Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I’ve seen people mention this, and it’s crossed my mind as an idea myself, but idk if it would be possible to actually make a license that prevents the cretinous rot that infects OSS
The troons are using licenses as an attack vector, there is zero chance that if a license to a desirable target was adversarial that they would respect it.

If they received any significant pushback, they’d create some kind of stink about license legality that would lead to the usual suspects throwing their weight around to force a handful of licenses or even trannyCoCs down the throats of the broader community.

I’m extremely blackpilled. It almost seems like ARR is the only way to actually have some measure of control over how projects end up.
 
Children playing pretend, avoiding the reality that you don't need anyone's permission to do anything and this fork is a giant online LARP. Despite all this squabbling I still have no idea what they're attempting to do to the engine, if anything. If Bioblaze wants to add a feature, why doesn't he just do it? Cart before the horse.

The reality of working alone, quietly, silently, on a game engine is far less romantic in practice than the idea of big a giant poser shouting about open source in chatrooms.

Edit: here's your new engine dev bro, lmao.
View attachment 6511287
It is definitely a LARP and both projects now look like they are more about playing culture war faggotry than about actual engineering.

One thing that is always a red-flag to me is this pervasive "we have a discord channel", so what and why and who fucking care about a discord channel?
Why does a development project and engineers need discord? That is fucking retarded.
You have a mailing list and all communications go over email to the mailing list. Anything else is retarded.
 
It is definitely a LARP and both projects now look like they are more about playing culture war faggotry than about actual engineering.

One thing that is always a red-flag to me is this pervasive "we have a discord channel", so what and why and who fucking care about a discord channel?
Why does a development project and engineers need discord? That is fucking retarded.
You have a mailing list and all communications go over email to the mailing list. Anything else is retarded.
Fucking this.

The discord is more or less a requirement at this point for many projects, since official communications is moving there.

Need support? Discord.
Implement a new feature? Discord.
Bug reports? Discord.

The chronic online fags and troons knows this is the best way to groom their audiences. After all, what is an open source project without a dedicated porn channel?
 
Well that didn't last long maybe the next fork will finally change the readme before it implodes
The people currently publicising their own forks of Godot are probably former contributors who smelt blood on the water and tried to gain internet relevance out of biting the original's neck, I don't expect them to hold up until they are able to better the engine, you know how these people act.
The only case where I see any Godot fork work is if a team works on the background sufficiently until they can release it to the public.
 
After all, what is an open source project without a dedicated porn channel?
It's not just about the porn with these discord servers. Though admittedly, quite a lot of the time it is.

Besides that though, it offers people (i use that word extremely loosely as i consider them barely human) a place to exert power and moderate, group-up and try force decisions (etc). It's just another avenue for trying to mould a community and push an agenda. Remember, you cannot speak against them or its hate speech. You cannot disagree or you're a nazi.
You'll quickly see that the fags permanently online in these servers are here because they can't do the thing that's actually important in open source - write code.

Programmers socks without the programmer. And with porn for some reason.
 
Whenever I've used Godot I've always used the C# binding (which is pretty shit) so I can't speak to the quality of GDscript, but the decision to not only make your own engine, but also make you own programming language and your own IDE seems to me like a major case of misprioritization. I understand it's probably a fun project if you like to tinker with that kind of thing, but if the goal is to make an easy to use game engine I think it's frankly a retarded quest to embark on, just like it's retarded they've decided to build their own shitty physics engine. It makes the community extremely reliant on a few core people to maintain it though which I think is what they really want (because they are those core people).
If I recall correctly from their home page they really wanted to put emphasis into Godot being "all-in-one" software that has "all the software you need for game development", specifically targeting portable platforms, mainly mobile, they even had a big banner with an image of the editor being displayed on a device's screen. Because for some fucking reason, someone's totes going to make a video game in their phone.
The fact that there's nobody within their project or anybody with a strong voice that can reach far and wide, to at least to put out some criticism about this retarded decision baffles me, but its all part of their positive toxicity, can't complain about bad management because that'd be heckin' problematic.
About GDscript, from what I remember its reasoning was somewhat similar: we must do a dialect of python because python-as-is is not good enough, but using some other kind of language would be a bad idea because then we'd have to deal with the decisions of other companies and we must have everything in-house.

They are just retarded. Everyone's fucking retarded. The engine is built on retardation. Any fork that doesn't go out of their way and just throws the whole house off the window will go nowhere as bad design is just embedded within Godot's core.
 
I’ve seen people mention this, and it’s crossed my mind as an idea myself, but idk if it would be possible to actually make a license that prevents the cretinous rot that infects OSS
The troons are using licenses as an attack vector, there is zero chance that if a license to a desirable target was adversarial that they would respect it.

If they received any significant pushback, they’d create some kind of stink about license legality that would lead to the usual suspects throwing their weight around to force a handful of licenses or even trannyCoCs down the throats of the broader community.

I’m extremely blackpilled. It almost seems like ARR is the only way to actually have some measure of control over how projects end up.
A majority of the contributors to F/OSS, especially the "exciting" kind dealing with current year library bloat in flavor of the year language, are going to be terminally online, degenerate freaks who treat code repositories and the adjacent Discord as their "home". When those are the people contributing code to your project, what control are you talking about? Licenses and codes-of-whatever are more suggestions, considering how international the software development community is. Once the code is out there, it's very easy to rehost it in a jurisdiction you won't be able to touch without serious fuck-you money as a last resort.

It's kind of blackpilling in a general decay kind of sense, but it will implode with time. Meanwhile, aside from said library bloat and that one Ukrainian guy putting code checks against Russian IPs, there haven't been any actively detrimental effects from using pozzed software. As an example to do with Godot, nothing prevents you from making a game in Godot mocking their tranny devs. Most of these kinds of problems affect project leaders and their leading developers. If you don't want to rely on alphabet people programs too much, just use boring software that doesn't plug into the whole "interconnected with Google Bullshit, deploys to a gorillion platforms" paradigm.
 
matt mullenweg is losing his mind
This is a weird case. I watched this short interview with him:
At first I was like "you cannot choose to selectively enforce your trademark" but later he goes on to talk about "WP Plans" and how the company that owns all those shit hosts (Bluehost/Gator/etc.) does pay for the trademark.

Towards the end me mentions Cambridge Analytica and Palentier (Peter Thiel's domestic spy company). WP Engine IS backed by a big asset management firm. Silver Lake is shady as fuck (on the level of State St, Vanguard, Blackrock). I don't think he's done will at portraying his side, but I do think WP Engine has a lot of successful negative PR going too.

I don't have a lot of love for Wrodpress/Automattic. They've censored blogs they don't agree with. But I can also understand how WP Engine is a legitimate threat, the same way Elastic saw AWS, causing their license change (departure from open source) and the Open Search fork (by Amazon)
 
I can also understand how WP Engine is a legitimate threat, the same way Elastic saw AWS, causing their license change (departure from open source) and the Open Search fork (by Amazon)
Too bad Matt is a complete retard and does the stupidest shit in the world.

Open source projects should all have a license stipulation: if your company makes more than a million dollars a year, you must negotiate a license agreement for offering or using the software. I love the idea of open source, but people have to eat. Most cool open source projects aren't made by microsoft employees in their spare open source work time
 
but people have to eat.
When i have come across this sort of shit flinging it is usually from people who are die hard Stallman types. But go even more insane than him. Computer code must always be free you should not be able to make a living off it types. They are basically the art fags of the computer industry. They have this batshit idea that taking a wage or donation or any sort of payment is selling out to the system mannnnnnnnn! They seem to care more and get hyper autistic about the licence the code is under than if the code actually fucking works in the first place.
It always leads to them having projects that are clones of actual useful programs, that have half the features, shit UI , bugs up the ass and a snarky smug faggot camping the github comments coping and seething with excuses as to why his program sucks ass. With gems like "at least it don't use your data".
 
When i have come across this sort of shit flinging it is usually from people who are die hard Stallman types. But go even more insane than him. Computer code must always be free you should not be able to make a living off it types. They are basically the art fags of the computer industry. They have this batshit idea that taking a wage or donation or any sort of payment is selling out to the system mannnnnnnnn! They seem to care more and get hyper autistic about the licence the code is under than if the code actually fucking works in the first place.
It always leads to them having projects that are clones of actual useful programs, that have half the features, shit UI , bugs up the ass and a snarky smug faggot camping the github comments coping and seething with excuses as to why his program sucks ass. With gems like "at least it don't use your data".
This has been my experience with lots of people on libera IRC. Especially #linux. They are huge FOSS zealots who think all forms of capitalism are the devil and nobody should ever want money for any reason. It's like they'd rather live in the woods under a rock and be poor, and they want everyone else to be poor too.

Not only that but they're always huge fucking dicks to everyone, especially anyone who dares ask a question. They have cosmically inflated egos and god complexes and always speak in absolutes like they are the masters of the universe about every topic in existence. At least Khaytsus (Walter Francis) and Disconsented (James Kerr) have been removed as mods, but only after akik autistically ban-evaded dozens of times spamming logs of their abuse to everyone he could.
 
This has been my experience with lots of people on libera IRC. Especially #linux. They are huge FOSS zealots who think all forms of capitalism are the devil and nobody should ever want money for any reason. It's like they'd rather live in the woods under a rock and be poor, and they want everyone else to be poor too.

Not only that but they're always huge fucking dicks to everyone, especially anyone who dares ask a question. They have cosmically inflated egos and god complexes and always speak in absolutes like they are the masters of the universe about every topic in existence. At least Khaytsus (Walter Francis) and Disconsented (James Kerr) have been removed as mods, but only after akik autistically ban-evaded dozens of times spamming logs of their abuse to everyone he could.
It gets really annoying when you have to sit there and listen to them talk like they are starting a revolution or some shit. FUK DA CORPOs gets really annoying to listen too when you have enough of these people around. Because nothing at all gets done. It is just endless rebel posting like they are bargain bin Johnny Silverhands. You never see them working on their projects at all. Extreme Linux and FOSS activists are always very petty. It is like they masturbate to Bill Gates getting a pie in the face. They always quote that dead slogan "Embrace, extend, extinguish", like Microsoft still pulls any of the shit it did in the 90s. If anything right now, Microsoft is very friendly to FOSS and open source and usually keeps out of Linux's way. They could fuck Linux gaming in the ass right now by changing DX calls and breaking the shit out of DXVK. Yet they haven't, Even after the success of the Steam Deck.
But they are eternal boogeyman to a FOSStard.
Like the examples you pointed out FOSS extremists just get more and more obnoxious as fuck.
 
My only beef on licenses is when someone starts arguing GPL and copyleft friends are not open and free while plugging BSD or CDDL. These people are happy to have corpos buck break them, screaming about how Linux will become obsolete and replaced by BSD because corpos are scared of viral licenses. I doubt Apple would ever decide to let you rebuild their latest BSD based kernel for your own server.
Somehow not being able to relicense and only release the binaries is an infringement on "developer freedom". The elitist pricks can't imagine users can also be developers, fixing their bugs for their own use.
In an ideal world, there would be no need for license autism, because everyone could just change what they have on their PCs or whatever hardware they own, however they want.
 
That's not because they're friendly to open source emulators, they have to stay compatible with a lot more than just Steam Deck.
That gives the FOSS fags even less of an excuse bro. Because it ruins their victim complex over how DA CORPOS ARE CUMMIN. If Microsoft are bound by such other commitments, why do they think that they are some sort of last line of defence at a siege?
It is annoying to have to constantly listen to them get up on their cross and be martyrs for a cause that does not exist.
 
I have to admit that when it first released, I did try it and it was quite interesting to see what it able to do on ARM Macs. Granted with the retardation the dev is using with the vtuber shtick, and the wedding of the vtube avatar with whatever else bullshit; has made me want to avoid it like the plague. I do remember hearing about other ARM Mac ports too, but it appears that they unfortunately might be related to the Asahi project.
Any word if any of these other projects are completely independent of the vtuber infested one?
1728898193651.png
1728898509827.png
1728898531357.png
 
They always quote that dead slogan "Embrace, extend, extinguish", like Microsoft still pulls any of the shit it did in the 90s.
That's because Microsoft lost most opportunities to do this, largely to Google. It still happily pulls its usual faggot shit wherever it can, like with VS Code extensions. Microsoft "loves" FOSS because it loves free labor and it blows my mind that people fall for this.
 
That's because Microsoft lost most opportunities to do this, largely to Google. It still happily pulls its usual faggot shit wherever it can, like with VS Code extensions. Microsoft "loves" FOSS because it loves free labor and it blows my mind that people fall for this.
And also because they were allegedly terrified of a second antitrust in the 2000's despite courtroom tech literacy being poor and them only recieving a slap on the wrist with a few incidental blows due to stuff getting unsealed and un-NDA'd.
 
They always quote that dead slogan "Embrace, extend, extinguish", like Microsoft still pulls any of the shit it did in the 90s. If anything right now, Microsoft is very friendly to FOSS and open source and usually keeps out of Linux's way.

Just because they are not actively fucking Linux desktop end users directly, that does not mean they are being "friendly" to open source. They acquired GitHub, started contributing to a bunch of open source projects, spun a few out with CLAs, probably contributed to "CLAs" being a thing... I think they want to *own* open source.

The main beef with Linux they had is that it ate a bit of Windows' market share. Now, I don't think they care about that at all. They're a services company. A "source available" type model may them fine, but they will definitely still view smaller, less bloated community projects as competition.

FOSS zealots definitely get on their soapbox about dumb shit, but this is one instance where I actually more or less agree with them.
 
Back