Pitch: Women's Only App Enforced by 3rd Party ID Verification

[Lidl Drip]

They always do until they go into fight about how women need to be back in the kitchen or feminism is evil or something. Then they get banned . Keep in mind there are men reading the man hate thread to seeth about it all the time and they give extra asspats to women who show up to spit on the " feminist"

.

I suppose they could join just to post a hot take like "women are dumb and shouldn't vote, I know this cause I'm a dumb bish" and then screenshot it to show off to the boys. Maybe we should make everyone who signs up answer some simple questions like:

"One thing I like about other women is_____"
or
"Women should have rights because______"

They could never make it past that.

 

[Baumstriezel]

I'd pay actual money for something like this

 

[Epic Fail Man]

I wouldn't trust any 3rd party app developed by pajeets or arabs or other brown people, for obvious reasons.

 

[h2_jGX]

I think the biggest issue would be the format/layout of the website rather than the ID system. On dating apps, a huge chunk of people verify themselves just to get a little badge next to their name. I don't think it's that unusual.

Whether it'd be a "huge success" or not doesn't really matter long term - or at least how I see it, I guess - As long as there's enough income coming in to keep the site running, I don't think it really matters if it's a million members or a thousand members.

The people who'd use it would use it, the people who wouldn't wouldn't. There's no point on trying to appeal to the people who are admitting they wouldn't use the service. Demand has been shown time and time again, and they kept failing due to legal or resource issues. You would know more than anyone what it takes to keep a site up and running with scrutiny.

 

[Kalamazoo 2 Timbuktu]

It is the fault of men as much as it is women. It's arguably worse with men considering we're supposed to be protecting women from predators (other men) they can't defend themselves from but we could.

You sure your husband isn't a homosexual?

Should women be held responsible for keeping women pretending to be men out of men spaces? Do men not have full agency to protect their own spaces?

Do I get frustrated that more men do not speak up about men invading women spaces, YES. But it’s tempered by the fact that when I show up, in person, to schools, libraries and city council meetings to speak about this issue, it’s 98% women who attack me. The “men can be women” crowd is predominantly female. The small number of men who show up (except troons) are typically speaking on “my side”.

Also, thank you, as a man, for telling me whom I, a woman, should hold accountable. Because of course women can never be held fully responsible, we’re too stupid to know our own minds.

I’m sure my husband is not homosexual, nor is he a feminist or ally, but I suspect you might be.

 

[JethroTullamore]

Maybe a free subscription to the Kiwifarms newspaper could be included when joining the app.
Might entice more members.

 

[Mankirk]

No, but they are the reason the idea of spaces exclusive to X-group of people became disputed and presently functionally impossible to maintain.

I'd argue that was more blacks and the end of segregation. Which is to say, damn Yankee politicians.

 

[community member]

PLEASE. I don't know much about the law, and I know their team said they were expecting the outcome they got and are continuing to fight it, but the Giggle case has had me pessimistic. Yes I am worried about who to give my info to but not gonna lie I feel increasingly nihilistic about keeping these things totally hidden at this point. SSNs are a security abortion, my email and SMS clients are in an arms race against India and Nigeria, and the government knows when I masturbate (to quote the philosopher Louis Cole) so I increasingly don't care about handing my license to some third party who at least is doing their best to protect against hacks

It would be administrated by a man, in an ultimate irony

idgaf about this at all because all of my charts and graphs predicted there HAD to be a nonzero number of men on planet Earth with actual nonpsycho human brains capable of the empathy that's supposed to elevate us above mere beasts and I believe you're one of them. I trust you with this and I think we need your kindhearted obstinate bastard powers. Not to be a suck up that's just exactly what I actually think. I am really caffeinated though I just chugged a monster. Siri send tweet

 

[Margo Martindale]

It sounds like a neat idea, what I would be worried about the most is potential lawsuits.

We already know that all it takes is a determined retard like Russel Greer to cause a lot in legal fees and time for you, now you have opened up another vector for possible lolsuits from more potential determined retards and trannies

Maybe try a small scale version of such an app under a different llc, then if it does cause you legal headaches you can just shut it down.

There is definitely a market for such an app though, and if it gains legitimacy it could cause the trannies to lose some in the face of the public

 

[CableNews]

If this is going to be an app, would it face any trouble from the companies that manage various mobile app stores? I'm not sure what the history of Apple or Google is with regard to something like this.

 

[Jex]

I'd support it if pooners were identified with a special badge so everyone knows where their annoying views come from.

 

[Garamok]

The “men can be women” crowd is predominantly female.

that is unfortunately true. To be honest, I was thinking the same before coming to the farms several years ago. As a woman you do get easily intimidated and even in a mixed community on discord, you have men there who will defend trannies. A straight male streamer told me he has a tranny friend and "she" looks like a woman, "she" sounds like a woman, "she" is totally normal. I had a discussion with him twice and he insisted that women can be born in a man's body. So what do you do when you think you are alone with your opinion? You adapt. You agree on it. Because many in the community agreed that transgenders aren't just mental issues. They insisted that it is real like a genetic defect (intersex). The moment trannies joined the community, it got worse. They got some of them on their side. Of course the other women in the community wanted to be friendly and stay nice and adapted. The community owner did complain to me several times how much he hates trannies and furries because his Twitter feed is full with porn and degeneracy but he can't unfollow them because they are his speedrunner "colleagues". And he can't ban them from his discord if they haven't broken a rule. The trannies in his server were quite obnoxious, telling me I don't know what a woman is and bringing in politics into a speedrunning discord. The best thing women can do is either adapt and go with the public opinion or be silent and move on, hide from aggressive transwomen.

I promise you, if many of those women were in a different social circle, they'd disagree with the "men can be women" nonsense or they'd be less supportive or sceptical to some extent. Some women are convinced they are fighting the good cause, they are passionate about it and it gives them a good feeling that they tell themselves that they are fighting against oppression. It gives them purpose and something to be invested in. And some are just batshit insane and we should bring back mental asylums and lock up insane people of both sexes.

 

[Dread First]

I’m a dude, my opinion’s probably worth 1/3rd that of a true & honest, XX, ovary-bearing woman’s with this matter.

Having said that: getting physical ID involved sounds like a nightmarish Pandora’s Box that bad actors hostile to the Farms, and all entities associated with Null, could easily exploit.

Also, just putting this out there: most of the women in my life aren’t entirely cognisant of the ramifications involving ID verification, much less how much user data is passively harvested by normie apps/websites/hardware manufacturers/etc. Kiwi chicks don’t need to worry about that stuff too much, but I suspect many non-Kiwi users to be far more ignorant.

 

[invisibult plus+]

As a woman, I wouldn't sign up for an app that needs my ID, even if a third party handles it and disposes of the data. "Trannies infiltrate everything" is a very good point. If you (hypothetical) let a third party verify IDs, they do have the experience and infrastructure built in. On the other hand, that means that you have less control over that data. CrowdStrike forced an update on its clients that destroyed computers across entire sectors. That's damage you can roll back (even if you can't roll back the losses), but you can't roll back a striped-socked, skirt-go-spinny pervert intercepting IDs as they come in (data stream, servers, etc), pocketing them, and doxing applicants. You can't control when he goes in, when or even if he goes out, or even know if it's happened until it's too late.

That said, the fact that women can't talk about important medical issues without men jerking off to them is unacceptable. Even then, "freedom of association" has been perverted so much that it's only applied to intruders. Why can only the likes of Dong Long Gone and John Flynt choose who they can associate with? Why do women with cervical cancer have to put up with men like that when they're already suffering? Women with those conditions didn't choose to get them. Trannies choose to take cross-sex hormones and have quacks mutilate them. Even then, besides "trannies ruin things for everyone" being a good point, too, choosing who you can associate with shouldn't be a privilege that people can take away at will.

Basically, while I support it on principle, the implementation has to be very careful. I don't know which third party I'd pick, but I'd still want to have as much communication with them as I can. If there's a way for the third party to log who has access to your data, and for that data to be sent to you in real time, there'd be less of an issue. However that itself can cause problems and I don't know enough about tech infrastructure or contracting to find a good way to do it. Ovarit may be a good cultural role model so to speak, but there should also be outlines like the farm's to keep it secure, though I can't speak for how many women would want or need it.

 

[Kalamazoo 2 Timbuktu]

Some women are convinced they are fighting the good cause, they are passionate about it and it gives them a good feeling that they tell themselves that they are fighting against oppression. It gives them purpose and something to be invested in. And some are just batshit insane and we should bring back mental asylums and lock up insane people of both sexes.

This is one of the many reasons I think this wouldn’t work long term. It’s a societal issue. I believe, unfortunately, that it is going to take a Supreme Court ruling to correct this problem, “what is a woman”. We are literally spilt down the middle (both men and women, although I think less men buy into this) on the issue and the mentally ill and degenerates have control at the moment.

Also, ID’d or birth certificates wouldn’t necessarily work. We just had a local case where the man legally changed his birth certificate and DL to female. He had implants and took his top of at a children’s event and because he was “legally female” he could be charged with indecent exposure. So unless this person outed themselves, we wouldn’t have a reliable way to verify.

Without a clearly written law, men can and are, legally identified as women.

 

[LargeChoonger]

If you are a man, your input is not solicited.

Green checkmark. The internet seriously went down the shitter when we lost containment cells Tumblr and r/incels. Genuine unironic woman hate has also infected the right, with zoomers stuck in 2013 feminism cringe compilations thinking it's le based to wish harm on the other sex. I know of a Pagan white nationalist bisexual pedophile who allegedly violated a rat (seriously), and a decent portion of his content is hating women. If they wanna retreat into their own forum, I have no interest in invading. I see no harm in trying at this point

 

[Hey Johnny Bravo]

There are potential legal issues, see Bostock v. Clayton County, but I would argue this is a forum for people born with certain chromosomal conditions, not sex, considering the pooners.

I think what you have here is a niche idea that could be successful, were it not for the aggressive lawfare that would inevitably follow.

 

[Jex]

And the cool thing about using the ID verification, after the troon is banned, they can't use that same ID to make another account

Nothing inherent in the verification system would require the ID evidence to be kept after the account was verified.

That could all be deleted once admin verified

Both are well intentioned ideas, but how would you go about blacklisting an ID from a nefarious tranny while also not keeping some ID data logged?

 

[Null]

I would like to thank the most profoundly low intelligence and deliberately annoying people on the forum who have come out in ranks to try to shit up this thread with irrelevant fucking bullshit. I was excited to see 5 more pages of discussion after my podcast and instead I've just banned four people from the BP for being retarded faggots who can't shut the fuck up.

I'd also like to thank the people asking questions answered in the very first fucking post they can't be bothered to fucking read.

 

[LargeChoonger]

Both are well intentioned ideas, but how would you go about blacklisting an ID from a nefarious tranny while also not keeping some ID data logged?

I think the most realistic solution is treadmill moderation. Troons have a tendency to make themselves known, so just ban them on sight unrelentingly. Yes, this is an infinite unwinnable battle, but nobody ever won anything meaningful without trying