- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
There is literally nothing wrong with IPv6 as a protocol.
The problems have been with its slow rate of adoption, retarded shit like DHCPv6, and people who have been used to using NAT as a firewall. If IPv6 was what we always had and someone suggested IPv4 as an improvement, they'd get laughed at.
IPv6 also has some minor improvements over IPv4 when it comes to fragmentation rules and checksumming.
The problems have been with its slow rate of adoption, retarded shit like DHCPv6, and people who have been used to using NAT as a firewall. If IPv6 was what we always had and someone suggested IPv4 as an improvement, they'd get laughed at.
IPv6 also has some minor improvements over IPv4 when it comes to fragmentation rules and checksumming.