
IMG_1724.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Fucking (white) women voting amirite
1727765255227.png1727765269051.png
1727765281120.png1727765302459.png

Btw isn't curious how when Amerimutt moids say "Ugh white women" they only mean American women but then go on
to try chase Slavic or European women that are also white? Except those women's whitey pass gets revoked when they
turn down these ugly yanks.
Same Matt Bernstein has wished that JKR would die or at least shut up forever, and has called her a bitch more than once. Faggots should stay in their lane.
Ew, why am I not surprised at all with this info? I am not too familiar with this dude at all, In fact I am very blissfully ignorant of most breadtuber or kweer content creators because the moment I see them have some pretentious name my mind goes "Yeah I won't like this person".

It’s disgusting how the American right will make up lies about women getting post-birth abortions (basically, murdering their newborn infants) when no case of that has ever occurred in an American healthcare setting and is nowhere near legal in any state. They’re trying to paint women as monstrous baby-killers when nearly all late-term abortions are performed because the pregnancy is ectopic or the fetus isn’t viable. It’s extremely traumatic to the mother and it’s despicable that stupid, ignorant men have the gall to insinuate these women are murderers and think that women should be forced to carry a dead fetus. The lack of empathy completely astounds me.
How "pro-life" moids unironically think women that had an abortion function like


Honestly what really disgusts me is how most these so-called "pro-life" /rightoid men will go to extreme lengths to ALWAYS depict women that had an abortion as cold-hearted cruel sadists that were just reveling at the idea of getting pregnant and aborting a baby just for funs, they refuse to acknowledge the idea that some women that went through with terminating their pregnancy were probably women that wanted to be mothers only to be informed that their child they are carrying might kill them both or would have so much insane health issues that would make its life terrible or maybe they just couldn't afford to have a child because they're financially unstable to have one.

It never crosses their mind that women that went through this painful process especially in the scenarios I mentioned above do feel pain, regret and remorse for having to do this and that maybe in an ideal world where everything was alright they wouldn't have went through with doing what they did, but why consider the nuance of these situation when it's easier to depict your political/culture war enemy in the worst light possible?

Make no mistake this lack of nuance, consideration and sympathy for women the "pro-life"/right wing men have isn't something done out of ignorance, it's done very much on purpose. They rather reserve their sympathy for a moid that laments about how his ex-girlfriend/wife had an abortion, not because he laments the loss of a potential child the loss of a woman's body that he could had control and they rather reserve their nuances for one of their ilk who gets exposed for begging a woman they impregnated but have no intentions to committing to get an abortion despite click-clacking away on Twitter dot com how woman's rightful duty is to bear children or whatever.
This scrote cares more about a hypothetical rapist's best interest than his hypothetical daughter's. If she went to her family for support after experiencing something as deeply traumatizing and life-ruining as sexual assault, his reaction would be "We're going to have the baby". He says he struggled with this question so he is aware of how fucked up it is but he ultimately came to the conclusion that forcing his daughter to give birth to the rapist's baby is the solution. What the fuck is wrong with him?
This haggot gives me such "If I impregnated my mistress I'd pay for her to abort my child" vibes it's unreal.
 
Mask-off moment for the morally despicable subhumans who want to ban abortion and think they are in any position to debate ethics. Terminating a fetus is not murder and everybody knows it, the only reason why anyone acts like women who have gotten abortions are literally Ted Bundy is because they are cocksuckers who downplay male crime and want to pretend women are just as evil.

Rape victims being forced to give birth to their rapists' offspring and raise them is so sickening that anyone who advocates for it must be a fucking rapist themselves. Pro-lifers who don't want to sound too rapey will say "ban all abortion with the exception of rape" but that is an impractical stance because we live in a world where most sexual assault victims do not get justice, many are afraid to speak up.

Other scenarios where women get abortions are also completely justified. People in committed relationships can get abortions because they already have the number of kids they want, or they want no kids at all. Why should the state be able to violate a couple's own mutual agreement and force them to have children they don't want? To what extent do you support governments disregarding the bodily autonomy of citizens, is it only when it comes to women?

Pro-life retards are under the delusion that no moid would ever encourage a woman to get an abortion. It happens all the time, especially when they think they can't take care of it. A lot of them want to have sex with a woman but not have children with her, some don't want to be fathers, sometimes they're already fathers but don't want any more kids, etc.

The category of women who get abortions that pro-lifers are the most obsessed with are those who have casual sex. Sex positivity is a dangerous movement that only benefits male degeneracy under the guise of feminism. Hookup culture is dysfunctional. However, people still engage in it. That's exactly why abortion is necessary, forcing these people to breed does not accomplish anything.

This is exactly why I’ve stopped trying to reason with pro-life Scrotes. No matter how civil I tend to be to explain that late term abortions are only done in medical emergencies, or that sexual assault is more than a valid reason to end a pregnancy. No matter how many times I explain that it is a traumatic procedure, and is one of many necessary evils in the world, they won’t listen.

Not to go full Android Raptor over here, but I think if men were capable of giving birth then there’d be as many abortion clinics as there are McDonalds franchise chains.

As it has been said several pages ago, men want babies like a six year old wants a puppy; not giving a damn about how much work babies/puppies are in both scenarios, and not caring about where they came from for that matter.

I think pro-life scrotes are pro-life because abortion is one of many ways that women are still the selectors of what genes get to be passed on. Abortion is literally expelling genes out of the pool, because for whatever the reason, the mother has no desire nor resources to care for it.

Plus, abortions have always been a part of every civilized country since the dawn of time. Just about every culture has abortion methods, even the so-called traditional Christian ones.
 
"we're going to have the baby"

unless this cuck waste of skin plans to shove the product of rape up his jap's eye and magically incubate it for the next nine months, we are not having a baby.

There is no 'we' in pregnancy.

men want babies like a six year old wants a puppy
(doubleposting like a fag)

This is incredibly unfair.

Six year olds very, very rarely harm, let alone murder, puppies. To the extent that a child doing so is considered a marker of severe mental illness.

Meanwhile, men kill two kids a week in my country via neglect, abuse, and violence. And those are just the ones that actually die. Thousands more are beaten and raped every week.

A puppy is a damn sight safer in the care of a six year old than a baby is in the care of a moid.
 
Btw isn't curious how when Amerimutt moids say "Ugh white women" they only mean American women but then go on
to try chase Slavic or European women that are also white? Except those women's whitey pass gets revoked when they
turn down these ugly yanks.
It's because they stand for nothing. They built their house on the sand instead of the rocks. They only pretend to hold a viewpoint so much as it benefits them. The moment it stops being a benefit, it gets washed away.

Plus, abortions have always been a part of every civilized country since the dawn of time. Just about every culture has abortion methods, even the so-called traditional Christian ones.

I see this notion of "Ancient Christian societies did abortion" all of the time but I've never seen it actually get sourced. This thread is admittedly starting to make me reconsider my 100% pro-life views, but does anyone actually have any backing for this? I'd like to have some kind of biblical backing for this.

(P.S: Yes, I already know about Numbers 5:21. No, that's not about abortion.)
 
I see this notion of "Ancient Christian societies did abortion" all of the time but I've never seen it actually get sourced. This thread is admittedly starting to make me reconsider my 100% pro-life views, but does anyone actually have any backing for this? I'd like to have some kind of biblical backing for this.
Just want to point out she said traditional Christian, not ancient Christian. But abortion was absolutely practiced in the Middle East in so-called biblical times (and in Greece, Egypt, Rome...). This lady says there are no references to abortion in the Bible either way. But the Bible isn't an accurately historical text regardless so it's not a very trustworthy source. https://nevadacurrent.com/2022/07/20/what-the-bible-actually-says-about-abortion-may-surprise-you/

Romans practiced abortions with a fennel-like plant that is today extinct: https://ipm.missouri.edu/meg/2022/9/silphium-DT/

Abortion in the definitely Christian Middle Ages, with sources: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/abortion-and-contraception-in-the-middle-ages/ (disregard retarded use of "sex worker" terminology)

'Abortion remedies from a medieval Catholic nun': https://daily.jstor.org/abortion-remedies-medieval-catholic-nun/

This is just a quick Google search, I'm sure you can find more if you keep looking. Women have always used abortion if it was available to them; religion is secondary to that fact.
 
Back