🐷 The Killstream General Discussion Thread - Discuss Ethan Ralph's stagnant Killstream and his appearances on other shows.

Will Faith and/or Amanda get another DVRO after this pillstream?

  • YES. Suffa piggy.

    Votes: 278 71.8%
  • NO! Another Ralphamale W.

    Votes: 109 28.2%

  • Total voters
    387
Based on the comments (that have been posted here), I'm going to guess he did the only smart thing he could and sweet talked Faith into taking him back/forgiving him so she would drop the charges.
If that's really what happened then she is a bigger idiot than ever thought possible, and deserves every bullshit thing that is coming her way by having Ralph forever be a part of her life.
 
Based on the comments (that have been posted here), I'm going to guess he did the only smart thing he could and sweet talked Faith into taking him back/forgiving him so she would drop the charges.
If that's really what happened then she is a bigger idiot than ever thought possible, and deserves every bullshit thing that is coming her way by having Ralph forever be a part of her life.
Hopeful that she's milking gunt for lemons, remeber he makes nickels a night but listed 70k a year to the court
 
Based on the comments (that have been posted here), I'm going to guess he did the only smart thing he could and sweet talked Faith into taking him back/forgiving him so she would drop the charges.
If that's really what happened then she is a bigger idiot than ever thought possible, and deserves every bullshit thing that is coming her way by having Ralph forever be a part of her life.
The theory I've seen is that he had some backroom talks (through his attorney, because Ralph making contact would be a no-no) with the Vickers. In return for dropping the charges Ralph would remove the negative shit he put up about them on his blog (as evidenced by the fact the shitpiece he did on Matthew Vickers is gone) and he'd give up parental rights to the child. The Vickers know that Ralph has no money so this is a win-win insofar as they will have nothing to do with the Gunt anymore, even with the revenge porn out there. Ralph's attorney likely wanted the charges dropped, but the prosecutor knows Ralph can't be trusted so she went the nolle prosequi route instead so that if Ralph violates the agreement then they can bring the charges back up. The strongest case for this theory holding water will be the coming weeks, because Ralph can not keep his mouth shut about people who have "wronged" him, and so if he isn't talking shit about the Vickers at all then that should tell us everything we need to know.
 
A donor just joked about Josh being poor and eating out of the trash. Need I say more?
It is like the caller asking the Drunken Peasants what they would do if someone dated their ex while Maddox was on as a guest. We know the superchat wouldn't go through if he said that Ralph is actually the one who is poor and eats out of the trash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crystal Golem
The one thing he had a point about was spergtre being a retarded attention-deprived turbofaggot, but even then bringing him up at all is a terrible idea because no one outside of this circle of autism even knows who he is. The rest of it came off as a forced attempt to own the haydurrz and ayylawgz. It sounded like he was about to cry towards the end there and the way he talked about how hard it's been ironically made him sound like some kind of battered woman in a private support group who got gunted and thumbed by Null. It's especially hilarious in that he got his start during gaymergay and he just spent an evening unwittingly doing his best Brianna Wu impression.
 
The theory I've seen is that he had some backroom talks (through his attorney, because Ralph making contact would be a no-no) with the Vickers. In return for dropping the charges Ralph would remove the negative shit he put up about them on his blog (as evidenced by the fact the shitpiece he did on Matthew Vickers is gone) and he'd give up parental rights to the child.
I'd probably need your help finding better sources/more information, but I don't think you can just terminate parental rights in California like that. Having a quick look, it seems like they only really do it if you're putting the kid up for adoption or if there is a step-parent who is taking on the role of a father.

When the Court Grants a Termination of Parental Rights​

As we mentioned above, the courts take parental rights very seriously and they are not so quick to terminate someone’s parental rights just because one parent does not want the other parent in the child’s life. As a general rule, the court only terminates parental rights when there is someone else who desires to step in and take on the role as an adoptive stepparent or an adoptive parent.

ā€œWhat if the other parent is a drug addict or a convicted felon? Can the court terminate their parental rights because they are morally corrupt?ā€ If terminating the person’s parental rights would leave the child with only one parent who is responsible to care for and financially support the child then no, the court would not terminate the parental rights.
This is a better source here, but I'm still doubtful this is the road they are taking.

I think it's more likely he's reconciled with Faith to some degree or she's playing her parents by saying that pressing charges against Ralph is 'too stressful' and she's 'cramping up and feels like she will miscarry', when that's literally not how it works.
 
Back