Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

Poor men can't even go to the mall anymore to creepily oogle teenage girls because they dress in baggy clothes and have ugly hair! We live in a gynocracy!

View attachment 6826934

Guess he will just have to stick to searching "teen" on any of the 10 Million porn sites where it's one of the most popular categories every single year.

View attachment 6826944

"I get angry when I am attracted more to a woman my own age than her child"

View attachment 6826952

What a fascinating insight into the moids disgusting mind. He thinks the mother is trying to inspire her teenage daughter to get pregnant?!

View attachment 6826954

🤮
Shit like this makes me want to shoot moids in the dick and let them bleed out.
 
I’m new to the thread but wanted to post something that I think/hope is appropriate here.
I follow a lot of “far right wing” pages on Facebook and one of them was I,Hypocrite. What made me unfollow the page after A LOT of red flags was this image he posted

View attachment 6878746
It was just the final straw, especially after I went to the comments and saw not only is this what this rhe looks like, but apparently he’s a pedo/groomer. He’s also married with children and posting things like the previous picture about how all women after 27 are used up and no longer of any use to men

View attachment 6878761
My question to all men like this is what exactly should I do as a woman now that I am over that age? Should I just kill myself? Will that help me atone for the sin of being born in the mid 90s?

Damn I guess I wish I was an ugly balding retard, then I’d really contribute something to society!
A lot of guys like him seem to have a fantasy of their wives cheating on them with "Chad", it's really just them projecting their cuckold fantasies. As far as the women past their prime bit that's an excuse men make up so they can be in their 30s or 40s still trying to hook up girls 18 - 19 years old.
View attachment 6886700

Idek what to say anymore.
images (1).jpeg
 
Screenshot_20250122-095751.png

Age of consent is now officially 9 in Iraq and grown men can marry children, lock them in their windowless house where they aren't ever allowed to talk to anyone but their grown adult husband rapist ever again.

Reminder that there is not a single country in this world where women are doing this shit to men, but people still try to claim that "misandry is just as bad as misogyny! Pointing out bad things men do makes you just like an incel!".

Also reminder, if you are American:

Screenshot_20250122-100517.png

Your vice president follows Andrew Tate on Twitter. It's so fucking over.
 
A lot of guys like him seem to have a fantasy of their wives cheating on them with "Chad", it's really just them projecting their cuckold fantasies. As far as the women past their prime bit that's an excuse men make up so they can be in their 30s or 40s still trying to hook up girls 18 - 19 years old.

View attachment 6889670
They are men first, they will side with niggers and mudslime pedo traffickers before their own women.
 
They are men first, they will side with niggers and mudslime pedo traffickers before their own women.
Your vice president follows Andrew Tate on Twitter. It's so fucking over.
J.D. Vance and Andrew Tate are both in-the-closet, woman-hating faggots larping as religious, conservative, heterosexual men. No wonder they follow each other.
 
Twitter is a fucking cesspool, dudes have no idea what women are actually like. Porn has wrecked entire generations. The seething for white women especially is absurd. Seethe harder! You can't all have a "wifejak" to lord over and make feel like shit. It's ridiculous out there for non-leftist or even just racist/islamophobic white women.
 
The seething for white women especially is absurd. Seethe harder!
IDK why they're so focused on white women.

Like, they do know can date outside their race, right? According to their own dumb moid logic:
Screenshot_20250103_165521.jpg

So why not marry and impregnate an asian or black woman if they want "family life" so bad? According to their logic, their superior white sperm will correct the gene pool!

(stupid couch-fuckers)
 
A lot of guys like him seem to have a fantasy of their wives cheating on them with "Chad", it's really just them projecting their cuckold fantasies. As far as the women past their prime bit that's an excuse men make up so they can be in their 30s or 40s still trying to hook up girls 18 - 19 years old.

View attachment 6889670

IDK why they're so focused on white women.

Like, they do know can date outside their race, right? According to their own dumb moid logic:
View attachment 6890348

So why not marry and impregnate an asian or black woman if they want "family life" so bad? According to their logic, their superior white sperm will correct the gene pool!

(stupid couch-fuckers)
The black women don’t want them and they can’t afford a mail order bride
 
IDK why they're so focused on white women.

Like, they do know can date outside their race, right? According to their own dumb moid logic:
View attachment 6890348

So why not marry and impregnate an asian or black woman if they want "family life" so bad? According to their logic, their superior white sperm will correct the gene pool!

(stupid couch-fuckers)
Some of them aren't white so their chances of getting a white woman are even lower depending on what race they are. For example, pajeets.
 
So if an Indian woman goes and has a mixed baby with a white man, she is diluting the Indian race?

But if an Indian man has a baby with a white woman, he is diluting the white race?

Wait maybe its more like this:

If a white man has a baby with an Indian woman, he is diluting the Indian race?

Sorry I just have been trying to make sense of that post for awhile now...

It's like Moid Math. Apparently white men and Indian women have the same power whoa

Did I get it right? Can I get 100k upvotes on twitter now?
 
Twitter is a fucking cesspool, dudes have no idea what women are actually like. Porn has wrecked entire generations. The seething for white women especially is absurd. Seethe harder! You can't all have a "wifejak" to lord over and make feel like shit. It's ridiculous out there for non-leftist or even just racist/islamophobic white women.
I keep saying this theory, which isn't completely solidified, so-- rate me autistic. Twitter became WORSE not long after Musk took over, as he seemed to deliberately redirect his coddled favored influencers towards relentlessly attacking women.
Nearly all online platforms follow the same patterns nowadays with misogyny. It's a deliberate psyops that seems to be financially backed by many tech moguls and possibly government entities. I can only assume that because it is so relentless, and AI is also being used to reinforce it.

Big tech is dominated by white fags and trannies, especially fags. Much of tech was developed by special forces military types and Satanist faggots who have always hated women, who enjoy raping little girls, who enjoy ass sex, and who think the male is the embodiment of the perfect God-head, while the woman is "subhuman evil scum". Might makes right in their world... since women are physically smaller, and due to religious/social indoctrination, autism, these men already see us as inferior in every way. Tech faggots are often degenerates who can't get off to regular women, anyway. Vagina doesn't really appeal to them much, unless it's underage and hairless. Women are always seen as "necessary evil" to make sons and to produce more little girls to rape, but NOW men in tech see new possibilities on the horizon which will make women "unnecessary".. artificial wombs, fuck robots. They're preparing us for genocide. They see a "final solution to the woman problem" on the horizon, and they're preparing. Twitter is like any other platform: homo-supremacist tech-worshiping, "dark enlightenment", effective acceleration, moderated by blood thirsty misogynists... accelerating minds towards genocide of all females.

Faggot tech moguls want to enslave women, they want use our bodies for transhumanistic experiments, forced surrogacy, they want to use our bodies for organ harvesting (women are often coerced into organ harvesting and surrogacy in 3rd world countries, rich white tech elites want to use white women's flesh for that now as it's more genetically compatible for them), then they plan liquidate us for robotics. They plan to use us as fodder to keep the male rabble content, as men's personal punching bag and torture slaves, so men don't pay attention to their civil liberties being eroded by big tech. That is until they deem us a liability and as a "drain on natural resources" and once artificial wombs are perfected.

I argue they want to erase us as there are so many signs. There are NO places online where tranny Jannies and incels haven't been given the right to dox, stalk, report, silence, harass women online. NO online space is safe, literally. Effeminate influencer males post images of attractive women crying or talking, and invite all their followers to ridicule said female, no matter how attractive, and dehumanizing/ridiculing said female is a way to prove one isn't a "Simp", a way to join in with the "brotherhood of men". They assign repulsive adjectives to the female, no matter how attractive, "roast beef pussy! smells like a cum dumpster! her vagina is a graveyard!" .... programming men to see nothing but filth and to feel nothing but revulsion at the sight of an adult female. Then they conversely praise males with homoerotic enthusiasm. It's like a ritual that is played over and over and over again, thoroughly training men to see "women=zero".

Things used to be so much better for women online. Online used to be a great resource for those of us in abusive families, bad life situations.. a great resource for help. Men in tech have deliberately taken those resources away from women, male moderators have dismantled all those spaces, algorithms have buried all those spaces.. and they've successfully managed to infiltrate all women's groups with trannies and captured every NGO to either eradicate them, or to boot women out and refocus all women's groups on men's kink rights and tranny rights. Women have zero represtention anymore, BY DESIGN. We were erased online, we were erased in law, we were erased in language... this is in preparation for real life erasure from the human race. We are being targeted for genocide.

Tech moguls specifically want to turn men into woman-hating faggots who rely on other men and their computers for a coom. They want men to prefer: other men, trannies, sex robots, AI girlfriends, their computer screens. Tech moguls want to enforce transhumanism.. they want all children born from machines and raised by machines, without the influence of women. This brainwashing has been going on for a LONG time... porn initially hinted at it, as man RAN to the computer stores to buy access to 24/7 porn and gloated how they "didn't need women anymore!" I really think the deliberate programming started with the MLP/red pill shit, but I could be wrong. The predictive programming movies that focused on cyborgs like Bladerunner and Ghost in the Shell, Matrix, etc, might have been part of it, but maybe that was just coincidence. (On the other hand, men in Ancient Greece dreamt of replacing women with robots.) Something definitely changed for the worse around 2012, when I first started noticing men ganging up on me for making the most mundane statements about gender related issues, whereas in the past they would just ignore or disagree and move on. They started with the mass reporting, rape threats, spamming, non stop degrading comments, then ultimately censoring/banning women. They want to erase women online... except for pornography. Unlike in the past, I feel as if my speech is always controlled no matter where I go online. I can't expect to be allowed to defend my sex even on the most basic of premises: such as the right to NOT be forced to have children, or maintaining the right to vote, own property, or have a job. Men seem to only support the notion of total female slavery online, and any back-talk on that point by women is often met with swift brigading, censorship, silencing, accusations of insanity (the old crazy witch accusations are making a comeback). I also think this constant barrage of misogyny is also aimed at increasing the suicide rates of women, as well as the self-sterilization in terms of transitioning, and also by making us feel disillusioned/helpless (therefor easier for men to control).

Women also serve as convenient "weak targets" or scapegoats to distract men who otherwise feel powerless... Scapegoating is a common tool the ruling elite use to keep their dangerous minions content-- by redirecting focus on some "other" group of people, and assigning all social blame to that "other" scapegoat group. Tech moguls fear men, not women, so they desire to keep men content as much as they can. Tech moguls can easily take men's civil rights away from them, pulling the carpet out from right under their feet, all while distracting men with misogynistic propaganda, by redirecting all of men's anger, blame and hostility on women. Men worship tech, which gives them infinite video game, porn and virtual reality pleasures, as well as positive feedback. Even while tech takes their rights away, men will still worship tech as it gives men the dopamine hit, and tech will continually funnel men's anger towards women., programming men's brains to automatically blame women for all of their own failings and unhappiness in life.

Tech moguls and tech platforms blatantly brainwash men into despising women, brainwash men into blaming women for all the world's problems, encourage homicidal hatred of women. Like I said, tech moguls also plan on pushing transhumanism-- replacing women with machines for reproduction as well as for sex-- so they want to prime men for the time when the "Final solution for the woman problem" is implemented. I don't know how or when, but I believe it will happen.. maybe some kind of black swan event will occur... and men will suddenly go on a rampage, and torture/rape/enslave/slaughter us in a massive blood fest or witch hunt. (I think femicide HAS increased dramatically over the past few years, but the internet deliberately hides that data behind paywalls, the algorithms hide them, and those stories are buried.. when women about this phenomenon, men accuse them of being delusional... even though it's real.) I assume a black swan event will occur, or tech-induced civil unrest will reach a boiling point where all rule of law collapses, and a massive slaughter will occur...For the tech elite, a bloody rape-and slaughter rampage of women, by the male rabble, would be a "convenient way" to decrease population, help assuage men's bloodthirsty desires for revenge (and therefor redirect them AWAY from blaming their misfortunes on the tech elite), to keep men occupied and content with torture and rape, and once women are eliminated completely... Once women no longer exist, men will be fully pushed into using sex robots.... that will then surveil these men and report their wrong-think and "crimes" to the Borg.

The only men who will be allowed to reproduce will be elite men, or men with a high enough social credit score, which is what big tech wants. They want a world of carefully curated, carefully engineered, elite superhuman men and robots. Elites want to hoard all the resources for themselves, so if these resources become more and more scarce, they will find "reasons" to cull more and more of the male rabble. They will eventually cull all the "rabble men", but I don't know how that will play out exactly, perhaps with drones and pandemics.
 
Great choice in using JD Vance too, a known homosexual who openly follows those "roman towel boy" porn accounts on Twitter
I hate this dopey cherub faced nigger so much. I didnt vote for him (or anyone) but im not particularly furious or victimized about Trumps presidency specifically but the embarrassing males he has on his platform doing victory laps utterly enrages me.

Musk, Zuckerberg, this apple checked faggot, they all hate women because they are FUCKING GAAAAY. Im so bothered more people arent seeing this. And they're so mad at women for not making their peepees hard or whatever so they're going to convince all the other weakling failmales in the country to hate us too and see us as inferior... and for what?

I dont want to get pink triangled but it seriously puzzles me how much this homoerotic misogyny is being promoted and defended. It's gay. It's homosexual as fuck. But in the same breath as "muh roasties, muh wall, muh cock carousel, etc" they also start on the MUH BURFRAAAAATES". I dont. Fucking. Get. It. This is the demo of men who want us to squirt out a gorrilion babies but quite frankly a yuge swathe of this male populace is repulsive to but also repulsed ** by** irl women. It's AI moidslop tiitty robots all the way down their algorithmic feeds and an utterly limp noodle down their pants when confronted with a true and honest naked woman.

I'm losing track of my tangent (no bully, am retarded) but this alleged """feminization"""" of our poor widdle scrotes does not appear to me to be coming from women wanting them to clean their asses and parent their children. It's coming from this ultra gay class of elite fags who I would be surprised could get their dicks hard and inside a real vagina long enough to have sired any of their own dozen children naturally.

Idk fuck Musk and Zuckerberg and this chubby little goon. They are repulsive. As far as the footage of Vance wife smiling upon him lovingly: as I watched in real time all I thought was "wow, sis is doing her best vaseline forced beauty pageant grimace for this fat faced goober bitch, she is working hard". Nothing about that smile felt natural but men have 0% empathy skill points towards women so they could never read such truthful subtleties in our faces. Also they don't care.

Remember when girls on Twitter were really into #KillAllMen and it launched a tirade of anti misandry wailing? That was funny. Misandry isn't real :)
 
You can't all have a "wifejak" to lord over and make feel like shit. It's ridiculous out there for non-leftist or even just racist/islamophobic white women.
Lol remember when these fags unironically thought they ended the gender wars with the "wifejak" meme because they thought being condescending
and "benevolently" sexist by depicting women as idiotic comedy relief support characters was somehow endearing? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

And look how short that lasted because men that unironically thought they ended the gender wars with that are back to posting how
""white women "" ruin everything despite allegedly their guys winning.
Like, they do know can date outside their race, right? According to their own dumb moid logic:
Screenshot_20250103_165521.jpg
"So you agree? You think (white) men are defilers and diluters of other races?"
1737583036661.png
I love how mad they get when they're called rice cookers/oil drillers and are told they are defiling their own bloodlines,
it's not so fun being called a dirty race mixer when the tables are turned isn't it?

Amazing how much mental gymnastics they will perform justifying how defiling other people's races and genetics is a-okay. I guess defiling and disregarding an Asian or a black woman's genetics that were are fully crafted through years of evolution and those women possibly facing backlash from their own communities for having some whitey man have sex with them is justified because it makes their dicks twitch.
 
Great choice in using JD Vance too, a known homosexual who openly follows those "roman towel boy" porn accounts on Twitter.
I bring before you negligible TAX showing that all moids are homo for boys and only watch and applaud dune for that "twink" timothy:
Screen Shot 2025-01-22 at 23.08.06.png

I expect not even gratitude - since it's tax - but just want for a 'lil drip of knowledge about that J D Vance towel boy affair.

(yeah, I found the above by searching roman towel boy meme and figured I am late to the party... again. Nothing outright on vance tho...)
 
The link now, ironically, 404's.
September 27, 2021, 8:58 AM PST
Commentary: In a series of conversations, women explain how online trolls are demotivating them from talking tech.

Image: Fizkes/Shutterstock

If you've been to a virtual conference lately or hung out on Twitter, you might not realize what you're missing: women. Hopefully, the conference has a healthy roster of women speakers. And, just as hopefully, you follow women on Twitter. But in both places, you're almost certainly not getting a high-fidelity version of women's voices. Instead, you're almost certainly hearing or reading a dumbed-down version of what they could share if only we'd stop shouting them down.

In a series of conversations with a number of high-profile women in tech, each told me how online abuse has pushed them to retreat. They talk on Twitter, but rarely share insights into hard technical problems. As one senior developer said, "I'm not even able to share 1-2% of the depth of my knowledge on a medium like Twitter." Why? According to another, "It's such a headache dealing with the comments on technical tweets."

And so we get less technical insight from these and other women, effectively turning them into 1950s American housewives who can talk about their pets but not the distributed server farms they may build and manage. What is wrong with us?

"I can't do it anymore"​

The tech world, and critical communities therein like open source, has never done particularly well with diversity. According to US Bureau of Labor data, just 21.2% of professional developers are women. That's bad enough, but the relative dearth of women in tech is exacerbated by their relative silence.


Though I talked with several women in researching this article, each asked that I not reveal their names. Why? They already deal with near-constant abuse online. They wanted to highlight the problem without inviting further abuse.

SEE: Sexual Harassment Policy (TechRepublic Premium)

But my first conversation wasn't about online abuse at all. It was the public speaking experience for women.

"I can't do it anymore," she told me. "My confidence is not there, even though everyone tells me, 'Oh, it's fine.' The reason being is the comments, feedback scores are just horrible, absolutely horrible." It's very possible that her feedback scores are low because she might not be a good speaker, right? Sure, possibly. But when the feedback has more to do with her appearance ("she's hot", "she should lose weight," etc.) than what she said, it's hard to know how to gauge the value of the feedback. This is doubly true in her case when she's the subject matter expert who develops the content (talk track, trained other presenters, etc.), and then gets graded 20% points below men who delivered her content.

But, sure, maybe the problem is her. But then it's a little harder to explain why her scores jumped more than 10% points when she dressed less traditional, less feminine, if you will, and wore jeans and a t-shirt. Suddenly, she seemed smarter. Same content. Same delivery. Different attire. I get criticism on a regular basis for things I write or during public talks–exactly none of it relates to how well my jeans fit.

"When you are constantly getting these comments, you start to think, 'Okay. Maybe they are true,'" she told me. "You question yourself and you doubt yourself like, 'Maybe they're right. Maybe I'm not cut out for this.'" So women like her are speaking less or not at all.

This includes Twitter.

Silencing women one tweet at a time​

One woman with whom I spoke, a senior leader at one of the FAANG companies, related how women may start with a "honeymoon phase" on Twitter, but it invariably ends in divorce. Speaking of someone new to Twitter, she said:

She's in the honeymoon phase of Twitter. She's learning and everyone wants to help, to prove how smart they are, but once she's confident and has hard opinions, then the same people who were so eager to help, to teach her, will be the same ones to tear her down. I found that Twitter was much more peaceful when I kept my tech opinions to myself. I can barely post about management without having to mute the thread.
It's much the same for others and, perversely, even their demonstrable, superior expertise gets shouted down, as another senior developer related:

I don't want to talk about the nifty details online [of my work] because random people are trying to teach the basics to me because they don't understand how much depth I have about the subject already. Then I'm put in a position to [defend] myself or look stupid for not responding to some of the obviously basic questions. There are people who legit still can't believe some women can be the inventors of what they use day to day even though there are so many examples (current and historical) to refute that.
And so, she continued, "They think they are doing us a 'service' by schooling women." This despite those same women are building the services, or writing the books, upon which these same men depend.

SEE: Diversity and Inclusion Policy (TechRepublic)

For many of these women, they choose to stay on Twitter and other social platforms, but dumb down the topics they'll address publicly. I'd noticed that some of the women I most admire in tech rarely talk about tech. I'd thought that was personal preference but in these conversations, each told me it was a deliberate choice to mute their tech voice to make it bearable to be online.

We have few enough women voices in tech. We can't afford to silence them. It's not clear what the ideal solution to the problem is, but one thing we can all do: speak up when we see women getting shouted down, thereby creating safe places for women (and other underrepresented voices) to be heard.

Disclosure: I work for MongoDB but the views expressed herein are mine.
 
Nothing outright on vance tho...
Oh boy, do I LOVE that vance rabbit hole, why didn't anybody tell me sooner?
:story:
Crosslinks:
In a mock-up of Norman Rockwell’s famous painting “Freedom From Want,” JD Vance superimposed his face onto the matriarch serving up a Thanksgiving turkey to her family. A grinning Trump takes the place of the husband, who is standing behind a dress-clad Vance.
JD Vance once wrote that he 'convinced myself that I was gay' when he was a kid
trump's dear wife(male).jpg

“Some men are born with an almost fetishistic need to be ruled and this weirdo is high key one of them.”​

New Republic deputy editor Jason Linkins declared.​

Still looking for someone to pill me on that catamite twitter sitch.
 
Last edited:
Back