Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

[𝕺𝖑' 𝕯𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖞 𝕱𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖔]

Man this really explains the nuclear response to this thread's existence

 

[Big Miss Steak]

I just opened my weekend WSJ to see an article on the trend of disturbed female characters. I got about a paragraph in and got bored. I'm just sick of the preposterous idea that in general women can not only be as sick and twisted by nature as men, but that they're able to execute any sick and twisted actions. I don't want to get into Stephen King, but for Misery to work, the lead character had to be literally disabled for the antagonist to do anything. I also get annoyed at the notion that when female weakness is acknowledged, then she still has ridiculous amounts of power do to magic or seduction. It's a stupid idea.

Then again I have known some seriously sick women who have abused their children. I also know some women who insist on doing really peculiar or dangerous sex things. To a woman, they were all mentally ill in other aspects of their life too. Meanwhile an every day average family man enjoys horrifying porn.

So rare to see female antagonists/villains done well. So often they're just jealous of the female protag or they're a male villain with a sexy hot lady paint job.

 

[𝕺𝖑' 𝕯𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖞 𝕱𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖔]

Moids think the desire to watch children being raped is just like weed or something that normal people get tragically duped into consuming to their own detriment.

 

[Pitbull Victim]

Moids think the desire to watch children being raped is just like weed or something that normal people get tragically duped into consuming to their own detriment.

View attachment 5556958

I unfortunately have to defend the FBI from this guy's retarded simplification. What the feds usually do is first take out the operator/webmaster of a CSAM site, then keep the site operational as they track down individual users. Obviously the morality of keeping the site up is pretty fucked.

Unsurprising that Redditor 1, Redditor 2, and Redditor 3 are all unrepentant convicted sex offenders.

 

[I'm a Silly]

So rare to see female antagonists/villains done well. So often they're just jealous of the female protag or they're a male villain with a sexy hot lady paint job.

I've always liked Neil LaBute, all the way back to In the Company of Men; he's gotten criticism for misogyny, but the people saying that seem braindead to me. A good example would be Your Friends & Neighbors, in which Catherine Keener played a complex, unlikeable character -- actors would kill for a chance to dig into a role like that -- but at the same time a much worse character, to a jaw-dropping extent, was the one played by Jason Patric, yet no one accuses LaBute of misandry. Critics are too used to male villains, and don't appreciate female ones --and-- that is why I think the results are so poor.

 

[bloodyexplosion]

I've noticed when pertaining to topics about women, a lot of males online will bring up or speculate about her relations to men. They think women will die or go crazy without males, because they're coping with being called out for being horrible and misogynistic they can be. Whenever women hate men, to them, it can't be because of how violent and degenerate they are. No, it MUST be because she's an obese crazy cat lady who gets rejected by every man ever. Either that or because she was traumatized or something by a man (therefore she can be fixed and saved from misandry through therapy!). From what I've seen, most women just became feminists after seeing all of the vile things males do. I was peaked after seeing weird violent lesbian rape shit from trannies online, that's all it took for me. Most feminists I've met became feminists after learning about how vile the porn industry is.

 

[Betonhaus]

I was peaked after seeing weird violent lesbian rape shit from trannies online, that's all it took for me.

Ngl that just sounds like trauma.

I adsed a statement in a different thread that probably wouldn't go over well here, but I'll ask this: are you happy? Would you be happier in your life if there were lines you chose to cross but shouldn't have, or lines you didn't cross that you should've?

 

[bloodyexplosion]

Ngl that just sounds like trauma.

I adsed a statement in a different thread that probably wouldn't go over well here, but I'll ask this: are you happy? Would you be happier in your life if there were lines you chose to cross but shouldn't have, or lines you didn't cross that you should've?

It's not trauma, I do not have any bad effects from it today. I discovered those weird communities from other feminists. Like I said, most women become radicalized from learning about how violent porn and male fetishes are. Something can make you angry without it traumatizing you. I'm sure there are things that make you angry too. I just don't think talking about raping a whole community is okay. Finding other people like me who were angry over rapey stuff is what helped me learn about feminism.

Yes I am happy in my life. Yes, I do stuff outside of the internet. I just rant online to let off some steam I really do not care about online tranny shit in real life. Also probably option 1, I think of that like being outspoken.

 

[𝕺𝖑' 𝕯𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖞 𝕱𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖔]

I've noticed when pertaining to topics about women, a lot of males online will bring up or speculate about her relations to men. They think women will die or go crazy without males, because they're coping with being called out for being horrible and misogynistic they can be. Whenever women hate men, to them, it can't be because of how violent and degenerate they are. No, it MUST be because she's an obese crazy cat lady who gets rejected by every man ever. Either that or because she was traumatized or something by a man (therefore she can be fixed and saved from misandry through therapy!). From what I've seen, most women just became feminists after seeing all of the vile things males do. I was peaked after seeing weird violent lesbian rape shit from trannies online, that's all it took for me. Most feminists I've met became feminists after learning about how vile the porn industry is.

Moids can't even respect fucking Marie Curie and say "hurr durr it was all Pierre" when she won her second Nobel prize 5 years after he died.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I'm tired

90% of what you detailed can be avoided by just knowing yourself and being unbothered by what other people do. For the other 10%, yes, there's something to be said.

I know there’s a good amount of women here who are more well read than me on the subject of feminism and general men/women conflict, and I was wondering what are some good books on the subject I could read for a different perspective.
Most of my reading on philosophical topics come from men, as to be real they talk about things I find interesting and relate to, but their thoughts on female nature is necessarily from the outside view no matter they actually write on the subject.
What women authors would you all recommend for gaining a different perspective? I would prefer more modern books, though anything that would be a good starting point would be much appreciated.

Here are some key feminist texts. I recommend organizing and digesting them in chronological order, so you get anchored:

Mary Wollstonecraft - A Vindication on the Rights of Women
Virginia Woolf - A Room of One's Own
Simone de Beauvoir - The Second Sex
Betty Friedan - The Feminine Mystique
Kate Millett - Sexual Politics
Germaine Greer - The Female Eunuch
Susan Brown Miller - Against Our Will
Ain't I A Woman -bell hooks
Susan Dworkin - Intercourse
Naomi Wolf - The Beauty Myth
Audre Lorde - Sister Outsider + poetry and essays
Sylvia Plath - The Bell Jar + poetry
Doris Lessing - The Golden Notebook
Kate Chopin - The Awakening
Jean Rhys - Wide Sargasso Sea
Adrienne Rich - Diving Into the Wreck + poetry
Charlotte Perkins Gilman - The Yellow Wallpaper

I also have enjoyed Helene Cixous and Luce Irigaray.

The above will not give you a single, unified approach, but if put in order it will give you a grounding in feminist thought and theory over time. And as an aside - I managed to adopt feminism without dwelling much in the Dworkin style of feminism. I encourage you to digest several and formulate your own synthesis.

 

[𝕺𝖑' 𝕯𝖎𝖗𝖙𝖞 𝕱𝖆𝖙𝖘𝖔]

It's not trauma, I do not have any bad effects from it today. I discovered those weird communities from other feminists. Like I said, most women become radicalized from learning about how violent porn and male fetishes are. Something can make you angry without it traumatizing you. I'm sure there are things that make you angry too. I just don't think talking about raping a whole community is okay. Finding other people like me who were angry over rapey stuff is what helped me learn about feminism.

Yes I am happy in my life. Yes, I do stuff outside of the internet. I just rant online to let off some steam I really do not care about online tranny shit in real life. Also probably option 1, I think of that like being outspoken.

The absolute fucking audacity of males to call women broken and traumatized for being pissed off at trannies fetishizing rape

And these retards blame women for tranny acceptance even they're the ones trooning out and pulling this shit

 

[Eggman's Ghost]

Ngl that just sounds like trauma.

I adsed a statement in a different thread that probably wouldn't go over well here, but I'll ask this: are you happy? Would you be happier in your life if there were lines you chose to cross but shouldn't have, or lines you didn't cross that you should've?

Huh? This question doesn't even mean anything

 

[I'm a Silly]

Ngl that just sounds like trauma.

I adsed a statement in a different thread that probably wouldn't go over well here, but I'll ask this: are you happy? Would you be happier in your life if there were lines you chose to cross but shouldn't have, or lines you didn't cross that you should've?

I'd be happier if a lot of motherfuckers had left me the hell alone [not targeted at you for asking, but it is the truth].

 

[sexy pee story]

Lmao @scoots malding so hard that you create an account on Kiwifarms just to publicly seethe in this thread. Are you gonna post on other threads or just this one? So let me guess, it's not really about this "being a revenge porn site" but more that you're mad that mean things are said about the gender of peace. Don't worry, you'll be welcomed with open arms at the true revenge porn kingdoms of Pornhub and Reddit

 

[Herr Flick]

Hell yeah I love recommending Germaine Greer on a revenge porn website that has been banned from so many hosts it had to resort to an island off Africa to stay online.

You sound mad.

This unfunny nigger appears to be some sub-80 IQ immigrant from another website (probably onionfarms) whose only activity prior to whining in this thread was half-heartedly posting the same retarded “kiwimods is STOOPID” meme to the profiles of three unrelated individuals.

Not even smart enough to spam or brigade correctly or to understand that KF isn’t and has never been a mod-loving community monolith.

Anyway, if you are a moid, you should kill yourself.

Spoiler: However,

if you are in fact a woman, I suggest that you give the ladies in this thread a chance, they’ll teach you a lot.

 

[Big Miss Steak]

Ngl that just sounds like trauma.

I adsed a statement in a different thread that probably wouldn't go over well here, but I'll ask this: are you happy? Would you be happier in your life if there were lines you chose to cross but shouldn't have, or lines you didn't cross that you should've?

Being offended by degenerate porn means you're just traumatized. Ok.

As for your questions it honestly sounds like you're implying women would be happier if they crossed personal boundaries they set for themselves. I can guarantee you I would not be happier if I let some STD-riddled porn actor have at me in front of a camera crew. I am friends with whores and I am friends with picker women that a lot of men on this site would probably call prudes. The prudes are all happier.

 

[11apocalyptic11]

wow I hate moid

 

[Nijigasaki]

It's one thing for a moid to proclaim that he knows a woman's place in society, the home, etc. and do so unrepentantly. But there's a special place in Hell for the moids that co-opt knowledge of women's history and specifically lesbian history. I see quite a few troons (such as Erin Reed) speak about those topics. And as someone who studies history at a higher level that your average person, it boils my blood. They don't know the nuances, they don't know about the problems of using certain terms and I'd bet a good amount of money that none of them have ever heard the term "historiography" in their lives. They regurgitate bullshit, revise history in a way to fit their agendas (which a lot of historians do, but at the very least they have peers reviewing their papers and the ability to defend themselves - one of the cornerstones of historical inquiry is historians basically arguing with each other and forming a discourse). To be fair, the term "revisionist history" to actual historians is not a dirty one. We all revise history, shape it for all sorts of reasons and so on, but that's far too much for me to go into on a KF thread.

I'm not saying history as a discipline should be something only for academics, but it's frustrating to see such bullshit fly under the radar, also encouraged by other men and even women who let their own history be told from the voice of a man who is pathetically masquerading as part of a group he doesn't belong to and claiming to understand them better than they do themselves. But the lesbian history side of things is a particularly aggravating thing to see. Male attraction to females is not the same as female attraction to females, but for some reason so many people act like just by saying you're a woman every part of you shifts and changes, even without hormones or having grown up as female! Ain't that crazy.

 

[I'm a Silly]

May I have a refresher on what to do with stinky little illiterate boys?
Side note, where is the primer on which offenses are reportable?
Please and thank you.

 

[11apocalyptic11]