Over 500 ‘incels’ completed a survey. This is what researchers learned

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
A study that looked at more than 500 members of the “incel” community suggests they are a diverse group that often struggles with mental health issues.

“Incels are often stereotyped in the media as young, white, right-wing men who are not in employment, education, or training,” lead author Andrew G. Thomas, a senior psychology lecturer at Swansea University in the U.K., said in a news release. “When we tested the accuracy of these stereotypes using primary data collection, we discovered misconceptions.”

In what they claim to be the largest incel community survey to date, the study showed that participants came from different backgrounds and had varied political beliefs.

“If we had to point to their most consistent characteristics, it would be incredibly poor mental health and their feelings of bitterness, frustration, and distain towards women – though even these show variation within the sample,” Thomas said.

‘An extremely hard to reach group’​

Led by researchers from Swansea University and the University of Texas at Austin, and published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behaviour, the study is based on an online questionnaire completed by 561 members of “the internet’s largest incel forum.” Incel is short for involuntary celibacy, and the controversial online subculture of men is united by their perceived inability to form romantic or sexual relationships.


“The community is an outlet for misogynistic hostility, and incels’ ideology includes the belief that most women are attracted to a small number of men, who monopolize sexual encounters with women,” the study explained. “Central to the incel belief system is the ‘black-pill’ philosophy that there is nothing they can do to improve their romantic prospects.”

A small, but growing number of violent attacks have also been attributed to self-described incels, including the 2018 Toronto van attack that killed 11 people.

“The community has been labeled as an emerging domestic terrorism concern by counterterrorism authorities in Canada, the U.S.A., and the U.K.,” the study noted. “Incels are considered an extremely hard to reach group who are cynical of the motives of academic researchers.”

‘Extraordinarily high rates of suicidal ideation’​

In terms of mental health, the researchers found that 37 per cent of participants reported daily suicidal thoughts, 48 per cent reported high levels of loneliness and 86 per cent reported experiencing bullying. Thirty per cent of participants also met the criteria for an autism assessment, compared with one per cent of the general population.

“The extraordinarily high rates of suicidal ideation in our sample were among the most alarming findings and demand urgent attention,” study co-author William Costello, a researcher in psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, said. “Likewise, the prevalence of autism traits was much higher than in the general population, pointing to the need for greater clinical attention to neurodiversity within this group.”

When it came to ethnic diversity, political orientation, socioeconomic background, employment, education and age, the participants were a varied group.

Just over half the respondents were white at 58 per cent while 42 per cent identified as people of colour. Many identified as middle class at 40.6 per cent, followed by lower-middle class at 27.1 per cent; 42.4 per cent were employed full-time and 16.4 per cent were in full-time education. The average age of participants was 26 and the oldest was 73. In terms of political orientation, on average, incels were slightly left of centre.

“Incels with right-wing leanings may be more predisposed to harmful attitudes and beliefs than those leaning left, as right-wing radical acts are generally more violent,” the study warned.

The study was conducted in collaboration with the U.K. government’s Commission for Countering Extremism. Anonymous participants came from the U.K. and U.S. and were paid UK£20 or C$37 for their responses.

“Our study is one of the first that takes a deep dive into a large sample of incels,” co-author Joe Whittaker, a senior criminology lecturer at Swansea University, said. “Our findings will help to inform policy and practice within the sphere of counter-extremism and help stakeholders to develop effective and appropriate responses.”

Link to article
 
I really want to know what 73 years of no pussy does to a mother fucker

I mean I guess at 73 he hasn’t fucked any mothers. Honestly do wonder what kind of person this is to:

A: respond to surveys
B. Identify as an incel
C: be this old.

I get the label for dudes who don’t have the money for a prostitute but I don’t quite get the involuntary part past a certain age.
 
That report and that section DOES NOT specify "but not islamic states" , or even "america" or "the west" and parts just before jump all over the place.
and yeah if you counted muslim countries OF COURSE right wings kill more.
Bro are you even reading the fucking report? See Page 36, section 2:
TRENDS IN THE WEST
In the West, total deaths from terrorism peaked in 2016 when 194 people died, while attacks peaked a year later when 176 incidents were recorded. Most of these deaths were caused by Islamic jihadists.
The graph I posted is from page fucking 37. It has an upper limit of deaths in the 90s over the span of nearly 20 decades. No where near the total 7,555 deaths in 2024 that includes Muslim countries. As I said, this report overall is treating both the Islamic State and the Sahel as separate entities from the West.

Here are the Results, Key Trends, The Sahel and Islamic State & Affiliates pages, since I apparently have to spoon feed you this information.
Screenshot 2025-06-11 at 22-16-41 Global-Terrorism-Index-2025.pdf.webpScreenshot 2025-06-11 at 22-23-10 Global-Terrorism-Index-2025.pdf.webp
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Hooked on phobics
As I said, this report overall is treating both the Islamic State and the Sahel as separate entities from the West.
I can't find a single piece of text in section 2 stating this. Infact I see a lot of stuff referencing central africa in THE EXACT SAME SECTION.

Theres NO REASON to assume this is "just the west".

Which is my entire point. It includes africans probably middle east, sections of south asia, ect. But its seemingly meant to imply by you (I think) towards maga hat wearers???

last bit I'm not 100% sure about, but you INSISTING its the west is fucking sus.
he Sahel and Islamic State & Affiliates pages
So you are showing me a page analyzing islamic terror as part of a GLOBAL study to PROVE that islamic terror is unrelated? Are you high? Also you can't just give me 4 ass long pages to read and insist its "spoon feeding me".
My lived experience on the forum says that people either react or reply. One usually needs to really hit it out of the park to get both.
maybe. In my experience many posts who EITHER don't get much reacts but lots of replies, but a mix of all kinds of reactions are a bit more interesting / controversial. doesnt really matter either way though.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Lokenstien
I mean I guess at 73 he hasn’t fucked any mothers. Honestly do wonder what kind of person this is to:

A: respond to surveys
B. Identify as an incel
C: be this old.

I get the label for dudes who don’t have the money for a prostitute but I don’t quite get the involuntary part past a certain age.
This goes back to the definitional problem of “incel”. I don’t hang around incel spaces so much as I get algorithmically baited, but if I check comments on an idly watched hoe math video or whatever I always find highly upvoted comments from bitter old divorcees.

Triggers a severe disgust reaction whenever I see that shit. In many ways it’s even worse than the post menopausal feminist bitches pulling that crab in a bucket shit on the TikTok girlies. These guys are like thrice divorced (statistically they’re the problem), still living good post-alimony on a pension, and they’ll even throw in jabs at ex-wifey about how the grandkids love him more - as if the zoomer incels will ever get a pension, house, hobbies they can afford, or grandkids with which to share them.
 
You're genuinely dumb @Hooked on phobics. Here's why:
you can't just give me 4 ass long pages to read and insist its "spoon feeding me".
They are not that long and they were only meant to highlight that anyone with a functioning brain would understand that a 100+ page academic report on global terrorism in 2024 would not include West Africa or the Middle East when referring to "The West" if they dedicated 2 whole sections to The Sahel, a region in Africa, and the literally global Islamic State terror organization (page 62). No one uses the "The West" to refer to anything other than North America, Europe and Australasia. Not even the fucking Muslims trying to blow it up!
Screenshot 2025-06-12 at 00-30-48 Global-Terrorism-Index-2025.pdf.webp
Here's your answer to the semantics question. The more interesting one is whether antisemitism is counted as Left wing or Right-Wing. I don't know the answer to that one. Maybe you can do some reading and answer it for me.
So you are showing me a page analyzing islamic terror as part of a GLOBAL study to PROVE that islamic terror is unrelated?
Screenshot 2025-06-12 at 00-49-18 Global-Terrorism-Index-2025.pdf.webp
This is page 36. I do not know how you read the sections I posted from this screenshot of page 36 and thought it included West Africa, or all the terrorists’ attacks ISIS committed. Oh wait, you didn't read it. No wonder you got lost in impotent fantasy land.
Like do they count ISIS killing thousands as far right extremists???
and yeah if you counted muslim countries OF COURSE right wings kill more.
Screenshot 2025-06-11 at 21-16-53 Global-Terrorism-Index-2025.pdf.webp
If you had looked at the numbers, the name of the graph, the section it was included in, the context quotes and used your understanding of common language, you would have read (d'oh! sorry about making you do that) from my first post, that this graph does not include ISIS killing thousands or any Muslim countries.
Theres NO REASON to assume this is "just the west".
There is. There was from my first post. You are just an idiot.

Screenshot 2025-06-12 at 00-49-58 Global-Terrorism-Index-2025.pdf.webp
Bonus fun: Here’s what is likely a very oversimplified map on U.S political violence over the span of 250ish years. Have a struggle session with this one too, are you going to assume it includes all the Mexico cartel killings or something?

I ripped all this straight from this global terrorism report PDF found on this website. The database used in for the report and index comes from this website, which is cited at the bottom of the first graph in the thread, which is also pay walled. So, If none of the answers to your inane questions can be found here, pay a pretty penny to find them there. Pick up the shovel I'm not digging for a bit.

End note: I found this fun little tidbit as I was skimming through:
In 2024, there were 24 publicised plots linked to IS or affiliated groups ... The US followed with four plots, with one notably being planned by a former CIA security guard in Afghanistan who had planned to carry out a mass shooting on election day. The suspect told the FBI that he was communicating with individuals associated with ISK (page 63).
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Hooked on phobics
They also don't DEFINE west from what I can tell, and include australia which is east as it gets. This is a red flag as far as statistics go since if you don't proclaim how you define something, you can define it as anything. Being charitable you could assume this is FIRST WORLD countries (europe, australia, america) But its not even defined far as I can tell (not reading the ENTIRE document, but first few pages mention nothing)

Anyway this is really derailing. We should stop anyway as this has nothing to do with incels besides a bunch of sperging.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Lokenstien
While I think incel is GROSSLY overused as a term (and retards obsess about not getting laid too much on both ends) Someone who CALLS themselves an incel bodes very, very, very badly

SOME are but frankly simps AND incels are both opposite ends of the (sexual) horseshoe. Both utterly fucking fail but for different reasons. Women who are truly intolerable you just tell them are intolerable, and remove them from your life, find better. They exist, and aren't unicorns

and if you notice men who genuinely seem happy with """intolerable""" women, ask yourself if its really so bad.

Also, ask yourself if YOU are tolerable. No woman will treat you that well if YOU are intolerable because YOU need to have something to bring to the table too. And no, this doesn't mean a millionare, or 6pack, or even college educated. Just nice, hardworking, and dedicated. You do that, gaurentee you can find a girl.

Also brade, since you've mentioned you have like a whole TB of porn IIRC, maybe just remove using that for a month or some shit. If you are being used to cranking it to a heavily curated porn collection, your standards are unnecessarily inflated, and any girl whos even semi average won't get to you. That would help in many ways too.

You might not believe it, but seriously, going without for even a WEEK will make you more attracted to just normal girls. Which makes the emotional stuff a lot easier. And women WILL like your attitude better for it overtime, in ways that are subconscious on both ends

But serously, consider setting aside the porn. I don't judge too much since porn in men is as prolific as crack to blacks in the 80s, but its not really worth it. YES it might be difficult for a bit, but its well worth it.
View attachment 7488286
EDIT : Managed to find the high quality one with readable links!!! REJOICE!!!!
The point is there isn't anything wrong with these guys. The problem is society and modern women. Like I said all the women these days are disagreeable worthless pieces of shit. The men haven't changed its society that changed. It's the women that have gotten worse. Men are still pretty much the same as they have always been. It's just that women and their faggot beta orbiters are in denial of the fact that society is collapsing and it's all their fault. Their tactic is to call anyone who notices this mentally ill. Notice that they are very concerned about men refusing to prop up and go along with their shitty society that hates them. It's bitches and Boomers that are really concerned. Two groups of people that are basically parasitic and rely on men working to support them.
 
Are most incels even self aware enough to know they are incels?
Actually this brings up a good point. You're getting a fucked up sample. Much like the Kinsey report.

While I joke around here and most of us do, id never discuss my sex life even anonymously. People who would are already outliers meaning this info is junk to start.

You can't be in data field and not understand this but they wanted to push a story found the weirdos who'd confirm what they want to hear and did so.

Fuck this dishonest shit. Incels are genetic dead end losers but the people who ran a study like this are actually evil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paper Machete
‘An extremely hard to reach group’
It's really not. You may not be motivated to reach them, that's a common miscommunication. Most NEETs and incels are pretty neutral about questionnaires, especially if you're giving them 20 bux.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ._.
Are most incels even self aware enough to know they are incels?
No, a lot of them delude themselves into believing false destructive ideologies that focus on loneliness and inherently self serving, poorly constructed ideologues centered around promoting personal growth through selfish demands while discouraging connection with the average person and encouraging parasocial relationships with money hungry interwebs personnel.
 
Interesting they don't take any swipes at the MGTOW movement, probably because most adherents are very explicit about not hating women, just their assorted collective bullshit, and have just said "eh, fuck it" and moved on to other interests instead of staying in the dating pool.

Wouldn't want to expose people to that idea. Women still have a pretty sweet deal going in the dating scene, and men noticing that is a big "no-no."
 
But what does The Science say about furcels?
 
Groundbreaking research. I don't think anybody would have ever been able to figure out that incels are lonely and severely depressed. Hasn't research on this been done like 500 times at this point? Oh, and every time they act like they've made a breakthrough when they find out that incels predominantly lean left. I just don't get it, it's really not hard to find out what incels actually think, they are lonely men who have access to the internet, they literally put their thoughts and opinions out there for other people to read. Anybody who funds these studies is a rube.
 
Back