Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

I do know that there's no group of men anywhere at any point in history who were benevolent to women.
This is what blackpills me. Not once in recorded history, or in prehistory, is there any evidence of a group of men getting together to protect women from men. None of them ever said "Wow, the way women are treated is pretty horrible. We should help them."? I'd like to think men aren't natuarlly degenerate rape apes, and are just socialized into behaving like it, but the fact that they have fought and died for all kinds of stupid shit from the Stone Age until now, but not once for women, well...
 
Last edited:
But women talk about male abuse on the Internet, this makes males feel bad. Basically women are just as baaaaaad. If women don't stop pointing out moids horrible behavior we can never solve these gender wars!
a female video game character that doesn't look like a 12 year old moe blob is just as bad as 4 million women being assaulted by partners per year
 
Today a man told me that women abuse kids more often than men (trying to make some point about women being just as aggressive/violent as men). I pointed out that women are only 10% more likely to abuse kids while overwhelmingly serving as teachers, babysitters, and caretakers, not a stat in favor of men. I also pointed out that men commit the vast majority of child sex abuse. He didn't appreciate it.

Men attack, rape, and kill each other more than women attack, rape, and kill each other and kids combined. Where did this narrative that "women are just as bad as men" come from?
 
Lundy Bancroft's Why Does He Do That is available free as a pdf on the internet.

That book has changed lives for the better. Many women reading it have found the courage and resolution to lose 250 ugly pounds shortly after.

Send the pdf link to all of your friends and family also struggling with 250 ugly, stinking excess pounds.

This book is an extremely insightful read. I can’t put it down.
 
Screenshot_20240625-054327.png
Article

Letting single men and gay men buy children is going to lead to so much fucking tragedy. What a horrible horrible way to die. No charges filed against either of them.

They also have a son, guess who's not dead because hr wasn't left in the car?
 
If you think Dankula is a bad husband for chasing tranny dick then clearly you are just jealous that you don't have such a wonderful relationship. After all what would entice a woman into wanting to get married more than seeing all these e-celebs torpedo their marriage and ruin their wife's life for cheap thrills like cocaine, hookers, underaged fangirls or girldick femboys?
I mentioned how humiliating it must be for a woman to be with a man with such an open, strong GAMP obsession as a reply to someone else's comment in the Dankula thread and I'm genuinely having an extremely difficult time trying to understand the reply I got to that thought. Actually let me just add my post and the reply here.

This is my post:
I remember Sue accidentally being a cameo in one of his videos when he was yelling a bit too loud and she came to check up on him and being genuinely shocked he had a normal, female partner. I was honestly expecting him to have a trans or femboy fuckbuddy or something. Even back then, and this was about two years ago, I was very surprised that a woman would want to be with a man with a very open, very strong GAMP fixation. I suspect I am one of the more lenient people on this site, and I just truly don't understand why any woman, outside of having a humiliation fetish or something, would have any reasons to be with such a man.

Not sure if I'm surprised that she had enough of a backbone to leave him or that the marriage even lasted this long.
And this is the reply I got to it:

"Gee, maybe she liked him for his other qualities instead. But what do I know, the only things that matter in a relationship are sex, physique, money, genetics and status, clearly."

I'm not quoting because I'm not trying to name or shame, I am genuinely curious; how the fuck do you read my post to mean that me thinking it's revolting to be with a man with a strong paraphilia, let alone marrying and having kids with him, equals to valuing a man for his sexual performance, physique, money, genetics and status? I'm half convinced that this is just bait but the genuine, general opinion from men seem to be "she should have shut up about it and let people think she was still married to a tranny fetishist for her kids' sake !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" so I'm unfortunately not completely there.

Imagine a popular female YouTuber with an open fetish for trans men marrying and having kids with another, less popular YouTuber dude having a thread here. There would be at least fifty pages of guys talking about how the guy was a beta faggot cuck for being with a woman who likes pooners. But when it's a man with a tranny fetish it's "oho but what about his personality?! She could have stayed with him for his personality!!! Oh they separated and they are both public figures, meaning the truth will become public no matter what??? Well she should have still shut the fuck up about it!!!!!!!!!!!! What about their kids?!"

I'm starting to believe a good amount of the male population is brain dead.
 
I'm starting to believe a good amount of the male population is brain dead.
they are not they know damn well dancula displayed a lot of red flags but they hate women so much they will use everything and anything against the woman.

On sue subject she is dime a dozen libshit woman tattoos and piercings included with sunked cost falacy regarding her relationship, The type of women who will witness glaring red flags and handwaves them with " he Is jUsT JOkiNg YoU gUYs" and " He DoESn'T mEAn tHAt ". She has been trained by her friends and family to ignore every glaring obvious sign that her man is a coomer and then just stick around anyway because she spent 3+ years with him . He would definetly not cheat he is just wanking on trannies right guys ? RIGHT?
 
Yesterday I watched a documentary on the Umoja tribe in Africa, which is a female only sanctuary for women who are abused, forced into genital mutilation or child brides. The men absolutely despise them and will refuse to sell to them or chase them out of markets. They spoke about how wonderful it is to be able to have the parts of the animal they were barred from eating before. Three women used cow shit to plaster a hut as one explained, "We've always done everything - cook, clean, raise the children while the men sat in the shade doing nothing."

Then they traveled to a family and asked a man to give his child to their school for free if he agreed to never cause her genital mutilation or marry her underage. The father thankfully agreed but not before saying she will be the only girl in the tribe who has not experienced it.

No white people are involved in this, it is just the African women who became fed up. They make beautiful beaded jewelry to sell for income and their biggest drama is who made the most beautiful necklace. They keep their sons and raise them until 18, taught and raised by only women. Otherwise, no men are allowed to join them.

As I watched this I realized that we truly are not different because of skin color - men, regardless of where they are from, would rape and mutilate women if given the freedom to do it. Average men. Men who you'd think is a "good one". If wider society accepted and allowed it, every single one of them would rape and mutilate women. Africans are just the lesser civilized and thus display the most basic of human desires - rape, pillaging and control. But all men, everywhere, would do exactly as they do. Women living in shit huts in the African desert should not have the exact same, sentiments as a Western woman about men. But they do. Just as the women in Korea share the same sentiments.

When I left my abusive situation with no support system (Id have joined this tribe), Lundy Bancroft's book was the first sigh of relief I was able to find. I believe it explains about how it can take years to recover from abuse, that it won't happen overnight and the most important part is to keep no contact. I now keep the pdf copy accessible to me at all times to be able to send to women who come to me with similar situations. Not all of them read it, and all the ones who don't, generally end up back with the abuser within days.

I think perhaps I might be joining the 4B movement. I think I might have red pilled myself hard enough to call off dating because of the regression of men. It is all men, it is a societal issue and trying to find a "good one" is worse than a needle in a haystack. I cannot even find one who is not trying to fuck me. Even the attached men with families have flirted and made disgusting remarks to me. Men with daughters.

I realize by opting out, and the more of us that do opt out, the more violent and hateful men will become. Those who aren't are placated by access to having their peepees touched. Once it's removed, they will join the drooling horde desperate for any attention that will lead to their peepees touched.

The Count Dankula thread blowing up by thirty pages because his wife wanted a divorce is the aggression continuing to build. Thirty pages in less than a day about some grifter very few give a fuck about getting a divorce. So basically if any man anywhere gets a divorce, 500 men will come out of the shadows to immediately support him and denigrate the mother of his children as a dirty disgusting retarded whore who isn't worth the shit on the bottom of a shoe who will now raise your offspring for the next 18 years whom you chose to lay next to to begin with. As they have a massive porn collection, receding hair line and hasn't done their own laundry in 14 years.

Yesterday I watched my landlords house husband mill about the yard as their monthly maid cleaned the house. The guy had all the time in the world to clean, doesn't even have a job. Is completely free, and they paid for a maid for a two bedroom one level home. Never in a million years would that be me. I don't know how she's not embarrassed. He did tell me, twice, in a span of one minute, that I was "well dressed, but you're always well dressed". I explained that living in the ghetto, I will clean up to run errands so I receive more respect. He then says he, "was thinking about that".

This man has already thought too much about me and the clothes I wear or how I look for a married man. But his wife paid for him to have the time to be able to think about me. Isn't that nice of her?
 
Don't ever forget the golden rule of misogyny; whatever a man does is women's fault.

Edgelord grifter husband too busy chasing femme boys to care about his wife and daughters? Well that's nothing, because the cluster B dangerhaired boot made a post on her social media. Doomed to be sold into a life of rape and slavery as a child bride? Tough shit foid, should have had a Y chromosome. But never mind, could be worse; someone could have swiped left on your Tinder or something. Male suffering never ends. (:_(
 
he Is jUsT JOkiNg YoU gUYs" and " He DoESn'T mEAn tHAt ". She has been trained by her friends and family to ignore every glaring obvious sign that her man is a coomer and then just stick around anyway because she spent 3+ years with him .
This is the main reason why I hate porn culture.

Dankula is someone who would just casually bring up his fetishes in his videos that had absolutely nothing to do with them. The straw that broke the camel's back for me was what he said in a Mad Lad video that had to do with a Japanese man (can't remember the name) and the introduction of the video (paraphrased) consisted of something like this: Over time, Japan has given us many things, ... and femboys, thank you very much for that...

Why is it normal to mention you sexually enjoy feminine men, usually depicted in fetish accoutrement, in contexts that have fucking nothing to do with them? Since when is this humorous and sympathetic behavior?

Maybe I'm just a humorless faggot and it's funny once or twice. But does it not lose whatever potential humor it had when it's so well known about you that it's the first reason people speculate about your divorce?

How does this behavior get handwaved and made into "it's for the meme, guys" when your husband is following traps and troons on twitter and liking their softcore pictures? Following femboy porn artists?

When did we let this become acceptable behavior, at least in relationship contexts?

I'm just as uncomfortable with women talking about their fetishes/ sex lives etc. in public places and have left writer/ book spaces because of it (even though it was never as grating as "haha yeah guys my husbands cums to trannies as a joke haha!!!!!!!!!!!!") but the amount that has spread from "funny dudebro on the internet" spaces into real life is just fucking revolting.
 
Hrr drr women are bad as men!

Yeah bro, it's all those women that record wartime rape and necrophilia and upload it on Pornhub or some other deviant porn site. It's also all those women that install spy cameras in women's changing rooms and public bathrooms, spaces that often have children in them. It's all those women that advocate for child marriage. Sure thing, buddy.

You can argue that when women commit evil, their type of evil is completely different than that of a man, which is true (with the exceptions with extreme child and animal abuse cases.
Honestly, most of the male posters in that thread that went "She shouldn't had gotten divorce over something like growing apart! They should had worked on it together!1 She should had tried harder!!1" really remind me of specific types of pastors. The pastors that when they encounter a married woman whose husband cheats on her with men and that cheating is taking a toll on the woman, mentally and emotionally (especially if they already have children), that pastor doesn't tell the woman to leave this man as he is emotionally draining her because she's also a human being with her limits that deserves respect and some people are just beyond saving/reaching out. No, he tells her that maybe if she tries just a little bit harder to be a good submissive wife and performing her wifely duties that by some miracle that itself will be just enough to pray the gay away and make her cheating husband stop having sex with other men.

Because in that pastor's eyes, divorce is a bigger sin than a husband that's emotionally draining his wife like a vampire by actively cheating on her and having sex with other men that can potentially endanger her (and the children, if they have any) with the possibility of STDs or AIDS, especially if that man is having unprotected sex with the other men.

Brain-dead? Perhaps.
Delusional? Absolutely.
 
that pastor doesn't tell the woman to leave this man as he is emotionally draining her because she's also a human being with her limits that deserves respect and some people are just beyond saving/reaching out.
And therein lies the rub; women are not human beings to these creatures. We are drones, servants, incubators, whose only function is to smile and be agreeable and take whataever abuse your husband throws at you with good humour. Because, again, nothing is ever men's fault.
 
Dankula is someone who would just casually bring up his fetishes in his videos that had absolutely nothing to do with them.
I dont know why you write long explanation about dankula being coomer . HE IS LEFTING HAS RED SOVIET STAR TATOOED ON HIS CHEST FOR THE LOVE OF ALL HOLY. REPEAT AFTER ME ANYTHING LEFT OF CENTER IS A DEGEN WHO WANTS WOMEN TO BE PUBLIC PROPERTY END OF AND NOT A HUSBAND MATERIAL .

The only thing that was suprising about dankula was putting ring on sue and paying to have kids instead of upgrading to younger model the minute the dust settled saying something didnt work out. He could have paraded her fertility problems as a reason and nobody would have blinked nor question it.
I guess he had conscience about sue sticking with him through thick and thin and thought he owed it to her. You cant fake or moralfag what your dick wants bro.

As for his boypussy love there was meme in his comunity that they endlessly circlejerked and memed but is it gay if the balls touch or is it gay sucking feminine penis . There were Q and A where fans would spew out whole essayes about is it gay if balls dont touch was honestly funny. The guy is funny I am gonna give him that , but I wouldnt touch him with 10 foot pole dating wise. I genuenly think both of them stick because sunken cost falacy all the way to divorse and they probably should never have married.

At this point I wander what broke the camels back. Did Dankula just told her you get to be SAHM suck it when Sue asked him to spend more time with the family, did dankula didnt bond properly with the girls , did one of the kids turned up fucked up or was it a unhinged tranny that dankula flirted with and the tranny went the "uwu he wants me hon not you set him free" but with threats and drama so much that sue was like thats it . Because her twitter post sounded VERY APOLOGETIC for saying they are broken up and dankula admitting the reason why he didnt wanted everyone to know they are divorsing because people would say boypussy as the reason.
 
Oh, you guys are already talking about the Count fella. I came to mention how weirdly volatile it is in that thread over women. I could understand blaming the woman for posting (I'm not sure if the matter needed to be discussed on the internet) but then it just became a "all women are bpd attention whores" free for all.

I honestly believe they probably did just grow apart. Either that or somebody cheated (probably the man). If she was crazy, I don't think the dude would've posted a long thing about how good of a mother she is. Anyway posters are being awfully shitty over there.
 
Oh, you guys are already talking about the Count fella. I came to mention how weirdly volatile it is in that thread over women. I could understand blaming the woman for posting (I'm not sure if the matter needed to be discussed on the internet) but then it just became a "all women are bpd attention whores" free for all.

I honestly believe they probably did just grow apart. Either that or somebody cheated (probably the man). If she was crazy, I don't think the dude would've posted a long thing about how good of a mother she is. Anyway posters are being awfully shitty over there.
The actual couple themselves is being less dramatic over their own divorce compared to the people reacting to it. It’s going to be hard on the kids, but I think the woman in particular is getting worse treatment over it, despite it being her full right to file for divorce if the marriage isn’t working.

I saw some people harping on why no fault divorce should be banned, but I’d argue it helps protect women and creates better outcomes on both sides. When no fault divorce wasn’t around, you had to do a lot more in the court of law to prove said marriage wasn’t working, and that typically meant having to show it was abusive, there was cheating, or there was criminal activity going on. If a couple can’t communicate effectively with each other, I think divorce should be allowed, but that would fall under the no fault divorce. A world where no fault divorce was illegal would mean that you’d have to prove what I mentioned above going on, and it isn’t always cut and dry, so a woman could potentially be stuck in a dangerous situation for years. Moids obviously won’t look into the legality of these issues and claim women only want these things for superficial reasons, but it is far from that.
 
The actual couple themselves is being less dramatic over their own divorce compared to the people reacting to it. It’s going to be hard on the kids, but I think the woman in particular is getting worse treatment over it, despite it being her full right to file for divorce if the marriage isn’t working.

I saw some people harping on why no fault divorce should be banned, but I’d argue it helps protect women and creates better outcomes on both sides. When no fault divorce wasn’t around, you had to do a lot more in the court of law to prove said marriage wasn’t working, and that typically meant having to show it was abusive, there was cheating, or there was criminal activity going on. If a couple can’t communicate effectively with each other, I think divorce should be allowed, but that would fall under the no fault divorce. A world where no fault divorce was illegal would mean that you’d have to prove what I mentioned above going on, and it isn’t always cut and dry, so a woman could potentially be stuck in a dangerous situation for years. Moids obviously won’t look into the legality of these issues and claim women only want these things for superficial reasons, but it is far from that.
I'm going to be autistic and say we should just ban marriage altogether. I'm not sure I know a single person who could handle that kind of commitment, and old people who are still married probably went through a shit ton of compromises and hardships. Even if you're someone reading this and you think "but my marriage is good" in about ten or twenty years you'll probably be splitting amicably.
 
I'm going to be autistic and say we should just ban marriage altogether. I'm not sure I know a single person who could handle that kind of commitment, and old people who are still married probably went through a shit ton of compromises and hardships. Even if you're someone reading this and you think "but my marriage is good" in about ten or twenty years you'll probably be splitting amicably.
You obviosly dont understand the legal benefits of marriage. If your partner decides to fuck off with a younger woman or a man while you stay at home even for a few years you take serious hit in career development and money making abilties, those half his shit help with that. Not to mention if he dies early as in his 50s or 60s you are entitled a portion of his pension after his death and myriad of other shit. Goverments fucking love people just living together and not marrying because they dont have to pay jack and squat to widows when the man dies not to mention half of the family court is clogged up with divorses and asset split , my parents had very bitter divorce it took 3 years to divorce and no joke 18 years to properly split the property between them , my mom got the apartment fully trashed. That is time and money spent by the goverment that they can spend somewhere else. One of the reasons why norway clamped down on foreign marriages and mail order brides was the women were almost always at least decade younger than the husband and asian women live damn long especially with first rate free healthcare thats a lot of money they spend on survivors benefits and care for women whos only contribution was being second much younger wife .
 
You obviosly dont understand the legal benefits of marriage. If your partner decides to fuck off with a younger woman or a man while you stay at home even for a few years you take serious hit in career development and money making abilties, those half his shit help with that. Not to mention if he dies early as in his 50s or 60s you are entitled a portion of his pension after his death and myriad of other shit. Goverments fucking love people just living together and not marrying because they dont have to pay jack and squat to widows when the man dies not to mention half of the family court is clogged up with divorses and asset split , my parents had very bitter divorce it took 3 years to divorce and no joke 18 years to properly split the property between them , my mom got the apartment fully trashed. That is time and money spent by the goverment that they can spend somewhere else. One of the reasons why norway clamped down on foreign marriages and mail order brides was the women were almost always at least decade younger than the husband and asian women live damn long especially with first rate free healthcare thats a lot of money they spend on survivors benefits and care for women whos only contribution was being second much younger wife .
I understand and am aware of the benefits. I just don't agree with the institution of marriage. Your example is actually one of the reasons why I see no point in it. People get bored and cheat, or they steal from you, or they just don't love you anymore. You parents wouldn't have had a bitter split had they never been married, and if something is in your name and you bought it, why would there be any arguing over property in the first place? You would have receipts. There should be protections in place for people in general, actually. The fact that you'd need to rely on a marriage says more about the government than anything else.

I understand that most people will disagree with me, and that's fine. But it's what I think anyway.
 
Back