Pitch: Women's Only App Enforced by 3rd Party ID Verification

SpellforceFan said:
You're looking at it from an incorrect perspective. It's not an ideological issue, it's a business opportunity. According to null, there is a market for women who'd gladly pay premium for an online hangout that they are absolutely certain contains no posts made by men. Said platform has to be immune to most harassment-based forms of takedowns, which KF has weathered, so a product by the same dev would most likely share that immunity. Right now there are only three serious obstacles that stand in the way of making fat fucking money: 3rd party ID verification, payment processors, possible gender discrimination lawsuit (trannies aren't a threat by themselves, seeing how KF still stands).

This is a market with no real competition. Once a service like that is stable and acquires fame/infamy as the one and only of its kind, you can set the entry fee as high as the market allows. SA's $10 ticket would pale in comparison, and once the payment method issue gets resolved, you could fleece users for shit like stickers, emotes and other dumb cosmetic shit that's popular nowadays. Hell, you could sell your soul to Satan and turn it into a live service, with a subscription fee. No jew would waste that kind of opportunity.
Click to expand...
I think that's ridiculous. People already complain about paying 5 dollars for an app, much less a forum. You also have to factor in the site being slow due to it being paid. Even massive sites like 4chan struggle to sell 4chan passes, and their /VIP/ board is slower than a disabled downy veteren.
 
Egg McMuffin said:
LMAO, you have to be a paid shill if you want a place to discuss women "baffled by their bodies." Try a therapist; you are clearly too soft for the internet.
Click to expand...

Why do I get the impression that 90% of these malding posts are written by the same two or three pot bellied homosexual punjabi men?
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Grimoire Canthari, Rad Cabochon, Hubelublub and 13 others
SpellforceFan said:
This is a market with no real competition
Click to expand...
What about mumsnet? Trannies seethe about that place but don't seem to be subverting it.
I'm aware the name "mumsnet" implies motherhood which carries notions of motherly love, existence of the family unit and by extension peaceful coexistence with males, which is alien and rage-inducing to many of these prospective new users, but ah well, you can't always have everything you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Cheese
Egg McMuffin said:
People already complain about paying 5 dollars for an app
Click to expand...
...in a market where hundreds, possibly thousands of apps offering the same thing exist.
Which other social website on the entire web offers what KiwiFemmes (name pending) would offer? Null claims that trannies will get into any female space, so having one and only place where that's not possible is an insanely appealing and marketable feature. For the price of a mediocre burger you could be a part of an exclusive natal female-only social media.

WTBOnlineFather said:
What about mumsnet? Trannies seethe about that place but don't seem to be subverting it.
Click to expand...
Mumsnet is british, you can't say nigger or faggot there, therefore you can't talk about men and trannies in derogatory terms, or bingbong pigs will put you in prison. Trannies don't attack it because it's not a real threat.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Rad Cabochon, tiny cuttlefish, Scolopendra Dramatica and 5 others
Egg McMuffin said:
Name a website without censorship of speech. 4chan censors X censors kiwifarms censors soyjak party censors There is no site that refuses to censor speech; feel free to prove me wrong.
Click to expand...
Back in the day the easiest method was to get a box on 1776 hostings and make your own basic website, but unfortunately that's not an option anymore.
 
The Repeated Meme said:
Here's a thought, why not make a separate women only thread in BP from the man hate thread, and don't allow anyone to post on it until they send you proof of their sex?

Or is there a specific reason you want this service to be separate from the forum?
Click to expand...
If you actually want ID verification on literal KIWIFARMS then I'm sorry but you're retarded. Literally the worst website of all time to do this on considering our public perception
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: Billy Bob Dick, SmallKiwi, Syntaxion and 3 others
Lurker said:
lol not my problem, go back to whatever shithole you came from
Click to expand...
See you laughed at my suggestion theres no censorship free website then tell me to go back to my quote "shithole" even though I don't have one every other site censors so you are just a crybully victim. This is why women need a hugbox. The vast majority are too stupid to debate men; all they have are personal attacks.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Grimoire Canthari, Rad Cabochon, KweenKarlotta and 11 others
winterfag said:
The vast majority of users on this site are against government ID verification online, it's retarded to disregard those principles just to own the troons
Click to expand...
It would appear more to normie women than to KF users I think. If KF and the female site were completely separate entities, then there would be no conflict of interests. Owner gets subpoena for the female site? Here, take this hash and go bother 3rd party, we don't know nothin' we dindu nothin'. KF users stay safe, since they don't need any ID verification.
 
Lidl Drip said:
Incels already beginning their revenge fantasies about super secret super embarrassing gorly leaks because just the thought of being excluded from something makes them seethe.

It would just be like LCF without the spamming trannies and butthurt moids that post decapitated women whenever they get mad. But ofc men who have never talked to women imagine that we possess some super secret knowledge that if it ever got out we would all have to seppuku.
Click to expand...
That's not what he was saying. Normies are retarded, they don't need there to have been anything actually bad, for them being on a Kiwifarms adjacent website like the one Null is going to create is already enough for them to brand you an alt right doxxing terrorist prison child or whatever. And if you live in the EU you could actually go to prison for it. It doesn't matter if there is nothing bad on the website.

SpellforceFan said:
It would appear more to normie women than to KF users I think. If KF and the female site were completely separate entities, then there would be no conflict of interests. Owner gets subpoena for the female site? Here, take this hash and go bother 3rd party, we don't know nothin' we dindu nothin'. KF users stay safe, since they don't need any ID verification.
Click to expand...
Yeah you could do the same shit but with like a voice call or something else if you would even want to go that far (I still think it's wrong but whatever). Using ID data is the dumbest idea ever.

SpellforceFan said:
It would appear more to normie women than to KF users I think. If KF and the female site were completely separate entities, then there would be no conflict of interests. Owner gets subpoena for the female site? Here, take this hash and go bother 3rd party, we don't know nothin' we dindu nothin'. KF users stay safe, since they don't need any ID verification.
Click to expand...
Normie women would be opposed to excluding troons lmao. And they would call it a Nazi website for being owned by Null.
 
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
  • Agree
Reactions: Hubelublub, mama Lazarou, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back