Polyamory General - Polyamory drama from Facebook, Reddit, and more

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Is "relationship anarchy" close enough to this topic?
1602264510940.png
1602264527877.png
1602264547900.png
1602264565154.png
1602264582290.png
 
So i was with this super model who flew in from Milan. Things were good and she brought in her equally hot friend. So there we were in bed and it turns out I was too big for both of them. I should have realized when they both gasped as i pulled down my pants and they got lust eyes seeing my magum dong but anyways long story short we had to lube up good but managed to go at it all might.

Hope this helps you with your big dick problems fellow kiwis.
 
georgyjobe said:
Is "relationship anarchy" close enough to this topic?
View attachment 1651540View attachment 1651542View attachment 1651544View attachment 1651545View attachment 1651546
Click to expand...

WTF did I just read. "Do not compartmentalize the modes of resistance to hegemony and divisive capitalist violence." BINGO in one sentence.

Pour menstrual blood on wedding dresses. Fuck romance, romance is stupid and so is wanting a family and children. Live for your desires (unless you desire family/children/one single committed spouse, I guess). Actively try to break up couples. Kinkshame monogamy. Talk to people about the politics of their sex lives. Have sex in public.

The only reason this isn't the craziest shit I've ever read is that I hang out on a forum entirely centered around making fun of crazy shit.
 
georgyjobe said:
Is "relationship anarchy" close enough to this topic?
View attachment 1651540View attachment 1651542View attachment 1651544View attachment 1651545View attachment 1651546
Click to expand...
"Assume that sex is political" Everything has to be activism with these degenerates.
They keep talking "autonomy" by doing away with monogamous relationships, but everything they advocate sounds like collectivism to me. Pretty sure that autonomy and the collective are at odds, or is this another case of words not having meanings anymore?
 
Blarmed&Dangerous said:
Where is the "gas" react? Seriously, this is the sort of thing that pushes me from pretty solidly left-libertarian to building concentration camps for degenerates.
Click to expand...
reminder that these same people will call you a lunatic conspiracy theorist if you suggest that leftists intend to destroy the nuclear family
 
Imagine wanting to be a gross old swinger instead of having a nice (if annoying, god SHUT UP ALREADY) wife and kids to keep you company in your old age.

Sex is cheap. I like sex, it's good stuff (p.s. I have sex). But it's cheap, in and of itself it's very unfulfilling. In isolation it's a high, like shooting up. I would maybe consider having more than one wife (IF THEY WOULD JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP ONCE IN A WHILE) but it'd be for the purpose of a larger patriarchal family structure rather than some weird idea about queering this or that, or radical what the shit-ism, or whatever those people are on about.
 
My favorite part of that whole manifesto is the "radical cuddle puddles" in bank lobbies :lol:
I really hope someone tries it, but I know this is just something one guy typed up with one hand.
 
georgyjobe said:
relationship anarchy
Click to expand...
I know a stunted american womanchild wrote this, because touch and eye contact are given inherently sexual meanings - just like in her favorite fanfics!

Also made me wanna puke. About as bad as S.C.U.M. Manifesto, or whatever it's called.
Blarmed&Dangerous said:
Seriously, this is the sort of thing that pushes me from pretty solidly left-libertarian to building concentration camps for degenerates
Click to expand...
This is what happens when people ascribe to commie/anarchist/whatever shit principles while knowing exactly 0 history.

Kosher Dill said:
guy
Click to expand...
>ignoring obvious crazyfem signs
 
Hux said:
I don't think this was concocted by someone with a healthy sex/romantic life

Or a healthy life in general, for that matter, but what do you expect from someone who ascribes to anything having to do with Anarchism of any stripe
Click to expand...
Probably someone with a disturbed sense of self.
 
Ugh, relationship anarchy. A guy I spoke to about it once described the practice as beyond just romantic or sexual relationships, to the point of not even labelling your friends as "friends" because each relationship with each different friend was different and a generalised label couldn't describe all the intricacies.

It's an extreme deconstruction of what a word like "boyfriend' is supposed to mean, while not taking any of the true emotional meaning behind the word. In other words, autistic.

Like, no shit mate, one single word is not going to apply to people, but just because you call someone a significant other doesn't mean you can't talk to each other about what that means for you, and it doesn't mean you can't set different boundaries for different friends. Or do you think everyone has the same kind of relationship with their parents, just because they all call them "mom" and "dad"?

That's why you TALK about things. Using your words. Including nouns. Nouns, like, shocker, "friend", "wife", and "cuck".

It's good to not just assume how a relationship is going to function, just because you're "together" or you're "friends", but all languages require nouns. Use them, you fucker. This is just a consisten practice of communication about what a relationship means to you, but with extra steps.

Oh yeah and this guy was French and polyamorous, too because of course.


Bad Take Crucifier said:
OK Trans queen domme with an MLP avatar. :c
Click to expand...
You... you know most people have satirical usernames and avatars here, right? XD

I also take it you haven't read Kevin Gibes' thread if you think I was describing myself as a trans alpaca ranch queen domme. Go check it out and thank me (or curse me) later.
 
Last edited:
Kosher Dill said:
You actually met someone who'd heard of this as a real practice?
Click to expand...

Unfortunately yes. He was in his very early 20s, so I hope it was just an experimental phase.

God I hate it when the internet turns into real life sometimes.

Quite honestly I think the concept of relationship anarchy is interesting in theory and when I heard of it it definitely made me re-examine how I treated my own relationships.

However after I had done that, I noted that I already *do* negotiate my boundaries and what I want from people and don't just expect something from my SO without talking about it first, because I'm pretty thoughtful about that kind of thing. So relationship anarchy would add nothing to my quality of life.

Basically as a thought experiment it works, but living it is the relationship equivalent of performance art. It is just a way to feel like a snowflake because you can't bear to use any word as plebeian as a friend, lover, partner, spouse, etc and you just wanna live "the weird life".
 
georgyjobe said:
Is "relationship anarchy" close enough to this topic?
View attachment 1651540View attachment 1651542View attachment 1651544View attachment 1651545View attachment 1651546
Click to expand...

Things have been great ever since I adopted the anarchist life. Yeah I did lose a lot of friends after I agreed to be best man at my friend's wedding then showed up 2 hrs late to disrupt the heteronormative paradigm and arrived with pallbearers carrying a casket holding the ring to mourn the loss of his autonomy. He asked me to leave when the music I picked for the dance started to play: "Let the bodies hit the floor". But I've made a lot of new friends in the sex-o-sphere. But ya, a lot of people are too bigoted to handle the changes in my life. The female cohabiting with me keeps crying and saying she's my "wife" and my "son" needs a "father". I told her I don't acknowledge arbitrary symbolic groups like "hereditary families" but the baby can stay, for now. My "brother-in-law" invited me over to drink beers and asked me if I'm going through some sort of crisis. I asked him if he wanted a blowjob. He hasn't talked to me since.

It's incredible that people are so defensive of monogamy they'll call the police on you for challenging it. In practicing the "seduce everyone" mantra, I ask out every 6+ girl I see on the street. One girl smiled awkwardly and said to me, "ummm I have a boyfriend..." I said her couplehood wasn't relevant to me. I don't CARE about your sociosexual availability! I kept pushing, kept asking, and this dumb girl just kept quietly repeating she has a boyfriend. And then she called the cops. That's violently straight. I had the cops called on me again after a cuddle puddle at the local museum's dinosaur exhibit got a little out of hand. I said we were radically occupying public spaces - they said I was "exposing myself in lewd acts to children".

When I got to jail and they offered me one phone call, I told them I reject this dyadic model that permeates society. I'd need at least 10 calls to accomodate all the non-romantic (FUCK ROMANCE) love I have to give. The cops then beat me up. The good news though is I've found a lot of new sexual partners in here! Only thing though is they happen to all be men, so I called my "wife" and asked her to come see me since I need conjugal visits to fully express my pansexual identity. She told me she can't because she doesn't acknowledge arbitrary symbolic groups like "marriage". She's finally starting to understand! I'm so proud of her
:suffering:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom