Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
I know we already know it, but dear god so many A&N posters are just spiteful retards who want to hate women no matter what. Look at the thread on the Welsh woman who won an unfair dismissal case because she was fired for being pregnant. Every other post is-

Single mothers are scum and always presumed to be racemixers (she was never specified to be a single mother, and the photo they found shows her with a (white) man who appears to be her partner)

She’s taking advantage of the poor corporation, they were right to save money by firing her (statutory maternity pay is fully refunded by the government to smaller companies in the UK)

She’s lazy and got pregnant to avoid having to work (she got two more jobs after being fired and was cleaning caravans at 39 weeks)

Twitchen is a very traditional British name (it actually is)

As time goes on I become more and more convinced that the whole manosphere movement is a psyop.
Every time I go into the cesspool that is The Thunderdome I can feel my brain cells dying in real time. It must be exhausting for your average A&N poster to be simultaneously that stupid AND angry.

Single mothers just want gubmint handouts > mother wants to work > omg why isn't she at home raising her baby no wonder western society is collapsing > single mothers just want gubmint handouts > etc etc

At least be consistent with your retarded takes.
 
Single mothers just want gubmint handouts > mother wants to work > omg why isn't she at home raising her baby no wonder western society is collapsing > single mothers just want gubmint handouts > etc etc
Mother has a provider husband > omg all womennare golddding whores!! > she'll just end up divorce raping him!!
They are very consistent-ly spouting red pill dogma all day long in the brainwashed manner of a cultist
 
So, to recap; your average A&N retard wants a 10/10 virgin trad wife who fucks like a porn star, who wants nothing more than to stay at home and raise their little tardlets and cook Mr Retard chicken tendies all the live long day but must also work full time because otherwise she's a gold digging whore who can't wait to divorce rape Mr Retard so she can hook up with DeMarcus and his BBC.

And they wonder why they're terminally single.
 
Every time I go into the cesspool that is The Thunderdome I can feel my brain cells dying in real time. It must be exhausting for your average A&N poster to be simultaneously that stupid AND angry.

Single mothers just want gubmint handouts > mother wants to work > omg why isn't she at home raising her baby no wonder western society is collapsing > single mothers just want gubmint handouts > etc etc

At least be consistent with your retarded takes.
Consistency and predictability of a moid is what seems to be extremely important for the most of women, and for many sad cases even when it's consistency in a domestic violence pattern, or at least the changes in his behaviour are gradual enough so it goes unnoticed for a long time.
They can't stay consistent sometimes even within a single post.
More logical and rational sex my ass.
 
I'm sorry. And I hope it was a legit mistake by him. But putting aside all the million things I don't know about that might literally somehow make it different, you don't have to be with someone you don't want to be with.
I just looked at the particular statement. It might have gotten mixed in by accident. It would have taken a nanosecond to see the mistake. I seriously don't look at his even though I really could because I 100% don't care. His money is his. Mine is mine. It was different with my high school "sweetheart" who I had a child with.

The current husband and I got together at 31 and 32 (he's 6 months older). Both independent adults. I suffer from a typical female trait in that I am a caretaker. I sacrifice myself for the good of others, even if it's only going to end badly for everyone.

He really isn't the worst though. There are many drawbacks and bad attributes but in the spectrum of moidery we've got rabid pitbulls (who'll murder babies) to clueless baby men (who need a mommy/comfort blanket).

No moids are actually good. I was top tier hot for a long while. I'm older now and we all know that bottom tier moids are pedophiles. I'm very cute and sweet and could very easily replace him.
 
Week seven(?) of the Pelicot trial was last week. I've been putting off the recap because it there's nothing amusing or especially interesting about last week.
Past coverage of court testimony:
Asking for forgiveness
Gisèle's lawyers want the videos shown
Gisèle's lawyers again asked for videos to be shown, rapist learns consent in prison
Accused rapist complains about cameras filming him
Gisèle hangs out with her 51 rapists while a bunch of lawyers watch videos of her being raped.
Psychological profiling begins
Gisèle's lawyers insist to discuss videos being shown in court
More psychological profiling, including two sad homos

I am obviously not the only one disinterested in hearing excuses from a bunch of rapists. On-site journalistic coverage was spotty last week. But fear not, it was all much the same: moids complaining that because their great granduncle died when they were 3, they became a rapist. I'm not going to cover these boring faggots, other that to point out how many of these rapists are saying that they had seen porn where the woman was asleep, which is why this situation didn't strike them as unusual or concerning. Remember, porn is just a healthy release for men, men can separate fantasy from reality, and watching porn has no negative impact on anyone.

One notable insight was when Dominique was questioned about some of last week's testimony, and it emerged that Dominique regarded Gisèle as a racist who didn't like people of a specific colour, which is, it is theorised, why he sought so many men of African and Middle Eastern origin.
The Pelicots divorced sometime ago and remarried in the 2000s, which Dominique used as proof he didn't hate Gisèle: 'If I had had any true vengeance towards her, I wouldn't have remarried her'. He insists he isn't racist, but adds in that neither is Gisèle. I have no idea what this faggot actually thinks, but his brother is right to say he is a fucking constant liar. His testimony is all over the place.
Dominique also says that three of the rapists are homosexuals, and that they lied to him and said they were heterosexual. Nothing like a man lying to get laid, which never happens unless it happens to men.

Dominique reveals that he was the one cooking dinners, and was able to drug Gisèle this way. She was sometimes suspicious, but never persued her suspicions. Women do this all the fucking time, their intuition is trying its damndest to save them, but years of social conditioning to think the best of moids is often enough to circumvent the voices of her foremothers. Listen to your gut, it has your best interests at heart.
Sex toys and clamps were regularly used on Gisèle, Dominique explains both for his pleasure, and by request of the other rapists. Remember Dominique regarded Gisèle as a prude, so this was no doubt used to further humiliate her.
Dominique says at one point that he derived both happiness and misery from what he was doing, 'because she is someone I love'. This causes Gisèle to begin sobbing, and I cannot hate this moid any more than I already do. Miserable pathetic little bastard.
He continues, saying Gisèle was never a submissive person, and he wanted to possess her:

Selfish male bullshit.jpg
This is the selfish bullshit that men have. People cannot own another, and I fought against this, I wanted to be able to do what I wanted, in the time I wanted.
Dominique notes that he had a number of refusals on the coco.fr website, with some men threatening to go to the police. None did, of course, because moids are weak little wimps with zero sense of honour or duty.Dominique goes on to note the difference between him and the other rapists, because he admits to being a rapist, while all these other men deny it. A true hero.

Yet again the court expresses scepticism that so many men could possibly have willingly agree to rape an unconscious Gisèle, and surely Dominique must have tricked them. Fuck this moidy court. Dominique says the other defendants are just claiming this to avoid any more gaol time, and fuck me if this faggot isn't completely accurate in his analysis. Dominique seems to imply that he is being honest now out of honour to his family, and that he has no interest in any of these other rapists, but he thinks that their honour, and their responsibility for their family, is their problem.

The videos continue to be an issue. Some of the rapists are asking that all videos specifically of them be shown to the court including journalists and the public attending, which should get the spidey senses of every woman going. Men are so fucking gross.
It also turns out that the lead investigator hasn't been fully detailing all the contents of the videos 'out of respect for privacy'. But now that these videos are all being shown in court, and with journalists watching, a lot of lawyers are being caught off guard by the contents (which would affect their defense case).

What a fucking mess.
 
Absolutely subhuman scum. If there was ever a case to bring back the guillotine, this disgusting pervert and his band of merry "men" are definitely it. And when I say "off with their heads", I don't necessarily mean the one on their shoulders either...
One rapist last week insisted he didn't rape Gisèle because:
If I was going to rape someone, it would be a pretty young woman, not a woman of 57 years
Noting too that Gisèle is right fucking there in the court room and has to hear this, and that this faggot is on trial for rape and this forms part of his defence, there is truly no end to the audacity of men.
 
The fucking :lunacy: of standing in court saying that shit as if it somehow makes you look better?? "No your honour, I didn't *rape* that woman, I thought that she had consented to be drugged into a coma while a conga line of random men had sex with her"???

And moids wonder why we need laws like "if you have sex with someone who is so incapacitated they cannot consent then that's rape" when they do and say shit like this :suffering:
 
The fucking :lunacy: of standing in court saying that shit as if it somehow makes you look better?? "No your honour, I didn't *rape* that woman, I thought that she had consented to be drugged into a coma while a conga line of random men had sex with her"???

And moids wonder why we need laws like "if you have sex with someone who is so incapacitated they cannot consent then that's rape" when they do and say shit like this :suffering:
Should I mention this man is 54?
 
And moids wonder why we need laws like "if you have sex with someone who is so incapacitated they cannot consent then that's rape" when they do and say shit like this
Moids bitch about the need for explicit consent saying it "ruins the mood", while women wonder when moids have ever been interested in setting the mood. Most of them can't even arrange a few minutes of foreplay and have the worst bedroom talk, but asking to hear an unambiguous 'yes' is apparently going to give them all softies. Pathetic.
 
Also moids: waahhhhh women are so immature and cheat on me and have too high standards :story:
> feel entitled to someone who was a child when you were 30 and looks 50 times better than you
> be surprised when they are less mature than you
Men don't actually care about baggage, they just want to show off their woman to other men because they are spiritual homosexuals. They don't have enough theory of mind to even see women's baggage.
 
Moids bitch about the need for explicit consent saying it "ruins the mood", while women wonder when moids have ever been interested in setting the mood. Most of them can't even arrange a few minutes of foreplay and have the worst bedroom talk, but asking to hear an unambiguous 'yes' is apparently going to give them all softies. Pathetic.
An embarrassing number of years ago I was a fresh-faced teenager and the boy I was seeing at the time asked “Are you sure you want to have sex?” And if it didn’t ruin the mood then, I don’t know why these grown-ass men think it’s ruining things now.
 
Moids bitch about the need for explicit consent saying it "ruins the mood", while women wonder when moids have ever been interested in setting the mood. Most of them can't even arrange a few minutes of foreplay and have the worst bedroom talk, but asking to hear an unambiguous 'yes' is apparently going to give them all softies. Pathetic.
The mere fact we have to argue in favour of "consent" is a problem in itself. Sex should be a matter of unequivocal, mutual desire. Shown and voiced in many, many ways. Consent is the lowest of bars, and it can be obtained under pressure through many different ways (plus in court it's very difficult to prove a verbal consent instance was in fact obtained under duress). Women have no problem identifying the desire of their sexual partners, men or women. And we don't want sex where the other one doesn't desire it. So what the fuck is up with men when this isn't even the bare minimum?
 
The mere fact we have to argue in favour of "consent" is a problem in itself. Sex should be a matter of unequivocal, mutual desire.
That right there is the problem, most of the moids in these spaces have never actually had a woman desire them, to be charmed by them and want an evening in their beds for the simple enjoyment of it.

So they start seeing women as prey animals instead.
 
that Dominique regarded Gisèle as a racist who didn't like people of a specific colour, which is, it is theorised, why he sought so many men of African and Middle Eastern origin.
Vile creature.
Yet again the court expresses scepticism that so many men could possibly have willingly agree to rape an unconscious Gisèle, and surely Dominique must have tricked them.
Nothing in this universe can absolve those men from the crimes they committed against Gisèle.

Idc what Dominique told them, they still willingly raped a drugged woman. Oh they aren't sure if she can consent? Have they ever considered not sleeping with her? No? Get fucked, spare us those crocodile tears. They made their choice, got caught (the true reason why they claim that they dindu nuffin) and now have to bear the consequences. They are lucky that the french people stopped putting people under a guillotine.

Those guys probably hurt other women too. You just don't rape an (unconscious) woman and then stop at this one woman.
 
Last edited:
Back