Xenu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2024
NiggersWhat would you imagine a thoughtful representation of slaves would look like?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NiggersWhat would you imagine a thoughtful representation of slaves would look like?
Shouldn't this have come with the other machine focused DLC? WTF? What's Synthetic Dawn for then?Full Trailer and Dev Diary for the Machine Age DLC for Stellaris:
https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...diary-335-announcing-the-machine-age.1626445/
Machine cults, new midgame megastructures, individualistic machine empires, new player crisis, new endgame crisis - a lot of features that have been commonly requested are being added. Looks pretty cool.
Fleshed out mechanics that represent one of the most remarkable mass migrations in history and its full impact on Africa and the New World.What would you imagine a thoughtful representation of slaves would look like?
Yeah it sucks that an old DLC is entirely subsumed into a new one, there's now no reason to buy it. I doubt anyone will make too much of a fuss about it, although they could make it better by saying if you've already bought SD then you get a discount.Shouldn't this have come with the other machine focused DLC? WTF? What's Synthetic Dawn for then?
I'm not sure why but they decided to 'update' the human portrait, but people got upset and they decided to add the original back, it should be next to the regular one. You might be out of luck if you wanted to play the UNE/COM preset empires. It's a bit of a worry too because most of the new portraits they've added are total dogshit.after reinstalling stellaris after years, i am greeted with hideous ass human portraits
the fuck happened?
all the women look like butch dykesYeah it sucks that an old DLC is entirely subsumed into a new one, there's now no reason to buy it. I doubt anyone will make too much of a fuss about it, although they could make it better by saying if you've already bought SD then you get a discount.
I'm not sure why but they decided to 'update' the human portrait, but people got upset and they decided to add the original back, it should be next to the regular one. You might be out of luck if you wanted to play the UNE/COM preset empires. It's a bit of a worry too because most of the new portraits they've added are total dogshit.
Shame the UI looks like shit, otherwise it is really exciting.
What do you mean you don't like having menus reset position and scrolling for hours every time you click something???Looks just like the shitty Vic 3 UI, I want to be optimistic for EU5 but I just can't find it in me thanks to their years-long streak of shitty releases and DLCs
It was okay in Imperator, in that they were your "producers". It made no sense, them being your taxpayers, but as an abstraction of economics it worked fine to represent slavery being the underpinning of ancient agriculture in most places. That gives me a little confidence, especially with the pop system, that we might see some actual representation beyond EU4's slave trade good. I think it hinges a lot on whether they want to offend Muslims/blue hairs; if they are going to be accurate, the vast majority of the population of southern Iraq and farmers in Egypt will be enslaved black Africans and that's no bueno, but Vicky 3 got away with it...Pops raises the question of slaves and we know they won’t do any sort of thoughtful representation of slaves.
What would you imagine a thoughtful representation of slaves would look like?
What are your thoughts on this reddit thread discussing how they may/should change the name of EU5 to be less "eurocentric"?
The way this is written makes me think you're a hack journo for Kotaku looking for quote mines.If they do decide to change the name and/or make a statement on being less "eurocentric" will you not be following development?
It's good. Just dead in terms of development. They got it to a decent point and then lied by saying they might, maybe, one day come back to it.Did they turn Imperator into something good or is it still trash?
Missing features from the previous iteration, just like was the case CK3 and Vic 3, is now a feature of their games, so that they can put in less effort and then reintroduce it in a completely inferior way for a more expensive price.Hard to get excited considering Paradox seem hell-bent on making every new game a shittier version of the one that came before it. So EU5 will be a shittier version of EU4 with less features, more predatory DLC (and that is really saying something) and a slicker UI.
I'm not at all man.holy fucking shit spot on
View attachment 5817280
Is that really accurate to EU time?if they are going to be accurate, the vast majority of the population of southern Iraq and farmers in Egypt will be enslaved black Africans
Bet you 95% of them play the "lesser" nations to simulate their KANGZ dreams of conquering the whiteoids. They don't hate war or conquest; they just want to be the one to do it.I will never understand the left wing segment of the Paradox GS fanbase. If you hate war and conquest and history, play something else.
Is that really accurate to EU time?
According to the lead dev, "Synthetic Dawn still has Machine Worlds, Resource Consolidation, Rogue Servitors, Determined Exterminators, Driven Assimilators, several Advisor voices, and the Machine Uprising. Probably some more things I can't think of now", so basically all the good and fun stuff of being a machine remain locked behind it.Shouldn't this have come with the other machine focused DLC? WTF? What's Synthetic Dawn for then?