Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

[fake farts]

Listen lady, women's standards are just TOO DAMN HIGH, every woman wants a guy who is 6ft tall, washboard abs, 10 inch penis and 6 figure income and then even if a guy fulfills all of these conditions they will not even swipe right on him because of something as minor as him being an executioner as a hobby...

View attachment 6483943

It's just not fair.

Sounds like women need to "ruin" this male hobby next, now that we've "ruined" Ghostbusters, Star Wars, pedo anime, comic books, and video game slop.

We can start with the moids.

 

[grenouille crétine]

shared CCTV footage of the attack as porn.

Men have NO REBUTTAL to this evil. If a woman is assaulted in a high-profile case, what do porn search results show the next day, every time, without fail? They just stammer and fall all over themselves when confronted because they all know they would and could and do jack off to rape but they can’t admit OR even deny it, just act offended they were made to acknowledge their own depravity at all. They have NO REBUTTAL to how horribly Gisèle Pélicot is being treated during her trial and what a horrorshow that is. They have NO REBUTTAL to Pornhub keeping up trafficking footage of children and denying the victims’ attempts to have it removed.

The best they can manage, if they even try at all (men are both stupid and lazy, as a rule) is “not all men”. That is the absolute best they’ve got, that and "no true man". When they reflexively defend their fellow rapechimps, it does not occur to them once to be sorry and feel shame. It does not occur to them why it does not occur to them to be sorry. Men know very little, but they do instinctually understand that they collectively share the sin of rape and are too weak, cowardly and pathetic to face justice, and so they remain inhuman demons of their own volition. They do not understand themselves because they because they cannot stand to. They do not understand women because they do not understand themselves. They do not understand god, or God, or the world they live in, let alone the world they are leaving behind, at all.

Nothing of value happens in a man’s head. They cannot think. They cannot feel real emotion. The average male psyche would crumble to dust if subjected to a fraction of what the average woman bears without complaint, because she has no other choice.

Men are the original source of sin, unequivocally. Not a fictional woman made from a fictional man’s rib.

 

[New & Improved Username]

I just want to remind everybody: sectur adjacent lolcow Jean-François Gariépy almost certainly (and I only use the word "almost" to avoid stupid bullshit) murdered his autistic/ slow adult wife who was the mother of his child(ren?).

I hope the Canadian version of the FBI will have enough evidence to press charges soon. This guy is smug and laughing at everyone. I really want to see it blow up in his face.

 

[crazedaze]

Moids are mentally ill by definition. They don't know their place and are taught that they're supposed to have power over women, and most of them believe that shit. Ruled by ego and lord penis, they are incapable of listening to reason, aka women, and stumble through life mad at the world for not conforming to their delusions. Truly, the moid mind is a hell of his own creation.
Blessed are you, Lord, our God, ruler of the universe who has not created me a scrote.

 

[Elysian]

>Executioner
>Entrepreneur
>Business owner

I just want to remind everybody: sectur adjacent lolcow Jean-François Gariépy almost certainly (and I only use the word "almost" to avoid stupid bullshit) murdered his autistic/ slow adult wife who was the mother of his child(ren?).

I remember when he did that interview on some podcast right after he announced his wife was “missing”. It was actually quite funny in a really morbid, fucked up way because the interviewer starts out chipper and sympathetic only to get visibly more unnerved as the interview goes on - because it’s obvious to anyone with a functioning brain cell that he murdered her.

 

[Lady Bizness]

This is how my whole family found out my dad was bisexual/gay, he never specified or really admitted it and took it to the grave with him. This was after he retired and was home all day, my mom went out to pick us up from school and I think he had headphones on and didn't hear us come in, my brother and I saw him first, jerking it to black/Latino gay porn and then my mom saw and freaked out and started beating him with my brother's tennis racket. She kicked him out that night, then had us all go get tested the next day because she didn't know if he cheated and passed anything to us, thankfully everything came back clean. My mom filed for divorce, but it never went anywhere cause my POS fag dad kicked the bucket some months later, turned out he had cancer and never told anyone.

Jesus, he had all kinds of secrets didn't he? Hopefully someone finds out you're also secret royalty and you inherit a spooky castle with treasure. Also, I'm sorry.

 

[Bloody Kotex]

Scrotes justified cheating as being innately male, that the desire to have sex and impregnate as many women as possible was normal, and that women wouldn't understand it. Like, if your entire purpose in life revolved around sex, then you were the result of semi-developed primates that should have died out naturally but, because of patriarchy, were able to reproduce and pollute the human gene pool.

Anw, the word femcel is soooo fucking redundant. God forbid women to want genuine connection; want to be desired in all ways, not just sexual. Is it really shameful to want to be loved? Men desire a bangmaid to abuse and take advantage of, no one blinks, but when a woman desires a man - HETEROSEXUAL, not the "bros before hoes" fags, who loves her, who she can trust, and that's asking too much, too picky! She must be like those basement dwellers who are fapping to sexualized drawings of children! Check mate, femcel.

Say what you will about cheesy romance novels, but in the end, they all have one thing in common: the male lead's attention and his heart for the female MC. Not any other man, not his best friend, his dad, not even God. Meanwhile, the male version is sex, dick, sex, more dick, violence, dick.

 

[Big Miss Steak]

Men are the original source of sin, unequivocally.

There are theologians who believe Jesus was born of a virgin so that he would not inherent the curse of depravity that clings to man's seed. Thus while every woman has sin according to Christian theology, it is from her father. Food for thought.

I remember when he did that interview on some podcast right after he announced his wife was “missing”. It was actually quite funny in a really morbid, fucked up way because the interviewer starts out chipper and sympathetic only to get visibly more unnerved as the interview goes on - because it’s obvious to anyone with a functioning brain cell that he murdered her.

Would you be able to find that podcast? No sweat if it's a lot of trouble.

 

[Slideshow Bill]

>Executioner
>Entrepreneur
>Business owner

Hitman for hire?

I thought these were two different cases, but they are actually connected. One of the many UK Mohammeds orally raped an unconscious 35 y/o mother until she died. A good and honest white, blue-eyed and conventionally attractive Englishman shared CCTV footage of the attack as porn.

All men all men all men all men

Did she die from her injuries later or did she die during the attack? One isn't really better than the other but it's the tiny difference between "men are jacking off to a woman getting raped, and this woman died" and "men are jacking off to a woman who was raped to death on camera".

Scrotes justified cheating as being innately male, that the desire to have sex and impregnate as many women as possible was normal, and that women wouldn't understand it. Like, if your entire purpose in life revolved around sex, then you were the result of semi-developed primates that should have died out naturally but, because of patriarchy, were able to reproduce and pollute the human gene pool.

Anw, the word femcel is soooo fucking redundant. God forbid women to want genuine connection; want to be desired in all ways, not just sexual. Is it really shameful to want to be loved? Men desire a bangmaid to abuse and take advantage of, no one blinks, but when a woman desires a man - HETEROSEXUAL, not the "bros before hoes" fags, who loves her, who she can trust, and that's asking too much, too picky! She must be like those basement dwellers who are fapping to sexualized drawings of children! Check mate, femcel.

Say what you will about cheesy romance novels, but in the end, they all have one thing in common: the male lead's attention and his heart for the female MC. Not any other man, not his best friend, his dad, not even God. Meanwhile, the male version is sex, dick, sex, more dick, violence, dick.

The term "femcel" is stupid anyway. I know it's supposed to mean "female incel" but femcel looks like "female celibate" which is basically a nun.

 

[S@credC]

This week's standout testimony has been this exchange between one of Gisèle's lawyers, Stéphane Babonneau, and one of the accused:
View attachment 6482422
As English:
Babonneau asks 'So today you're asking to be declared innocent of rape?
Alleged Rapist says 'no, I'm not saying I'm innocent, I'm saying I'm just not a rapist'
Babonneau: 'was Ms Pelicot a victim of rape?'
AR: 'she was the victim of rape, as there was no consent'
Babonneau: 'so who penetrated Ms Pelicot when she was a victim of rape?'
AR: 'I don't understand the question'

An answer like that deserves an immediate bullet between the eyes.

 

[Tutu]

Scrotes justified cheating as being innately male, that the desire to have sex and impregnate as many women as possible was normal, and that women wouldn't understand it. Like, if your entire purpose in life revolved around sex, then you were the result of semi-developed primates that should have died out naturally but, because of patriarchy, were able to reproduce and pollute the human gene pool.

This type of moid get offended when you point out that a woman dumping him for a hotter and richer guy is also innately female and normal. They will only make appeal to nature arguments as long as it benefits them.

 

[keke]

One isn't really better than the other but it's the tiny difference between "men are jacking off to a woman getting raped, and this woman died" and "men are jacking off to a woman who was raped to death on camera".

She was unconscious already when attacked but was alive and moving. She was repeatedly orally raped by a Mohammad homeless man until she died. He’s being charged with manslaughter because that’s a safer bet and it was the oral rape that killed her, the coroners report isn’t public, but that is the prosecutions case. So yes, she is dying and then dead in the footage.

I forgot to mention the guy who shared the video was a cop.

Why does the distinction matter? They jack off to women/animals/kids getting raped to death all the time too.

 

[Susanna]

I forgot to mention the guy who shared the video was a cop.

Who else would have access to share the video? Just about every time someone posts a rape video or murder site photos to r/cutefemalecorpses or whatever, it's a cop.

 

[keke]

I want to ask the morons at Reddit and that stupid daughter if she’d be okay if her black mother walked in on their white father watching slave roleplay porn?

Would they be okay with the implications of that? No, not for one second. Would they expect the mother to be okay with that? No, not for one fucking second. But ONLY because of the racial aspect. Black people are not expected to be fine with that yet. The horrific crime of incest, which ruins lives, and misogyny-driven sexual assault—crimes which are only increasing and getting worse, unlike racism—mothers have to be just fine with that. A mother (who wasn’t raised alongside porn obliterating societal norms AND women’s boundaries around sex, unlike the traitor daughter) is supposed to see that and think it has no bearing on a moid, because when their dicks are hard they are not responsible for anything, but if there was a racial aspect, he’d be a terrible racist and the mother is a based queen. Watching incest “roleplay” doesn’t mean he likes incest, but watching race roleplay would make him racist. The logic falls apart.

TLDR Cull Redditors.

 

[Hubelublub]

For the third Friday in a row, the Pelicot trial is engaged in debating the merits of showing the videos to the court. Both Gisèle's and the defense have several lawyers, both sides providing arguements of varying quality.

There is a moderately positive outcome, but I will provide an English summary of the arguements as well as transcribing some quotes, because this fucking clown court fits perfectly with fucking Clown World, and it must be read to be believed.

This is long, sorry, no way to make this shorter. Grab a cup of tea or something.

Gisèle's lawyer, Babonneau, is first.

Spoiler: the rights of the victim

Babonneau states that the right of the victim to have a trial be public was decided many decades ago, and that to frame this request as one of vengefulness is to debate the very merits of public hearings. If the defense wishes to debate on those grounds, it needs to take its claim to the Parliament (for a change in law), not right now in the courtroom trial.

Earlier last week and the week before, the defense has repeatedly asserted that Gisèle is an exhibitionist, and that the existence of the videos is not proof of rape, but rather proof that Gisèle's exhibitionist kink exists.
The defense has argued that Gisèle's desire to have journalists and court attendees view these videos is yet more proof of her exhibitionist inclinations.

Babonneau pushes back on the claim that viewing the videos is exhibitionism, as it is instead the right of every victim perusing a case in French courts, to request that the court proceedings be made available to the public.

'Why would Gisèle want to endure yet more psychological poison' in having these videos made public, after 10 years of 200+ rapes by 60+ men? Babonneau asks. Gisèle has already declared 'it's too late, the damage is done'. The brutality of these debates we are having in this courtroom, Gisèle will have to live with forever the rest of her life.
Babonneau continues: Gisèle wishes that in making public the videos of this suffering inflicted upon her, it will change public perception, shifting shame away from the victim and onto the accused. It cannot be that in 2024, Babonneau says, rape is still so shocking and so unworthy a crime that man is not able to look it straight in the eye, and must instead see it behind closed doors.

Another of Gisèle's lawyers, Antoine Camus, speaks now. Camus makes the case that the videos are the very subject of this trial. They are crime scene videos.

Spoiler: Camus' much stronger case

Camus continues, noting that so far, most of the accused have made claims of perception, that they did not see it as rape, that they did not know she wasn't consenting or able to consent. The problem with perception is that it is subjective, and one incident can have multiple perspectives.

In most cases, it is he said-she said. But here in this case, it is not so. It is only the claims of the defense which are being admitted into this court. (Gisèle, it should be noted, was drugged to the point of stupor and unconsciousness, is unable to provide an eyewitness report to her own rapes.) Camus states that many of the defendants have suggested they were pressured and threatened by Mr Pelicot into raping Gisèle, a fact that would be proven or disproven by viewing the videos. 'We have videos which show sound and image, which destroy the claims of rape by lack of knowledge or inattention or recklessness. They prove that this was rape by opportunity.'

Camus continues:

It is not only the rapes, it is a question of degrading, humiliating, dirtying, it is in fact a question of hatred of women.
It is only by viewing these videos, viewing all of them, that we can understand this ten-year monstrosity, this banality of evil, this banality of rape.

Spoiler: more from Camus

It is pointed out that the public prosecutor wishes the videos be seen by the media. Camus also notes that historically, courts are only emptied when there is a disruption to the court, when bad behaviour of court attendees requires it. However, here this court is being emptied to show evidence of the crime itself, which is very atypical.

One of the defense lawyers speaks, and he says he does not oppose the viewing of the videos. However, most of the defense agrees with the judge. First fucking sign there might be something amiss here, no?

Spoiler: Gontard the retard

One such lawyer, Paul-Ronger Gontard, doesn't believe the videos are needed to know the truth. There is already sufficient information to draw conclusions, and (fuck this is a doozy) viewing the videos will unnecessarily lengthen the court case. I'm being polite when I describe this Gontard character as an absolute ball-washer. He spends God knows how long gently caressing the scrotum of this judge, making claims that the dignity of the court must be retained, that the facts of the case as derived from the testimony is enough, and that allowing the videos to viewed by journalist would take away from the judge's rightful role to be the final decider. It would turn the court into one of public opinion and public perception.
I hate to agree with this cock-sucking faggot, but suggesting the videos be viewed so that we can enact social and cultural change is perhaps one of the weakest arguements Gisèle's lawyers should have offered. It is true, but I'm not sure it's much of a legal arguement.

Onto another defense lawyer, Oliver Lantelme.

Spoiler: the court is not your therapist

He says the court is not a therapist's office, it's not a place of mourning, and we should not be using the court to sort through personal emotions. He pushes back against the notion that shame must change sides, as it presumes his client does not already feel shame.

Lantelme refers to hysteria, so you know there's some moid bullshit coming:

I resent this collective hysteria, dripping with blood, the colour of semen. Everyone is being sacrificed, on top of the alter of populism.
Do you want our courts to become like the American courts, is that what you want? You want it all to be shared, to be tweeted?

Lantelme complains that the families and children of the accused have been harassed, which sounds like not Gisèle's problem, so I'm not sure why the court should care.

I haven't talked about Nadia El Bouroumi in any of these reviews, but she is a defense lawyer who perhaps should not be licensed to practise law. She's posted some questionable videos on social media of herself WHILE DRIVING TO COURT, including one where she's singing in her car along to - wait for it -'Wham's 'Wake Me Up Before You Go Go'.

Spoiler: dis bish craycray

In the context of this case, it's a pretty gross song choice. The media has covered El Bouroumi plenty, because who doesn't love a crazy woman, so I've not bothered to discuss her antics. Anyway, keep in mind Lantelme's complaints about hysteria and American courts as you read El Bouroumi's comments.

El Bouroumi begins to speak, and quickly starts raising her voice. She asks if the defense does not have the right to be defended, and whether it's allowed to ask questions without Gisèle's team suggesting their rights are being violated. 'We have the right not to be called rapists!' El Bouroumi says, 'We are being threatened, humiliated, insulted!' I have no idea what this has to do with the request to have the videos viewed. 'They have the right to a fair trial!' 'We have a media dictatorship!' 'We have been humiliated for a month now!'

Somehow, this is now about Nadia El Bouroumi. To reiterate, this is actually the trial of a lady who is alleging to have been raped over 200 times, by nearly 80 separate men, after being repeatedly drugged by her husband.

These are the words of El Bouroumi, a supposedly qualified defense lawyer for two of the accused rapists:

I tell you, I am very brave, but it is very difficult during the Pelicot trial.

She's not talking about Gisèle.

The court is adjourned shortly after, while they decide on whether or not to view the videos publicly.

Spoiler: the outcome

The outcome is that, still, Gisèle's lawyers must make the case for each video to be viewed, and that it must be proven necessary to view the video to discern the truth.
However, now the announcement will be made for people to leave the courtroom if they wish.

Journalists may now be permitted to attend. A small victory for Gisèle.

In her arguements, Babonneau referred to Gisèle Halimi; a video of her can be viewed here (you'll need to understand frog):

For those not fluent in froggish:

A raped women is a broken woman, an exploded woman, she is a woman who will never recover.
When she fights, it is true courage, it is because she knows the fight is not for her, but so that other women do not have to endure what she has endured.

 

[Galaxolotl]

Another thing I hate is that moids have ruined an innocent thing like sleepovers , they whine about how women, feminism and nigs made a low trust society. But what is more low trust than having to refuse your kid a night over at her friends house because there might be a coomer man in the house? Men have made a childhood pastime a category on porn hub, with actresses who look suspiciously young and wearing clothes straight off the tween rack. It has gotten so bad that even spending the night at relatives houses is a fat no now. And these predators are getting bolder too, remember that dad that drugged his daughter and her friends at a sleepover to potentially molest them? But of course it's his life ruined by the girls and their families and not the consequences of his own actions.

 

[Aliénor]

They have ruined everything. You can't string three words together near some guys without them interpreting some sort of innuendo. They are fucking disgusting, and because they do this since early teenage years, it fucks us up since we are young.

 

[glitterglue]

Another thing I hate is that moids have ruined an innocent thing like sleepovers , they whine about how women, feminism and nigs made a low trust society. But what is more low trust than having to refuse your kid a night over at her friends house because there might be a coomer man in the house? Men have made a childhood pastime a category on porn hub, with actresses who look suspiciously young and wearing clothes straight off the tween rack. It has gotten so bad that even spending the night at relatives houses is a fat no now. And these predators are getting bolder too, remember that dad that drugged his daughter and her friends at a sleepover to potentially molest them? But of course it's his life ruined by the girls and their families and not the consequences of his own actions.

No wonder troons and other perverts have always been obsessed with sleep-overs. As in they are convinced a sleep-over is just an underage lesbian orgy.

Moids sexualize everything and therefore ruin everything. It must be a tormenting existance, to not be able to enjoy anything, without devolving It into something sexual.

 

[Lidl Drip]

I am reading so much horrible shit about South Korean men daily, I honestly had no idea it was so bad there before women online started speaking out. Really makes you understand why the 4b movement started there.






I wonder if it's just South Korea that is this bad or if other Asian countries are similar and just not speaking out about it like they are?

Insane that men blame falling birthrates in these countries on "feminism" when it's obvious their men are fucking monsters and the women want nothing to do with them because of that.

 

[Soi Woh Jak]

This probably belongs on the India Menace thread but holy fuck whats wrong with people

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c80r38yeempo