Plagued Pizzagate / Pedogate - Batshit Conspiracy Nuts Who See Pedos Everywhere

If Epstein really was part of a secret elite pedo circle, and really had pedo blackmail on other bigwigs... Then why is he in jail? Why didn’t his pedo buddies work behind the scenes to drop the case?
Well if he had blackmail on enough people theoretically they could have come together to fuck him over and then be first on the scene to destroy evidence.
I'm not supporting the conspiracy but that's the way I'd tackle that question.
 
Well if he had blackmail on enough people theoretically they could have come together to fuck him over and then be first on the scene to destroy evidence.
I'm not supporting the conspiracy but that's the way I'd tackle that question.

That or he let somebody get close enough to know what's going on without getting blackmail on them just because he trusted them.

Possibly sacrificial lamb too.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 person
The other option is that they're so fucking arrogant they'd never get caught and don't have assets in place to easily do anything about it.
 
I'm Catholic, Corbin. I don't believe one's behavior gains some special status as you rise or fall in social status. Sin is sin, regardless of who does it, and I believe it is sinful to speak ill of another unless you know what you say is true. It's clear you don't think that it is. That's your opinion. This is mine.
Why bring up being catholic? We are all sinful though so even though you may not commit what you think is a sin, do you know you're perfect according to catholic dogma? Corbin says he's telling the truth or at least what he's observed. He doesn't know what he saying is false in the case of it being false. He's doing to speak the truth about it then close the eyes and be blind to it.
 
To emphasize that I believe in morality being universal, with things like public relevance or social status not altering what is right or wrong to do.
The rest of your post is incoherent, so I can't respond to it.
It is true that morality is universal but how does that factor into the other fella speaking his mind? From the looks of things, he's speaking the truth. If he is, why is that sinful? He has done so in a tasteful manner and has not passed judgement on it like you have. He is fully convinced in his mind like you are.
 
It is true that morality is universal but how does that factor into the other fella speaking his mind? From the looks of things, he's speaking the truth. If he is, why is that sinful? He has done so in a tasteful manner and has not passed judgement on it like you have. He is fully convinced in his mind like you are.
Saying that someone is a pedophile and also saying that pedophiles are bad is a moral judgement. In fact, given that Corbin has made it clear that pedophiles are pretty close to maximally evil in his worldview, it is an extremely strong moral judgements. My opinion is that we should be cautious about saying "This person is definitely a maximally evil person" without some strong evidence, for a wide variety of reasons.
 
Saying that someone is a pedophile and also saying that pedophiles are bad is a moral judgement. In fact, given that Corbin has made it clear that pedophiles are pretty close to maximally evil in his worldview, it is an extremely strong moral judgements. My opinion is that we should be cautious about saying "This person is definitely a maximally evil person" without some strong evidence, for a wide variety of reasons.
But it is just calling out people for what they see. If you saw someone giving a pizza and saw it had blood and shit over it in favor of what should have been pepperoni and cheese, you get pissed off would you? Calling them a faggot or whatever is just calling them for what they are, in most of the cases about this topic. It can go on a relatively good to evil scale. The pharisees would be called evil/bad today, but should we go and call them relatively bad/evil instead? Perhaps instead of framing in that manner, we go on a totem pole from the lowest degeneracy(etc.clean) to most degenerate(pedophiles). That would be a much fairer assessment and pedos would be up there. Plus Corbin has given evidence for his beliefs and does it in a sincere sense and does not apparently possess wickedness/sin in doing so.
If we should call nobody evil since nobody in the typical humanity is good, it should we be wise instead in calling out what they're being. In that case, we can definitely call these billionaires or other elites being wicked and/or their actions as being bad.
 
But it is just calling out people for what they see. If you saw someone giving a pizza and saw it had blood and shit over it in favor of what should have been pepperoni and cheese, you get pissed off would you? Calling them a faggot or whatever is just calling them for what they are, in most of the cases about this topic. It can go on a relatively good to evil scale. The pharisees would be called evil/bad today, but should we go and call them relatively bad/evil instead? Perhaps instead of framing in that manner, we go on a totem pole from the lowest degeneracy(etc.clean) to most degenerate(pedophiles). That would be a much fairer assessment and pedos would be up there. Plus Corbin has given evidence for his beliefs and does it in a sincere sense and does not apparently possess wickedness/sin in doing so.
If we should call nobody evil since nobody in the typical humanity is good, it should we be wise instead in calling out what they're being. In that case, we can definitely call these billionaires or other elites being wicked and/or their actions as being bad.
I can't tell if you have brain problems or are just being willfully obtuse. Either way, it's clear that my words are simply bouncing off of your ears.
This isn't even a response to what I've said: your past three posts have just been repeating the same thing.
 
I can't tell if you have brain problems or are just being willfully obtuse. Either way, it's clear that my words are simply bouncing off of your ears.
This isn't even a response to what I've said: your past three posts have just been repeating the same thing.
Okay, how about this. What's wrong with him passing moral judgement on a person or their actions? He obviously can't pass judgement on the person since that is God's job but yet he can call them out just as this forum does to its lolcows. If he legitimately thinks so, there's not a problem there. Nothing wrong if he has the right information.
 
Okay, how about this. What's wrong with him passing moral judgement on a person or their actions? He obviously jcan't pass judgement on the person since that is God's job but yet he can call them out just as this forum does to its lolcows. If he legitimately thinks so, there's not a problem there. Nothing wrong if he has the right information.
If you'd paid attention to anything I said before, you'd already know my answer to this. It's on the previous page.
But, to make it clear one more time: I think the evidence against Podesta is laughably tenuous at best and is largely grounded in a conspiracy theory that believes that elite pedophile rings:
-Use the exact same slang as 4channers when it comes to child porn and molestation.
-Publicly advertise their pedophilic allegiances through coded signals borrowed from NAMBLA.
-Lack any kind of infosec.
-Send each other emails that, once "decoded", boil down to "I sure love raping children, see you at the next loli snuff orgy, kthxbye!"
- Conveniently are only affiliated with one side of the political aisle.
- That the Podesta brothers personally kidnapped Madeline McCann to rape her.

I won't respond to you any further for now, because endlessly going back and forth with a single sperg just shits up the thread.
 
If you'd paid attention to anything I said before, you'd already know my answer to this. It's on the previous page.
But, to make it clear one more time: I think the evidence against Podesta is laughably tenuous at best and is largely grounded in a conspiracy theory that believes that elite pedophile rings:
-Use the exact same slang as 4channers when it comes to child porn and molestation.
-Publicly advertise their pedophilic allegiances through coded signals borrowed from NAMBLA.
-Lack any kind of infosec.
-Send each other emails that, once "decoded", boil down to "I sure love raping children, see you at the next loli snuff orgy, kthxbye!"
- Conveniently are only affiliated with one side of the political aisle.
- That the Podesta brothers personally kidnapped Madeline McCann to rape her.

I won't respond to you any further for now, because endlessly going back and forth with a single sperg just shits up the thread.
>exact same slang as 4channers
They would use identifiable slang though, especially since it would easy to communicate and be cool-and-hip. Why make your termiology when you can use another's? Their horniness blinds them to the truth. Besides, where did that 4channer terminology come from in the first place? CP is easily understood to be child porn but can also be constructed as cheese pizza, a widely explainable icon.
>publicly advertise their pedophilic allegiances through coded signals
They're rich snobs who don't care. Nobody is gonna bother looking through them and the ones who do are shitposting autists. What common sense does is block you from the truth and refuse to see it from another angle since it just ain't "rational". You don't think it is happening for instance. Explain the dora the explorer image and the triangles that just appeared in the USA version that are literally the same as from the FBI file discussing their imagery, with an added bit of Michael Bay being the producer.
zcms3n3jy8e31.png

You're not gonna see on the front page of Google or Reddit the image. Dug a bit to find it and only originally got it on a discord.
>Lack any kind of infosec
They do. Blackmail and only confidential links. The wikileaks only came about from an insider who leaked the emails of a bunch of privileged people who thought nothing bad would come their way and only victory and conquest. Remember Hillary Clinton and "her turn?". Given Bill Clinton's several rides on the Lolita Express and with Hillary having to know about that, does that not scream confidentiality at you? The only other major infosec they need is just for you to be a pedophile yourself or make you into one.
>Send each other emails that, once "decoded", boil down to "I sure love raping children, see you at the next loli snuff orgy, kthnxbye!"
Yeah, how else are they gonna send their communications with each other? Remember that they're a bunch of old boomers who don't know how the internet works. They still think a coded message is enough, and to them they did think it was enough till it inevitably blew up in their faces. Epstein was thought to be untouchable but look what happened to him. You're also forgetting that they're human. Any sort of communication needs pattern to it to effectively work, that's just the bane of humanity's communication. Else, we wouldn't be able to talk to each other or do anything.
>Conveniently are only affiliated with one side of the political aisle.
Of course. With all the degeneracy that has been coming out of the left(tranny, white people are evil, sexualizing children-seen in Joe Biden and that queer kid). Just who do you think exactly is in control of the world? Look at Google, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and the hand that is puppeteering them. Especially with the grasping choke-hold on the internet. Their craziness is shown in the primary democratic debate, the first one at the least. Sin. If you believe in demons then you ought believe in demonic forces inside the world wriggling around it and controlling it.
>That the Podesta brothers personally kidnapped Madeline Mcnann.
Don't know much about this. It'll be looked into. It's highly unlikely that they'll go and kidnap her, if they did, by themselves and would get an escort to do it instead(Haiti if I'm not wrong, but mostly sure)it'll depend on the circumstances and timing.
>I won't respond to you any further for now, because endlessly going back and forth with a single sperg just shits up the thread.
>sperg
>Just asking questions and a response
>Being backed up and thus bringing out catholicism to defend thyself.
>Holier-than-thou attitude to Corbin.
>On Kiwifarms, the forum for doxing and talking shit on people.
I'd kek, but you need to check your scripture.
Also talking to God helps.
EDIT:The triangles differ from the French version in the USA version that are near 99% in resembling the swirl triangles shown in the FBI document. What's the rational explanation behind this? Someone who just wanted to shitpost in the marketing campaign?
 

Attachments

  • zcms3n3jy8e31.png
    zcms3n3jy8e31.png
    4.3 MB · Views: 253
Last edited:
It is true that morality is universal but how does that factor into the other fella speaking his mind? From the looks of things, he's speaking the truth. If he is, why is that sinful? He has done so in a tasteful manner and has not passed judgement on it like you have. He is fully convinced in his mind like you are.
Here's what happened:

Senior Lexmechanic at some point decided to make fun of the pizzagate conspiracy theory, which is understandable enough, it's pretty crazy. However he's gotten so invested in the conspiracy theory being 100% untrue, to the point that he's retreated to "It's immoral to cast aspersions on people you don't know for sure did something wrong." In response to my pointing out Podesta has some fucking creepy shit that bears investigating.

He's retreating to a completely bullshit hiding place of "Well I'm too moral to pass judgement on people if I don't know with 100% certainty they're guilty." Which is obvious horseshit if you've seen how the dude behaves, or even just the shit he's said about me.

It's pure 100% retroactive rationalization of a decision already made. Anything pizzagators said cannot be true, ever, no matter what, and reality will bend to accomplish that if necessary. So now it's immoral to comment on the weirdness of Podesta owning a lot of really creepy artwork that borders on pedophilia.

Your observation that it's a patently ridiculous position, especially here, of all places, is apt.
 
That is true. I agree with you. Perhaps, it'd be better to discuss in Deep Thoughts. It's more thought-out over there.
 
Here's what happened:

Senior Lexmechanic at some point decided to make fun of the pizzagate conspiracy theory, which is understandable enough, it's pretty crazy. However he's gotten so invested in the conspiracy theory being 100% untrue, to the point that he's retreated to "It's immoral to cast aspersions on people you don't know for sure did something wrong." In response to my pointing out Podesta has some fucking creepy shit that bears investigating.

He's retreating to a completely bullshit hiding place of "Well I'm too moral to pass judgement on people if I don't know with 100% certainty they're guilty." Which is obvious horseshit if you've seen how the dude behaves, or even just the shit he's said about me.

It's pure 100% retroactive rationalization of a decision already made. Anything pizzagators said cannot be true, ever, no matter what, and reality will bend to accomplish that if necessary. So now it's immoral to comment on the weirdness of Podesta owning a lot of really creepy artwork that borders on pedophilia.

Your observation that it's a patently ridiculous position, especially here, of all places, is apt.
@ me next time. Also, if you look into the past, you'll notice this isn't a new position: the FIRST time Podesta's creepy artwork was brought up, over a year ago, I said that it, at best, indicates that he's weird and into creepy art.
 
@ me next time. Also, if you look into the past, you'll notice this isn't a new position: the FIRST time Podesta's creepy artwork was brought up, over a year ago, I said that it, at best, indicates that he's weird and into creepy art.
No, the new position is
I'm Catholic, Corbin. I don't believe one's behavior gains some special status as you rise or fall in social status. Sin is sin, regardless of who does it, and I believe it is sinful to speak ill of another unless you know what you say is true. It's clear you don't think that it is. That's your opinion. This is mine.

Uh oh, you didn't @ me!

I feel like you're vastly overestimating Corbin's reasonableness.

Uh oh, you're sinfully speaking ill of me, and again without an @!
Your sudden conversion to super catholic is a surprising one, I have to say. Did Jacob Harrison manage to get to you? Or did you forget your catholic morals until they were convenient to an argument?

You are incredibly disingenuous, and it's funny you think you're hiding it well. Yeah, you're pretty good at posting content free bullshit to push opinions you don't like off the front page, but you fucking suck at arguing positions, because you don't pick which positions to support based on reality, it's all rationalization after the fact. Which is why sometimes you'll happily make unfounded claims about people, and other times, you're too pure hearted a catholic to engage in such sinful activity.
 
Back