Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

I watched this 90s documentary about the difference between lesbians and gay men. Link here if you want. YouTube.

In it they have a bit about the focus on appearance from fags. Multiple gay men talk about how the hyper masculine is attractive to them (youth, muscles, tan, huge dick, etc etc) because that is what men, they themselves, want to be. The exact same as the troon stuff. This is male sexuality to its CORE and again goes to show that this is all because of moids and their insane sexual desires. They were saying this before anyone was saying this about trannies. Blaming the troon epidemic on feminists is just gaslighting and we all see plain as day where the real push comes from. Lefty Feminists love pooners just as much yet their standing is nowhere near that of the trans identified moid because male privilege, entitlement, and intimidation tactics supersede what any libfem could manifest.

To be clear, this applies to straight men as much because moids are still moids, they too as spiritual homosexuals seek the ultimate masculine figure as both what they want to be and what they’re attracted to.

Extra stuff 1: There is a bit about AIDs and how lesbians took care of the fags. Some framed this as them enjoying having them at their mercy (fuck off) as if it was not just BASIC empathy which we know men don’t have. Near the end, one les mentions how gay men would not have noticed if the AIDs epidemic happened on the lesbian side unless they started tripping over their bodies on the street. TRUE

Extra stuff 2: One old gay guy talked about how anal sex was seen as gross to even homos, if he even knew a guy was a sodomite he wouldn’t go home with him, and many just did mutual masturbation and oral. Then the ass started being centred in all types of gay porn and it got more popular. So when AIDs came he was like, yeah I knew this was against nature lmao
 
Last edited:
There are way worse PhD dissertations that were mocked online, she is a white woman though and posted hers online with a selfie, and men have no principles they only hate women so sadly she has been targeted. She’s handled herself well from what I’ve seen.
The whole situation is really fucking telling of men. Very few moids are passing the test.

When women criticise this, they're criticising her PhD and the woke shit.

When men criticise this, they immediately latch on to evaluating her as a person. Even one moid upthread here couldn't help but see a measurement on her 'uselessness', even when none existed.

The xitter posts are exactly the same. Women are saying "what a dumb PhD", and the men are saying "what a dumb woman".

Men have absolutely no principles at all, and they hate or love a woman not intrinsically, but how well she abides by their own personal practices and views.

They don't see us as people, but as objects and servants, here to fulfil their needs and desires. They see us only in how much we satisfy their selves.

Her PhD may be retarded, but I'd rather be alone with her in the woods than any man.
 
If you're American, you might wanna skip the Turkey for Thanksgiving this year. Apparently men are raping the Turkeys before slaughtering them.
The turkeys are hatched because some farm moid jacks off a male turkey and forcibly inseminates the females with a syringe of turkey cum. Commercially bred turkeys are bred to be so big in the breast that the males mostly can't copulate normally (and when they do it's really inefficient.) So basically all the turkeys are the product of rape, and this is in some ways the least miserable part of their short lives.
View attachment 6692548

So sick of this retard. No I don't know what it's like to be an effeminate man who is punished for it by other men. Same as you will never know what it's like to be a woman.

Males being awful to other males is not my problem. Males feeling uncomfortable as males is not my problem. Males feeling more comfortable in the presence of women because of it isn't my problem either. Womanhood is not a safe space for failmales to hide in. Fuck off and fix your dumbass shitass male community.

Women shouldn't have to give up our privacy and safety just because men are so fucking misogynistic that they hate and exclude other men for acting in ways they deem "feminine". The issue is with men. I do not give a single shit about effeminate males having to deal with 1/10th of the shit that women have to deal with from men and thinking that makes them a woman.
It's the same thing as when Hontrapoints made up that character "Abigail Ironcunt" to be a TERF bit part and most of the character's schtick was to ask "DOST THOU BLEED?!?" as if that was a totally unhinged and unreasonable definition of womanhood. He wanted to represent the TERF cause as illogical and bigoted, and wanted the audience to agree with the "gender is a social construct" hero, but I came away from the video agreeing with Abigail more than any other position. Nick was belittling women, and I don't really understand how someone so grossed out by women could want to pretend to be one.

Women don't have a sense of being female. We ARE female.
Yeah this too. Flynt doesn't get it, and in that mobile video game he made the women are proportioned like Barbies anyway.

I've been suspended on Twitter multiple times for "violent speech" against men but this is ok. 🤪
I got suspended once for calling a man a "dumb cunt" on Twitter. I guess that was a bridge too far.

TL;DR

Does my moid religion allow me to rape my wife? I have no concern for my wife's feelings or even U.S. law.

Total Muslim Moid Death
Absolutley haraam content

Ah, by "need of her" you meant sex. Also, note - They have only been married a few months. She clearly fucking hates him and doesn't wanna be there, and yet she has on a couple of occasions, at least, slept with him.
The age old dilemma of conservatively raised girls is that you're supposed to fear men and sex until you get married, and then suddenly you're supposed to do a 180 and not be afraid of these men that you were told are so horrible or this sex that you were told is so dangerous. It mostly affects women. Men involved in conservative religions will still sleep around before marriage if they can.
There it is.

The Implication.
"Rape is a conscious process by which all men keep all women in a state of fear" - Susan Brownmiller
"THAT LITERALLY NEVER HAPPENS, ITS LUDICROUS THAT YOU THINK SO, I WOULDN'T EVEN RAPE YOU" - moids in denial
...Yeah. I guess that could be a consequnce. Up until I read it, it never occurred to me that something like that could happen.

TMD.
I hate to tell you, but the very first instance of artificial insemination occurred in 1880's London when a bunch of male medical students jacked off into a beaker and the melange was injected into a woman whose husband was infertile. They didn't tell the family what they did lol and pretended it was that guy's child so as not to embarrass him.
but what is the “consequence” for being an attractive woman? Men will salivate over the idea of hurting and humiliating you. It’s pornbrain. You are very right on the titles and thumbnails as well.
There's no way out with moids. They'll fantasize about hurting you if you're pretty or ugly. It doesn't matter how you look or what you're wearing - the key factor is the opportunity. They will hurt any woman who's available for them to hurt.
- take everyone for haircuts regularly
Lol I skipped this one and now my ponytail is doubled over on my head in a loop.
Don't forget that husbands must also defend the home. Although, I get the impression that many thoroughly modern "men" would shit themselves and cry in a real home invasion, or say "NOTHING EVER HAPPENS" while their family gets raped.
I have a dog that already tries to do this and the idiot broke a pane in the windows trying to jump through to drive away coyotes. If the resident moid had been at it too, they would have broken four window panes - one for the dog and three for the shotgun blast.
If women were actually in charge of the justice system, the death penalty would not only be used more often by the following crimes would be DP worthy:
I don't like the death penalty. If God wants you dead, God can make that happen without human help. Life in prison is much worse imo.
Damn women sure have sky high standards for not wanting to go on a date at a shitty fast food chain or putting themselves in danger by being alone with a stranger at his house. 🙄 Going to a nice local restaurant is definitely too much to ask, next you'll expect the guy to shower before the date and not show up in cum stained hoodie and sweatshirts or something else unreasonable like tha
I once had a guy who balked at taking me anywhere nicer than a 7/11 because "eating out is too expensive" and wouldn't understand why I wasn't going to see him again.
 
That PhD is the biggest fucking pile of retarded woke bullshit ever and I cannot wait until this shit ends.

But her crows feet, and whether she should've been married and had children instead, is such a gay red herring I almost suspect it's bullshit being planted by leftist tards to distract from the real problem.
That thesis is some real fucking DEI bullshit and all you can offer is some dumb comment on a couple of wrinkles? Come the fuck on, stop being such gay faggots.
You know, I am going to defend this. I read her abstract, since her actual thesis has been pulled off the web because of fucking moidery. It's a literature PhD. This is absolutely bogstandard for a literature PhD to look at themes of othering and literary devices to do this. I would read this with interest. Literature PhDs have done this since the dawn of time. It has nothing to do with wokery: it's not even social sciences based.

And over and above that, I will be absolutely fucked if I will ever defend the standpoint that some fucking knuckledraggers on t'internets get to take cracks at the 'value' of someone else's PhD when they struggle to even compose a tweet correctly. Things don't have to have some Benthamite utility to have value to the person completing them, and indeed value to the wider community.

Academia is not for everyone, and that's fine. But the idea that academics should be expected to defend their academic interests and passions to the retarded moids of the internet, that I cannot support. "hur durr i dun like her PhD thesis" is exactly the same criticism in a moid's mouth as "hur dur elbows too pointy would not bang" and it's for the same purpose: trying to shit on anything that belongs to a woman or is important to her.

I'm not about that life. I don't think any of us are.

Anyway, the abstract: GdjEYjxWAAA4WnT.jpeg
 
These rage fests always come off as insecurity and jealousy. Like his loneliness is down to the evil women choosing education over making babies, and threaten his very existence. Unless all women start a family, there is just too much competition for this beta male.

There’s a lot of moids even on this site that say women not having children is destroying the future lol. Wouldn’t it be better for everyone in an extended family to pool their resources and leave fewer children as heirs to inheritance anyway, if they really cared about the future?
Honestly it is such a joy to see genetic dead end males die alone again because they don't have leverage and control over women anymore. Their impotent rage on social media over not getting the life they think they deserve, but the one they actually deserve, is fantastic. It's a net benefit for humanity that these men will never have access to a woman.

None of these men care about "muh birthrates" or "muh society" they are just mad that women don't have to settle for low value males like him anymore to have a roof over their head.
 
You know, I am going to defend this. I read her abstract, since her actual thesis has been pulled off the web because of fucking moidery. It's a literature PhD. This is absolutely bogstandard for a literature PhD to look at themes of othering and literary devices to do this. I would read this with interest. Literature PhDs have done this since the dawn of time. It has nothing to do with wokery: it's not even social sciences based.

And over and above that, I will be absolutely fucked if I will ever defend the standpoint that some fucking knuckledraggers on t'internets get to take cracks at the 'value' of someone else's PhD when they struggle to even compose a tweet correctly. Things don't have to have some Benthamite utility to have value to the person completing them, and indeed value to the wider community.

Academia is not for everyone, and that's fine. But the idea that academics should be expected to defend their academic interests and passions to the retarded moids of the internet, that I cannot support. "hur durr i dun like her PhD thesis" is exactly the same criticism in a moid's mouth as "hur dur elbows too pointy would not bang" and it's for the same purpose: trying to shit on anything that belongs to a woman or is important to her.

I'm not about that life. I don't think any of us are.

Anyway, the abstract:View attachment 6706961
The thesis, fundamentally, is 'do smelly people get treated badly'. I personally wouldn't argue that to be a groundbreaking discovery, but even if it was, it's hardly worthy of an entire thesis. A xitter thread, maybe.

But let's put all that aside. Let's say it's an insightful topic, and has more than enough discovery to justify it being a thesis.

Instead, look at the fucking language used. Just look at it.
It has, on that page alone you shared, almost all of the woke words. Oppression. Intersectionality. Reflexivity. Identity. Harmful.

She even mentions gender, but not sex. Because of course.

And something about "species power structures", which is probably a rich white person's fault.

If you want a (not) fun drinking game, take a shot each time you see the word 'harm' or a form of it. Be dead by the 5th page.
This is absolutely bogstandard for a literature PhD
It IS standard, because that's what gets degrees right now; throw in as many DEI words into your DEI thesis, and be sure you'll have it passed with no corrections.

I do think it's unfair to suggest that criticising this thesis, and wokism itself, is somehow linked with not being suitable for academia.
If anything, criticism is, or at least, was, a major component of academia as well as the scientific method.

I haven't seen a lot of moidery critique of the thesis itself, because these faggots are too busy attacking her looks, her marriage and reproduction choices, and her utility to the world.
I have seen a lot of women criticising it, and very little of that criticism has been what I would describe as 'hurr durr I dun like her thesis'. It has been incredibly thoughtful and insightful, and measured in how it critiques her thesis, and not the writer herself.
 
I watched this 90s documentary about the difference between lesbians and gay men. Link here if you want. YouTube.

In it they have a bit about the focus on appearance from fags. Multiple gay men talk about how the hyper masculine is attractive to them (youth, muscles, tan, huge dick, etc etc) because that is what men, they themselves, want to be. The exact same as the troon stuff. This is male sexuality to its CORE and again goes to show that this is all because of moids and their insane sexual desires. They were saying this before anyone was saying this about trannies. Blaming the troon epidemic on feminists is just gaslighting and we all see plain as day where the real push comes from. Lefty Feminists love pooners just as much yet their standing is nowhere near that of the trans identified moid because male privilege, entitlement, and intimidation tactics supersede what any libfem could manifest.

To be clear, this applies to straight men as much because moids are still moids, they too as spiritual homosexuals seek the ultimate masculine figure as both what they want to be and what they’re attracted to.

Extra stuff 1: There is a bit about AIDs and how lesbians took care of the fags. Some framed this as them enjoying having them at their mercy (fuck off) as if it was not just BASIC empathy which we know men don’t have. Near the end, one les mentions how gay men would not have noticed if the AIDs epidemic happened on the lesbian side unless they started tripping over their bodies on the street. TRUE

Extra stuff 2: One old gay guy talked about how anal sex was seen as gross to even homos, if he even knew a guy was a sodomite he wouldn’t go home with him, and many just did mutual masturbation and oral. Then the ass started being centred in all types of gay porn and it got more popular. So when AIDs came he was like, yeah I knew this was against nature lmao
Just remembered an extra scene where a lesbian talks about being at some homo interest group with a bunch of men and they started organising because faggots were getting arrested for banging in public parks and this was homophobia and she was like… ‘why am I here, I think they should be arrested for that.’

based. huge parts of the doc are lesbians implying, I wish gay men would stop being so fucking gross. They’re genuinely so repulsive, because it’s moid sexuality without the filter women provide, how they want to act deep down, what with aids and the constant pro-pedo pushes that they really would’ve gotten nowhere without lesbians presenting as so, well, tolerable.
 
Last edited:
Multiple gay men talk about how the hyper masculine is attractive to them (youth, muscles, tan, huge dick, etc etc) because that is what men, they themselves, want to be
I have had a theory for a while that besides molestation and sexual availability, some gay dudes are gay simply because they are massive narcissists. Something along the lines of "I'm a man, I'm the best and therefore I can only love the best which is another man, or myself projected unto another man" could also explain their obsession with getting sons from surrogates.
 
Last edited:
All gays/bis, or just male gays/bis?

It’s in the abstract:
In a cross-national sample (N = 4063; 1507 men, 2556 women; Mage = 24.78, SDage = 7.55; 90.58% heterosexual, 5.74% bisexual, 2.83% homosexual) collected online via student and snowball sampling, we found in sex-aggregated analyses that bisexuals and homosexuals were more Machiavellian than heterosexuals. Bisexuals were more psychopathic and narcissistic than heterosexuals. The only significant findings in within-sex comparisons showed that self-identified bisexual women scored higher on all Dark Triad traits than heterosexual women. The findings support the gender shift hypothesis of same-sex sexual attraction in bisexual women, but not in lesbians nor in men. The finding that bisexuals are the sexual orientation group with the most pronounced Dark Triad profiles is opposite to what would be predicted by the prosociality hypothesis of same-sex sexual attraction. The life history and minority stress implications of these findings are discussed as alternative hypotheses to the gender shift hypothesis.
 
This piece was published over a week ago: https://www.vanityfair.com/style/st...VuzEcEoUUASD6MMIALORGsMLEXffMxTS-7c2c4dH9ZWe2

It's a long article. In summary, a journo who is a turbo fan of Cormac McCarthy was able to contact a woman who left a comment on one of the journo's previous stories where she alluded to knowing Cormac well. He goes out to stay with her for like NINE MONTHS. Turns out she met Cormac at a motel pool when she was a teen and in an abusive foster family. She was a fan of Cormac and recognized him and approached him to sign her book. They began a romantic relationship. She ran away from her foster family to live with Cormac for several years. At one point the FBI was on the verge of arresting him. Cormac wrote her dozens of letters and the journo believes she was the muse for some of Cormac's main characters (who are all male of course). There are also versions of her in nearly everything Cormac wrote. Creepy.

The article is nauseating for its romanticization of what was clearly the grooming of a young and vulnerable girl. Augusta still rationalizes the relationship (as victims tend to do). The journo constantly fawns over her and is infatuated with her childlike mannerisms. He doesn't seem to pick up on the fact that Cormac had Augusta move out once she was no longer as young and impressionable. He doesn't pick up on the fact that Cormac recognized a young fan and buttered her up with praise in a deliberate ploy to groom her. Augusta seems to be stuck in a childlike frame of mind due to a sum of her life's trauma. The journo fangirls Cormac so much that I think he literally falls in love with Augusta because he knows Cormac was banging her. Just deeply gross all around.
Isn't Cormac McCarthy that guy who wrote Blood Meridian and No Country for Old Men?
 
He's not even a good writer.

"The Road" - I actually did enjoy and that was the first of his books I ever read. At the time, I thought his lack of grammar, punctuation, or quotation marks were meant to symbolize the stillness of the dead post apocalyptic setting. I thought it was brilliant.

Turns out he just writes like that in all of his books and his apparent justification is he doesn't want to "dirty up the page". AKA lazy shithead.

I enjoyed Blood Meridian despite McCarthy's snobbish refusal to utilize basic punctuation.

I have always hated Cormac McCarthy for his refusal to use proper puntuation, and his fucking pretentious answer when questioned about it. "I mean, why'd I wanna mess up my page with all those dots and dashes, maaaaan?"

Oh, fuck off, you nonce cunt. Just admit you don't know how to do it properly. If I'd've pulled that kind of bullshit in English class, Ms. Jackson would've given me a proper bollocking, and she'd have been RIGHT to do it, but you do it and suddenly you're the greatest American author?

You're not even a sentient human being, as far as I'm concerned, unless you know how to use a fucking apostrophe.
 
Just remembered an extra scene where a lesbian talks about being at some homo interest group with a bunch of men and they started organising because faggots were getting arrested for banging in public parks and this was homophobia and she was like… ‘why am I here, I think they should be arrested for that.’
There are some materials (pdfs in the first post) in this thread: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/patient-zero-and-the-early-days-of-hiv-aids.118860/
They already were dying en masse, but stop ass fucking, as the doctors recommended? Oh no, that's homophobic. Wear protection? Sorry homophobic too. Close the bathhouses, because that's where the disease spreads from? Gas and ovens will come next! Consider not donating blood, because the disease is suspected to be bloodborne? S T I G M A T I Z I N G.
Imagine back then having a role model, a favourite artist, musician or a sportsman, you want to be as great as him one day, and suddenly he succumbs to the ass-fuck disease because it turns out he got fucked in the ass by many men, oh no, childhood ruined.
 
Moids: Women traded being provided for, supported, loved and cared for feminist lie of
equality. Women were docile, tender and subservient to men and they were happy!

Women in the 1600s:
1733225047311.png

Women in 1800s:
1733225293247.png

Women in 1920s:
1733225073731.png

Women in 1950s
1733225102619.png


It's funny to see men bitching about MUH DIVORCE a century ago even when they were the ones that would get everything during the divorce back in that time period. Also if you wanna get really MATI and peaked about men more just read Sofia Tolstoy's diaries and generally about her life.


1733225062520.png
We need another version of this post but instead of pooners seeing an abused woman from 1700s and concluding that her wish to be seen as a human means she wanted to be a dood, it's men seeing an abused woman from 1700s wishing to be seen as a human and going "But could she felt unhappy!? She gave birth to 16 children! Being a mother is one of most honorable things she could be!"

I have always hated Cormac McCarthy
When men show me a written paragraph that features child rape and sodomy but tell me
the writer was Cormac McCarthy:
luigi-that-is-cinema.gif
 
Cormac McCarthy's 15 minutes of resurgence is up soon. I think the interest coincides with wendigoon's video on blood meridian as well as the romanticization of impoverished rural communities appalachian/southern/western gothic shit on tiktok/tumblr/pinterest. Because you know damn well him being pedo isn't going to stop anyone from liking his work when it's so quirky and cool to do so. Like American Psycho memes, people will lose interest eventually, probably when middle schoolers and jeets start adopting it as part of their stoic sigma personas.
 
Cormac McCarthy's 15 minutes of resurgence is up soon. I think the interest coincides with wendigoon's video on blood meridian as well as the romanticization of impoverished rural communities appalachian/southern/western gothic shit on tiktok/tumblr/pinterest. Because you know damn well him being pedo isn't going to stop anyone from liking his work when it's so quirky and cool to do so. Like American Psycho memes, people will lose interest eventually, probably when middle schoolers and jeets start adopting it as part of their stoic sigma personas.
Fuck sake I got gifted like 3 of his books early this year
 
Isn't Cormac McCarthy that guy who wrote Blood Meridian and No Country for Old Men?
Yes

I have always hated Cormac McCarthy for his refusal to use proper puntuation, and his fucking pretentious answer when questioned about it. "I mean, why'd I wanna mess up my page with all those dots and dashes, maaaaan?"

Oh, fuck off, you nonce cunt. Just admit you don't know how to do it properly. If I'd've pulled that kind of bullshit in English class, Ms. Jackson would've given me a proper bollocking, and she'd have been RIGHT to do it, but you do it and suddenly you're the greatest American author?

You're not even a sentient human being, as far as I'm concerned, unless you know how to use a fucking apostrophe.
His refusal to use basic punctuation drives me absolutely up the wall. That said, I really liked Blood Meridian. I think that (by accident) his refusal to follow grammar and punctuation rules really adds to the nightmarish, fever-dream quality of the book.

Cormac McCarthy's 15 minutes of resurgence is up soon. I think the interest coincides with wendigoon's video on blood meridian as well as the romanticization of impoverished rural communities appalachian/southern/western gothic shit on tiktok/tumblr/pinterest. Because you know damn well him being pedo isn't going to stop anyone from liking his work when it's so quirky and cool to do so. Like American Psycho memes, people will lose interest eventually, probably when middle schoolers and jeets start adopting it as part of their stoic sigma personas.
Ridley Scott is trying to make a movie adaptation of Blood Meridian so unless that gets canceled I think we have a few more years. Thankfully, I don't see anyone really idolizing any of the characters (yet). The Judge is a fascinating figure but he's fat and hairless and a child-murdering pedo, so not exactly sigma material.

Fuck sake I got gifted like 3 of his books early this year
Which ones?
 
I have always hated Cormac McCarthy for his refusal to use proper puntuation, and his fucking pretentious answer when questioned about it. "I mean, why'd I wanna mess up my page with all those dots and dashes, maaaaan?"

Oh, fuck off, you nonce cunt. Just admit you don't know how to do it properly. If I'd've pulled that kind of bullshit in English class, Ms. Jackson would've given me a proper bollocking, and she'd have been RIGHT to do it, but you do it and suddenly you're the greatest American author?

You're not even a sentient human being, as far as I'm concerned, unless you know how to use a fucking apostrophe.
I honestly can't believe anybody ever bought that excuse.
Cormac McCarthy's 15 minutes of resurgence is up soon. I think the interest coincides with wendigoon's video on blood meridian as well as the romanticization of impoverished rural communities appalachian/southern/western gothic shit on tiktok/tumblr/pinterest. Because you know damn well him being pedo isn't going to stop anyone from liking his work when it's so quirky and cool to do so. Like American Psycho memes, people will lose interest eventually, probably when middle schoolers and jeets start adopting it as part of their stoic sigma personas.
The fact McCarthy's a pedo goes a long way to explain why Judge Holden was a pedo, is Holden a self insert?
Moids: Women traded being provided for, supported, loved and cared for feminist lie of
equality. Women were docile, tender and subservient to men and they were happy!

Women in the 1600s:
1733225047311.png

Women in 1800s:
1733225293247.png

Women in 1920s:
1733225073731.png

Women in 1950s
1733225102619.png
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
 
Back