- Joined
- May 7, 2020
Ralph wants to gunt his lawyer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because he's a big fat gay boi.Not sure why a grown man is so worried about another dudes genitals to make a shirt about it.
Imagine him giving vickers 50k and a promise to never talk to his only child in the exhange for faith silenceI wouldn't be surprised. Probably going out to California to have her sign a NDA.
Is he convinced jewsh is a fed like he was convinced Godwinson was an mi6 agent or that PPP was an actual member of antifa? Cause that would be hiliarous.Rand may cover Josh's teenage posts on his own show on Saturday for those who are interested.
Yes.Is he convinced jewsh is a fed like he was convinced Godwinson was an mi6 agent or that PPP was an actual member of antifa? Cause that would be hiliarous.
Hopeful that she's milking gunt for lemons, remeber he makes nickels a night but listed 70k a year to the courtBased on the comments (that have been posted here), I'm going to guess he did the only smart thing he could and sweet talked Faith into taking him back/forgiving him so she would drop the charges.
If that's really what happened then she is a bigger idiot than ever thought possible, and deserves every bullshit thing that is coming her way by having Ralph forever be a part of her life.
The theory I've seen is that he had some backroom talks (through his attorney, because Ralph making contact would be a no-no) with the Vickers. In return for dropping the charges Ralph would remove the negative shit he put up about them on his blog (as evidenced by the fact the shitpiece he did on Matthew Vickers is gone) and he'd give up parental rights to the child. The Vickers know that Ralph has no money so this is a win-win insofar as they will have nothing to do with the Gunt anymore, even with the revenge porn out there. Ralph's attorney likely wanted the charges dropped, but the prosecutor knows Ralph can't be trusted so she went the nolle prosequi route instead so that if Ralph violates the agreement then they can bring the charges back up. The strongest case for this theory holding water will be the coming weeks, because Ralph can not keep his mouth shut about people who have "wronged" him, and so if he isn't talking shit about the Vickers at all then that should tell us everything we need to know.Based on the comments (that have been posted here), I'm going to guess he did the only smart thing he could and sweet talked Faith into taking him back/forgiving him so she would drop the charges.
If that's really what happened then she is a bigger idiot than ever thought possible, and deserves every bullshit thing that is coming her way by having Ralph forever be a part of her life.
It is like the caller asking the Drunken Peasants what they would do if someone dated their ex while Maddox was on as a guest. We know the superchat wouldn't go through if he said that Ralph is actually the one who is poor and eats out of the trash.A donor just joked about Josh being poor and eating out of the trash. Need I say more?
I'd probably need your help finding better sources/more information, but I don't think you can just terminate parental rights in California like that. Having a quick look, it seems like they only really do it if you're putting the kid up for adoption or if there is a step-parent who is taking on the role of a father.The theory I've seen is that he had some backroom talks (through his attorney, because Ralph making contact would be a no-no) with the Vickers. In return for dropping the charges Ralph would remove the negative shit he put up about them on his blog (as evidenced by the fact the shitpiece he did on Matthew Vickers is gone) and he'd give up parental rights to the child.
This is a better source here, but I'm still doubtful this is the road they are taking.When the Court Grants a Termination of Parental Rights
As we mentioned above, the courts take parental rights very seriously and they are not so quick to terminate someoneās parental rights just because one parent does not want the other parent in the childās life. As a general rule, the court only terminates parental rights when there is someone else who desires to step in and take on the role as an adoptive stepparent or an adoptive parent.
āWhat if the other parent is a drug addict or a convicted felon? Can the court terminate their parental rights because they are morally corrupt?ā If terminating the personās parental rights would leave the child with only one parent who is responsible to care for and financially support the child then no, the court would not terminate the parental rights.