- Joined
- Jun 24, 2024
I'm not saying that raped as a kid = good with tech. I'm saying that you can't say he would be a good tech employee based on what we know because his entire life has had both tech shit and diapers. We can't point at him and say he was normal before the diapers because that doesn't exist. He could have turned out the same good with niche tech type person without the child rape but there's nothing to say that. If he wasn't raped as a kid we have absolutely no idea how he would have turned out and there's no way you could know that and realistically the chance that he would be good with tech in the same way is pretty low. They're not linked, but for his entire life both have been there so you can't just say how he would be if magically half of his entire personality never happened. How do we know that his interest in tech shit wasn't an escape for him? Maybe him getting into tech and joining forums for said tech was a way of coping? Maybe he became introverted because of the raping and the tech shit was just a way to busy himself because he didn't want to be around people? Maybe it was just something completely unrelated but that whole butterfly effect is pretty impactful especially when the start of it is literally before you can form memories properly.I really don't find that this logic tracks. He was first being molested extremely early in life (OP says 3 years old, and I doubt that was an isolated incident), so he was bound to wind up with sexual dysfunctions regardless. That doesn't mean all his interests are intrinsically tied to pedophilia, or that the only way he'd develop his knowledge of obscure technology was by being molested and groomed into diapers/pedophilia. It stands to reason that if he was never sexually abused, he could have avoided becoming a pervert, and he still could have had a propensity for these uncommon technologies.
Let me just requote this part of the original post just to make the context clearer.
Like, if this guy gave up anything related to diapers and being a furry in general, he could reasonably be any upper-middle class autist with a tech job.
If you keep obsessing over fucking stickers on the autism forum then pamps will confuse you for an actual child and you will be his next diaper rape victim.him negatively reacting to my post
You mean alogging a guy most known for huffing year old diapers and disagreeing with someone that said 'this kid could have had potential if he wasn't raped'. The fuck do you mean there was never any future for him? What do you think that just because he was raped as a child, exposed to pornography also as a child and then groomed yet again as a fucking child that he should just kill himself when he turned 18 or something? He should kill himself now yes. But at the very core of this he is a victim of csa. He did have a future, it was just stolen by a child rapist, epi shit and another child rapist, then meth and that sort of shit.attacking pamperchu


