Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
And at that point he can be replaced with a decent RSS feed. Well, I guess depends if you're a spastic zoomer or not, the idea of reading text to get your news might be highly unappealing for some, so a funky narrator with soyjak thumbnails is needed.
I don't have a bone to pick in this debate, but reading vs listening is quite different. I can't really focus on brushing my teeth, taking a shower, taking out the trash, cleaning around the house, etc and reading, but I can listen.
 
Making fun of you really. I come to this site to watch retard cows blame everyone but themselves and here you are doing just that.
Yeah I don't know about that, I think I made myself very clear about my specific OpenWRT issue, how I couldn't be humanely expected to predict this specific scenario happening, how no matter what I did the obstacle was the software, how there was no guarantee a config backup wouldn't fail in the same way, how all of it keeps derailing from the core argument of Mental Outlaw being a retard, but of course it will always be me who's at fault.

It's not OpenWRT developers that's at fault, it's me who's at fault for not making a backup.
It's not Apple's fault that iPhone 4 is badly designed, it's your fault for holding it wrong.
It's not Liz Fong-Jones who's at fault for raping someone, there was a consent accident.

You know, I think I'm starting to notice a common trait between FOSS evangelists and rapist troons. Makes a lot of sense why they infested FOSS so easily if this blame shifting mentality is so widespread and accepted in that community.
 
You know, I think I'm starting to notice a common trait between FOSS evangelists
Not the troons, not the corporate meddlers, it's you, the community that blames FOSS' issues on anything but the FOSS.
1712702799078.png
 
>I can confidently say that code quality should be the least of your concerns when it comes to your FOSS project.
Everyone saying FOSS sucks because @Slav Power has a skill issue: take a look at the above. It's not Slav Power having a skill issue or not that's making FOSS suck. It is because faggots are actively working to purge anyone who might care about craftsmanship more than backstabby high school social games.

I swear, you'd think they'd never read The Hacker's Manifesto. Or if they had, they failed to grok it, and are at best superficially trying to cop what they think is the same attitude.

A retarded faggot said:
I can confidently say that code quality should be the least of your concerns when it comes to your FOSS project.
The Mentor said:
I made a discovery today. I found a computer. Wait a second, this is
cool. It does what I want it to do. If it makes a mistake, it's because
I screwed up. Not because it doesn't like me...
A retarded faggot said:
No matter how talented you are as a contributor/developer/maintainer...
The Mentor said:
or feels threatened by me...
A retarded faggot said:
...if you are obnoxious and have no incentive to improve yourself, especially by openly admitting that you do not care about people's feelings...
The Mentor said:
or thinks I'm a smart ass...
 
Retarded take of the day: (https://social.treehouse.systems/@TheEvilSkeleton/112241679352421223, https://archive.is/c1hQL)

View attachment 5892747
>I can confidently say that code quality should be the least of your concerns when it comes to your FOSS project.

Now that I have experience operating and managing nuclear power plants, I can confidently say that safe operation should be the least of your concerns when it comes to your power plant. The most important quality is who you are as a person, and how the power plant is presented.

No matter how safe your power plant is and how talented you are as a operator/technician/executive, if you are obnoxious and have no incentive to improve yourself, especially by openly admitting that you do not care about other people's feelings, don't expect to be welcome in most communities.

Your talent in safety does not translate into team spirit or yourself. Having a welcoming place that attracts new employees (or event current ones) is much healthier. At worst, it will gradually improve the entire plant, regardless of any aspect of the complex (safety, power generation, not being on fire, etc.)
 
Retarded take of the day: (https://social.treehouse.systems/@TheEvilSkeleton/112241679352421223, https://archive.is/c1hQL)

View attachment 5892747
>I can confidently say that code quality should be the least of your concerns when it comes to your FOSS project.
Of course it's on treehouse.systems, the instance ran by lolcows like Ariadne Connill and Hector Martin.

They say this, but they never consistently follow this standard. Exhibit A: Daniel Micay. The man's a schitzo who constantly attacks others at the detriment to his own project, GrapheneOS. But do these woketards ever caution others to be wary of GrapheneOS, even if it's still one of the most secure OSes despite Micay's lolcowdom? No.

Rules for thee, not for me.
 
Retarded take of the day: (https://social.treehouse.systems/@TheEvilSkeleton/112241679352421223, https://archive.is/c1hQL)

View attachment 5892747
>I can confidently say that code quality should be the least of your concerns when it comes to your FOSS project.
I know its bullshit. Pretty much every Foss project basically has 1 developer.
Besides that even in team projects the end result is usually a toxic hierarchy where people get autistic about their part of the codebase(see kernel).

This is true of all industries. Open source and Proprietary

In fact this is vaxry's commit history. The Hyprland project has a developer group of 2-3 people at best.
Screenshot_20240410-072242_Firefox.png
 
Last edited:
I know its bullshit. Pretty much every Foss project basically has 1 developer.
Besides that even in team projects the end result is usually a toxic hierarchy where people get autistic about their part of the codebase(see kernel).

This is true of all industries. Open source and FOSS.

In fact this is vaxry's commit history. The Hyprland project has a developer group of 2-3 people at best.
View attachment 5893365
FOSS/open source is so impenetrable egotistical and insular within their own approved people why would anyone else bother? I dont mean jia tan - although notice without heavy social engineering that it wouldn't have been possible. The number of reasonable prs submitted by people to fix a bug or add a feature they need is inevitably ignored (or better rejected for reasons having nothing to do with quality, performance, security or best practices).

Like nigga, at this point I am 100% guaranteed to fork your code and maintain it myself with whatever additional bits I need and give precisely zero fucks. Because that's what always happens no matter who or what tried to do it any other way.. even better are maintainers who make their repos look better on npm stats by not accepting issue reports from anyone not on their patreon. Not just leaving it unfixed,, actively closing bug reports.. pay for the privilege and make sure nobody else will find it.

OSS community not be massive egotistical assholes of the narcissist variety? Challenge level impossible.

I mean it *is* why troons abound and the notable women are the DEI cOC or whatever evangelists who can't code their way out of a paper bag. They fit right the fuck in.

Eta: spelling and grammar but also *fuck redhat* for this which is also fuck *ibm*

And also I wanna write a BNU license. Its like mit or apache except "but not you" specifically to redhat/ibm/google/meta/woke tard mega tech. If I ever release foss I suppose I've just doxxed myself because I'm fucking doing it.
 
Retarded take of the day: (https://social.treehouse.systems/@TheEvilSkeleton/112241679352421223, https://archive.is/c1hQL)

View attachment 5892747
>I can confidently say that code quality should be the least of your concerns when it comes to your FOSS project.
The amounts of steps backwards we as a society take is astounding.

In places like the soviet union and other dictatorships it was more important to have the right opinion than to be skilled at what you do. And the result? It sucked. It's the one facet of capitalism that conquered the world: Your opinion (and the people you're buddy with) don't matter. The quality of your work matters anf if you deliver, you will succeed.

I guess the open source community (not all open source) will turn into these nepotistic, corrupt places with shitty quality, where comrades get promotions for saying the right things.
 
Ok good art, when does this get posted to the soyjak booru?
How about +HarryPotterIsRad. It is a lot less spicy but it is still enough to prevent corporate adoption I would think.
Why are you getting booed, you're right. It'd be better if devs used something subtle to scare off trannies than something that could prolly get their project banned from github like the +NIGGER license.

+HarryPotterIsRad is a great idea. Perfect to piss off trannies and also github safe.
 
Ok good art, when does this get posted to the soyjak booru?

Why are you getting booed, you're right. It'd be better if devs used something subtle to scare off trannies than something that could prolly get their project banned from github like the +NIGGER license.

+HarryPotterIsRad is a great idea. Perfect to piss off trannies and also github safe.
-41 looks like it would work better for me.
 
Back