Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

Cloudflare reverse engineered Wordpress using Claude Code. Its marketed as "more secure" (uses more RAM), but the main goal was obviously to strip the GPL, since their new version (100% TypeScript) is MIT licenced rather than GPL. Emdash is the future, there is simply no other safe way to build a website!
View attachment 8832439
View attachment 8832484
I'm not a fan of WordPress, but I'm even less a fan of Cloudflare.
:story:. matt (wordpress ceo) is going to lose his FUCKING MIND.
 
Last edited:
Why anyone would need more than a f'ing SSG for a f'ing blog is beyond me. Hell, you could host a blog in Gopher.
SSG+VCS even allows shared blogging. You just need the user to be a bit more proficient in using the SSG and knowing how to use VCS.
Probably more than 50% of the sites I visit could be static but are dynamic bloat.
 
Cloudflare reverse engineered Wordpress using Claude Code. Its marketed as "more secure" (uses more RAM), but the main goal was obviously to strip the GPL, since their new version (100% TypeScript) is MIT licenced rather than GPL. Emdash is the future, there is simply no other safe way to build a website!
View attachment 8832439
View attachment 8832484
I'm not a fan of WordPress, but I'm even less a fan of Cloudflare.
"Spiritual successor" seems to be the most recent word co-opted by TroonHat et al. when referencing laundered software. Here's an interesting thought experiment: consider any software description that uses the phrase "spiritual successor" or ones in a similar vein, then check the bio of the author. 9/10 times it will either be a tranny, pederast or corposcum employee. It may very well be as big of a warning sign as the Contributor Covenant CoC. Its the new unholy trinity: MIT + CoC + Spiritual Successor.

Edit: Forgot "safe" and "secure". These are meaningless buzzwords used to convince laypeople that laundering good software is le heckin based and secure and protects from imminent threats to human life! Thank you Matthew Prince for totally not being a tranny cock gobbling niggerhell dweller!
 
Last edited:
If Microsoft sues, it would set really bad precedents for Copilot and they are fucking DESPERATE with it right now.
That's the whole gag.
aotku4.jpg
 
Cloudflare reverse engineered Wordpress using Claude Code. Its marketed as "more secure" (uses more RAM), but the main goal was obviously to strip the GPL, since their new version (100% TypeScript) is MIT licenced rather than GPL. Emdash is the future, there is simply no other safe way to build a website!
View attachment 8832439
View attachment 8832484
I'm not a fan of WordPress, but I'm even less a fan of Cloudflare.
The Github repo said:
EmDash depends on Dynamic Workers to run secure sandboxed plugins. Dynamic Workers are currently only available on paid accounts. Upgrade your account (starting at $5/mo) or comment out the worker_loaders block of your wrangler.jsonc configuration file to disable plugins.
This is dead on arrival, right? The big thing about Wordpress/PHP is that you can put it on any dog shit host.
 
Cloudflare reverse engineered Wordpress using Claude Code. Its marketed as "more secure" (uses more RAM), but the main goal was obviously to strip the GPL, since their new version (100% TypeScript) is MIT licenced rather than GPL. Emdash is the future, there is simply no other safe way to build a website!

So they vibe coded a blog host (a type of software that's existed for around thirty years) with a feature to import data dumps from WordPress sites. Other than that and some back end UI similarities it doesn't seem to be a reimplementation at all. I'm guessing they're just using the brand name because it's so widely used.

Also, you expect me to believe a piece of software vibe-coded in the last few days is more secure than one that's been maintained by humans for the past quarter century? No.

:story:. matt (wordpress ceo) is going to lose his FUCKING MIND.

He'll never even notice, because…

This is dead on arrival, right? The big thing about Wordpress/PHP is that you can put it on any dog shit host.

And its wide ecosystem of existing themes and plug-ins which you'll no longer have access to. Anyone attempting to migrate will hit brick walls when they find out that some crucial plug-in is missing and they'll have to re-implement their theme from scratch. I'm guessing the fact that WP doesn't really have a standard router whereas a JavaScript app wouldn't be able to function without one might also be a point of friction.

Don't get me wrong, WordPress is a piece of shit that has been far surpassed by all standards by better software a decade ago if not earlier and should never be used by anyone who cares about quality software, and it pains me to defend it like this, but whatever shit this is that CloudFlare just shat out isn't impressing me as a replacement.
 
Don't get me wrong, WordPress is a piece of shit that has been far surpassed by all standards by better software a decade ago if not earlier and should never be used by anyone who cares about quality software, and it pains me to defend it like this, but whatever shit this is that CloudFlare just shat out isn't impressing me as a replacement.
Meh, when comparing having bronchitis and having ebola, you don't need to defend a preference for the former
 
Probably more than 50% of the sites I visit could be static but are dynamic bloat.
Some of us were still dynamic because of legacy. I gave up on my ancient blog software and moved to a slightly-less-ancient Grav instance. Dropped my dedi for a small KVM <1GB and cut my toy boxes I don't really do anything with down to two VPS.
 
Cloudflare reverse engineered Wordpress using Claude Code. Its marketed as "more secure" (uses more RAM), but the main goal was obviously to strip the GPL, since their new version (100% TypeScript) is MIT licenced rather than GPL. Emdash is the future, there is simply no other safe way to build a website!
FagFlare sucks ass. Wouldn't be surprised if their "safer" version ends up having a critical vulnerability.
 
I am still a little dissapointed that DukcStation stopped being open source simply or apparently 'cause it's creator got jelly that he didn't got the money third parties got from it lol
 
I am still a little dissapointed that DukcStation stopped being open source simply or apparently 'cause it's creator got jelly that he didn't got the money third parties got from it lol
I mean this is pretty autistic, code is still Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 and you can grab the code and build it for yourself just fine. That's what I do in Gentoo.
 
Honey, wake up, its time for your daily OSS troonslop post! Today's subject is, as usual, Francis Rowe. This time ol Franky has gotten into a one-sided spat with DHH, the guy behind Omarchy. One merry day our boy Franky was obsessively looking up "libreboot" until he stumbled upon a little pull request from an Omarchy user: https://github.com/basecamp/omarchy/pull/4230 ; its a really nice read about a user configuring a custom Omarchy ISO so that it can boot on Libre/Coreboot with GRUB instead of the Limine EFI that Omarchy expects and implements by default. It all goes swimmingly until -- oh no! Frankie has found out that his project has been co-opted by na.... by n-n... by n-n-NAATZEES!!!! Frankie took swift action, putting those dirty transphobes in their place by replying to a pull request that hadn't been touched for ~3 months:

1775962299152.png


Hi. I'm Leah Rowe, creator of Libreboot. I want to be ten thousand percent clear: I am not affiliated with Omarchy Linux, in fact I find that project's leadership quite repugnant, and I do not support them at all. I consider the fact that they invoke Libreboot's name to be an insult to Libreboot, and I hope that they will stop doing so - of course, making it easier to boot Linux on Libreboot is a noble goal, but the creator of Omarch, dubbed DHH, has been known to associate heavily with the far-right; the development channel for Hyprland of which he and his project is associated is rife with racism, transphobia and all sorts of bigotry in general. As a trans person, and someone who wishes to see myself and others of my kind flourish in prosperity, I consider that our community has no place for people like DHH. I found this post during a random Google/DuckDuckGo sweep for the word "libreboot", and felt the need to say something here. DHH and co are of course free to associate as they wish, and partake in any sort of open source development they wish, but I would ask that they do not associate either Libreboot, my name, or the names of my compratriots with that of his ilk, even if only tenuously as in this instance.Thank you, and have a wonderful day.

But ohhhhhh, those damn knawt zeys, they just wouldn't let up. An imminent threat to human life occurred right then, as those repugnant, evil, vile nazis DARED to IGNORE the word of FRANCIS ROWE, after invoking HER name in vain. The gall! Frankie replied to their horrible, life-threatening, gender de-affirming, bone chilling, spine tingling, no-burn ignoring by taking them to task on Mastodon (archive), saying that:

1775962543157.png

Fascists recently invoked my name in vain.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260410131141/https://github.com/basecamp/omarchy/pull/4230

I thus declare war on said fascists. They must stop invoking my name, the name of my projects, and they must entirely disassociate from both. I will not have them associating with me in any way, even if tenuously; they must disassociate their project from Libreboot.

They will desist, lest they incur my wrath.

DHH, Omarch Linux's author, is associated with Hyprland, whose community openly engages in racism/transphobia.

1775962632642.png


Leah Rowe ist kein Roweboter @libreleah
Context: there is a patched version of Omarchy Linux made specifically for booting on Libreboot systems. I found it today during routine Google search for "libreboot" (I often check Google).

The fact that the word "Libreboot" is written anywhere within the Omarchy project is an *insult* to Libreboot. It is an insult to me personally. It is an insult to both, because of the implied association; not only do I disassociate from Omarchy and DHH, I find them actively repugnant. Vile, neo-nazi trash.

Leah Rowe ist kein Roweboter @libreleah

This isn't an idle threat btw. I will mess u up. Recent precedent: GNU/FSF when they tried to mess with Libreboot. Different context there of course - that was a bunch of zealots backed by a well-funded (read: multi-million dollar) cult, and they were not fascists. But I felt their presence and felt a pressing need to remove said presence.

Bunch of crazy assholes. I'm crazier :)

You have been warned.

Have a wonderful day.

How DARE those nazis use HER open source software!? Don't they know that valid TRANSFOLX like herself can dictate who uses their open source software and how at any given time? Oooooh, I bet Vaxry and DHH are really quaking in their boots after that one! They better back off before they get the one-two-ACK-aroo from ol' Frankie boy here, oh he'll show'em what a real woman can do, just like he showed those vile nazis at the FSF & GNU by having a meltie on the mailing lists then posting images of his rotten stinkditch on his personal blog. She won in the end. By "excommunicating" her, the FSF not only lost THE best way to get Open Source Firmware (except if you're a VILE nazi zealot!!!), but they lost the BEST C hacker in the world, and don't you forget it, chud! You don't wanna mess with Leah Rowe. After all, she's one crazy gal :)
 
I found this post during a random Google/DuckDuckGo sweep for the word "libreboot"
Lol, no he didn't. Troons like him obsessively stalk people and projects they don't like to dig up dirt on them. Is he aware that we're discussing him on the Nazi Farms too?
This isn't an idle threat btw. I will mess u up. Recent precedent: GNU/FSF when they tried to mess with Libreboot. Different context there of course - that was a bunch of zealots backed by a well-funded (read: multi-million dollar) cult, and they were not fascists. But I felt their presence and felt a pressing need to remove said presence.
> Vaxry gets booted from the FSF for being a heckin' chud, big L for Vaxry
> Frankenstein spergs out and pulls his project out of the FSF, epic ween for him?


Not sure what precedent he is trying to reference, because the FSF is still chugging without him 10 years after his meltdown and the GNU Boot thing went nowhere (the blog post is now gone, but the archive of it shows that his only actions against them were trying to contribute and then making a snarky blog post criticizing them). If his bootloader is distributed under a libre license like the name implies, it means he doesn't have any power over who gets to use it and how they get to use it.

The guy who opened the PR responded politely to him with standard inoffensive centrism, but did not concede to his demand. I hope that Frankenstein gets so angry that he gives libreboot a taste of the Tranny Special: modifying the license to non-libre, or adding malware to the code that detects and sabotages Omarchy systems, so he can be scorned as "ideologically motivated maintainer threatens the free software ecosystem for his personal vendetta" and the project can be forked out from under his gaping axe wound.
 
Last edited:
The guy who opened the PR responded politely to him with standard inoffensive centrism, but did not concede to his demand. I hope that Frankenstein gets so angry that he gives libreboot a taste of the Tranny Special: modifying the license to non-libre, or adding malware to the code that detects and sabotages Omarchy systems, so he can be scorned as "ideologically motivated maintainer threatens the free software ecosystem for his personal vendetta" and the project can be forked out from under his gaping axe wound.
Literal best ending possible. The upstream Coreboot maintainers that collaborate on Libreboot code have little reason to not commit a coup d'etat. His commits are great when he can focus on them instead of schizoposting, arguing with invisible nazis or going on retarded tangents for months at a time. The guy legit makes fun things happen, like adding compatibility for a newer CPU to the 3050 micro and enabling it to run with up to 64gib RAM, up from its stock max of 32. That is legitimately good shit. Sadly, Frankie boy can't help but air out his rancid ditch and act like a spoiled child whenever someone does anything he doesn't like. Same kind of behavior endemic among their neck of the woods. Wish I knew enough C to rip Libreboot patches out piecemeal and upstream them to Coreboot.
 
But ohhhhhh, those damn knawt zeys, they just wouldn't let up. An imminent threat to human life occurred right then, as those repugnant, evil, vile nazis DARED to IGNORE the word of FRANCIS ROWE, after invoking HER name in vain. The gall! Frankie replied to their horrible, life-threatening, gender de-affirming, bone chilling, spine tingling, no-burn ignoring by taking them to task on Mastodon (archive), saying that:
Someone talking as though he is a proverbial God in a Old Testament story, ready to throw lighting bolts to punish the arrogant, malign, dirty fucks who say his name in vain. Totally, completely, normal individual with absolutely no mental issues whatsoever. What's that? The guy that patched Omarchy isn't even related to the team he's just a third party that wanted his shit to work and to share it with others? wow :story:.
 
Thom Holwerda occasionally gets lazy and allows heresy on "OS News", which should rightfully be renamed "Screeching Drooling Rants About Trump, Elon Musk and LLM's". Grabbed these before he could mash that fat stubby finger down on the bahleet key:

What causes this level of victim complex? And why are so many of you perpetual victims attracted to OSNews?

Ive been here a long time, since long before Thom came on the scene but things have changed over the last few years. Ive become tired of the perpetual victims and politics on a tech blog over the last few years. Its not even a good tech blog any longer, its not like Thom has the faintest idea what is being discussed most of the time and most of the good commentators are long since gone.

Using my backup account in case someone gets butthurt and I want to come back in the future.

I wish you good fortune in the future, but Im out. Im so tired of this victim hood nonsense in the tech world. I get enough of it during my day job, though fortunately many of the lazy, incompetent perpetual victims have been laid off recently.

And:

I'm willing to wager that most of the people on here clutching their pearls has never served in the military or seen warfare firsthand. You've lived your lives segmented from the harsh,, cold reality that the world is a dangerous place and that there are people who want to destroy Western civilization. Get a grip on reality and go touch grass.

The latter posted as a comment to the hot tech news that Red Hat are using euphemisms in order to hide the fact that they are participating in GENOCIDE. Just like IBM during the Holocaust, man.
 

Attachments

  • osnews-lol2.png
    osnews-lol2.png
    33.7 KB · Views: 69
  • osnews-lol.png
    osnews-lol.png
    83 KB · Views: 69
How DARE those nazis use HER open source software!? Don't they know that valid TRANSFOLX like herself can dictate who uses their open source software and how at any given time?
I almost want to see him try to follow up on this, just for the retarded drama it would cause.

Unless he's got a trademark on "Libreboot", just how is he going to enforce that? And just how the hell is he going to prevent people from using the Libreboot code, or making their code compatible with Libreboot? Has he forgotten about the the tech troon cabal's failed attempt to infiltrate the OSI to remove those pesky 1st, 5th and 6th tenants from the Open Source Definition (Archive)? Has he forgotten that he has licensed his code GPLv3?
 
Are there any sources for that attempt? It sounds like it'd be an interesting read.
Corey Dale Ehmke's Ethical Source "movement" at the peak of the CoCsucking trend during Wuflu. He ran for a seat at the OSI board in 2020 with the intention of replacing 5 and 6 with his Ethical Source versions that directly contradict the originals.


The Ethical Source Definition
Software is considered Ethical Open Source (EOS) when it meets all of these criteria:


  1. It benefits the commons. The license under which the software is released must not prohibit modification, derivative works, and linking or compiling with other software (unless under a copyleft provision), in the general spirit of open source distribution.
  2. It is created in the open. The source code must be publicly available, developed and maintained in public view, and welcoming of public contributions (subject to review and approval by the software project’s maintainers.)
  3. Its community is welcoming and just. The software project’s community of maintainers and contributors must be governed by a comprehensive code of conduct that is consistently and fairly enforced.
  4. It puts accessibility first. If the software has a user interface, it must be designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring all software functionality is available to all users, including users who may rely on assistive devices.
  5. It prioritizes user safety. The software must be designed with features and safeguards that minimize the risk of abuse or harm to others through the use of the software.
  6. It protects user privacy. If the software collects end-user data, the entity running the software must, upon request, delete or provide to the end-user any and all data generated and stored from the end-user’s usage of the software. All such data provided to the end-user must be in either a human-readable or widely interoperable open format.
  7. It encourages fair compensation. The software project’s maintainers may, at their discretion, request remuneration in the form of code contributions, financial consideration, or other forms of voluntary support from organizations that derive commercial value from the software.
Ethical Open Source projects are encouraged to use the “Open|Ethical” badge in their project’s documentation:

https://img.shields.io/badge/open-ethical-%234baaaa


https://img.shields.io/badge/open-ethical-#4baaaa

Ethically Licensed Open Source
Software is considered Ethically Licensed Open Source* (ELOS) if it meets any of the following additional criteria:


* The term “open source” in this context refers to the broad experience of public and collaborative software development in contribution to the collective software commons. ELOS software licenses may or may not conform to the Open Source Initiative’s conventional criteria for open source software licenses.

Ethically Licensed Open Source projects are encouraged to use the “Licensed Ethically” badge in their project’s documentation:

https://img.shields.io/badge/licensed-ethically-%234baaaa


https://img.shields.io/badge/licensed-ethically-#4baaaa

Attribution and Contributions
Maintaining this definition is the collaborative work of the Ethical Source Working Group. Pull requests and issues in our source code repository are encouraged. Special thanks are extended to Nate Berkopec, Will Barton, Steve Phillips, and Madalyn Parker.

© Copyright 2020 Coraline Ada Ehmke.
Support this initiative through Open Collective.
 
Back
Top Bottom