- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
I think I'm beginning to hate men more and more.
Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread
- Thread starter Lidl Drip
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2023
What are our thoughts on this?
Bumped into this doomscrolling, and the headline "A woman is like a child" made me vomit on contact.
Bumped into this doomscrolling, and the headline "A woman is like a child" made me vomit on contact.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
I think its a sensationalist headline possibly on a junk news article site meant for outrage bait and doomscrolling. But I wouldn't be surprised if a politician said that.
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2023
I guess, but I've yet to meet a local Republican man that didn't hate the idea of a woman beyond a cum sponge. I feel compelled to believe this. Men are scum enough that they would.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
I think any moid involved with US politics would think of women as cum sponges, just look at the endless scandals from both parties. Progressive political types are just somewhat better at camoflauging. But if you ever see their relationships it makes you wonder if they even believe what they preach for, or if the faux feminism is really just for money and grifting. A moid desire to be involved and have control.
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2023
I forget, mainly because I've been out of touch with the thread, what's the stance on Trump at the moment, since Elon's his butt buddy now, and that fag has always been a waste of skin.
It feels like there's no winning.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
In our democracy there is no winning. What are you winning? What are non-consensual taxpayers winning? Only the politicians and plutocrat men "win". It's hard for women. I see financially poor single moms who are still struggling and not receiving the aid a lowlife would have in the bag. They have to go to the church to receive aid, necessities. The game is rigged. But at least we can still somewhat live a life compared to other countries.
If you have any fixes do suggest. Join a cause, who knows?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2023
I'm not satisfied with the idea that what's best for us is to roll over and take it.
Why have we set ourselves up for failure and then resign to defeat when there's no good way out? This is stupid.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2016
Does anyone else feel Hoe_Math is a potential lolcow? The guy has been having more and more nonstop skitzo meltdowns over women on xitter.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
This is the Man-Hate Thread, not the Unified Thoughts For Hive-Minded Retards Thread.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2022
I bring you more retarded male weeb clownery
"If Japan is unsafe then how come drunk women can sleep on the streets
with no issues, checkmate Japhobes
"
Except somebody has pointed that this video was taken from a fetish channel focused
on recording drunk women sleeping on the street and being in compromised
positions.
Screenshots from the post
Editing because they got community noted
where it was revealed this is was a
fetish video.
This also reminds me when a woman few months ago made a post about reminiscing about her teen crush who wasn't able to confess her feelings to and making a meal he liked for her children she had with another man, the same men called her a psychopath, accused her of thinking about this guy while her husband fucks her and sympathizing with the husband even when she revealed him and her got divorced because he cheated to her, which prompted to say that she deserved getting cheated on. But sure, they're the more romantic sex that's why they can't stop thinking about black dicks and cuckoldry while married men are the biggest consumers of porn and OF.
is regurgitating 4chan posts and opinions
"If Japan is unsafe then how come drunk women can sleep on the streets
with no issues, checkmate Japhobes
"Except somebody has pointed that this video was taken from a fetish channel focused
on recording drunk women sleeping on the street and being in compromised
positions.
Screenshots from the post
Editing because they got community noted
where it was revealed this is was a
fetish video.
It's funny how men use this post as proof that "Men are the more romantic sex" (ignore the fact the stick their dicks into McChickens) but when you go through that post you'll see plenty of them responding "The girl I liked in school is now a single mom she deserved it because she didn't choose to take my failsperm", truly the romantics.
This also reminds me when a woman few months ago made a post about reminiscing about her teen crush who wasn't able to confess her feelings to and making a meal he liked for her children she had with another man, the same men called her a psychopath, accused her of thinking about this guy while her husband fucks her and sympathizing with the husband even when she revealed him and her got divorced because he cheated to her, which prompted to say that she deserved getting cheated on. But sure, they're the more romantic sex that's why they can't stop thinking about black dicks and cuckoldry while married men are the biggest consumers of porn and OF.
He is weird as fuck but I don't expect anything from Poolish clown whose personality
is regurgitating 4chan posts and opinions
Last edited:
Lonely Millennial Cat
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2023
All of you should be monitoring South Korea's politics closely. This country provides an undeniably bleak warning about the near future of all developed countries around the globe. The conflict/gender divide between women and right-wing moids in SK is a horrid microcosm of societal and political trends emerging in tandem around us. Whichever side you think will win doesn't give you the luxury to ignore the increasingly hostile world we are moving forward.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
Sure is interesting how the "protector and provider" sex is always ready to defend and make excuses for rapists and murderers (like in that case where the husband murdered his wife) and rarely ever calls out other men for misogyny, are totally silent when men make "jokes" about rape and pedophilia but they are ALWAYS ready to police a man who doesn't fall in line with their misogyny and dogpile him for being a "white knight" or "simp" if he treats women with kindness.
Golden Apple
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2024
Saw this on twitter.
Ok, dude. Sure. You don't need meds to help you be gay.
But you do.
You fags take prep and a COCK tail of expensive aids meds to stay alive from you bug chasing. God knows how many of you fags have Hepatitis ABCDEFG from how gross you are. You're not some monogamous little church boys who don't sleep with any hole and pass your infections on to women.
But go on. Go be gay without any medications. I'll wait. We'll watch you all die off in a generation. What we should have let happen in the first place, so you fags could learn a fucking lesson.
Give me a damn break.
If a lady fag has said this, I'd nod and move on. But aw hell naw turd burgler didn't just say whaat. All the worldwide money spent on aids, new meds for aids, resistant aids, preventing aids, preventing kids from getting aids, keeping aids out of the blood supply, keeping aids infected fags alive and this is how he separates himself from the trannies?
LOL. LMAO, even.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
I remember when they complained about Don't Ask, Don't Tell policies, because "coming out" was a necessary part of the gay identity.View attachment 7036935
Saw this on twitter.
Ok, dude. Sure. You don't need meds to help you be gay.
But you do.
You fags take prep and a COCK tail of expensive aids meds to stay alive from you bug chasing. God knows how many of you fags have Hepatitis ABCDEFG from how gross you are. You're not some monogamous little church boys who don't sleep with any hole and pass your infections on to women.
But go on. Go be gay without any medications. I'll wait. We'll watch you all die off in a generation. What we should have let happen in the first place, so you fags could learn a fucking lesson.
Give me a damn break.
If a lady fag has said this, I'd nod and move on. But aw hell naw turd burgler didn't just say whaat. All the worldwide money spent on aids, new meds for aids, resistant aids, preventing aids, preventing kids from getting aids, keeping aids out of the blood supply, keeping aids infected fags alive and this is how he separates himself from the trannies?
LOL. LMAO, even.
I'd be on board with a return to DADT. Just say the word, homos.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
What a whiny little faggot. Yet another "I'm not like the other faggots!" type lmao. He seems as delusional as AGP trannies, and queer+'s who only live for attention whoring.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2024
View attachment 7036935
Saw this on twitter.
Ok, dude. Sure. You don't need meds to help you be gay.
But you do.
You fags take prep and a COCK tail of expensive aids meds to stay alive from you bug chasing. God knows how many of you fags have Hepatitis ABCDEFG from how gross you are. You're not some monogamous little church boys who don't sleep with any hole and pass your infections on to women.
But go on. Go be gay without any medications. I'll wait. We'll watch you all die off in a generation. What we should have let happen in the first place, so you fags could learn a fucking lesson.
Give me a damn break.
If a lady fag has said this, I'd nod and move on. But aw hell naw turd burgler didn't just say whaat. All the worldwide money spent on aids, new meds for aids, resistant aids, preventing aids, preventing kids from getting aids, keeping aids out of the blood supply, keeping aids infected fags alive and this is how he separates himself from the trannies?
LOL. LMAO, even.
I recall some local faggot activists whining last year, when they wanted to remove a rule (or more like an advice) that prevents them from donating blood. There isn't even anything about homosexuality. They can look at men and think of them as much as they want, and even touch them. The wording is a bit different in every hospital, but it says those who had anal sex, are banned from donation for certain time. Or somewhere it's worded as ''practicing risky sex''. It's not like that if you are fag and they learn it somehow, they will check your past plans in your little faggy foreskin-bound diary or something. It's just up to everyone's responsibility (the blood is checked anyway, infected units are disposed of).
And they want it gone, because it's HOMOPHOBIC and STIGMATIZING and them donating blood is not unsafe anymore, allegedly.
It's not surprising, that in the 80's peak epidemy it was the very same whining. When the doctors realized that even people who never had sex, but received infected blood and got AIDS, they advised the fag community that ''Look, there are some signs the unknown disease that kills your community en masse might be bloodborne, so apart from not fucking ass for some time, you might consider to stop donating blood for now too. Please?'' And their reaction? That's STIGMA and HOMOPHOBIA.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
Imagine being so fucking PATHETIC. Being a man truly is living a half life, constantly handicapped by your lust, a slave to your own cock. A sex crazed creature who is always just one bad penis decision away from ruining their entire life cause they got horny. If men had any self awareness the suicide rates would be way higher.
The only reason some men now want to ban porn is because they realize how much it controls them, everywhere they look they are reminded that they are weak.
Lonely Millennial Cat
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2023
Golden Apple
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2024
After years of protests, FDA makes blood donations easier for men who have sex with men
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. is moving to ease restrictions on blood donations from gay and bisexual men and other groups that traditionally face higher risks of HIV.
The Food and Drug Administration on Friday announced draft guidelines that would do away with the current three-month abstinence requirement for donations from men who have sex with men. Instead, potential donors would be screened with a questionnaire that evaluates their individual risks for HIV based on sexual behavior, recent partners and other factors.
If finalized, the shift would be the latest FDA move to broaden donor eligibility, with the potential to boost the U.S. blood supply.
Gay rights groups have long opposed blanket restrictions on who can give blood, saying they discriminate against the LGBTQ community. Medical societies including the American Medical Association have also said such exclusions are unnecessary given advances in technology to test blood for infectious diseases.
“Current and former blood donation policies made unfounded assumptions about gay and bisexual men and really entangled individuals’ identity with their likelihood of having HIV,” * said Sarah Warbelow of the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBTQ advocacy group.
The U.S. and many other countries started blocking blood donations from gay and bisexual men during the early 1980’s AIDS epidemic, aiming to prevent the spread of HIV through the blood supply.
In 2015, the FDA dropped the lifetime ban and replaced it with a one-year abstinence requirement. Then in 2020, the agency shortened the abstinence period to three months, after donations plummeted during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Regulators said there has been no negative impact on the blood supply as a results of those changes.
The FDA sets requirements and procedures for blood banks throughout the U.S. All potential donors answer questions about their sexual history, drug use and any recent tattoos or piercing, among other factors that can contribute to the spread of blood-borne infections. Donated blood is then tested for HIV, hepatitis C, syphilis and other infectious diseases.
Under the new questionnaire, men who have sex with men will be asked about new or multiple partners in the last three months. Those who answer affirmatively to either question and also report having anal sex would be barred from donating until a later date. The policy would also apply to women who have sex with gay or bisexual men.
The policy mirrors those used in Canada and the U.K.
The FDA based its latest proposal on a recent study o f 1,600 gay and bisexual men. The FDA-funded research compared the effectiveness of a detailed, personalized questionnaire on sexual behavior to the current time-based abstinence rules.
It will take several months for blood banks to make the changes, according to Cliff Numark, an executive with Vitalant, a blood center that participated in the study. The changes will require new questionnaires, training for staff and updating computer software.
The Red Cross said it supports the FDA changes but added that it’s too early to know if they will result in more blood donations.
Lukas Pietrzak of Washington D.C., said he eagerly volunteered for the FDA study. He credits emergency blood transfusions with saving his father’s life after a cycling accident in 1991.
Pietrzak donated blood in high school but became ineligible after becoming sexually active as a gay man.
“Until I fully came out to my friends, I had to skirt around why I never went to blood drives with them,” says Pietrzak, 26, who now works for the federal government.
When there are calls for blood donations “now we’re able to be part of that,” Pietrzak said.
*what assumptions? That they're fags and act like fags? It's well documented they have more partners than heterosexual people.
The Food and Drug Administration on Friday announced draft guidelines that would do away with the current three-month abstinence requirement for donations from men who have sex with men. Instead, potential donors would be screened with a questionnaire that evaluates their individual risks for HIV based on sexual behavior, recent partners and other factors.
If finalized, the shift would be the latest FDA move to broaden donor eligibility, with the potential to boost the U.S. blood supply.
Gay rights groups have long opposed blanket restrictions on who can give blood, saying they discriminate against the LGBTQ community. Medical societies including the American Medical Association have also said such exclusions are unnecessary given advances in technology to test blood for infectious diseases.
“Current and former blood donation policies made unfounded assumptions about gay and bisexual men and really entangled individuals’ identity with their likelihood of having HIV,” * said Sarah Warbelow of the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBTQ advocacy group.
The U.S. and many other countries started blocking blood donations from gay and bisexual men during the early 1980’s AIDS epidemic, aiming to prevent the spread of HIV through the blood supply.
In 2015, the FDA dropped the lifetime ban and replaced it with a one-year abstinence requirement. Then in 2020, the agency shortened the abstinence period to three months, after donations plummeted during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Regulators said there has been no negative impact on the blood supply as a results of those changes.
The FDA sets requirements and procedures for blood banks throughout the U.S. All potential donors answer questions about their sexual history, drug use and any recent tattoos or piercing, among other factors that can contribute to the spread of blood-borne infections. Donated blood is then tested for HIV, hepatitis C, syphilis and other infectious diseases.
Under the new questionnaire, men who have sex with men will be asked about new or multiple partners in the last three months. Those who answer affirmatively to either question and also report having anal sex would be barred from donating until a later date. The policy would also apply to women who have sex with gay or bisexual men.
The policy mirrors those used in Canada and the U.K.
The FDA based its latest proposal on a recent study o f 1,600 gay and bisexual men. The FDA-funded research compared the effectiveness of a detailed, personalized questionnaire on sexual behavior to the current time-based abstinence rules.
It will take several months for blood banks to make the changes, according to Cliff Numark, an executive with Vitalant, a blood center that participated in the study. The changes will require new questionnaires, training for staff and updating computer software.
The Red Cross said it supports the FDA changes but added that it’s too early to know if they will result in more blood donations.
Lukas Pietrzak of Washington D.C., said he eagerly volunteered for the FDA study. He credits emergency blood transfusions with saving his father’s life after a cycling accident in 1991.
Pietrzak donated blood in high school but became ineligible after becoming sexually active as a gay man.
“Until I fully came out to my friends, I had to skirt around why I never went to blood drives with them,” says Pietrzak, 26, who now works for the federal government.
When there are calls for blood donations “now we’re able to be part of that,” Pietrzak said.
*what assumptions? That they're fags and act like fags? It's well documented they have more partners than heterosexual people.
“Until I fully came out to my friends, I had to skirt around why I never went to blood drives with them.”
When there are calls for blood donations “now we’re able to be part of that,” Pietrzak said.
poor faggot. Social embarrassment is so. so, uncomfortable. better protest to give someone a fag disease so you can go to the blood donor party.
When this was happening I heard that even if there's a mistake and someone gets le aids while getting a donation it would be ok, because aids was no longer a death sentence. As if taking aids meds for the rest of your life was a comfortable experience or that fags live into really old age.
I love that the "party of science" denies science so disease ridden fags can add to the blood supply. EW.