Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
There is literally nothing wrong with IPv6 as a protocol.

The problems have been with its slow rate of adoption, retarded shit like DHCPv6, and people who have been used to using NAT as a firewall. If IPv6 was what we always had and someone suggested IPv4 as an improvement, they'd get laughed at.

IPv6 also has some minor improvements over IPv4 when it comes to fragmentation rules and checksumming.
 
sex haver said:
If this post (Archive) doesn't convince you that sticking to leftist ideals is a pointless exercise in frustration, I don't know what will.

Luigi Mangione literally threw his entire life away to execute a CEO of a health insurance company, and that still isn't good enough for them because he DARED to not be openly "trans-inclusive", whatever the fuck that means.
Click to expand...
Let me tap the sign:

what leftism really is.jpg
 
I'm gonna be honest, my biggest problem with ipv6 is the addresses are too long to manually remember and type in and would require me to always copy and paste.
 
SleeplessEcho said:
NAT introduces state into a protocol that was very explicitly designed to be stateless for performance and scalability reasons (and because frankly it's the only sane design that would work). NAT turns a network of peers into a network of providers and consumers; of privileged, content distributors and passive NPC consumers.
Click to expand...
This is a very insightful point. I never thought about it this way before but this is true.
 
Concentrate Juice said:
The DoD currently has 218,103,782 unique IPv4 addresses allocated to them, thirteen /8s, one of which they got from boeing like 15 years ago. Kinda weird considering they do all their ops using AWS anyways. Disconnect the DoD and give the ranges to Josh.
Click to expand...
Anti-trust lawsuit on DoD when?
 
Another Char Clone said:
The alternative being CGNAT pisses me off. You can't even use wireguard anymore even if know your ip address. On the other hand NAT 66 exists, so you can still do that for your own network if you want to via dhcpv6.
Click to expand...
There's a dirty trick you can do with Wiregaurd using a public server as a mediator. I've used this, and it does work, but performance isn't great.

 
SleeplessEcho said:
NAT is a horrible but necessary kludge in a world where the amount of network-connected devices exploded beyond anyone's wildest dreams at the time IP was designed. It makes zero fucking sense from a network design point of view. It is only tolerated/understood by today's engineers because they've been (forcefully) exposed to it, from day zero, their entire fucking careers and that's the way their brains are wired to think now. I guarantee you that if you grabbed a completely novice, unprejudiced (but capable) student and gave them a formal course in network protocols and network design the way it was meant to be, and then introduced the concept of NAT to them, they'd vomit all over your face and ask why the fuck you'd want to do that.
Click to expand...
What are your thoughts on mesh networks like Netsukuku?
 
On the topic of that Hexbear forum, turns out that not only do they require you to answer questions, but also pledge your loyalty to the libtard cause.
1734150672760.png
 
Danann said:
On the topic of that Hexbear forum, turns out that not only do they require you to answer questions, but also pledge your loyalty to the libtard cause.
View attachment 6749755
Click to expand...
I love these fuckin guys, like someone trying to infiltrate to fuck with and troll them wouldn't already know their views well enough to mimic them.
 
Sloth Revolution said:
Also regarding that ban in the mod log, the mod added "that shit is inspiring, you fucking nerd"
that looks like it could be a kid standing right next to a dead body
what a bunch of retards
Click to expand...
Leftists are OK with horrifying violence as long as their side is doing it. 'Violence is bad' is an unacceptable opinion to a leftist. At least the right doesn't claim to be peace-loving in the way that these retards do.
 
AnOminous said:
I love these fuckin guys, like someone trying to infiltrate to fuck with and troll them wouldn't already know their views well enough to mimic them.
Click to expand...
I guarantee you there are no trolls there. They ban even true believers. No troll would write a 2-page essay as penance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom