- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
The adult was asking for it. Stop being such a sexy adult and you won't be raped by children.But what if the child rapes the adult?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The adult was asking for it. Stop being such a sexy adult and you won't be raped by children.But what if the child rapes the adult?
Actually, women are most fertile at 21, so there's zero evolutionary advantage to going lower, technically. I see a lot of people repeat that myth though, and sort of assumed as much when I was younger.
So even from a supposed "only physical development matters" argument that defense doesn't actually hold up, and maybe you're right that education on this matter could help.
![]()
Sure, I suppose back then there were a lot more dangers so you'd probably want to breed early, regardless of idealism. Today it's just unnecessary, and as I pointed out, evolutionarily disadvantageous, not to mention immoral.That maybe that 13-16 year old cavegirl could be cavebear food at 21. Doesn't really matter for this age outside of Apefrica anyway.
That said, I am ambivalent on the whole "ebe" thing. In Europe it is less of a taboo. A 20 and 16 year old won't raise a stink. The parents should wet the partners anyway.
But preteens is seen still in a very bad light.
A 17 year old getting pregnant will be a shitty life decision, its bad, all that.
But a 7 year old getting dicked will be even way worse, even without the added pregnancy.
Problem is, you can't eradicate it even under the reich conditions. Like faggots, it is a biomechanical error that pops up, so the best you can do is catch and send them camping to Loliswitz. Until the predator ambushes it, detecting it is never 100% good.
A noble goal, but a little utopian. Of course I was discounting darkies, but they are monkeys so who cares?
Sure, I suppose back then there were a lot more dangers so you'd probably want to breed early, regardless of idealism. Today it's just unnecessary, and as I pointed out, evolutionarily disadvantageous, not to mention immoral.
16 year olds don't know anything. Not that 18 year olds do, but you gotta draw the line somewhere, and currently 18 is the generally agreed upon proper age. Ideally it'd be 21 based on the science, but we apparently only follow the science for coof.
Preteens, I think, are at a significantly heightened risk of death from pregnancy, so there's definitely no logical argument to be had there (not that you were necessarily making one).
And yeah, it's a mental illness, or "biomechanical error" as you put it. I know you can't prevent 100% of anything but it's necessary to try. Keeping a closer eye on the LGBT would protect like 1000x more victims, but that'd be bigoted!
In America this will get you lynched probably. Another whole problem of going after pedos is that everybody's definition of pedo is different. I unironically got called creepy and pedoish by a girl because my partner at the time was petite (Also, this girl telling me shit was 4'9 and she had a boyfriend of her own, which confused me even more). Leonardo de Caprio gets called Pedo because he is 47 and refuses to date a girl under 23. I've seen guys argue that 14 year olds can consent while another argue that the AoC should be 25.A 20 and 16 year old won't raise a stink.
Pedophilia a brain abnormality/disorder/"you're born that way", a quick google searches shows that their brain's "face and sex area" respond and activate when viewing children's faces. I mean, think about it logically, if you subscribe to the theory that heterosexual attraction is based on how traits display how good of a mate you can be, a child with no big hips or developed secondary sexual characteristics obviously does not match that criteria at all. Hell, if you believe in shit like hip-to-shoulder-to-whatever ratios theories of attractiveness it doesn't make sense either. Unironically if you want to eliminate pedophilia you need to isolate the pedo gene, which we all know is literally impossible.
In America this will get you lynched probably. Another whole problem of going after pedos is that everybody's definition of pedo is different. I unironically got called creepy and pedoish by a girl because my partner at the time was petite (Also, this girl telling me shit was 4'9 and she had a boyfriend of her own, which confused me even more). Leonardo de Caprio gets called Pedo because he is 47 and refuses to date a girl under 23. I've seen guys argue that 14 year olds can consent while another argue that the AoC should be 25.
Feel you there but on other occasions. Kinda forgot that american ways are quite different and, in perspective, may be very retarded.I unironically got called creepy and pedoish by a girl because my partner at the time was petite
Nah, not until lolicon\shotacon become a forbidden thing too. It's an improtant factor, because allowing lolicon to be a legal thing because it's drawn, fictional children or adults age degraded to the children age, is a way for pedos to have a safe haven.Will we ever fully get rid of pedophiles?
I wish it was that easy but nope, nothing is simple these days.Get rid of homos and pedos will disappear
I believe it was a 9 year old.pedophiles have existed since the beggining of the human race. back during the christ days you had 15 year olds marry 30 year olds.
muhammad married a 12 year old or some shit.
do i think pedophiles are disgusting fucks despite that?
yes i do.
the question is, how do we identify pedos and make sure to stop disasters before they happen.
These elites in the upper echelon being pedos themselves have been normalising pedophilia for a while but they get complacent too fast, they become overconfident every now and then, do the most retarded shit like Netflix producing Cuties or Microsoft collaborating with Marina Abramovich.
I find your answer to be utterly disgusting. I also am in agreement somewhat with it. Whilst its easy to say "just kill them all, easy as", this is simplistic and fails to actually solve the issue. It would make the issue far worse, as child molesters would have incentive to kill the victims as a means to avoid a death penalty. But we must do something new, because what we have no is not working at all. Its like in my shitdump nation, we call out for harsher laws against pedos, but the problem is we do not enforce the laws we already have, so making them harder would still not make them enforceable. Like tax the rich harder, they don't fucking pay either way, you can use whatever number you like, they are not paying it.No. People want to shag kids and have shagged kids for 1000's of years. It's a human condition, for some reason, to want to bone 12 year olds, and history is full of examples.
We can either legalise it, and accept it (no) or make a kid fucking simulator using VR and a fleshlight. Anything short of those two will push it in to the fringes and dark web, where people really do get hurt.
Prevention is the key: it is necessary that someone begins to seriously study the phenomenon, focusing not only on pedophiles who were themselves victims, but above all on the so-called unsuspected ones. Better still: on the unsuspected young people.How exactly we deal with it I am unsure, but perhaps actually bringing them to justice and not shying away because they are muslims, or rich and powerful would be a fucking good start.
It's pretty simple why they wouldn't immediately legalize it - most people find pedophilia abhorrent, and politicians know that if they even mentioned something like this, their head would be on a spike before the day is done.I think this is a dumb thing to say for a few reasons. If the elitists are pedophiles, why don't they just legalize it now instead of continually incriminating themselves assuming that they have that power? Nothing's stopping them, because, as you said, they have all the power in this country. Secondly, if all the elitists are pedos, why did they outlaw CP in the first place? Why was the age of consent raised from 14 to 16-18 n the 1920s? So that they could let society see what happens when you oppress a people for so long just so that society can see that we should return back to our old ways perhaps? Really makes no sense. I'm not saying some people in high positions of power aren't pedophiles, but then again, it's rather coincidental if you ask me. This pizzagate stuff seems to be disinformation, given how outlandish (nd falsifiable) some of these claims are, and it is all reminiscent of the "Satanic panic" of the '80s which of course turned out to be fake news as always. Our leaders may be bad, but they are not like that now, come on.