he just spewed out typical closeted homosexual arguments about how it's natural for straight men to have sex with other men under certain circumstances, and if they perform visual femininity well enough.
I will say this though, from the data I've seen: most men are spiritual bisexuals vs homosexuals (I know it's an accurate meme), because bisexuality is very common and is more common than exclusive homosexuality. The problem is, most men, especially black men, will not disclose that they've been on the down low and that can be a danger to women.
My black pill for male sexuality came from Randy Shilts when I read 'And the Band Played On'. Men will fuck anywhere, at any time, in any orifice, in any object, and will still come away with it with No Fucks Given. I've even noticed it in the erotic fiction I read - males can get away with anything, while female sexuality is shamed and the female characters used as a humiliation ritual for said 'pure gay love'.
What is the name of the book
Only if you are young , hot and thin enough. Otherwise you are just another danger hair psycho
Daniel Roche, The People of Paris. I have the English edition. All of his works are originally in French; he even has one on the Enlightenment in France, which I also have. He goes into the working conditions of men and women, birthrates, life expectancy, literacy rates among men and women etc. It's not very long, under 300 pages, but very informative. Well over 65% of Parisians, male and female, were literate, while the national average was under 5%.
As for your second point, men only love danger hairs if they have a big ass and tits.
Posting without comment.
View attachment 6978238
Sorry for double posting but I just noticed this post. Alexander the Great was not homosexual, despite everyone saying he was a massive faggot; at best, you could say he was bisexual - and he even got offended when someone offered him underage male prostitutes to fuck. This type of attitude may be venerated among 'alpha male' communities and they'll point to Roman Towel Boys, but the Romans themselves were actually rather conservative. They understood such unrestricted male sexuality posed a problem and told their men to keep it together. The Athenians were the major faggots, but even then you had treatises from Socrates talking about how evil pederasty was and Aristotle compared gay sex to 'eating dirt'. Aristotle, mind you, was also a classic misogynist, but it does reveal that even Greek thinkers were well aware of what homosexuality could entail if left unrestricted. In 'Against Timarchus', Aeschines talks about how Timarchus, a former gay prostitute (I am muddying the details, please forgive me) should not be allowed because he committed deeds that 'made him lower than beasts'. The entire treatise is basically him calling this guy a raging faggot who has no place in Athenian courts, which says a lot. Sparta was one of the few city states that did not approve of pederasty or homosexuality, but were fine if you did it in private (don't ask, don't tell, you know the rules).
Leather Apron Club and Metatron have discussed Roman sexuality and laws surrounding it, and most of them are around same sex male activity.
That amount of testosterone that causes other 'alpha' men to fuck others is a well known thing for men with too much testosterone. More testosterone, more aromatase, more estrogen, more 'I wanna fuck this guy', etc. There are some users here that said that tren does the same.
