Science One in four who had Pfizer Covid jabs experienced unintended immune response - lol

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1701905648772.png

More than a quarter of people injected with mRNA Covid jabs suffered an unintended immune response created by a glitch in the way the vaccine was read by the body, a study has found.

No adverse effects were created by the error, data show, but Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid “spike”, which mimics infection and leads to antibody production.

mRNA jabs, such as the ones created by Moderna and Pfizer, use a string of genetic material to tell the body to create a specific protein that safely imitates an infection.

Research in the field, spanning decades, had been slow work. It often stalled because RNA itself is often attacked by the body as a foreign invader.

But in 2023, the Nobel Prize for Medicine went to the pair of scientists who had spent years working to fix the problem. It was done by taking one of the RNA bases, uridine, and swapping in a very similar synthetic alternative.

This breakthrough allowed scientists to create proteins in the body without the immune system attacking the jab.

It allows for quick and precise vaccines that are highly effective and was the backbone of the Covid vaccine response.

Not a perfect fit​

It was thought the minor tweak to uridine caused no problems in cells, but a team of researchers at the University of Cambridge’s Medical Research Council (MRC) Toxicology Unit have now found when this partially synthetic code is read, the protein-making machine in the body sometimes struggles with the uridine analogues.

Because it is not a perfect fit for what is expected, there can be a momentary pause which causes the process to stutter and a letter in the code can get skipped, much like a bike slipping a gear.

This process, called frameshifting, throws out the way the code is interpreted as it relies on groups of three bases, known as codons, being read in the right order.

This issue, caused by the jab’s code, throws the process completely out of sync and the entire subsequent code becomes garbled.

In the case of the Covid jabs, the end result is a nonsensical and harmless protein, the team found, which the body attacks and leads to an immune system flare-up. The new study, published in Nature, found this occurred in around 25-30 per cent of people.

Rogue protein fear​

The vaccine is read well enough to create the strong protection against the coronavirus, the scientists say, but the frameshifting issue creates what was, until now, an unknown off-target effect.

The code relating to the Covid vaccines was harmless and no issues were created. However the team say that subsequent mRNA vaccines used for other diseases or infections could, in theory, lead to viable proteins being created that are active in the body.

In this scenario not only is the vaccine not making the right protein, it could lead to a rogue protein being produced.

There is no evidence of this occurring in the Covid jabs, the authors stress, and they say any trials on other mRNA therapeutics would detect any such problems in early stages.

Dr James Thaventhiran, senior author of the report, said: “Research has shown beyond doubt that mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 is safe. Billions of doses of the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines have been safely delivered, saving lives worldwide.”

The authors also found that there is an easy way to eradicate the frameshifting events which relies on changing the code of the mRNA drug to minimise the use of the problematic pseudo-uridine.

Replacing it with a natural base that when read as a trio still makes the correct amino acid is enough to stop the unwanted skips and therefore improve safety without sacrificing efficacy.

These findings were shared with medicines regulator MHRA around a year ago, the scientists say, and updated vaccines that use the improved form of mRNA are in the works for cancer jabs, and other therapeutics.

‘Revolutionary technology’​

“This technology is amazing and it’s going to be revolutionary as a new medicine platform for all sorts of things, but we’ve just made it a whole lot safer going forward,” Professor Anne Willis, co-senior study author and director of the MRC Toxicology Unit told reporters.

“Ribosomes are somehow sensing the modified RNAs, but the Covid vaccines are very, very safe and very, very efficacious.

“But there are decoding issues with this technology that can cause stalling and frameshifting and we can get cellular immunity to these peptides after vaccination.”

However, she adds it is very exciting that there is a way to fix the issue, which “massively de-risks this platform going forward”.

https://news.yahoo.com/more-one-four-had-mrna-171724613.html (Archive)
 
There's still those "The Narrative™ says" message things on jab-related YT vids.
It's only getting worse, not better. With the rise of AI LLMs, they now have a perfect excuse to clamp down on free speech online, because now, in picture-perfect Black Mirror fashion, they can allege that anything they don't like is a "sophisticated foreign influence operation using human-like bots to attack the cognitive infrastructure of the West and undermine democracy".

Another thing I should mention is that the NIH, DOD, and USAID were originally trying to do all this shady GOF/DURC research in the US, and they led a massive expansion of BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs throughout the early 2000s. When Edward Hammond and the Sunshine Project and other watchdog groups drew attention to the proliferation of biolabs in the US, to the point that there was a congressional hearing about it, these GOF/DURC virologist fuckers realized that everything done in the US was subject to FOIA, and after years and years of rebuffing FOIA requests by giving people completely redacted blank sheets of paper in response, they understood that this was unsustainable and that what they were doing (illegal bioweapon research) would come to the attention of the public eventually. In 2007, right after a hearing where Edward Hammond squared off against biolab apologist Gigi Gronvall, Nathan Wolfe founded Global Viral, and the NIH, DOD, and USAID/CIA outsourced all of it to foreign biolabs where it would be immune to FOIA disclosure.

These motherfuckers know exactly what they did.
 
I believe that the left loves science so much because following the science has always been seen as the smart lifestyle. Science has always been presented as true facts and not theories like religious dogma has. And because religion has always been associated with the right, being a stupid religious nut has always been associated with the right, and being a science believer has always been associated with being nonreligious and the left. This is why science is so appealing to leftists. But much of the science that is presented to the general public pushes its own narratives based on who funds it- but is never questioned by its readers because it’s still pushed as science. Inevitability, the readers don’t know that they are being brainwashed just as much as the religious right that they hate so much because they still look up to their coveted science magazines and TV shows.
To be a leftist requires a degree of mental incompetence and/or profound mental illness. Leftists must instinctively know this because they have a single-minded obsession with appearing to be more intelligent than they are. They always gravitate toward anything that can give them (undeserved) status and social capital and, hilariously, shit up that very thing that attracted them in the first place. Garbage like big bang theory was huge with dimwits because they saw it as a 'smart' show and that by liking it and the artificial nerd culture it pushed, they believed it demonstrated that they were actually 'smart' which in itself betrays their profound stupidity.

The few actually intelligent leftists are liberal in the classical sense and thus have nothing in common with progressives, or are system shills on the payroll like that retarded faggot chomsky who is being trotted out every once in a while to push some gay narrative to NYT's fart huffer readership.

The funniest thing about religion is that some of the most intelligent people in human history were believers. Religion is the perfect encapsulation of the midwit meme. Total retards just follow scripture and can lead a reasonably good life. Big brains appreciate the philosophical and methaphysical intricacies of the text and have the capacity to understand that as a species we understand nothing, and stare in wonderment at God's creation. Meanwhile midwit subhumans repeat jewish slogans and think they're being edgy and smart whereas all theya re really doing is obliterating the already terrible signal to noise ratio on the capital-i Internet
 
Last edited:
To be a leftist requires a degree of mental incompetence and/or profound mental illness. Leftists must instinctively know this because they have a single-minded obsession with appearing to be more intelligent than they are. They always gravitate toward anything that can give them (undeserved) status and social capital
reminds me of Patrick S Tomlinson where despite his 1.7 GPA he thinks he has a 140 IQ or whatever.
 
Yahoo News? That's a well-known disinformation site. I'm surprised this site is even allowed on the internet since it blasphemes the Name of Science like this.
 
Back