Bussyking7
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2020
Hahahaha you can't be serious. Of course, you mongoloid, physical examples are important for physics, that's what the whole subject is about. However, what you linked to is pop sci nonsense that the average redditard would be into. Any non degenerate college student that's about to learn variational calculus does not need flashlights to serve as a motivation. Any student that would be motivated by these examples has probably never learned classical mechanics. Why waste time superficially learning general relativity when you could instead start teaching real physics?Real world examples are important though. Take physics, for example. It is the the foundation of our world. If you can explain to a child why a feather and a coin that weigh the same but fall at a different rate you can explain acceleration, show them the mathematical formula and segue into relativity. Mathematics and physics are inextricably linked.
I had a professor in university who basically did this
(and a lot of other similar demonstrations) in class. A good teacher should inspire their pupils to want to understand and know the subject he's/she's teaching. The teacher is almost always not and expert in the subject being taught but is able to explain in a manner the pupil can understand.
As for the Odyssey it's one of the oldest works of literature still being read and taught today. It's been referenced over and over again. If you haven't read it then how can one appreciate Joyce's Ulysses or watch O Brother Where Art Thou without realizing it's a modern retelling of the Odyssey? I guess they decided the future gardeners or housekeepers don't need to know these things. Sort of how the Deltas and Epsilons in A Brave New World didn't need their simple minds cluttered with fancy books and such.
Ignoring that whole aspect, math most definitely does not need physics (the reverse is obviously true of course). Mathematics is formed from general intuitive notions (which could arise from some real world scenario) and then abstracted and pushed beyond those notions. That's what actual mathematics is about. Ignoring that aspect, only giving out plug and chug formulas to memorize, and then spewing out contrived real world examples is inefficient and belies the true nature of the subject. Nobody will be motivated to learn about Pythagorean theorem when they hear they could use it to calculate the length of Sally's shadow in the sun. They will be motivated when they're pushed to understand the actual reason why it's true. That reason doesn't have much to do with applications to the real world.