Personality Assessment System - What if MBTI, but glowie?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Penis Drager 2.0

My memes are ironic; My depression is chronic.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 20, 2022
If you don't care for my description and just want to take the online test, click here. (WIP because the assessment wasn't originally intended as a questionnaire). For a list of all basic types, click here.
Start with "primitive" then input your 3 letter result at the start of the "basic."

The Personality Assessment System is a lot like some of the better-known personality tests like MBTI or Big5 where it attempts to classify people based on a set of core traits in order to predict their attitudes and behavior. The two selling points that set this one apart are:
  • It was developed by a CIA psychologist who was directly involved with MKULTRA.
  • It does not pretend every personality type is heckin' wholesome and valid. If you're a piece of shit, it will say so.
Because of its origin and focus, it might say you are probably a violent rapist. Maybe you're more of a dismembering prostitutes kind of guy. Perhaps you'd fit right in running a concentration camp.
Or maybe you'll strike gold and end up just like me.
He is rarely an imaginative person because he guards against autistic tendencies.
he is inclined to persevere in spite of setbacks, obvious incompetence, or failure.
As he grows older, the e*f*u becomes more delusional and an eccentric, and an although he rarely becomes a true schizophrenic, he often becomes more bizarre, eccentric, and an seclusive; most always, however, he is able to maintain himself. Alcoholism, particularly solitary drinking, may occur here
What a Chad!

Anyway, at the end of the day this is just another dumb online personality test. Take it and discuss it if that's a thing you're into. Come here to call us all retarded faggots if it's not.

MOD EDIT:
Gotta be careful in reading the stuff because of antiquated language
Like, "schizophrenic" to mean structurally self-referential/inward-facing. Or "narcissistic" meaning being more interested in the self than in external objects or relationships. Or "autistic" meaning minimizing dependency on interpersonal input for meaning.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Or maybe you'll strike gold and end up just like me.
i think this is just a long winded psued way of telling you that you have autism because i got the same thing as you lol
1766780346073.png
 
Mine is so flattering that I honestly thought I'd screwed up somewhere at first. The more I read it, though, the more I got freaked out. It's pretty much bang-on even if it hurts me to say. Whoever made this knows his stuff.
PAS_Basic_12.26.25_1.PNG

Now to go devour the other two because I down personality quizzes like alcoholics down vodka.

edit I forgot the third quiz was unfinished :(
 
Last edited:
Gotta be careful in reading the stuff because of antiquated language
Like, "schizophrenic" to mean structurally self-referential/inward-facing. Or "narcissistic" meaning being more interested in the self than in external objects or relationships. Or "autistic" meaning minimizing dependency on interpersonal input for meaning.

I think the test got me correct as a rare extremist with high resistance to social pressure and indoctrination, high tolerance for solitude and deep focus, and independence. Perhaps even optimized for epistemic independence.
Although it sucks that my result is so rare he only wrote two paragraphs and that's it
 
Here's mine.

This is a relatively common and generally effective adjustment of the primitive IFA orientation. The e*fa individual has reacted against his succor dependency needs and has developed some discipline of intellectual and autistic activities. In addition, he has learned to exploit his sensitivity. This combination can often result in considerable creativity and imagination. The e*fa is socially and interpersonally oriented and is both willing and eager to take responsibility or assume authority. Since, as a primitive F, he must have some understanding before he can learn, it can be expected that the e*fa will be realistic about skills; he will rarely undertake anything that he does not understand or appreciate.

Behavioral activity, of the sort seen in the e*r*a*, [IcFcUc] is also characteristic of the e*fa. He does not have the highly individualized toughness of the e*r*a*, [IcFcUc] but he does tend to have highly individualized interests. For example, many excellent tennis and basketball players and football quarterbacks will come from this adjustment group. Dancing, swimming, golf, and vigorous outdoor activities are common here. The e*fa are people who like to be active and, in most instances, they have a high tolerance for fatigue.

The e*fa is experientially curious. He gets a thrill out of all types of sensual stimulation, from cold showers to music to social conversation. The i*fa, [EcFuAu] in contrast, tends to be passive and contemplative because he is defending against his early activity. On the other hand, the i*fa [EcFuAu] will be active intellectually and can be characterized as intellectually curious. The e*fa is also sexually active, but is usually very well controlled. Masturbation, as such, is very threatening to him because of its autosexual and autistic connotations. He will react very much against autosexualilty by becoming extremely active in heterosexual relationships in spite of the fact that he is not inclined to become involved, in the reciprocal sense, of efa [EuFuAu] or the i*fa, [EcFuAu] with his partners.

The practical application of ideals is an important motivating factor for the e*fa. He feels he learns something in order to use it. If he becomes interested in religion, which is common, he really wants to practice what he preaches. Not only this, he also wants others to do so, too. Thus, the e*fa is an advocate. He enjoys persuasion, argument, and discussion. Under most circumstances, he is not authoritarian or discipline-oriented. He really wants people to believe, to understand, and to accept his ideas and beliefs. In this sense, he is tolerant and understanding person.

However, once he recognized that someone cannot, or will not, understand or accept his ideas, he can be quite arbitrary and unfeeling in the way he rebuffs or rejects them. Many young socialists and young communists come from this cluster; as they grow older, however, they lose much of their enthusiasm and dedication and devote more time to their individual interests. Initially, the e*fa is very perceptive of, and attracted to anything that has a group feeling and group enthusiasm. However, he is equally perceptive of lack of true identification and readily becomes disillusioned with the group. A primary characteristic of the e*fa, that is extremely difficult to define is that he will abandon a group or an individual that does not live up to his ideals; however, he really modifies these ideals, but continues to look for other groups or persons that may live up to his expectations. Thus, the e*fa, like the i*fa, [EcFuAu] has a low threshold for disillusionment. However, the i*fa [EcFuAu] is inclined to look within himself to find out what is wrong with his ideals. The e*fa has no need to do this, since he is sure about his ideals, but may become bitter and cynical at the failure of others to come up to a standard. This is the sort of adjustment that can produce the individual who is very concerned with raising standards in school, professions, and occupations in order to keep out those who cannot really qualify. There is, thus, an element of snobbishness in the e*fa. He sets very high standards for his associations and relationships and will rarely compromise them. It is this kind of person who, if raised in Nazi Germany, could accept and identify with the social purification ideas of National Socialism. If reared in the deep south of the United States, or as a white South African, he can accept and identify with the concept of segregation or apartheid. If reared in the Soviet Union, he can accept and identify with the "new man" idea of communism. More so than most, the e*fa will hold on to, and remain loyal to, the principles, ideals, and concepts established early in his life. Dedication, enthusiasm, and zeal are all characteristics of this adjustment. The e*fa is the kind of person who knows in what he believes and has the courage of his convictions.
 
I know I should be talking with a doctor about this kind of stuff but I'm amazed how much it called me out on some of the shit I never knew about myself. It gave me a profile of an IFU. I'm too much of an introvert, easily distracted, and should probably log off of kiwifarms and get a life.
But I also appreciate it since it seems to let me know what I need to work on to better myself as a person and how I might have potential to be a certified badass™️ if I actually tried.

Oh and it also had this to say about me at the end
One of the most dramatic examples of the difficulties in establishing communications with an [IFU] and an equally dramatic example of the potential for communicating, once effective contact is made, is to be found in the life of Helen Keller.
Dunno if I should be concerned or not.
 
Apparently I'm the kind of person who would create the right wing death squads.

Behavioral activity, self-sufficiency or independence, and social-interpersonal aggressiveness are the major characteristics of this adjustment derived from the primitive IFU orientation. Unlike the e*r*a*, [IcFcUc] the e*fa* has a well developed sense of responsibility and, in most instances, can sublimate or displace his primitive emotionality into productive and less personalized channels. Thus, the self-centeredness and stubborn individuality of the e*r*a* [IcFcUc] is not nearly as marked in the e*fa*. The e*fa* tends to be broadly humanitarian and is active in seeking out interpersonal relationships. However, he does not have the individual perceptivity of the efa* [EuFuUc] and is frequently judged to be sentimental, idealistic, and naive rather than truly empathic or discerning. Nevertheless, the e*fa* is oriented toward social responsibility, cultural sensitivity, and ideological consistency. Unlike the e*f*a*, [IcRcUc] the e*fa* will not take ideas and principles on faith; he must understand and believe in order to be effective. Consequently, he has less reliance on authority and convention in determining his attitudes and beliefs. There is a definite element of "free will" or choice in his values.

As a result, the e*fa* is less likely to mirror his sub-cultural milieu than is the e*f*a*; he will seek out and try to gain acceptance to those areas or fields that interest and challenge him. He does not have the conflict of the e*fa, [IcFuAu] who feels very similar but is more prone to conform or adapt to any social milieu in which he is placed even though he may not accept or believe in it. The deceptiveness of the e*fa [IcFuAu] -- the tendency to appear more comfortable and adapted socially than is the case -- is not characteristic of the e*fa*.

This need to search out and identify ideologically or idealistically with a compatible social-ideological environment is the primary drive force of the e*fa*. In this sense, he is individualistic and self-centered. However, he has marked need to rationalize or justify his actions on acceptable intellectual of social-idealistic grounds. Because of this, the e*fa* is usually not satisfied until he can proselyte others to accept and identify with his values and ideals. The e*fa* is a crusader and advocate. Normally, he accepts and attempts to become involved with only those who have attitudes and tastes similar to him. The acceptance anxiety of the e*fa*, then, is dynamically quite different than that of the ef*a*, [EuRcUc] although the superficial overt manifestations may be similar. The e*fa* is "anxious" that his values and beliefs be reciprocated so that he 'does not have to eliminate or change his associations; the er*a* [EuFcUc] is "anxious" that his values and beliefs be acceptable so that his associates do not reject him. The e*fa* tends to be independent of his associations while the ef*a* [EuRcUc] to be dependent on theirs.

While the e*fa* is basically humanitarian by principle, he can often be ruthless in practice. This occurs because he is often more interested in what a person should be than in trying to understand what he is. The productivity of the efa*, [EuFuUc] for example, is often complicated by the fact that his individual empathy makes him more of an apologist than a realist. He becomes confused by the exceptions of individual empathy makes him more of an apologists than a realist. He becomes confused by the exceptions of individual differences and tends to over-react to them. The e*fa*, on the other hand, easily recognizes how social systems, lack of opportunity, and inadequate education may produce inefficient or inadequate people. He feels that if the social system is overhauled, the opportunities provided, the educational system is corrected, those who do not benefit because they are truly inadequate, fundamentally ignorant, and basically lazy. Such people can easily be ignored or eliminated without guilt or anxiety because they are not worthy of existence. Depending on the life experience of the e*fa*, he can be a "busy-body" who is constantly engaged in trying to change the life goals and patterns of others, a competent, creative person who is skilled at finding new and better ways of doing things, or an intensely dedicated idealistic who believes that when the right social order has been created, he is justified in eliminating the misfits and insidious influences.

In general, the e*fa* individual is an ambitious, active, often aggressive, self-sufficient person who, is one form or another, is very much dedicated to change, modification, perfection, and social control. Whatever his political, social, religious, or institutional values, from his point of view, they are precise, well-defined, and fully understood. He not only expects but demands that others accept and identify with his values and beliefs. He is rather easily disillusioned, but is more likely to project against systems -- heretical ideas, the capitalistic system, the education system -- than to become introspective and evaluative. His primary psychological problems occur when he does not have social mobility through which he can find a compatible milieu. When his mobility is blocked, as for example, when boxed in by a caste, feudal, or religious system or social order, by an institutional setting, or by family tradition, he does not accept or understand; he becomes subversive, devious, and sometimes actively revolutionary.

I also hate the implication that I'm a horseshoe jump away from being a filthy communist.
 
But I also appreciate it since it seems to let me know what I need to work on to better myself as a person and how I might have potential to be a certified badass™️ if I actually tried.
I'm gonna call you out real quick and say you only did the "primitive," which is gonna be much more general "base-level" characteristics.
If you plug your primitive score into the "basic" test linked below the one you took, then you'll have a short questionnaire about how your adolescent development actually turned out which is why you see a lot of people ITT whose scores look like "IcFuUc" instead of simply "IFU."
 
1000052129.jpg
Primitive Type: IFA
Perhaps the most striking difference between the [R] adjustments and the [F] adjustments lies in the spontaneous curiosity of the [F]. The [EF] is very aware of and very involved with the external events in his experience. His responsiveness to a wide range of external stimuli is both his greatest liability and his greatest asset. The multitude of things to which he can respond and his inherent interest in responding can easily create confusion and chaos. On the other hand, if he learns to order or control this perceptivity, he may become extremely creative and productive. The [IF] has similar responsiveness but he is very aware of and very involved with the internal events in his experience. He, also, is in danger of becoming chaotic and confused because of the multiplicity of subtle stimuli that attract and interest him. However, if he learns control, he is capable of marked imaginativeness and creativity. The direction of spontaneous interest for the [EF] is external and unless he is checked or disciplined he will develop in a very one-sided manner. He will develop his environmental relationships in a fickle, intense way at the expense of his ideational activity. Likewise, the direction of interest of the [IF] is ideational, and if unchecked, he will become extremely over-ideational at the expense of his environmental relationships. Since [EF] activity is obvious and involving, there is much more chance that restraint will be brought to bear and, in general, the [EF] individual has a long period to learn some control. The [IF], on the other hand, is externally passive and the extent of his ideational activity is far from obvious. The fact that he is a "good" baby in the sense that he demands little attention, entertains himself and is fairly invulnerable to discomfort and isolation, causes him to be taken for granted, and the pressure for control is apt to come fairly late. To some extent, then, the sensory-motor or behavioral maturation of the [IF] child is likely to occur quite late.

Of the two [IF] adjustments the [IFA] baby is likely to attract the most initial attention. There is a kind of "doll baby" quality to the [IFA] infant. He demands little attention, yet is responsive to care and attention due to his social adaptability. When left alone, he is capable of amusing himself. He is very curious about himself, and most parents find this initial curiosity "cute" and tend to encourage it without recognizing the essentially narcissistic quality of the curiosity. In general, it is fun to take care of an [IFA] baby, so this type of child rarely lacks either attention or succor dependent care. Generally speaking, the qualities associated with the [IFA] as he matures are much more appropriate and acceptable in the maturing female than in the male. Under ordinary circumstances, therefore, the Primitive [IFA] male is under more pressure to modify his behavior than is the [IFA] female. The elfin-like qualities, coyness, helplessness and social facility of the true [IFA] can be very pleasing to many when they appear in a female. On the other hand, this very same trait is particularly unacceptable in the male. Thus, after the "golden" years of babyhood, the [IFA] male is placed under terrific pressure to modify or change his pattern. It is not too strange, then, that many of the most actively masculine and self-sufficient individuals in all the patterns will occur in the [IFA] male group.

As the individual is placed under pressure to modify or change, there is bound to be some resistance. The [IFA]'s revolt or resistance is internalized and thus not very obvious. His role adaptability and succor dependency needs are such that he is much more openly conforming, and he is much more likely to symbolize or ideationalize his negativism and hostility. For example, the [IFA] child is most likely to displace his hostility to his mother or to a doll or to some other inanimate object. He is also the type most likely to have imaginary playmates, not because he is lonely, but because they offer no resistance to the free rein of his imagination. Fantasy in all of its forms is easily provoked and easily maintained in the [IFA] individual. Nightmares and terror of the unknown are the bugaboos of the [IF] adjustments (sleep walking and talking in sleep are typical of [EF] patterns.) As the [IFA] makes some modification, he has considerable inner stress (as opposed to the muscular tension states of the [E]). Stuttering, asthma and allergies are the most usual early manifestations of this stress.

Oddly enough, as the [IFA] individual develops an external orientation, he experiences what is best described as a sense of discovery. His curiosity, which has been going through a state of containment, finds a new outlet. He becomes an active, eager taster of life in adulthood and may achieve extremely productive social effectiveness. He learns how to respond to subtleties and nuances of external behavior extremely well and can become an especially effective observer of the details of his external environment. Even so, he is able to remain relatively detached and non-involved.

The [IFA], because of his role sensitivity, may become an extremely misleading person. His sensitivity, capacity for empathy and apparent social-interpersonal warmth may be highly effective. However, beneath this facade, he may be an egocentric and narcissistic individual. On the other hand, given firm training and guidance, he also may become the most creative, imaginative and socially effective of any of the Primitive Types. [IFA] s are particularly effective working in programs where the aim is to benefit the greatest number. It is not unusual for the [IFA] to become extremely interested and creative in mass endeavors like socialism, communism, economic theory, social welfare and political action. However, they are particularly prone to look for ways to elevate or improve the common good or common competence. They are inclined to become very disillusioned at lack of drive, lack of enthusiasm, or lack of competence in individuals. Since, as individuals, they often lack real compassion, they can be extremely unfeeling or objective in the way they punish and destroy what they see as bad or non-productive. Certain types of militant zealots and fanatics may appear in this group.

The [IFA] is not so much a reformer as he is an implementer. He usually identifies strongly with and is very loyal to the aims, methods, principles and practices with which he identifies. He is more inclined to want to do things better than to want to do them differently. In this sense, he is more a dedicated evolutionist than a revolutionist. However, his tendency to be critical, to seek innovations, and to place proficiency above tradition or compassion is likely to make him the object of considerable distrust, dislike and concern on the part of more conventional, imitative and authority-bound individuals.

Aside from the part of being a doll baby, the rest of the assessment is extremely close to how I view myself, especially the part of being a fanatic and wanting to destroy what I see as bad.
1000052131.jpg
This one is not quite as accurate as the primitive one, probably because the way I was raised was quite different than the one it presents
Unlike the e*fa, [IcFuAu] who tends to be a doer, an activist, or a humanist, the e*fu* denies, avoids, or defends against self-related activity. Behavioral activity, but not social-interpersonal interactions, is a prominent feature of the e*fu*; he is a doer and an activist, but in an independent and an individual way. Scientists, scholars, and an highly skilled specialists of all sorts are common in this cluster.

The e*ru* [IcRuAc] characteristic of frank narcissism and an self-centeredness is mitigated in the e*fu* by a sense of responsibility, social usefulness and dedication. The e*fu* follows his interests in a rather ruthless and an insulated way, but she often does this in socially productive areas. The one thing he does not allow is for the social-interpersonal involvements to interfere with his interests, training, and an education. The e*fu* has little sense of responsibility for others and and is, thus, very self-sufficient and self-contained.

He expects to work hard to learn his skills, but he also expects to be recognized and properly rewarded once he has acquired them. This is, in a sense, the "artistic" patterns; temperament, self-interest, and an acceptance of pampering are frequent manifestations.

This adjustment has variable effectiveness. Although some if the most creative and an imaginative intellectuals are found in this cluster, it is also the pattern of some of the most morbidly self-concerned individuals. Intellectual level is particularly important in this adjustment, with the chances of effective adjustment being greater for high levels. Intelligence, per se, does not guarantee adaptation; life experience is, perhaps the most important single factor.

The primitive IFA tends to be a sensitive, nervous child who has a great chance of being pampered and petted. In some environments, this sort of child may be over-protected; he grows up to be succor dependent and vain -- ir*a [IuFcAu] or ifa. [IuFuAu] If he is under protected, he may become defensively self-reliant and negativistic -- e*r*u*. [IcFcAc] For him to become e*fu*, one of two things must have occurred: (1) After some initial protection involving pressure to be environmentally active and responsive, interpersonal-social rejection or trauma, such as death of a support figure, occurs; this causes the IFA to become hostile, disillusioned, and cynical. He is too well-defended to become autistic and withdrawn, and too well-controlled to become aggressive and emotional. Thus, he develops a conflict state characterized by frustration and morbid self-concern. Alcoholism, drug addition, and an tense apathy or agitation are frequent manifestations of this form of the e*fu* adjustment. (2) Alternatively, after protection involving pressure to be environmentally active and and responsive, the primitive IFA is exposed to, or taught, some highly individualized activity that requires application, concentration, and an practice. In order to be effective, he must learn to deny, avoid, or defend against social-interpersonal distractions. As a primitive A, he is the target of considerable social attention; thus, he must be aggressive in his denial. This is the sort of person who would rather practice the piano, work with his radio, or read about science and and mathematics than play baseball or be a social lion. To do this, he must assert his right to do so, often against considerable pressure. General productivity and an effectiveness may result from this adjustment provided, of course, that the preoccupation has ultimate social value. It is possible for this sort of person to develop interests that are so esoteric, and an to develop them in such an individualistic and an self-centered way, that he has no expression of social responsibility.

The crude sexuality of the e*r* does not occur in this pattern, nor does the conventional sexuality of the e*fa. [IcFuAu] Sublimation of autosexuality is most common in the e*fu*; drugs, art, music, and stream-of consciousness literature are possible outlets. Almost always, however, when others intrude, distract, or try to share such experiences, the e*fu* becomes negativistic and bitterly hostile.
 
Last edited:
I'm gonna call you out real quick and say you only did the "primitive," which is gonna be much more general "base-level" characteristics.
If you plug your primitive score into the "basic" test linked below the one you took, then you'll have a short questionnaire about how your adolescent development actually turned out which is why you see a lot of people ITT whose scores look like "IcFuUc" instead of simply "IFU."
Oh shit guess I'll do a retake then.
Edit: Got my results back
This is a reasonably effective adaptation of the primitive IFU orientation; it is relatively more common for women than for men. The ifu pattern is quite similar to the ifa* [IuFuUc] adjustment, but represents more individualism and less conventionality. While the ifa* [IuFuUc] tries to establish a uniform role that gives him as little social-interpersonal anxiety as possible, the ifu is both less conforming and less conventional; snobbery, pretentiousness, and hauteur are less likely because the ifu is relatively oblivious to his social image and less consistent in maintaining it. However, as he reaches maturity, the ifu is likely to be more aware of his failure to pay enough attention to his image; social-interpersonal anxiety is quite common in the adult.

Fundamentally, the ifu is a person with so much intellectual curiosity that he can, for long periods of time, become so involved in his own interests and attitudes that he has little time or inclination to be aware of the other people in his environment. The ir*u [IuFcUu] is completely self-centered in a narcissistic way. His self-centeredness is directed toward the acquisition of knowledge and skills; what he learns makes his behavior more appropriate and more useful, socially, than that of the ir*u. [IuFcUu] The ifu is self-centered because he is so busy getting knowledge of an intellectual and abstract nature that he misses opportunities to acquire social and pragmatic skills. He is usually a serious, dedicated student who learns his lessons well and finds sustaining pleasure from the nuances of what he studies. Because he commits so much of his psychological energy to his sort of activity, he has little breadth or versatility in anything other than intellectual interests. The ifa* [IuFuUc] spends much of his time trying to develop a social role, for he has a strong sense of social-interpersonal responsibility as well as personal integrity and ethical standards. The ifu develops his ethics, his principles, and his integrity, but often does so at the expense of any kind of conventional social-interpersonal orientation.

Individuality, integrity, and intellectual specialization, then, are the primary characteristics of the ifu, particularly if he is average or better in intelligence. Like the e*fu, [IcFuUu] he chooses rather early in life the areas of his interest and application and sticks to these assiduously. Unlike the e*fu, [IcFuUu] however, his interests are more diffuse, artistic, creative, and abstract. Thus, he is more philosophical, contemplative, evaluative, and mystical in orientation.

Art, music, literature, and social studies are more likely to interest him than mathematics, science, and economics. He may be quite imaginative in the areas of his interest, but is not as imaginative as the ifu*. [IuFuAc] The ifu is succor dependent in that the milieu in which he lives must give him support and direction. Unlike the ifa*, [IuFuUc] he does not feel, even intellectually, any need to be socially active and aggressive. There is an element of "the world owes me a living" to his adjustment because he is inclined to believe that he deserves acceptance and understanding for his intellectual productivity rather than for his social perceptivity and interpersonal activities. This attitude makes the ifu careless, indifferent, or insulated about his social relationships. As a result, he is often considered different, unusual, queer, eccentric, or odd. Since structure, form, and security are so important to the ifu, it is important to understand the nature of this need. The drive of the ifu is toward creativity and imagination; thus, he must live in a milieu that does not thwart or frustrate this need. Concepts such as seniority, tenure, accreditation, and academic freedom become very important to him because these frameworks give him the freedom to be different and, at the same time, guarantee that he will not be punished for his difference. In some ways, this is similar to the need of the i*fu [EcFuUu] and i*f*u [EcRcUu] for status and recognition. Dynamically, however, these groups are more concerned about discrimination because they are disliked or misunderstood, than about lack of opportunity to be creative and imaginative. In addition, the i*fu [EcFuUu] and i*f*u [EcRcUu] are much less passive and spontaneously contemplative than is the ifu.
Dunno if I wanna say it's fairly accurate or not. But atleast it didn't call me a schizo like the last test.
 
Last edited:
I’ve been given this one before. It’s quite brutal in it’s assessment
Ic Rc Ao Anyway
I always come out as an INTJ when the do this shit at work. They keep hiring these idiot consultants and then they don’t like the results .
 
Dear federal agencies et al. pwease use this information against me
pasq-iairesultb.webp
b64types-bIuRcUu IosevkaTermSlabExtended.webp
The if*u pattern, essentially, is the true, classic, schizophrenic adjustment. It differs from the iru [IuRuUu] adjustment in that there is more inner control, a kind of defensiveness that makes the if*u less suggestible. Since the mood vacillations and impulsiveness of the iru [IuRuUu] adjustment are not present, the if*u is tense, withdrawn, and autistically preoccupied. To a certain extent, the if*u has made an attempt to relate, but he has not been successful. He does not continue to be responsive, as does the iru, [IuRuUu] but gives in to his inner needs; at the same time, he fails to differentiate what is autistic and what is experiential. He sees relationships and has a kind of sense of responsibility, but this is distorted, bizarre, and unrealistic. He cannot separate true external guidance and control from his own autistic productions, so becomes a splintered, confused individual who does not recognize his own confusion. He responds to inner, self-generated stimuli as though they were external in origin, is impervious to logic, and insulated from experience. While the if*u, in extreme cases, has either lost or never developed this ability.

The if*u*, [IuRcAc] on the other hand, has had more experience with reality. During his childhood, at least, he usually had considerable attention paid to his role-playing ability and has reacted against the social pressures that have been put on him. The if*u*, [IuRcAc] in a sense, escapes from the pressures of being socially active by developing some form of appropriate intellectualization. The if*u, however, is much more insulated from the very beginning. He is negativistic in child hood, but learns not to be combative or obviously resistant. Generally, this results in his being left alone. His intellectualizations are likely to be fantasy and, in most cases, highly autistic. In a few cases, the if*u may find appropriate outlets, but he will always be resistant to direction and insulated from control. He is highly individualistic and there is always an excellent chance that he will develop in the schizophrenic direction. If his intellectual level is so high that he can acquire knowledge with little effort, he may not become schizophrenic, but he will obviously function far below his potential. As he grows older, the if*u becomes more withdrawn and out of contact because more pressure is applied on him to be otherwise. If too much pressure is applied, he withdraws completely, losing all touch with reality; he is then a full-blown schizophrenic.

At best, the if*u is a self-preoccupied, highly individualistic person who is more responsive to his inner mental needs than to the events in the external world. He may make a fairly adequate adjustment to a milieu that accepts him for what he is and allows him to be a meditative, contemplative, and self-involved social isolate. In most cases, however, the milieu will not tolerate such idiosyncrasies, and the resulting pressure will result in schizophrenic fantasy. Hallucinations, delusions, and inappropriate behavior are very common in the if*u adjustment.

To a certain extent, the primary problem of the if*u is that as he attempts to "discover" reality, he is faced with so much frustration and guilt that he cannot tolerate his psychological discomfort. In effect, this is a massive inferiority reaction that can be met only by retreating behind his insulation. At times, the if*u may have enough insight to know that he should be different, but he has no understanding, even at an intellectual level, of what he can do about it. He cannot lash out in a primitive way against his frustrators, as does the iru, [IuRuUu] who may assault his tormentors without apparent reason and certainly without explanation. The if*u, who must find some intellectual rationalization for his behavior, over-controls his need to strike out until it becomes unbearable. Then, although combativeness comes unpredictably, it can occur because "voices" told him to do it; this gives him a rationale, but relieves him from all responsibility.

All IRU adjustments have a need for defining what is "good" and what is "bad." Since these individuals have limited capacity to make this judgment, most IRU individuals follow the lead of the authority figures in their world. The if*u, who has unusually limited ability to recognize authority figures, knows that he should be "good", but his authority recognition is confused. It is not too strange, then, that much of what his "voices" say to him represents these judgmental poles. The if*u will obey, without question, the commands of the "good voices". In the same way, while the iru [IuRuUu] will take what he wants without guilt or explanation, the if*u needs some rationalization; this permission can range from the concurrence of his "voices" to a delusional belief that something is his or that he is entitled to it by position or right. In this later case, he can believe that he is the true natural son of the president. Or the reincarnation of the Holy Ghost. His sense of responsibility, or conscience, still operates, but in a bizarre or ludicrous manner. Nonetheless, it serves as a method to relieve him of guilt.
 
These results are quite funny
Primitive Type: IRU
Primitive Type: IRU
The [IRU] is one of the most difficult Primitive Types to describe, primarily because of the extreme contrasts that may exist here. More so than in the other Primitive Types, the [IRU] depends on the guidance and direction of external events to form and mold the adult personality.

In the primitive state, the [IRU] is not only a very passive infant, but is also a nonresponsive one. The [IRA] does have social responsiveness and picks up and imitates the social-interpersonal skills of his immediate environment. The primary danger to the maturity of the [IRA] is that he may mask his autism and self-centeredness by his apparent adaptability and impressionistic social-interpersonal skills. His fundamental lack of maturity may not become obvious until it is too late to do much about it. But passivity and nonresponsiveness of the [IRU] is very obvious, almost from the beginning, and provokes in parents or parent substitutes a definite concern. It is rare, therefore, for the [IRU] not to be placed under strong external pressure to be active and responsive at a very early age. The [IRU] is not only very imitative but is relatively slow to learn externalized activities. Repetition, practice and role imitation come easy for people in this group. Since the [IRU] is not involved with what he does, he moves on to each new activity more or less as directed, without much emotion. Since he has less need of interaction (acceptance, praise and reassurance), he appears to be task-oriented and objective. Because he is neither hurt nor upset by criticism or correction, he makes necessary changes efficiently and effectively. To an unusual extent, then, the [IRU] can be just as good as his teacher or mentor. If he falls under the tutelage of a highly skilled person, he can become exceptionally effective. Thus when a talent exists in an [IRU] and is recognized and developed, he can become an outstanding performer. However, if the [IRU] is not placed under consistent external pressure and his skills and special talents not recognized, he can become a listless, withdrawn, autistic and non-productive person. The paradox of this adjustment is that it not only produces the outstandingly successful technician but also the most clear-cut person who has lost touch with reality.

The [IRU] begins life as an internally oriented, passive child who is not particularly attractive or interesting to others. Regardless of his intelligence, his maturation rate will be considered slow because he will show little spontaneous behavioral activity and little social responsiveness. Once he is under pressure to learn, however, he will be a perseverating but not particularly apt student. Initially, he will be inefficient and awkward but at least responsive (or willing). He will then begin to receive considerable attention primarily because he appears so helpless. Once he begins really to respond, he is more able to sustain his attention and interest than most children, and after a slow start, makes rapid progress towards maturation.

The [IRU] does not attract competition for direction and control, and once he responds to the influence of an individual, he is very likely to remain consistently loyal. In him, respect for and obedience to authority are traits that are particularly marked.

The [IRU] is relatively invulnerable to most childhood emotional trauma. He has the succor dependency of the [IRA] and as long as he is provided with this type of security he is more or less insulated from emotional shock. Warmth, or lack of warmth, from his succor figures has little to do with his adjustment per se. In fact, probably more confusion and frustration is generated in the [IRU] when the involvement is too emotionally demanding. By nature, he is not demonstrative and when he tries to be, he may be quite inappropriate and inept. He may receive unexpected punishment for reasons he is incapable of understanding. This is unlike the [IRA], who learns appropriate responses, but has little understanding or insight into their true meaning. Loss of succor dependent status before learning how to be independent and too much early permissiveness may be the most traumatic events for the [IRU].

Acquisition of language is usually somewhat retarded. The [IRU] is the type of person who has little need to communicate, yet may learn language quickly when necessary. He is the kind of child who suddenly begins to talk without much trial and error. Often he learns more vocabulary than he appears to, and is regarded as a slow learner. On the other hand, more so than most Primitive Types, the [IRU] suffers from exposure in an environment in which there is limited opportunity to learn vocabulary. As an adult, the [IRU] is often the kind of person who learns the language of his profession (or a foreign language) with considerable ease in spite of the fact he may not know the vernacular of his own language. He has a limited need to be understood and usually will learn only enough to get by.

Since the [IRU] individual as a child is obviously withdrawn, autistic and contemplative, he will be under almost immediate attack from outside forces to "pay attention" or to busy himself. There is a "trance-like" state to his passivity that disturbs the observer. The child quickly learns that his withdrawal causes violent reactions, and he easily becomes guilty and frightened when he has a tendency to withdraw. He anxiously seeks support from the outside to provide him with means to avoid the "trauma" of withdrawal. Compulsive behavior patterns, then, may be very frequent manifestations in the [IRU] child. These compulsive patterns may range all the way from compulsive thumb sucking (as a means of keeping himself alert and responsive) to other more active, compulsive patterns of behavior. A primary early problem of the [IRU] child is that he may lose awareness of certain requirements and he will resort to rituals as a means of remembering. For example, toilet training an [IRU] child is apt to be troublesome, not because it becomes for him a means of getting attention (as in the case of an [ERU]), but because he has limited awareness both of the need for toilet elimination and the discomfort of wet or dirty clothes. He does learn to respond to the emotional outburst his lack of awareness provokes in others, and he attempts to learn how to avoid this. As a result, if the [IRU] is trained to regular toilet habits, he is prone to make what is best described as a conditioned response. He eliminates on schedule and in the area prescribed by his training. Failure to maintain his schedule or sometimes even a change in his toilet facilities will bring on constipation. This tendency to respond in a conditioned way is characteristic of the [IRU]; regular, ritualized habits and procedures are most common in adults of this group. This tendency towards conditioned or rote responses may also produce aberrations. The effects of early fright (for example, dog bites, fire exposure, violent experiences in the dark) will linger for a long period in spite of the fact the individual has forgotten the original cause. Trauma in the [IRU] child is most likely to occur as the result of startle reactions. These reactions are most often associated with experiences where the [IRU], oblivious to what is going on around him, is suddenly shaken out of his trance. Little wonder, that many an [IRU] has profound feelings of panic when he starts to become autistic and contemplative.

The [ERU] develops suspiciousness and mistrust of persons in his environment who disappoint or reject him. And he develops suspicion and mistrust of all the events and occurrences that take him by surprise and startle him. The [ERU] generally learns how to do things for himself so he will not be hurt and ignored. The [IRU] learns to use the people in his environment as a means for learning what is right and wrong and to avoid the unknown. A general characteristic of personality types as opposed to [E] personality types is an awareness of a world full of unseen forces that cause unexpected and disturbing effects. The [IRU] is particularly prone to this type of "reality anxiety" but is one of the most active of the personalities in learning how to recognize and respond to the external world.
>The primary danger to the maturity of the [IRA] is that he may mask his autism and self-centeredness by his apparent adaptability and impressionistic social-interpersonal skills
>His fundamental lack of maturity may not become obvious until it is too late to do much about it

>Since the [IRU] individual as a child is obviously withdrawn, autistic and contemplative, he will be under almost immediate attack from outside forces to "pay attention" or to busy himself
:lossmanjack:
Man what the hell

Overall profile: Io Rc Uu
The e*f*u adjustment is most often resistant in nature. Unlike the e*f*a* [IcRcUc] who adapts to, imitates, and precisely conforms to his milieu or cultural heritage, the e*f*u is more likely to be out-of-pattern, nonimative of the general milieu, and more apt to have self-generated and self-inspired interests. Often, these interests are definitely foreign to his heritage and the e*f*u has had to be stubborn in order to develop and maintain them.

In some cases, e*f*u represents an intellectual or intellectualizing adjustment in which the individual has become indifferent to, or ignored, the development of social-interpersonal skills. He has not only developed mental discipline, but he has learned to be evaluated and probing. In both instances, it is the modification of socially conforming and interpersonal activity that differentiates the e*f*u for the e*f*a*. [IcRcUc]

Much of the time, the e*f*u feels that he is being creative; in fact, he is usually able to be productive at the level expected from his intellectual capacity. He is rarely an imaginative person because he guards against autistic tendencies. He is likely to be a very effective mental technician, and can be proficient in such diverse areas as physics, economics, and music theory. It is probable that some composers come from this cluster, and it is relatively certain that the best computer programmers are found here. At middle and lower ranges of intelligence, the most precise typist, machine operators, and stock or inventory clerks are found.

A primary characteristic of the e*f*u is his social-interpersonal insulation. The true e*f*u makes only the most superficial effort to develop social versatility. Shyness is often present, but in most instances, the e*f*u is actually indifferent to social pressures. Living alone, being self-sufficient and self-reliant, are non-stressful. Unlike the e*ru, [IcRuUu] who is generally self centered and immature, the e*f*u has a sense of responsibility and a genuine involvement with his interests. What he is doing is all important to him; he expects to gain security for the quality of his productivity. Since he is likely to be ignored -- he rarely is disliked and teased as is the i*f*u [EcRcUu] -- he becomes very settled and preoccupied with his own activity. He has little interest in authority or prestige positions, but he is quite threatened by any change of pattern, whether this be a move to a new apartment, or a requirement to change or modify his work habits. He usually finds his interests early in life and is consistent in his preparation; once established, he is stable and long-lasting.

Among women, this pattern will produce many highly effective nuns, nurses, and office managers. However, it is a characteristic of the e*f*u women to be more effective in the rituals, procedures, and techniques of her calling than in the nuances of compassion and human understanding. She has a strong sense of responsibility, but is often cold, detached, and overly rational. This form of adjustment, however, does not have the defensive cruelty or dogmatic authoritarianism of the i*f* patterns.

The primary problems of the e*f*u stem from his consistency and his inner tension. As indicated above, once a course of behavior is determined, the e*f*u is not only persistent, but resistant to change. The appropriateness of his interests, then, is an important ingredient in his ultimate adjustment. If his interest is inappropriate or unrealistic, he is inclined to persevere in spite of setbacks, obvious incompetence, or failure. The Greenwich Village poet, painter, musician, actor, or author who persists in the face of continuous failure and an lack of talent is an example. As he grows older, the e*f*u becomes more delusional and an eccentric, and an although he rarely becomes a true schizophrenic, he often becomes more bizarre, eccentric, and an seclusive; most always, however, he is able to maintain himself. Alcoholism, particularly solitary drinking, may occur here; drug addiction ranging from Benzedrine (because it makes him feel alert and active) to hallucinogens (because they make him feel creative and imaginative) is also common. Insomnia, restlessness, and nervous mannerisms are also evident. Headaches, produced by inner tension, depression in the form of apathy, mental confusion, and blocking are also common.
>Since he is likely to be ignored -- he rarely is disliked and teased as is the i*f*u [EcRcUu] -- he becomes very settled and preoccupied with his own activity
>As he grows older, the e*f*u becomes more delusional and an eccentric, and an although he rarely becomes a true schizophrenic, he often becomes more bizarre, eccentric, and an seclusive; most always, however, he is able to maintain himself
>Alcoholism, particularly solitary drinking, may occur here; drug addiction ranging from Benzedrine (because it makes him feel alert and active) to hallucinogens (because they make him feel creative and imaginative) is also common. Insomnia, restlessness, and nervous mannerisms are also evident. Headaches, produced by inner tension, depression in the form of apathy, mental confusion, and blocking are also common

:stress:
I might become a mentally ill lolcow. What the hell bros
 
Here are my results:

1766869454737.png
Primitive Type: IRU
The [IRU] is one of the most difficult Primitive Types to describe, primarily because of the extreme contrasts that may exist here. More so than in the other Primitive Types, the [IRU] depends on the guidance and direction of external events to form and mold the adult personality.

In the primitive state, the [IRU] is not only a very passive infant, but is also a nonresponsive one. The [IRA] does have social responsiveness and picks up and imitates the social-interpersonal skills of his immediate environment. The primary danger to the maturity of the [IRA] is that he may mask his autism and self-centeredness by his apparent adaptability and impressionistic social-interpersonal skills. His fundamental lack of maturity may not become obvious until it is too late to do much about it. But passivity and nonresponsiveness of the [IRU] is very obvious, almost from the beginning, and provokes in parents or parent substitutes a definite concern. It is rare, therefore, for the [IRU] not to be placed under strong external pressure to be active and responsive at a very early age. The [IRU] is not only very imitative but is relatively slow to learn externalized activities. Repetition, practice and role imitation come easy for people in this group. Since the [IRU] is not involved with what he does, he moves on to each new activity more or less as directed, without much emotion. Since he has less need of interaction (acceptance, praise and reassurance), he appears to be task-oriented and objective. Because he is neither hurt nor upset by criticism or correction, he makes necessary changes efficiently and effectively. To an unusual extent, then, the [IRU] can be just as good as his teacher or mentor. If he falls under the tutelage of a highly skilled person, he can become exceptionally effective. Thus when a talent exists in an [IRU] and is recognized and developed, he can become an outstanding performer. However, if the [IRU] is not placed under consistent external pressure and his skills and special talents not recognized, he can become a listless, withdrawn, autistic and non-productive person. The paradox of this adjustment is that it not only produces the outstandingly successful technician but also the most clear-cut person who has lost touch with reality.

The [IRU] begins life as an internally oriented, passive child who is not particularly attractive or interesting to others. Regardless of his intelligence, his maturation rate will be considered slow because he will show little spontaneous behavioral activity and little social responsiveness. Once he is under pressure to learn, however, he will be a perseverating but not particularly apt student. Initially, he will be inefficient and awkward but at least responsive (or willing). He will then begin to receive considerable attention primarily because he appears so helpless. Once he begins really to respond, he is more able to sustain his attention and interest than most children, and after a slow start, makes rapid progress towards maturation.

The [IRU] does not attract competition for direction and control, and once he responds to the influence of an individual, he is very likely to remain consistently loyal. In him, respect for and obedience to authority are traits that are particularly marked.

The [IRU] is relatively invulnerable to most childhood emotional trauma. He has the succor dependency of the [IRA] and as long as he is provided with this type of security he is more or less insulated from emotional shock. Warmth, or lack of warmth, from his succor figures has little to do with his adjustment per se. In fact, probably more confusion and frustration is generated in the [IRU] when the involvement is too emotionally demanding. By nature, he is not demonstrative and when he tries to be, he may be quite inappropriate and inept. He may receive unexpected punishment for reasons he is incapable of understanding. This is unlike the [IRA], who learns appropriate responses, but has little understanding or insight into their true meaning. Loss of succor dependent status before learning how to be independent and too much early permissiveness may be the most traumatic events for the [IRU].

Acquisition of language is usually somewhat retarded. The [IRU] is the type of person who has little need to communicate, yet may learn language quickly when necessary. He is the kind of child who suddenly begins to talk without much trial and error. Often he learns more vocabulary than he appears to, and is regarded as a slow learner. On the other hand, more so than most Primitive Types, the [IRU] suffers from exposure in an environment in which there is limited opportunity to learn vocabulary. As an adult, the [IRU] is often the kind of person who learns the language of his profession (or a foreign language) with considerable ease in spite of the fact he may not know the vernacular of his own language. He has a limited need to be understood and usually will learn only enough to get by.

Since the [IRU] individual as a child is obviously withdrawn, autistic and contemplative, he will be under almost immediate attack from outside forces to "pay attention" or to busy himself. There is a "trance-like" state to his passivity that disturbs the observer. The child quickly learns that his withdrawal causes violent reactions, and he easily becomes guilty and frightened when he has a tendency to withdraw. He anxiously seeks support from the outside to provide him with means to avoid the "trauma" of withdrawal. Compulsive behavior patterns, then, may be very frequent manifestations in the [IRU] child. These compulsive patterns may range all the way from compulsive thumb sucking (as a means of keeping himself alert and responsive) to other more active, compulsive patterns of behavior. A primary early problem of the [IRU] child is that he may lose awareness of certain requirements and he will resort to rituals as a means of remembering. For example, toilet training an [IRU] child is apt to be troublesome, not because it becomes for him a means of getting attention (as in the case of an [ERU]), but because he has limited awareness both of the need for toilet elimination and the discomfort of wet or dirty clothes. He does learn to respond to the emotional outburst his lack of awareness provokes in others, and he attempts to learn how to avoid this. As a result, if the [IRU] is trained to regular toilet habits, he is prone to make what is best described as a conditioned response. He eliminates on schedule and in the area prescribed by his training. Failure to maintain his schedule or sometimes even a change in his toilet facilities will bring on constipation. This tendency to respond in a conditioned way is characteristic of the [IRU]; regular, ritualized habits and procedures are most common in adults of this group. This tendency towards conditioned or rote responses may also produce aberrations. The effects of early fright (for example, dog bites, fire exposure, violent experiences in the dark) will linger for a long period in spite of the fact the individual has forgotten the original cause. Trauma in the [IRU] child is most likely to occur as the result of startle reactions. These reactions are most often associated with experiences where the [IRU], oblivious to what is going on around him, is suddenly shaken out of his trance. Little wonder, that many an [IRU] has profound feelings of panic when he starts to become autistic and contemplative.

The [ERU] develops suspiciousness and mistrust of persons in his environment who disappoint or reject him. And he develops suspicion and mistrust of all the events and occurrences that take him by surprise and startle him. The [ERU] generally learns how to do things for himself so he will not be hurt and ignored. The [IRU] learns to use the people in his environment as a means for learning what is right and wrong and to avoid the unknown. A general characteristic of personality types as opposed to [E] personality types is an awareness of a world full of unseen forces that cause unexpected and disturbing effects. The [IRU] is particularly prone to this type of "reality anxiety" but is one of the most active of the personalities in learning how to recognize and respond to the external world.

1766869503527.png
This is the most primitive and least tense adjustment of the primitive IRU orientation. There are many similarities between iru and ira, [IuRuAu] but the iru is not as deceptive or misleading. Since he does not have the imitative role adaptability of the ira, [IuRuAu] the schizoid flavor and self-centered withdrawal of the iru are very obvious. He is usually recognized and dealt with as a schizoid; there are few attempts by others toward social-interpersonal involvement.

The iru and ira* [IuRuUc] adjustments are also very similar. However, the iru does not develop the role uniform social behavior of the ira·. Rather than stereotyping and caricaturing social behavior, the iru tends to be oblivious to, indifferent toward, or uncertain about his social-interpersonal role. He uses very little social initiative of any kind and, thus, tends to be passive and preoccupied in social situations. Shyness and elusiveness are common characteristics. When placed in social situations, moreover, the ir will be non-responsive and non-active. He is rarely as defensive as might be the i*r*u*, [EcFcAc] who has a need to avoid or escape his desire for activity. The iru adjustment is one of true indifference.

Since the primitive IRU is rarely left alone because his non-participation is so obvious, he has a choice -- in an abstract, not a conscious sense -- of either cutting off his responsiveness entirely or learning to respond to direction. The ira* [IuRuUc] has been described as the adjustment through which an individual learns a social role that covers or masks his schizoid activity. In the purist sense, the iru adjustment represents a procedural ability rather than a role-playing ability. The iru covers or obscures his schizoid tendencies by learning rituals; protocols, and procedures that he can persevere and use to avoid either the threat of complete isolation where he might become autistic or the threat of social-interpersonal activity where he will be shy or indifferent.

If a satisfactory adjustment can be made at all, the iru will be very work-oriented. As is true for most of the adjustments derived from the primitive IRU orientation, the effectiveness of the iru is very much a function of the skill and attention of his teachers and the extent to which his intellectual level allows him to learn by rote what is required. The e*ru [IcRuUu] acquires a certain amount of discipline of his autistic tendencies, but the iru lacks self-discipline; in addition to learning how to perform what is required, he must also be supervised and controlled while doing it. To a certain extent, the iru becomes inoperative and passive when left to his own devices. The e*ru [IcRuUu] can often be kept out of trouble by giving him a complex task to perform; in contrast, the iru tends to get into trouble unless he is given frequent supervision and is forced to perform. His problems are passivity, inactivity, and social-interpersonal withdrawal.

The psychotic iru, for example, will respond well to occupational therapy, but if it is withdrawn (because he seems to be responding), he relapses into apathy and non-response.

The iru has little or no sense of responsibility. He is selfish, self-centered, and an insulated against the needs and desires of others. Like the e*ru, [IcRuUu] he takes what he wants when he wants it, with little or no regard for the consequences. Unlike the e*ru, [IcRuUu] however, the iru is not active or aggressive in taking material things or in any interpersonal sexual activity. While the e*ru [IcRuUu] may rape with little awareness of the object -- he may be guilty of sexual assault of an aged woman or necrophilia -- the iru is more prone to compulsive masturbation. Some exhibitionists may be iru, but they are less likely to be exhibiting themselves in order to gain attention than to be so auto-erotically involved that they are oblivious to the inappropriateness of their behavior.

Moodiness is an aspect of the iru adjustment, but it must be remembered that overt affective signs are not characteristic of the primitive internalizezer. He must learn to show his feelings in an appropriate manner, but, as pointed out elsewhere, these over displays are not necessarily related to his true feelings. Since the iru shows less overt feeling than any other basic cluster, moodiness, as it occurs in him, is relatively unobservable. The primary signs of moodiness are found in his responsiveness to direction. Apathy may be an indication of intense inner feeling because he is so preoccupied with his inner experience that he loses what little external responsiveness he may have developed. This accounts, in part, for the fact that the iru may unexpectedly and violently react to attempts to arouse him from his apathy or apparent lethargy. Extreme violence in defense of his inner preoccupations is not uncommon in the iru.

The ability to control many of the iru tendencies is directly related to intellectual level. However, it is generally true that the iru does not come near to living up to his intellectual potential. Many very bright iru persons will do an adequate job in procedure-bound, ritual-oriented positions, but their performance is ordinarily considerably below expectations. Some child prodigies, particularly those who can learn numbers and mathematics quickly and who overachieve in childhood, but fail to make an adequate or productive adjustment in adulthood, may come from this cluster. At best, the iru is a schizoid, and even schizophrenic, person who is compulsive, ritualistic, and poorly socialized.

>While the e*ru [IcRuUu] may rape with little awareness of the object -- he may be guilty of sexual assault of an aged woman or necrophilia -- the iru is more prone to compulsive masturbation.
>Some exhibitionists may be iru, but they are less likely to be exhibiting themselves in order to gain attention than to be so auto-erotically involved that they are oblivious to the inappropriateness of their behavior.


The CIA is calling me a gooner 🤣
 
Last edited:
he may be guilty of sexual assault of an aged woman or necrophilia -- the iru is more prone to compulsive masturbation.
Ive always found the utter brutality of this typing to be funny. Total ego takedown. It doesn’t hold back does it? It’s like astrology for masochists.
Also honeypot but whatever
 
Back
Top Bottom