- Joined
- Sep 23, 2019
You can't be that stupid.Don’t be stupid, that’s a gremlin from Yokai Watch by Koei Techmo.
It's clearly a Spectrobe.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can't be that stupid.Don’t be stupid, that’s a gremlin from Yokai Watch by Koei Techmo.
Fuck you, now I want to play spectrobes. I loved that game. But I hate to break it to you, it's clearly a neopet.It's clearly a Spectrobe.
How can you brainlets not know a tomadachi when you see one?Fuck you, now I want to play spectrobes. I loved that game. But I hate to break it to you, it's clearly a neopet.
Don’t you mean a monster from Monster Rancher, you ignoramus?How can you brainlets not know a tomadachi when you see one?
They're the Legendary Hamsters, duh.
I don't think it's an unpopular opinion, but I do think it's the less vocal opinion. The squeaky wheel gets the oil, or in this case, the attention online. People complain about recent Pokemon designs online, but Pokemon's still just as popular of a game, so obviously people still enjoy the recent designs.Is it an unpopular opinion to prefer more fantasy designs in Pokemon and humans than the “grounded realism” old school fans sperg about?
I'll give the response you're looking for and say I feel the same way.Is it an unpopular opinion to prefer more fantasy designs in Pokemon and humans than the “grounded realism” old school fans sperg about? The older designs for humans and Pokemon are boring as hell. When I got older I started losing interest in grounded shit and started craving more interesting and weird designs now that graphical limitations aren’t as much of a thing anymore. Even though I’m an older fan who was here from the very beginning I lack the nostalgia and attachment towards old school things.
Also to me Pokemon should be monsters instead of just animals. And monsters that aren’t just creatures with claws and fangs but a whole diverse array of cute, fierce, ugly, simple, complex, etc. Even furbait Pokemon are still considered monsters to me. I know about the origins and the lore book of gen 1 but it just seems too bland for my tastes.
Sorry for sounding autistic it’s too early in the morning and I am super sleep deprived.
Kind of a nitpick here, but calling Hisuian!Zorua and Zoroak the "spiteful fox" and "baneful fox" bothers me because those titles feel much more in-line with Ninetales, or a Ninetales variant.Two new trailers, one for for Arceus and one for BDSP:
Well that's because nineties are gay.Kind of a nitpick here, but calling Hisuian!Zorua and Zoroak the "spiteful fox" and "baneful fox" bothers me because those titles feel much more in-line with Ninetales, or a Ninetales variant.
I think what most people mean by "grounded in reality" they mean the anatomy or artstyle, not the designs. Of course Pokémon always had a fantastical element to them, that's the whole point, but the difference was all in artstyle. It's more cartoony now, meaning less rough details and more simplistic features.Personally I never thought Pokemon were grounded in reality, despite whatever the original intention was, and that's caused a few autistic tangents from me. They're larger than most animals (One of the smallest Pokemon, Joltik, a literal tick, is the size of a tarantula), but lighter as well (Groudon, one of the heaviest Pokemon, weighs less than an elephant). They're pocket monsters, fine, but they're hardly monsters at all, they were all designed to be giant stuffed animals that you could fit in your pocket.
Eh. Styles change over time and I've never had a problem with it's more cartoony take on things. The games are primarily marketed towards kids and if they want a more "rough" artstyled game there are other alternatives out there.I think what most people mean by "grounded in reality" they mean the anatomy or artstyle, not the designs. Of course Pokémon always had a fantastical element to them, that's the whole point, but the difference was all in artstyle. It's more cartoony now, meaning less rough details and more simplistic features.
Here's a comparison between Pidgey and Rookidee.
View attachment 2661061View attachment 2661062
Having said that, Rookidee's eyes always bothered me. What the fuck is going on with its eyes? At first I thought it had that Badtz-Maru look going on.
View attachment 2661082
But it turns out the white of the eye isn't even it's actual eyes? And the red part is?
Could be that they’ll show up in Arceus. It is the past, after all.I think cartoony can be great, there are some great ones, but the problem is overly designed cartoony. They're just throwing too much into them, simple isn't always better but considering how much people love Wooloo they could stand to tone some things down.
I also desperately want those stupid ugly fossil pokemon to be put out of their misery and get that cute little electric velociraptor zolt in one piece. I will never forgive gamefreak for what they did to him and I have half a mind to start a petition (that they will ignore) over this injustice.
About that, this is why it's considered the "Spiteful fox" pokemon:Kind of a nitpick here, but calling Hisuian!Zorua and Zoroak the "spiteful fox" and "baneful fox" bothers me because those titles feel much more in-line with Ninetales, or a Ninetales variant.
For a long time people complained the newer Pokemon were too complex and looked like Digimon, and now they say newer ones are too simple. Older gen fans can’t make up their minds.I think what most people mean by "grounded in reality" they mean the anatomy or artstyle, not the designs. Of course Pokémon always had a fantastical element to them, that's the whole point, but the difference was all in artstyle. It's more cartoony now, meaning less rough details and more simplistic features.
Here's a comparison between Pidgey and Rookidee.
View attachment 2661061View attachment 2661062
Having said that, Rookidee's eyes always bothered me. What the fuck is going on with its eyes? At first I thought it had that Badtz-Maru look going on.
View attachment 2661082
But it turns out the white of the eye isn't even it's actual eyes? And the red part is?