Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It seems like there was a bit of internal bickering going on at GitLab over this, as some dumb broad tried to inject SJW-style "we can refuse to serve customers who offend us" nonsense into the document yesterday.

Someone with a larger brain overruled this and largely reverted that nonsense and added text further cementing the notion that the company has no business judging its customers or foisting its values upon them. There were subsequent revisions of less significance, but I thought it was noteworthy that someone actually tried to walk this back only to be smacked back down and overruled again.
 
It seems like there was a bit of internal bickering going on at GitLab over this, as some dumb broad tried to inject SJW-style "we can refuse to serve customers who offend us" nonsense into the document yesterday.

Someone with a larger brain overruled this and largely reverted that nonsense and added text further cementing the notion that the company has no business judging its customers or foisting its values upon them. There were subsequent revisions of less significance, but I thought it was noteworthy that someone actually tried to walk this back only to be smacked back down and overruled again.
Gitlab is open source so idk just fork it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moocow
It seems like there was a bit of internal bickering going on at GitLab over this, as some dumb broad tried to inject SJW-style "we can refuse to serve customers who offend us" nonsense into the document yesterday.

Someone with a larger brain overruled this and largely reverted that nonsense and added text further cementing the notion that the company has no business judging its customers or foisting its values upon them. There were subsequent revisions of less significance, but I thought it was noteworthy that someone actually tried to walk this back only to be smacked back down and overruled again.

What does it take for these stupid troon fucks to understand that the whole concept of open source is antithetical to closing it off for no reason every time some hypersensitive deviant pervert gets a case of the vapors over god knows what?
 
What does it take for these stupid troon fucks to understand that the whole concept of open source is antithetical to closing it off for no reason every time some hypersensitive deviant pervert gets a case of the vapors over god knows what?
They don't care, they were only ever there in order to destroy.
 
That Register headline. How long has it been taken over by screeching lunatics? Do they even realize how absolutely insane that headline is, and how it looks like fanatical insanity?
That's a hit piece headline. I'm saying 50/50 it was on a personal whim by the writer and on it being paid content by someone at github. maybe both.
They don't care, they were only ever there in order to destroy.
They're there to assimilate and make ever apparatus subservient to their ideology. If it doesn't further their ideology first, before its very own business needs, it has to go. They're parasites. a politburo.
It seems like there was a bit of internal bickering going on at GitLab over this, as some dumb broad tried to inject SJW-style "we can refuse to serve customers who offend us" nonsense into the document yesterday.
Gentle reminder to never hire wamen
 
That's a hit piece headline. I'm saying 50/50 it was on a personal whim by the writer and on it being paid content by someone at github. maybe both.

They're there to assimilate and make ever apparatus subservient to their ideology. If it doesn't further their ideology first, before its very own business needs, it has to go. They're parasites. a politburo.

Gentle reminder to never hire wamen
I used to be a fairly religious reader of The Register, and the headline is probably just the author's view, not a hired hit piece. Their quality tends to vary a lot exactly because they let their writers pretty much do whatever.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Shoggoth
What does it take for these stupid troon fucks to understand that the whole concept of open source is antithetical to closing it off for no reason every time some hypersensitive deviant pervert gets a case of the vapors over god knows what?
Troons’ favorite thing is manipulating people into giving them control over others. Trooning out to begin with was a way of demanding control over others. If a community makes control over others difficult, that community must be altered.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: moocow
It seems like there was a bit of internal bickering going on at GitLab over this, as some dumb broad tried to inject SJW-style "we can refuse to serve customers who offend us" nonsense into the document yesterday.

Someone with a larger brain overruled this and largely reverted that nonsense and added text further cementing the notion that the company has no business judging its customers or foisting its values upon them. There were subsequent revisions of less significance, but I thought it was noteworthy that someone actually tried to walk this back only to be smacked back down and overruled again.
Oh, fuck. I feel like this is something I may actually need to run up the chain of command at work. We are one of GitLab's bigger clients, and this sort of thing carries real risk. Thank you for your service, @moocow.
 
The Register went a bit looney when they opened their San Francisco office. Then Lester died and any sanity they had left died with him. It's just a other trendy San Fran tech rag now, filled with diversity hires, troons and woketards who take every opportunity to call everyone they don't like a nazi.
 
Uncle Bob comes out against cancel culture, gets piled on as expected

https://mobile.twitter.com/unclebobmartin/status/1186365513968050176 | https://archive.is/PlfLn
https://mobile.twitter.com/unclebobmartin/status/1186603658001223684 | https://archive.is/x3drz
https://mobile.twitter.com/unclebobmartin/status/1186985896521994241 | https://archive.is/KRSEf

The cancel culture is in high dudgeon today. All the smug virtue signalers enjoying a bloody good pile-on. It is that culture, that toxic ideology, that in my estimation deserves cancellation far more than their victims do.

You’d think that twitter culture would have learned from the Covington event. A nasty mob, ignoring the facts, spurred only by appearances, swarmed a group of innocent kids and hurt them. Mobs are bad. Always. Don’t join them. Never pile on.

My recent tweet about the “cancel culture” elicited the response I expected. In that tweet I neither attacked nor defended any individual. Rather, I called out a behavior that in my opinion is toxic. Specifically the twitter “pile-on”.
 

I think more and more "woke" people are realizing cancel culture is a tumor upon society, and I think this is a good thing.

Not giving attention to bigoted shitheads is for the best, you don't have to cancel them because they say something mean. Even if it's something you said years ago (such as the Kevin Hart homophobic joke controversy from 2009), doesn't mean you can't be forgiven for it. People mature and learn over time.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CIA Nigger
just remember FOSS is only free if your time is worthless.
Isummit_2008%2C_Japan%2C_free_beer_crop.png


cGxg6TY.jpg
 
Back