Pastadome - A place for friends who are being too friendly in other threads.

SIGSEGV's copypasta folder

This is my copypasta folder. In honor of this shitposting haven that @It's HK-47 has created for us, I will post one of the pastas from my collection. The first reply to this post which names a copypasta from my collection decides which one I post.
Edit: the prize has been claimed by @Iwasamwillbe
 
Last edited:
Ive just done one of those personality tests on reddit and I confirmed myself as an INTJ. It made me ponder about the other denizens of this so called web forum. After a decent amount of surfing around the various sub-forums of this website and analyzing alot of posts, I just started laughing. Why am I laughing, you ask? Apologies. It's because I am an INTJ and the illogical and idiotic posts of most of the users here....... Well, I find them amusing to say the least. It struck me that the majority of kiwi farm users are simply white, low IQ and low income. It’s lonely at the top if the IQ ladder and it is often a challenge for me to find like-minded individuals who are able to keep up with my relentless intellectualism and chess-like maneuvering.

So as a generalized statement to most of the posters who will now reply to this thread: The next time you're working your shitty minimum wage job at Walmart handing out free samples of your store's new crisped potato snacks: dont offer me one. It's simply not necessary as I've already calculated its flavor in my head. Heh... Perhaps a little more sodium chloride next time! (that's table salt by the way)
 
Ive just done one of those personality tests on reddit and I confirmed myself as an INTJ. It made me ponder about the other denizens of this so called web forum. After a decent amount of surfing around the various sub-forums of this website and analyzing alot of posts, I just started laughing. Why am I laughing, you ask? Apologies. It's because I am an INTJ and the illogical and idiotic posts of most of the users here....... Well, I find them amusing to say the least. It struck me that the majority of kiwi farm users are simply white, low IQ and low income. It’s lonely at the top if the IQ ladder and it is often a challenge for me to find like-minded individuals who are able to keep up with my relentless intellectualism and chess-like maneuvering.

So as a generalized statement to most of the posters who will now reply to this thread: The next time you're working your shitty minimum wage job at Walmart handing out free samples of your store's new crisped potato snacks: dont offer me one. It's simply not necessary as I've already calculated its flavor in my head. Heh... Perhaps a little more sodium chloride next time! (that's table salt by the way)
Saved.
 
View attachment 1463416
This is my copypasta folder. In honor of this shitposting haven that @It's HK-47 has created for us, I will post one of the pastas from my collection. The first reply to this post which names a copypasta from my collection decides which one I post.

>Uses Gaynu-slaanesh-loonicks
>Uses a terminal like a 1980's movie dudebro
>Has spaces in his filenames

67b.jpg


PS: Thread is gay and anybody who downvotes this post is also gay and probably a tranny too.
 
>Uses Gaynu-slaanesh-loonicks
>Uses a terminal like a 1980's movie dudebro
>Has spaces in his filenames

View attachment 1463461

PS: Thread is gay and anybody who downvotes this post is also gay and probably a tranny too.
No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.

Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.

One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you?

(An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.

Next, even if we limit the GNU/Linux title to the GNU-based Linux distributions, we run into another obvious problem. XFree86 may well be more important to a particular Linux installation than the sum of all the GNU contributions. More properly, shouldn't the distribution be called XFree86/Linux? Or, at a minimum, XFree86/GNU/Linux? Of course, it would be rather arbitrary to draw the line there when many other fine contributions go unlisted. Yes, I know you've heard this one before. Get used to it. You'll keep hearing it until you can cleanly counter it.

You seem to like the lines-of-code metric. There are many lines of GNU code in a typical Linux distribution. You seem to suggest that (more LOC) == (more important). However, I submit to you that raw LOC numbers do not directly correlate with importance. I would suggest that clock cycles spent on code is a better metric. For example, if my system spends 90% of its time executing XFree86 code, XFree86 is probably the single most important collection of code on my system. Even if I loaded ten times as many lines of useless bloatware on my system and I never excuted that bloatware, it certainly isn't more important code than XFree86. Obviously, this metric isn't perfect either, but LOC really, really sucks. Please refrain from using it ever again in supporting any argument.

Last, I'd like to point out that we Linux and GNU users shouldn't be fighting among ourselves over naming other people's software. But what the heck, I'm in a bad mood now. I think I'm feeling sufficiently obnoxious to make the point that GCC is so very famous and, yes, so very useful only because Linux was developed. In a show of proper respect and gratitude, shouldn't you and everyone refer to GCC as 'the Linux compiler'? Or at least, 'Linux GCC'? Seriously, where would your masterpiece be without Linux? Languishing with the HURD?

If there is a moral buried in this rant, maybe it is this:

Be grateful for your abilities and your incredible success and your considerable fame. Continue to use that success and fame for good, not evil. Also, be especially grateful for Linux' huge contribution to that success. You, RMS, the Free Software Foundation, and GNU software have reached their current high profiles largely on the back of Linux. You have changed the world. Now, go forth and don't be a nag.

Thanks for listening.
 
View attachment 1463416
This is my copypasta folder. In honor of this shitposting haven that @It's HK-47 has created for us, I will post one of the pastas from my collection. The first reply to this post which names a copypasta from my collection decides which one I post.
"Midget kidnapping"
 
"Midget kidnapping"
What I would give to kidnap a famous midget and make his life a living hell. I would force him to dress up in elf and leprechaun outfits and subject him to pure awfulness and humiliation. just terrible degradation and shameful acts. it would be so easy to break his spirit and drive him to suicide, but I wouldn't let him do it. if I could train a dog to rape on command then I would totally do that as well. a really big dog like a mastiff. he would be so completely and utterly powerless to stop it, not to mention terrified. a big ass dog is even scary and life-threatening to a normal human but to a midget? might as well be a dragon. I'd keep him in a cell and what's more is that I would actually place to key inside with him but put it in a high place. not extremely high but just ever so slightly out of reach. it would drive him mad. I would dress him like a baby and force feed him 99 cent store baby food. I'd also pick him up like a child and toss him from one corner to the next. I'd grab him by one leg and swing him as hard and as fast as I could then hurl him to see how far he goes. I'd rent one of those giant inflatable bounce houses and body slam him all day until my arms got tired. I'd hold him down with 1 hand and slowly stick things up his butt just to see him squirm. I would stick him in dryers and turn them on and leave him in there for long periods of time. I'd force him to fight other midgets to the death. just so many things I would do.
 
Ive just done one of those personality tests on reddit and I confirmed myself as an INTJ. It made me ponder about the other denizens of this so called web forum. After a decent amount of surfing around the various sub-forums of this website and analyzing alot of posts, I just started laughing. Why am I laughing, you ask? Apologies. It's because I am an INTJ and the illogical and idiotic posts of most of the users here....... Well, I find them amusing to say the least. It struck me that the majority of kiwi farm users are simply white, low IQ and low income. It’s lonely at the top if the IQ ladder and it is often a challenge for me to find like-minded individuals who are able to keep up with my relentless intellectualism and chess-like maneuvering.

So as a generalized statement to most of the posters who will now reply to this thread: The next time you're working your shitty minimum wage job at Walmart handing out free samples of your store's new crisped potato snacks: dont offer me one. It's simply not necessary as I've already calculated its flavor in my head. Heh... Perhaps a little more sodium chloride next time! (that's table salt by the way)
>taking a Myers-Briggs test
Imagine being too gay to just tell people your astrological sign
 
No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.

Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.

One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you?

(An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.

Next, even if we limit the GNU/Linux title to the GNU-based Linux distributions, we run into another obvious problem. XFree86 may well be more important to a particular Linux installation than the sum of all the GNU contributions. More properly, shouldn't the distribution be called XFree86/Linux? Or, at a minimum, XFree86/GNU/Linux? Of course, it would be rather arbitrary to draw the line there when many other fine contributions go unlisted. Yes, I know you've heard this one before. Get used to it. You'll keep hearing it until you can cleanly counter it.

You seem to like the lines-of-code metric. There are many lines of GNU code in a typical Linux distribution. You seem to suggest that (more LOC) == (more important). However, I submit to you that raw LOC numbers do not directly correlate with importance. I would suggest that clock cycles spent on code is a better metric. For example, if my system spends 90% of its time executing XFree86 code, XFree86 is probably the single most important collection of code on my system. Even if I loaded ten times as many lines of useless bloatware on my system and I never excuted that bloatware, it certainly isn't more important code than XFree86. Obviously, this metric isn't perfect either, but LOC really, really sucks. Please refrain from using it ever again in supporting any argument.

Last, I'd like to point out that we Linux and GNU users shouldn't be fighting among ourselves over naming other people's software. But what the heck, I'm in a bad mood now. I think I'm feeling sufficiently obnoxious to make the point that GCC is so very famous and, yes, so very useful only because Linux was developed. In a show of proper respect and gratitude, shouldn't you and everyone refer to GCC as 'the Linux compiler'? Or at least, 'Linux GCC'? Seriously, where would your masterpiece be without Linux? Languishing with the HURD?

If there is a moral buried in this rant, maybe it is this:

Be grateful for your abilities and your incredible success and your considerable fame. Continue to use that success and fame for good, not evil. Also, be especially grateful for Linux' huge contribution to that success. You, RMS, the Free Software Foundation, and GNU software have reached their current high profiles largely on the back of Linux. You have changed the world. Now, go forth and don't be a nag.

Thanks for listening.
Anyone who agrees with rms that it's GNU/Linux is agreeing with a probable paedophile.
 
Back