Personality Assessment System - What if MBTI, but glowie?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Could you explain why do you believe that to be the case?
It's easy to answer a question you know the answer to right? Or one you can say is close enough. What does your personality type do when you're given no good options? It's a direct challenge and response which helps you understand how someone deals with a no win situation. If this test is to be done in person, seeing how someone responds to it helps you understand them and their personality.
 
Could you explain why do you believe that to be the case?
Not understanding this innately is likely why you're pegged as autistic on the test.

Not a jab or a dig at you, it's the difference in approach. You're looking for absolutes to dictate someone's entire being, however people are very complex and often will do things that may be contradictory, or may not be an absolute 'good'. When presented with a grey scenario with binary answers, it forces people who may be indecisive to make a decision based on their own thoughts and feelings rather than what they think is 'correct'. It helps pry more of an individual's personality out, by forcing them to make a choice they may not normally have to.

Looking for absolutes, however, can be a very logical way of processing people. Like a tickbox. It takes the idea of a personality test and turns it very literal; and in normal tests, there is a correct answer and an incorrect answer. That way of thinking is fairly common in autists, as the empirically 'correct' answer is often the most desired as opposed to their personal answer
 
I got IFA/e*r*u* (IcFcAc)
The e*r*u* is not only masochistic, but he is also sadistic. Many e*r*u* vacillate between hostility directed toward the self and toward others. It is this sort of person who is most likely to take aggressive sadistic actions toward others. Individuals who stick needles in women on the streets, or carve initials on the breasts and thighs of prostitutes, or who dismember the bodies of victims of their hostility, most frequently come from this cluster. These acts are not followed by contrition, but by dissatisfaction that results in self-destruction or self-mutilation. It is not uncommon for the e*r*u* to go haughtily and proudly to execution because, in some bizarre way, this represents the final solution of his awful conflict. The extreme forms of this pattern are among the few universally bad adjustments of all the basic patterns.
Interesting to know if I ever go off the deep end after I'm done slicing my own skin up I'm going to be carving up prozzies and chopping up anyone who annoys me and proud of doing it.

I know these descriptions are meant to be the most extreme in that grouping but the IcFcAc one in particular doesn't have any crossover with anything in my life that I can think of, so makes me wonder if I maybe overthought some of the questions.
 
Fuck this bullshit. It's completely rigged. It just called me autistic for no reason at all. What a bunch of evil niggers.

And then it called me schizophrenic. Fuck this!
 
Fuck this bullshit. It's completely rigged. It just called me autistic for no reason at all. What a bunch of evil niggers.

And then it called me schizophrenic. Fuck this!
I'm sorry comrade.

The e*f*a has learned to manage his autistic susceptibilities and succor dependency needs and has developed a strong sense of values or conscience.
We can't all be perfect, I'm afraid.

 
I've took the test multiple times and I've noticed that it will mark you as autistic or schizoid if you express any indifference towards the feelings of others or general human suffering. I think that the test does not handle this sort of thing accurately because there are levels to this kind of stuff. For example one might not care about a misfortune of some stranger who lives on the other side of the globe while caring for the misfortune of their next-door neighbor. Same with the questions about accidentally offending someone, if it's a person I respect it will bother me, if it's someone on the internet then who cares. In both cases it seems like it's not possible to give a truly truthful answer and yet at the same time the answers seem to change the outcome rather drastically.
Let's not forget that this thing is old and uses different definition for these terms. See this page:
1768266038512.png

And for anyone interested, there's also case discussion. Interesting read.
 
This test was invented by a demon worshipping pedophile and should be ignored.
 
What does your personality type do when you're given no good options? It's a direct challenge and response which helps you understand how someone deals with a no win situation.
I agree in principle, but at the same time I doubt that this test in particular measures these kinds of things. The test is essentially asking me to treat close friends, members of my own family and complete strangers as if there were no differences between any of these groups. So it's not a matter of a "win/lose" situation but rather a matter of several different situations being treated as one and the same. I find this to be an unreasonable approach.
If I answer the questions I've described previously as if I were relating to a complete stranger I get IuRuUu which means I am a schizoid that is unable to care for other people. If I answer these questions as if I were to consider a friend I get EcRcAu which in turn doesn't sound that much out of the ordinary. Which one is the correct assessment?

Not understanding this innately is likely why you're pegged as autistic on the test.
I was interested in the reasoning behind this statement and whether it was a case of a classic gut feeling or whether there was more to it that I wasn't aware of, such as the test taking that into account.
 
Oh neat a CIA assessment made by a child rapist meant to tell you that you're broken and worthless and your only use in life is to be fucked in the ass and pumped with psychedelic mind control drugs so you can serve the zionist genocide state.
 
I too browse /sci/

Anyhow I pulled a shiny type

This is the most primitive of the IRU patterns and an tends to be relatively rare. In general, the ir*u has made little adaptation or modification of his primitive tendencies; he is a non-involving schizoid person with limited emotional control and little awareness of any need to develop social-interpersonal competence. At best, he is a self-centered, highly autistic person who is individualistic and self-seeking; at worst, he is the classic childhood schizophrenic who never develops beyond his autistic personalized world.

Like the ir*u*, [IuFcAc] discussed below, this is a narcissistic adjustment, but it lacks the negativism and social-interpersonal defensiveness of the ir*u adjustment. Instead, the ir*u is much more socially passive and insulated. The ir*a* [IuFcUc] has learned some form of social adaptation in his development that maintains him fairly effectively, but the ir*u remains socially and interpersonally insulated from the beginning without developing superficial maturity. He is completely succor dependent and needs constant care and attention, not because he demands it in an overt way, but because he is essentially helpless without it. Obviously, it is very difficult for the ir*u to achieve any sort of productive, adult adjustment. The extreme ir*u is very difficult, if not impossible, to test, so part of the rarity of this pattern stems from this. Some ir*u records will occur in individuals with organic conditions, but usually the pattern is a result of the impairment and masks the pre-organic personality pattern. The ir*u is often a management problem because he is abusive, overactive, and assaultive. There are definite childish temper tantrums that are unrelated to external events.
Got the same thing, twinsies!
 
I dunno I got a personality I feel that fits me accurately flaws and all. Though maybe it’s just another test meant to stir you close enough the answer you get will always generally be ‘spot on’ because the creators knew how to make a cool magic trick not a real scientific study.

Either way I will now continue on remembering nothing about this and learning nothing of importance. Except a bunch of you are psychos.
 
Its interesting to see how they thought about this sort of thing at the time. I think the bulk of the type of people like the psychologist who made this went insane a long time ago.
 
I got IuRcUu. Basically an autistic shut-in who lives in a fantasy world. Apparently this personality type is likely to become schizophrenic later in life and develop delusions of grandeur. Seems like I have lolcow potential.
 
Back
Top Bottom