Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

Genuinely curious what about Alaska especially makes men more rapey than elsewhere in the US?
1720733572061.png


Native Americans.

Edit: oof @Friend of Dorothy Parker - apparently there's more to it than I thought.
 
Noooo stalker child, how dare you imply pooners exist because they were exposed to men constantly downplaying anything female, including female friendship groups?

On a more serious note, something I really noticed about when moids discuss pooners is that they get really, really upset when you say the reason why many pooners poon out is because they genuinely cannot see anything positive about womanhood and femininity as those that got molested/sexually abused by their male relatives see those things as vulnerability and genuinely believe if they were born as boys, they wouldn't suffer this trauma, meanwhile girls that got raised on the Internet suffer a serious case of internalized misogyny because they got to see the very worst of male sexuality thanks to pornography being rampant and everywhere, how it's determined to warp femininity and womanhood, along with traits associated with those things as something degrading which in result girls will do anything to avoid what they believe are burdens of womanhood.

If you say this, they get instantly mad and INSIST that pooners aren't sexually traumatized or frightened, that they exist because they gooned too far to anime twinks because of tumblr, they will insist how the concept of "internalized misogyny" is just some made-up feminazi lingo but then under the same breath say how internalized misandry is totally real and how MtF troons suffer from it because they grew in a modern environment that demonized them for being a "straight white guy".

Moids are allowed to make thousands of jokes about how pooners were sexually molested as children/young teenage girls and say shit "lol this is what happens when you raised in a single mother household" but don't you dare to ask who molested them and how come the absentee father didn't even bother to provide any support for that child or even attempted be part of her life in any sort of way?
I see that too. They are so adamant about it always being yaoi or fanfiction because then otherwise it would be men's fault for the creation of TIFs. From what I've observed, the main reasons why women troon out are because of internalized misogyny, then mental illness, then eating disorder then internalized homophobia then autism. Even if you did blame the yaoi, if you have a a bunch of shut-ins constantly consuming media from a notoriously misogynistic country, wouldn't that warp their opinion of women. Why would you want to be the air headed airbrushed sex object with jello breasts that squeaks like a toddler when you can be cool, smart, powerful interesting and fully clothed?
Can someone explain to me what the fuck is wrong with Alaskan men?!

View attachment 6178582
View attachment 6178583

Genuinely curious what about Alaska especially makes men more rapey than elsewhere in the US?
Cold, dark isolation drives people bonkers. Alaska also has the highest amount of serial killers iirc.
 
"I hAvE dIgNiTy I can't work at Walmart or something!" says a man that sits in his room whole day browsing twitter, reddit and imageboards as he goons off to anime tits and writes how it's the feminists fault for his own sloth
Its not that its that the jobs dont bring anything extra for them . Will it get them a house and car ? No! benefits paying for most of the bills plus work under the table gets them whatever extras they want with far less worked hours . They will be at the same station in life if they work for globohomo plus they will be paying taxes and fees on top of their income . Of course corporations don't want to pay living wages let alone a salary that can afford you a starter shed in some town . So now nobody wants to work. I pretty wary of agri counties claiming nobody wants to work even though they have high unemployment. What they are saying nobody wants to work under the current ( inhumane) conditions and the current ( shit) pay.

I don't blame anyone not wanting to be exploited for nothing when they can get the same via government gibs and above all they starve the beast.
 
Genuinely curious what about Alaska especially makes men more rapey than elsewhere in the US?
I was going to add: oil town economics. (Oil trade mostly employs men, way fewer women to men, and sexual violence, rampant prostitution, drinking, stripping ensue.
I assumed it was a storage and cost-cutting issue, but my manikin experience is different
Those are also undoubtedly true, but I like to think it’s because men are too slovenly to actually keep a life size sexdoll (or even a scale model) in any kind of good condition.
 
Can someone explain to me what the fuck is wrong with Alaskan men?!

View attachment 6178582
View attachment 6178583

Genuinely curious what about Alaska especially makes men more rapey than elsewhere in the US?
Kiwisisters ITT, take your fancy pants science on this topic and throw it away, I have found the answer!
Alaska is cold. Cold makes the penis look smaller as blood vessles constrict to conserve heat.

Small looking penis = angry insecure moid

Angry insecure moid = rape ape.

Simple as.

(But fr I love the discussion this post has generated. I can't think of a single other place Online where women could discuss something like this so frankly, and without having to cater to male feelings.)
 
It's because those with narcissistic and/or paranoid and various asocial disorders (men make up about 75% of cases) found a place where to congregate (somewhere on the internet) You know there can't be anything done with those except using them as kannonenfutter, they are irreparable, that's what is a mental disorder about. And they started to making up theories. In the same time, people living in the urban hells like those in the US and under corporativism lost their places for healthy socialization and covid games sealed the deal. Now even those remotely normal see they have no future and through the manosfere vids found someone to blame (women).

Also there is a theory about history repeating itself (there is a big war about every 75 years), which is about the lifespan of contemporary human.
You see the surge in violence and woman hating, that means there is too many useless and violent men roaming around aimlessly, because the society has no effective mechanism against those, and the solution to get rid of them is (as usual), unfortunately, another war that inevitably comes. The afterwar times always came with certain problems, but also with certain freedom, because there suddenly wasn't that many moids to terrorize other people.
You've likely already heard the theory about the violent male monkeys that fought off any other that tried to eat beef carcasses, and then they died to bovine tuberculosis. And the rest of the local population was much better off without them. It's just like that and those men aren't any better.


I really wanted to hear the female perspective on the genesis of the Incel movent. I find it destructive to both genders in western culture. It seems to be promoted as some kind of poorly established "support group" that became this collection of "can you top it" stories of women rejecting them, women as poor examples of accepting personal responsibility and etc. I specifically quoted this post because I think you have it correct. IMHO there is a reality disconnect probably best described as mild schizophrenia in some, perceiving communication as insulting or an accidental slight as a deliberate act to insult them. Due the previous interaction not going well due to their poor communication the attempt a second relationship of some per-disposed and angry from the prior. "stupid bitch didn't text me back after I paid for her $8 coffe? Is been at least 12 hours, I knew it, I fucking knew it, she's doing this to screw with my head, I'm going to text her she's a worthless whore" and now the woman becomes soured by the date and becomes more guarded than ever about who she even gives her number too. and the cycle repeats. I personally thought Elliot Rodgers was fairly attractive, he definitely had some narcissism problems and was a whiny little cunt of a boy, driving around in his new BMW dad bought he seemed as if his personality had done a 180 he would be perfectly fine. Easier said than done but, something started him on this Jihad against women who he perceived thinking him unworthy of him. I forget the details. I was extremely anti-social my younger years and only realized years later that conversations I had with women were them testing waters by approaching me and struggling to make conversation to see if they were were interested in me. I suppose I was lucky enough to never find this Incel movement thing, I grew out of antisocial phase. This Incel cult that sucks men into exerting a lot of energy into hating something that they simultaneously claims to lust after so badly is simply so odd to me. Spend your time and energy on a good career, learn to be self reliant and what confidence means. Narcissism seems to play a huge factor in my opinion, from Chris Chan to Elliot Rodgers they all felt like they were owed companionship by a society of their peers and equals, they obviously didn't see them as equal if they felt they were owed a relationship.

I strongly disagree regarding war. Strong men make easy times, easy times make weak men, weak men make hard times, hard times lead to war. War tends to decimate the healthy young male population leaving the weak mentally emotionally and physically to form LTR's for the next generation. Women are not attracted to them and despite what women say sexual attraction is necessary for both parties to form a successful LTR. I'm disgusted most men my age cannot service their own cars, change their oil, do basic home repair or operate a firearm. I think any woman should consider the man they are dating, and ask them or just lie, about a friend that got a flat tire they don't have 4g for some reason and the owners manual is missing. Can this man walk them step by step how to change a tire? If I were a woman any man who cannot describe the process in detail not the one for me. I think one of my greatest values to my wife is security, she feels if there were some kind of natuaral disaster home intruder it would be simply handled.
 
I really wanted to hear the female perspective on the genesis of the Incel movent.
“The modern world is not feminist, it simply has less use for men as technology will increasingly take away waged labor.

A few of the men at the top looked around and realized long ago that men would not naturally participate in the project that is civilization unless they were bribed into doing so. They bribed men by guaranteeing them sexual access and progeny- a wife, and giving them full control over their families so men could feel like a "kings" in their home even though they were actually lowly serfs in the world.

Now those men at the top are looking around and seeing that they increasingly don't need most men to participate in civilization. Technology can replace much of what men do while also not requiring bribes such as wives, or wages for that matter.

The men at the top don't need anything from most men now, they're done playing with you, daddy never actually cared about you, and this realization is breaking men's brains and causing them to lash out at women rather than the system that gladly exploited them and threw them out like yesterdays trash the moment they weren't needed anymore.”

(source: radfem hitler)
 
1) Exploitation by whites bc no one gaf about Native women/girls and laws that make it possible, and 2) annihilation-level generational dysfunction among the Indian/Native population.

Indian/Native girls and women are abused by everyone. And it's far beyond rape.
Canada puts up similar numbers. About half of all First Nations women were sexually abused growing up.

This is basically what happens when you put men in a situation where they know they'll get away with it. Natives were the target of police brutality for a long time and that distrust runs deep. Nothing gets reported.
 
We talk about the blackpill. The blackpill isn't individual acts of monstrosity by moids. The blackpill is situations like the plight of Native/First Nations women above, where you look at the black and white data and realise that:
- this is a systemic problem, this is beyond one or two outlier moids
- this is also a problem with systems, the systems designed to protect women from moid violence are not working, everyone knows they are not working, and nothing is done to change that

When we say things in frustration like "moids are allowed to attack and indeed kill women", moids REEEEEE NotAllMen and "hysteria" and similar bullshit.
What we are pointing out is that where there are systems to protect people from violence, and we can look at the data and see that a certain class of victim (women, domestic partners) are disproportionately likely to experience a particular harm from a particular class of offender (fucking moids), we can say the system does not work.
It does not punish offenders who beat their wives to the same extent as offenders who beat their bosses in the workplace. it routinely downgrades the seriousness of the offence, drops charges, and credibility-tests victims before even ascertaining the facts of the offence.
Where there is a system of punishment that rotuinely and systematically allows those who offend to avoid the consequences of their offending, that is a system that allows the behaviour.
If you have a reasonable expectation that if you rape a Native/First Nations woman, you are unlikely to be prosecuted, the system is allowing you to commit rape.

The blackpill is not even how many unhinged moids out there that are willing to harm you. The blackpill is how many normal men and women will shrug apathetically and turn a blind eye, and blame 'the system' for the fact you were harmed, and that your attacker will not suffer the consequences of his crime.

Systems of criminal justice are composed of people. From legislators to lawyers to law enforcement, they are composed of people who routinely take the view that violence against women and girls is too difficult, too complicated, too low-return to be worth dealing with as if it was a crime against someone important.
When that effect ripples through a criminal justice system, and then through the society that lives under that system, violence against women and girls is normalised. Normalised in the sense that while it may be condemned in words, it is accepted in fact as "something that happens".
It's not normal that moids should harm women and nothing get done about it other than blame the women for the existence of a moid near her. It should not be accepted.

"buh huh huh what are you going to do about it" You're going to prosecute everyone for VAWG where there is a preponderance of evidence to substantiate the crime.
No, you are not going to spend two years on 'digital discovery' of the complainer's phone to satisfy yourself beyond reasonable doubt that she never gave the moid a kind word, because that is not fucking relevant. You are not going to set up The Worst Jury In The World in your head, and decide that they will shit all over the complainer before you've even taken a full statement from her.
You are going to prosecute all VAWG where there is sufficient evidence to substantiate the crime, and then people will stop believing this is some rare and unusual and unfortunate event. Even the magical thinkers amongst women will finally grasp: just because it's not happening to you, doesn't mean it's not happening.
Then finally it will stop being normalised. This isn't something we can accept, 'oh moids kill women that's how it is'. It's not 'how it is', it's how we allow it to be.
 
The "What the fuck is wrong with men in Alaska?" discussion earlier reminded me of horror stories women deal with in Antarctica... You see, women still act civilized when they are isolated from the rest of the world and consequences are temporarily out the window but scrotes quickly turn into violent chimpanzees. A lot of these moids sent there are highly educated first worlders and even they are like this.

In 2022, the US National Science Foundation published a report that found that 72% of current and former female employees believed sexual harassment and assault in Antarctica is a problem, that 59% of women had experienced it themselves, and 95% knew someone directly affected.
Antarctica itself was envisioned by many male explorers as a "virginal woman" or "monstrous feminine body" to be conquered by men. Women were often "invoked in terms of place naming and territorial conquest and later even encouraged to have babies in Antarctica." Using women as territorial conquest is literal in the way that Argentina flew pregnant women to Antarctica to give birth and stake a national claim to the area.

Men enjoyed having a space that was free of women and which, in the late 1940s, "allowed them to continue the kind of male companionship and adventure they had enjoyed during the Second World War."

In 1957, after the United States established its first permanent bases on the continent, the then-program supervisor joked, "women will not be allowed in the Antarctic until we can provide one woman for every man."

It wasn't until 1969 that the first all-women scientific team deployed to Antarctica. At the time, a New York Times reporter called it "an incursion" into the "largest male sanctuary remaining on this planet."

One scientist, Lyle McGinnis, who had been going to Antarctica since 1957, resented women in the field saying that "men never grouse." He believed that women complained and needed "comfort."

Other men felt that women's presence made life in Antarctica better and one male engineer stated that without women around, "men are pigs." Sociologist Charles Moskos stated that as more women are introduced to a group, there is less aggression and a "more civil culture develops."
...the “Sistine ceiling” of the Weddell Hut at Australia’s Mawson Station–a collage of ninety-two 1970s and 1980s pornographic pinups–was described as a “shrine to the red blooded pioneering spirit” of the earlier explorers and labeled “part of the national heritage”.

Wheeler’s Antarctic travel memoir from the early 1990s describes how men used pornography in order to “get a rise” from women on the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) training program at Rothera station.

When heavy equipment operator, Julia Uberuaga, first went to Antarctica in the late 70s and early 80s, she recalled that "the men stared at her, or leered at her, or otherwise let her know she was unwelcome on the job."

Rita Matthews, who went to Antarctica during the same period, said that the "men were all over the place. There were some that would never stop going after you."

In 1983, Marilyn Woody described living at McMurdo station and said, "It makes your head spin, all this attention from all these men." Then she said, "You realize you can put a bag over your head and they'll still fall in love with you."

In the 1990s, some women experienced stigma in Antarctica. These women were labeled "whores" for interacting with men and those who did not interact with men were called "dykes."
Polar science had its #MeToo moment in 2017, just weeks after the Harvey Weinstein scandal broke, when Boston University suspended Antarctic geologist David Marchant with pay.

...in July 2016, Jane Willenbring filed a Title IX complaint with Boston University in which she stated that on her 1999 Antarctic expedition with Marchant, he repeatedly pushed her down a steep slope, threw stones at her while she was urinating outside, blew shards of volcanic ash into her eyes, and called her a "slut" and a "whore."

A second woman stated that he repeatedly called her a "cunt" and a "bitch" and promised to block any NSF research funding for her should she continue her career in academia; she left academia.

A third woman, Hillary Tulley, stated that "His taunts, degrading comments about my body, brain, and general inadequacies never ended."
University of Tasmania sociologist Meredith Nash boarded the ship as a researcher studying leadership programs for women in science and tech. What she discovered on the expedition shocked her.

One night on the ship, Nash, a native Chicagoan with tattooed arms and a crest of blond hair on her close-shaved head, attended a group party that quickly devolved into a drunken bash, with the captain wearing a dress and another crew member being led around on a leash. (Nash says there’s “a long Antarctic tradition for men to cross-dress.”)
In 2020, the Australian Antarctic Division commissioned her to lead a government-funded review of diversity, equity, and inclusion at its programs. “When I first started,” she tells me, “one of the scariest moments I had was when one of the people I was working with said, ‘See that guy there? He raped that woman over there 10 years ago on station.’”

In the NSF report, one interviewee said she’d been told on her first day at McMurdo to stay clear of a certain building unless she “wanted to be raped.” Another woman said she felt like she was seen as “prey” no matter where she was physically on the base.

During her nearly two years working on that review, Nash learned about widespread incidents of harassment and assault. The reign of male expeditioners in the region and the isolation of the harsh environment made it all the more insidious. “Women have to work in the field with their abusers for weeks at a time because they simply can’t leave,” as she puts it.

“The onus is on the victim, the survivor, to say something, and then when they do say something, they’re punished. There’s a backlash—women have their rooms destroyed on station, or they get tormented for the entire season until they get so distressed that they’re the ones that have to leave. The stakes are really high for women who speak up."

This article gives more information about the topic, including statements from Willenbring, Nash and more women who worked in Antarctica. The details are disturbing. https://www.wired.com/story/women-antarctica-science-predators-whistleblower/
 
Last edited:
The blackpill is not even how many unhinged moids out there that are willing to harm you. The blackpill is how many normal men and women will shrug apathetically and turn a blind eye, and blame 'the system' for the fact you were harmed, and that your attacker will not suffer the consequences of his crime.
Or rally around your attacker.

The OJ Simpson trial got pretty fucking weird if you were good enough friends with black people that they'd speak their mind openly. There was a lot of "yeah he probably killed that bitch but she deserved it." Chris Rock even did a bit about it.
 
God could've made us all female and reproduce by spinal juice or whatever but noooo. Now we have to deal with baby murder justifying incels and receding hairlines. Porn addictions, bragging about rape and molestation of children and disabled people, unwashed underwear and budlight fridge stock filled faggots with snapchat or 4chan bookmarked on their browser, full of barely legal girls being exploited in their recently watched history pornhub account. Monitor lizard raping subhuman shitflinging gangraping monkeys from africa,sea, and south america who sell their daughters to perverted old western men to rape and profit from. From the average married woman being cheated on after buying the "marriage will fix everything" pill to the low iq idiot who lets some college dropout amazon warehouse worker impregnate her. The demonic teenage boys posting cp and animal abuse on sharty to one up each other on degeneracy, making ai porn of their female classmates and terrorizing their teachers, moms, any woman within a 50 foot radius with their xy disability. Lord, why do this when we could've had it all. (:_(
 
I used to think this picture was super deep when I felt sorry for online men, but now
I think it's load of horse shit lol, so I decided to modify it.
1720805186832.png

tumblr_b746924d0dd951cb534cec2c59d5e62d_28a1d847_1280.jpg

Anyways, I'm fed up when moids pretend that they're the only exclusive group that wants community and family, especially given they were pretending that women wanted to trap them in marriages. Newsflash everybody to some degree wants a form of community and a family, but having a family is difficult especially in these times and the idea of communities have became completely obsolete thanks to Internet, particularly reddit gentrifying everything and because we as a society became incredibly work-oriented as see work now the only place where you can hang out with people.
I see that too. They are so adamant about it always being yaoi or fanfiction because then otherwise it would be men's fault for the creation of TIFs
Even if yaoi or fanfiction can play as a catalyst for pooning out, men that blame it entirely miss the point why exactly pooners tend to latch onto yaoi. Most of pooners tend to be young women that unfortunately got raised by the Internet or grew up on the Internet where they grew up seeing their whole existence as a woman be completely sexualized and degraded especially if they were feminine, most of romantic media also either played into this, demure submissive woman being swooped by an Adonis or the woman serving as a supporting role for the main protagonist's journey to uplift him, there's never a story where man and a woman equally develop feelings for each other but they feel as relatable humans.

Yaoi on other hand allows women to enjoy romance genre without having to feel completely degraded or reduced into a one-dimensional character meant to uplift the male protagonist because another guy is the one taking the bullet for team by being the submissive one and in the role of that woman. Why do you think moids absolutely dislike the whole "babygirlification" of male characters? Because it forces their favorite male character into a role of a woman that's being constantly infantilized by men.

When pooners poon out because of yaoi, it's usually because they look at these romantic stories and think "I won't be able to have that as a woman, because most of men want to be in the role I am not comfortable with and feel shame performing, but if I was a man I wouldn't have much of an issue performing them". It all comes back to internalized misogyny, but of course moids will instantly start stomping their foot insisting how this concept does not exist, how it's some made up feminist buzzword but say how internalized misandry is TRUUUUUU and REAL though because young men are taught to hate themselves by evil feminazis single mothers and society.png.

I mainly say this because I've seen so many pooners talk about how hecking valid powerbottoms they are, but then also talk how they can't imagine themselves a submissive woman.
Its not that its that the jobs dont bring anything extra for them . Will it get them a house and car ? No! benefits paying for most of the bills plus work under the table gets them whatever extras they want with far less worked hours . They will be at the same station in life if they work for globohomo plus they will be paying taxes and fees on top of their income . Of course corporations don't want to pay living wages let alone a salary that can afford you a starter shed in some town . So now nobody wants to work. I pretty wary of agri counties claiming nobody wants to work even though they have high unemployment. What they are saying nobody wants to work under the current ( inhumane) conditions and the current ( shit) pay.
I should had clarified better, my post was meant to criticize specific groups of moids, ones that refuse to even work jobs in Walmart or some fast food chain for a temporarily time until they get/find a better job while whining how they no money, refuse to take these jobs because they think they'll get stuck working on them and of course the whole "muh dignity".

The reason I have a beef with this group is that they always cry they're denied having a family by the bad economy or whatever, okay, let's say they do get their wish, they find some woman to get married with and she's pregnant with their first child, however they get fired/laid off from their current job and the only job that is willing to employ them right now is something they would consider degrading or below them, would they be willing to grit their teeth and work it if it meant providing to their family or would they be willing to potentially damn it because "muh pride"?

If men like these cannot make sacrifices and put their pride aside now, what makes them think they'll be able to if by some miracle they were
given a family they allegedly desire so much?
 
Last edited:
Anyways, I'm fed up when moids pretend that they're the only exclusive group that wants community and family, especially given they were pretending that women wanted to trap them in marriages.
Men not even 10 years ago:
- "Women are poking holes in condoms to baby-trap us! I'm not ready to be a dad!"
- "Women want to settle down too early, I'm a young man and I need to see what else is out there!"
- "Women all want big diamond rings and wedding parties it's too much! I don't want to spend all that money, it's just a useless piece of paper!"
- "I need to have a bachelor party with strippers to celebrate my freedom one last time before I am settled down with a ball and chain hahaha" *literally wears a ball and chain to this"
- endless "I hate my bitch wife" and "I hate my dumb kids" jokes in every single media
- endless tropes of men fucking their young hot secretary cause their wife is so old and gross
- endless worship of millionaire playboy men with 10 girlfriends, never married
- "Al Bundy is literally my hero! He hates his dumb bitch wife!"
- "Women are so dumb for liking romance movies and romantic comedies, that stuff isn't realistic!"
- "Women are all puritanical prudes who hate fun and sex!"

Men now:
- "Men have always been the ones who want to have kids and a wholesome happy family and women just want to slut around, why doesn't any woman want to marry me?!"

???????? Did they forget that they complained about this every single day when it was still what women wanted? Men will never be happy, there is no way to make them happy. Whatever they have they don't appreciate and always want what they don't have.
 
Men not even 10 years ago:
- "Women are poking holes in condoms to baby-trap us! I'm not ready to be a dad!"
- "Women want to settle down too early, I'm a young man and I need to see what else is out there!"
- "Women all want big diamond rings and wedding parties it's too much! I don't want to spend all that money, it's just a useless piece of paper!"
- "I need to have a bachelor party with strippers to celebrate my freedom one last time before I am settled down with a ball and chain hahaha" *literally wears a ball and chain to this"
- endless "I hate my bitch wife" and "I hate my dumb kids" jokes in every single media
- endless tropes of men fucking their young hot secretary cause their wife is so old and gross
- endless worship of millionaire playboy men with 10 girlfriends, never married
- "Al Bundy is literally my hero! He hates his dumb bitch wife!"
- "Women are so dumb for liking romance movies and romantic comedies, that stuff isn't realistic!"
- "Women are all puritanical prudes who hate fun and sex!"

Men now:
- "Men have always been the ones who want to have kids and a wholesome happy family and women just want to slut around, why doesn't any woman want to marry me?!"

???????? Did they forget that they complained about this every single day when it was still what women wanted? Men will never be happy, there is no way to make them happy. Whatever they have they don't appreciate and always want what they don't have.
They hit the wall and are trying to baby trap the beta Beckies who think they can’t do better
 
both genders
*both sexes will serve you rhetorically. using the G-word just feeds the beast.
I read a little Mary Renault when I was in early high school; she was so well-versed in the intricate social codes surrounding gay male sexuality in a Greek classical setting that I began to suspect she were a man. Even when not using the ancient Greek setting, she still had gay male characters in British boarding school, for example. It appears I was not alone in my wondering:
In South Africa Renault was able to write forthrightly about homosexual relationships for the first time. Her sympathetic treatment of love between men won her a wide gay readership, but it also led to rumours that Renault was really a gay man writing under a female pseudonym. Renault found these rumours amusing but also sought to distance herself from being labelled a "gay writer".
Note the difference between the live wiki pg and the archive -- Mary would not approve.
image_2024-07-12_185446909.pngimage_2024-07-12_185516652.png
After remembering to look all this stuff up a few years ago, I noticed that wiki had an entry called "girlfag" which seemed to encompass this female interest in lit. I wound up chatting in the a.v.club comments with a user who caught a temp ban for not using squirrely spelling to address the subject. [I had mentioned that there used to be a Girlf@g entry which wiki had disappeared, and she had written, "I used to be a girlfag, then I grew into a lesbian," or she may have even doubled down and written "dyke," but AVC was not having it!] So -- I discovered that the girlfag/yaoi interest evidently had appeal to both heterosexual and homosexual females to at least some small degree when girls are at an age of sexual discovery in general. And I agree that it is a much safer space to identify with romance, as the genuine humanity-respecting partnerships in popular culture are few and far between.

[wiki continues to skizz out on the GF question]
image_2024-07-12_191118322.png
 
I need to have a bachelor party with strippers to celebrate my freedom one last time before I am settled down with a ball and chain hahaha
- endless "I hate my bitch wife" and "I hate my dumb kids" jokes in every single media
- endless tropes of men fucking their young hot secretary cause their wife is so old and gross
- endless worship of millionaire playboy men with 10 girlfriends, never married
Every day I'm reminded just how fucking pornsick the average man is. Not just from digital porn, though it's certainly a huge factor, but also in terms of lifestyle. This has been a thing for a few decades now.
Your average college football obsessed Miller Lite chugging Good Ol Boy would see nothing wrong with taking his kids to Hooters, or encouraging them to join a fraternity to shovel as many sorority girls onto their dicks as they can get. It's all a fucking game, and porn is like a tutorial or walkthrough on how to play it.
Women are fucktoys, vows and promises are just words. Once you cum (wherever it might be) it all doesn't matter and you can go back to the normal routine of shitting on your significant other for interrupting you while the Bama-Auburn game is on. Because this is just the way things are, it's the "American Dream" nuclear family life generations have aspired to. Fuck being loyal to someone you truly, genuinely love as a person with their own goals, ideas, values, and beliefs. Fuck any idea that women have things on their minds other than dicks 24/7/365. It's a mans world, you can be as trashy as you want and still win. Married or not, you're always in the right for cranking one out to a barely 18 girl on Instagram because your Bitch Wife/GF isn't as good in bed as the sluts you watch on the computer screen.
 
Back