- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
because woman are literally wired to think differently than man. Especially in term of value system. Both sexes literally value things differently. For example here's how people value themselves by sexes. Male tend to value themselves by how much they provide. Women sets their own value and expect things based on their perceived own value. "I'm worth X so I should do or get Y" for woman as opposed to man "I need to do or earn Y to be worth X". Theres a reason why some fields are entirely dominated by a certain gender.First TSR now this. Why do women in charge always try to destroy D&D?
Maybe. They clearly are trying assert ownership of the D20 RPG System. The problem is its been so openly used by everyone for so many different projects that a serious Public Domain challenge could be made.No. Not another one. I literally made friends from this! Look it may be their copyright, but it was used for decades, you can't tell me there ain't some monopoly argument to be had- its like patenting water and suing every soda maker.
It's about commercial projects that are based on OGL-licensed rules.If only there was a way to distribute information that violated copyrights...
Simple: you aren't niggers.They're not going to be happy until they've scrubbed every shred of what's decent about nerd culture off the face of the Earth.
What did we do to get on the powers that be's shitlist so bad?
Or the second.This totally didn't backfire the first time they did this.
WOTC can eat shit, but if I HAVE to go back to D&D, it's 3.5. Fite me.AD&D is all you need. Faggots of the Coast can't bother you there.
The nerds that know what they're doing will just go back as underground as we need to. We've done it before, we'll do it again.lmao get fricked, nerds!
The open game license is not about playing the game, it's about developing the game.I heard about this from a group of lgbt2aqshxbn++squared people I know irl who are deep into this shit. I don't get it. If you're upset, just go and follow another set of make-believe rules? It's not hard to make your own stuff - that's the point of TTRPGs. Is this like going to Square Enix to ask for permission before developing a JRPG? I'm not sure if I understand this right (or care). I just want to understand why I am laughing at someone freaking out over nothing. Sometimes it makes it more funny.
This. The people running this shit clearly don't realize that the true beating heart and soul of D&D isn't Hasbro or WOTC. It's never been those two, and it's never been the people who run official D&D events. If it was, the RPGA would have been something other than a giant fucking excuse for every grognard to attend events at and take the piss out of people who take themselves entirely too seriously.The nerds that know what they're doing will just go back as underground as we need to. We've done it before, we'll do it again.
Three things.They're not going to be happy until they've scrubbed every shred of what's decent about nerd culture off the face of the Earth.
What did we do to get on the powers that be's shitlist so bad?
Thing is, the new rules are so overtly hostile to creators that if the issue is forced, most small-timers would just quit outright. This isn’t even a virtue-signaling thing, it’s basic cost-benefit: why would you spend time, effort and money making content for D&D when WOTC can waltz in at any time and shut you down without even giving a reason, while stealing your hard work for themselves? For a lot of people who are doing this as a hobby/side gig in their free time, it’s simply not worth the trouble.The open game license is not about playing the game, it's about developing the game.
Someone who's enough of a fan of dnd to make their own stuff is going to want to do dnd stuff.
Unlike shit like star trek, this has been possible in dnd because of the old license, it basically made large parts of dnd free to use for your own products.
The result became a huge ecosystem of third party dnd derivatives.
If this new license goes trough - if big market places for rpg content adopts it and enough players are fine with it - making your own dnd can become very restrictive.
The old license can't actually be retracted, but if all the big market places adopt the new one and all the customers only hang around those places wtf are you going to do? Hawk your wares on your own website? Lol.
Wizard putting their lawyers on this point that they have the power to modify & delete the OGL because the language used on it is loose enough. Most people agree that this is a court issue.Wasn't it already covered in the other thread that the baseline legal structure of this whole situation states that the original OGL cannot be revoked, only a new OGL can be created; and that it cannot re-contextualize its preceding license in order for anyone who isn't happy with the changes to just revert back to how things were?
Correct, on the cuck thing & most people, are saying if you update your current work when the new ogl comes into effect you are moved from the original OGL to OGL 1.1.The only way WOTC cashes out is with the cucks who sign the OGL 1.1 or want to do anything for D&D One. MAYBE 5E, but who the fuck wants to develop anything for that anymore?
Because it's going to be selectively enforced.Thing is, the new rules are so overtly hostile to creators that if the issue is forced, most small-timers would just quit outright. This isn’t even a virtue-signaling thing, it’s basic cost-benefit: why would you spend time, effort and money making content for D&D when WOTC can waltz in at any time and shut you down without even giving a reason, while stealing your hard work for themselves? For a lot of people who are doing this as a hobby/side gig in their free time, it’s simply not worth the trouble.