🔥 Zoosadist Pamperchu - Microwaved Diapers, Pedophilia, Zoosadism, and Meth

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Pamps has always been disturbingly open, much like Chris-Chan never learns he almost seems to relish in his own incrimination, but this seems extreme even by his standards. I apologise if this is already known but do we know if Pamps is actually autisitc or has a developmental disorder? I don't think I've ever seen it confirmed.
I learned about Pamperchu because of an ancient Chris Chan thread on /b/. It was when Ivy convinced Chris to take pictures of himself wearing Butt Garments. An anon was surprised that Chris had to be coaxed into putting them on, and he expected him to be enthusiastic about it like Pamperchu. Which made me ask the fateful question: who the fuck is Pamperchu?

Chris craps his briefs like a grown ass manchild. Up until Barb Breaking, Chris always stood at the edge of the horrorcow cliff. He had his moments, like the un-clit and the fanta. Those were warning signs of what was to come.

As for the other developmental disorder? I highly suspect fetal alcohol syndrome + alcoholism in his early teens. It's pretty clear that alcoholism is strong in his family. That middle aged woman, idk if it's his mom or his aunt, that shows up in some videos is always so wasted that she doesn't care what pamps is up to. He has kind of a weird face. It looks undeveloped almost. The small eyes, flat cheeks, and smooth upper lip are all tell-tale signs of FAS. People with FAS often have trouble understanding right and wrong, but unlike cluster-B's, they can seriously not understand. They are also less likely to plan out their bad activities and not have any kind of endgame or contingency plans to minimize consequences if things go wrong. A psychopath might rob a minimart and get away with it, but get caught when he gets cocky and robs a bank the next week. Someone with FAS might rob a minimart and get caught because he came back the next day to buy things with the money he stole.
 

Attachments

  • FAS-face-1024x685.jpg
    FAS-face-1024x685.jpg
    63.3 KB · Views: 483
  • azNHfQK.png
    azNHfQK.png
    230.2 KB · Views: 590
Sorry this is a bit late but here are some audio clips from yesterday. Prepare for disturbing pedo shit.
Ayyy can you ask Pamperchu what his dental health is like? I want to know if he has meth mouth.
Also ask him if his mom drank while she was pregnant with him. He might not know, or want to talk about it, but I doubt he'll give a certain "no".
 
There's a now deleted video where pamperchu is filming a crappy Halloween party at his mom's house. One of the guests was this 70+ year old ADBL guy and then of course there's pamperchu himself walking around with a pacifier. In the comments people were asking how his mother was okay with all of this, with pamperchu replying that his mom was also into age play/age regression, but didn't give any specifics. Which means she's either a full blown abdl like her son, or she just likes to pretend she's 19 and still in college. She kinda a milf too in a weird way.
Oh boy get ready for Incestachu 2.0
Wish the video was still around.
 
He's degenerate and has the money for it. Considering how much his family is involved with his lifestyle, I'm sure he was just born with a wealthy family.
If he ever gets caught for CP or pedophilia, count on an elite lawyer getting him a slap on the wrist the first time. House arrest, pleading down to lesser charges, maybe a deal where he's off the sex offender registry once his sentence is served, shit like that. I remember reading about a guy in Utah who got convicted of aggravated indecent exposure for wearing a diaper in front of kids on a playground. Then it was vacated on appeal because his lawyer argued that the diaper was an article of clothing, and the judge went with the letter of the law and not the spirt of the law. Also put the burden of proof on the prosecution to determine that he was wearing it for sexual gratification and not due to incontinence.

US courts need to quit being lenient towards pedophiles. Shoot the batty boys ffs. If Pamps is caught for pedo related shit, he'll probably get a lighter sentence than what he got for clogging the toilet at his friend's apartment.

 
If he ever gets caught for CP or pedophilia, count on an elite lawyer getting him a slap on the wrist the first time. House arrest, pleading down to lesser charges, maybe a deal where he's off the sex offender registry once his sentence is served, shit like that. I remember reading about a guy in Utah who got convicted of aggravated indecent exposure for wearing a diaper in front of kids on a playground. Then it was vacated on appeal because his lawyer argued that the diaper was an article of clothing, and the judge went with the letter of the law and not the spirt of the law. Also put the burden of proof on the prosecution to determine that he was wearing it for sexual gratification and not due to incontinence.

US courts need to quit being lenient towards pedophiles. Shoot the batty boys ffs. If Pamps is caught for pedo related shit, he'll probably get a lighter sentence than what he got for clogging the toilet at his friend's apartment.

Fucking FLOORED that this wasn't about Deeker.

I wonder what happened to him... Wonder what Pamperchu thinks about him...
 
I remember reading about a guy in Utah who got convicted of aggravated indecent exposure for wearing a diaper in front of kids on a playground. Then it was vacated on appeal because his lawyer argued that the diaper was an article of clothing, and the judge went with the letter of the law and not the spirt of the law.
I frankly think judges should avoid thinking about "spirits" and shit, "penumbras" and "emanations" and that kind of nonsense (that is literally from a Supreme Court decision). They should base their decisions on the law as it actually is, not just make up shit to justify their own morality. The only place thinking about the "spirit" of something comes into play is if the language itself is ambiguous. Otherwise, judges are bound by the law. The law is not bound by judges, or at least shouldn't be.
 
I frankly think judges should avoid thinking about "spirits" and shit, "penumbras" and "emanations" and that kind of nonsense (that is literally from a Supreme Court decision). They should base their decisions on the law as it actually is, not just make up shit to justify their own morality. The only place thinking about the "spirit" of something comes into play is if the language itself is ambiguous. Otherwise, judges are bound by the law. The law is not bound by judges, or at least shouldn't be.
Ok then, enjoy letting diaper guy flash his diapers at kids on the playground because the people who wrote indecent exposure laws didn't know about these kinds of fetishists.
Though there is the saying "better to acquit ten guilty men than convict one innocent".
 
Back
Top Bottom