I'm reasonably sure that it's a troll. No Jeet would use a shit smear as an example of a bad thing, and no quotes from customers would be that blunt. And it says point blank a lot of things that would normally be hidden in corpospeak. I don't have an example to upload to see what happens, however. It's possible that creator put in the same amount of work into it as if it was a legitimate project, in which case it'll try to do what it claims but very, very badly.
From the link, and I quote:
Seems legit to me. In fact, why don't we make a LinkedIn post sharing this wonderful resource so all of our fellow esteemed Open Source developers from Canonical and Red Hat can make use of it? I'm sure they'd be blown away by the results!
This is a non-sequitur. Unless you're assuming the LLM writes entirely perfect code it will have CVEs. I don't think they're saying that (although they are trying to imply it) but instead saying because the code is new and completely untested it won't trigger any CVE scanners. Think about that. The benefit is removal of the ability to check if your code is secure easily.
RIPgrep is written in Rust, so that means that it's faster, safer, and bug-free.
Their wording is actually correct. The slop output, being in principle new code, is not audited at all (and pravtically un-auditable in a reasonable time frame), so it will not have any CVEs assigned to it. A CVE is assigned when someone finds a possible vulnerability, and being a huge code base generated entirely by AI it's likely full of subtle security bugs.
they are pretty much betting the farm on security through obscurity.
whenever I look at the list of data breaches I forget what year it is, because it feels like we are back in the early 2000s
the github repos are getting DMCA'd but people are using LLMs to rewrite it in rust/python to get around it.
i see you
I wouldn't be surprised if some burocratic faggot decided that untested code with 0 CVE's looks better than one that had plenty but is tested because it looks better on paper if you are retarded
Is there any stable link leading to the entire leaked codebase? Useful or not, I want it in my collection.crossposting this here because not many people check the claude thread and some people may find it interesting:
the github repos are getting DMCA'd but people are using LLMs to rewrite it in rust/python to get around it.
i see you
btw it's currently almost 2am the next day in London.
I know that. That's what I'm saying. "We used code with no known CVEs so we are not liable" is a feature. Then you never need to patch your shit and if someone did report a vulnerability, just have claude remake that section hey presto, back to 0 CVEs. All the data breaches that happen... already happen so no one will give a fuck about those.
Dude I saw this in a quoted post so the image isn't there and thought it was legitimate for a second. "But how they have so much hand tuned assembly?!". You have no idea how relieved I am it's merely the start of April.
It's real. Primagen covered it last week, he actually paid and used the service to test it out.
