Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

I saw some discussion about the Gleam language, which is another in the Erlang/Elixir family (running on Beam), so I checked out their home page
FML, and here I thought that there's finally a readable language that runs on BEAM (Erlang/Elixir is painful to go through). Anyone want to step up to make a chud fork that will inevitably be abandoned in a few weeks?
 
No matter what you think about Bryan Lunduke, his GitHub repo SoftwarePoliticsTracker (which, I should note, is pretty much just reposting links to his Xitter as proof of all the transgressions of the usual suspects) caused some faggots to meltdown in issues and I think the cope and seethe is pretty funny.
Screenshot 2026-04-07 at 20-17-12 Pretend to be a serious person · Issue #200 · BryanLunduke_S...pngScreenshot 2026-04-07 at 20-21-24 Twitter is not a reliable source for political views · Issue...pngScreenshot 2026-04-07 at 20-22-27 You do know everything is 'Woke' in FOSS right · Issue #195 ...png

Screenshot 2026-04-07 at 20-23-07 M4m thread · Issue #191 · BryanLunduke_SoftwarePoliticsTracker.pngScreenshot 2026-04-07 at 20-25-54 You do realize the very concept of FOSS software is woke rig...pngScreenshot 2026-04-07 at 20-26-24 Add da kirk to non-woke · Issue #186 · BryanLunduke_Software...png

In particular this freak spammed issues with its tranny fetishes, for example:
Screenshot 2026-04-07 at 20-34-48 did you know it takes you 10 seconds to make a new issue · I...png
 
Dumb communist faggots don't even understand their own propaganda. "Capitalism" being the private ownership of the means of production, has nothing to do with open source projects existing. They're completely different spheres of ideas, and don't conflict at all.
 
Dumb communist faggots don't even understand their own propaganda. "Capitalism" being the private ownership of the means of production, has nothing to do with open source projects existing. They're completely different spheres of ideas, and don't conflict at all.
To add to that
A developer using their own mind, body, and hardware to create or contribute something out of their own volition and unilaterally decide what to do with the product of their work

I don't even need to invoke praxeology to point out that profit doesn't need to be financial, and psychic profits motivate the vast majority of human actions
 
Dumb communist faggots don't even understand their own propaganda. "Capitalism" being the private ownership of the means of production, has nothing to do with open source projects existing. They're completely different spheres of ideas, and don't conflict at all.
You don't get it, idiot child:
FOSS = Free and Open Source Software, free as in beer, meaning it is free. I like free stuff. Free stuff means communism. Communism is therefor good. If I were to pay for software, it would be literal dictatorship capitalism. Also, free as in freedom, meaning I can spam furry porn wherever I want, censoring me would therefor be a form of censorship and dictator capitalism.

Since you're too much of a dumbfuck to understand, here's a tl;dr:
Let me post furry porn.
 
FML, and here I thought that there's finally a readable language that runs on BEAM (Erlang/Elixir is painful to go through). Anyone want to step up to make a chud fork that will inevitably be abandoned in a few weeks?
What's wrong with elixir? The author is a bit derp but I'm not sure why adding a giant rust dependency tree would be better.
 
For some reason I've never understood this phrase and I've never bothered learning it.
Imagine a beer someone gave you, "gratis" to use a Latinism. Free of charge. That's the meaning. The comparison is "free as in speech", which is that you are free to say what's on your mind, "libre" to use a Latinism. "Free"/libre in the ideal sense, as there are really no jurisdictions where you actually have freedom to eg. yell "fire" in a crowded theater or tell someone to assassinate a politician. The whole point is to differentiate the amphiboly of the word "free", as English sucks at making this distinction, whereas other languages are not so impoverished.
 
Yum!
FSF has an article that explains the differences. I really prefer the "freedom" analogy over "free speech", more direct.
I prefer to refer to the lot of them as Free as in Freeloaders, because that more accurately describes their particular brand of hobosexuality.
 
I prefer to refer to the lot of them as Free as in Freeloaders, because that more accurately describes their particular brand of hobosexuality.
You sound like a Microsoft employee. They're looking for cheap work force, maybe you should apply.
 
Long be the days where us spergs would claim "Code is poetry!" from the top of our autistic lungs.

1775594341193.png

Code:
#include <iostream>

#define TRUE  (1==1)
#define FALSE (!TRUE)
#define isCodingFunAndHelpfull TRUE
#define isPoliticsInvolved isCodingFunAndHelpfull

int main() {
     printf("Is coding fun and helpfull? %s", isPoliticsInvolved ? "Yes it is!" : "No it's not! Sometimes there are consent accidents, where we try to push our beliefs into you");
    return 0;
}
 
No matter what you think about Bryan Lunduke, his GitHub repo SoftwarePoliticsTracker (which, I should note, is pretty much just reposting links to his Xitter as proof of all the transgressions of the usual suspects) caused some faggots to meltdown in issues and I think the cope and seethe is pretty funny.
He's the most clueless motherfucker alive in the chud software space and making trannies seethe is his only redeeming quality. Were the troon mob capable of not taking the bait at every offense he would be a complete nobody, but here we are so I might as well laugh.

I would be more concerned about him making alt-tech look like a clueless chud mob, but until commie faggots actually attempt doing the communism (which requires constructively working together with people they don't like, so it will never happen), their seething is inconsequential so who cares lmao.
 
Dumb communist faggots don't even understand their own propaganda. "Capitalism" being the private ownership of the means of production, has nothing to do with open source projects existing. They're completely different spheres of ideas, and don't conflict at all.
Here is what one of the grandfathers of open source and the co-founder of the open source initiative has to say about open source and communism:
For those that dont know he's a member of the libertarian party and a gun rights advocate and he has said some things these communists hate, such as:
In 2015, Raymond accused the Ada Initiative and other women in tech groups of attempting to entrap male open source leaders and accuse them of rape, saying "Try to avoid even being alone, ever, because there is a chance that a 'women in tech' advocacy group is going to try to collect your scalp"
Raymond has claimed that "Gays experimented with unfettered promiscuity in the 1970s and got AIDS as a consequence", and that "Police who react to a random black male behaving suspiciously who might be in the critical age range as though he is a near-imminent lethal threat, are being rational, not racist"
 
Raymond has claimed that "Gays experimented with unfettered promiscuity in the 1970s and got AIDS as a consequence", and that "Police who react to a random black male behaving suspiciously who might be in the critical age range as though he is a near-imminent lethal threat, are being rational, not racist"
These were the average opinions of technology autists before The Institutions started making them transgender. BSD had at least a dozen Hitler quotes in their fortune datfiles.
 
Back
Top Bottom