I think there's some hope among the younger set. A young man I know who got caught up with Tate ideology as a Freshmen in high school now recognizes him as a queer influencer-grifter. IF you happen to have contact with an adolescent male, and the topic of Tate somehow comes up, remind them of how he grifted and scammed poor teenaged boys in numerous third world countries with his fake pick up artist programs, and how the trannies literally hacked his website (an unusually benevolent and worthy act by the jannies) and how Tate said he'd fuck a tranny.. . and how fucking gay he looks.
Gurus come and go. Unfortunately, younger men aren't off the hook yet--has anyone here heard the statistic that
Gen Z men are the first generation to be more conservative than the one before it? Even if the role model changes, I would hazard to say that the majority of under-30s still have a seed of the manosphere embedded in them. And if men aren't conservatives, then they're libtard "male feminists" who swear by troonery and sex slavery. And if they're self-avowed "moderates" or just "not interested in politics", then that means that they are not only
complicit, but also likely to get swept along with whatever bullshit their friends tell them, because they don't have any of their own convictions. Which is the general problem among younger people (and quite a few older people too): they just don't care much about anything, they feel like nothing matters, and they don't know how to think for themselves. If you want to see this in action, have a look at r/antiwork.
This "convictionlessness" is what leads to fanbases around guys like Tate and Trump, but, honestly, from what I've noticed, men will lionize literally anyone who they deem "based" for arbitrary reasons. Just like how men have worse color vision and hearing than us, they're also worse judges of character. I used to peruse subreddits like r/presidents and r/monarchism (I'm a history buff, not a politicstard) and the men they consider to be good leaders are always mid at best and immoral at worst. They don't know what constitutes greatness, or what characteristics make someone fit to lead, or anything. TL;DR, there will always be a Tate, and different "subgenres" of men have their personal Tates.
- Bullies Women and Girls for fun
- Thinks DV/rape is funny
In a similar vein--thinks violence against women is "deserved sometimes, like idk, she shouldn't have provoked him, we don't know the whole story, play stupid games win stupid prizes"
