Pop science and informational YouTube channels...full of misinformation. - When the fact checking is worse than Buzzfeed

So hes doing videos on science that hes not actually an expert in the field in? Many such cases. Especially ironic as he criticized Bill Nye’s show when it came out and he’s doing the exact same thingg
He actually defended Nye's politisperging and cited fucking hbomberguy to bolster his "but science is already political" point(tldw science is political but its ok as long as its left wing bias)
And in his part 1 of 3 video on Jan Hendrik Schon he literally kept bringing up "eugenics" like it was rent free in his head
 
He actually defended Nye's politisperging and cited fucking hbomberguy to bolster his "but science is already political" point(tldw science is political but its ok as long as its left wing bias)
And in his part 1 of 3 video on Jan Hendrik Schon he literally kept bringing up "eugenics" like it was rent free in his head
So Im going to guess he's gone full meltdown mode on NHS not kowtowing to tranny bullshit if you asked him? Also it's so strange to say science is always political because that just gives ammo to people to completely ignore stuff and go into misinformation land. If you said science isnt political and evidence based solutions to our problems exist that you dont have to validate to agree with they might get stuff done instead of having the chuds look up matt walsh or using the dreaded iverminctin
 
Do retarded life hacks count here? I was going to say if you see anyone do the "cut a bottle with lighter fluid and fire trick", you can safely dismiss everything and anything they have to say.
 
So Im going to guess he's gone full meltdown mode on NHS not kowtowing to tranny bullshit if you asked him? Also it's so strange to say science is always political because that just gives ammo to people to completely ignore stuff and go into misinformation land. If you said science isnt political and evidence based solutions to our problems exist that you dont have to validate to agree with they might get stuff done instead of having the chuds look up matt walsh or using the dreaded iverminctin
no silly when they science is political it means its ok when a guy paid by the government tells you chopping off your penis makes you a woman despite bone structure, chemical makeup. hormones. dna. or an un human tested chemical shot that literally killed every animal they tried it on is good for you and you should take it 4 times a year

but you're a crazy nutcase if you dare research anything yourself or go against the paid shills like scientists who lose there jobs when they go on tv and say no cows arent causing global warming

unlike any point in history you can only truly be a scientist if everything you say 100% lines up with what the person paying you tells you it should be
 
no silly when they science is political it means its ok when a guy paid by the government tells you chopping off your penis makes you a woman despite bone structure, chemical makeup. hormones. dna. or an un human tested chemical shot that literally killed every animal they tried it on is good for you and you should take it 4 times a year

but you're a crazy nutcase if you dare research anything yourself or go against the paid shills like scientists who lose there jobs when they go on tv and say no cows arent causing global warming

unlike any point in history you can only truly be a scientist if everything you say 100% lines up with what the person paying you tells you it should be
before(as in medieval to renaissance times) it used to be the catholic church sticking its nonce ass in scientific progress
now its a different group of pedos
 
He actually defended Nye's politisperging and cited fucking hbomberguy to bolster his "but science is already political" point(tldw science is political but its ok as long as its left wing bias)
Those are idiots... Scientists were always political, but science wasnt...
the most prominent example is the manifest of the 93. most were artists, but the scientists they had sign were groundbreaking and they had 12 noble prices between them.

The issue now is that we dont have Scientists being political, we have propagandists playing scientists...
Nye is no Haber or Planck, he is just a guy who explained science to kids on TV, why would anybody listen to him?
 
I Hope I’ll never see Lemmino‘s videos being posted in this thread. His stuff seems fucking great researched.
He does what every YouTuber who's talking about a complicated subject should, he includes a link to a list of the sources he used, then goes above and beyond by directly linking them so you can read them yourself easily and gives his commentary on them. His Eight Spiders video was also a great introduction to thorough fact checking and critical thinking.
 
Looking back now, I honestly wonder just how much was I deceited by these "science" channels and how much of it was fueled propaganda. I know it was probably mostly fun pop-science, apolitical videos but still... it's sort of a sad but sobering thing to think about that these channels have likely "groomed" young minds to think this is how some things are and meant to be.

Or in other words
 
Those are idiots... Scientists were always political, but science wasnt...
the most prominent example is the manifest of the 93. most were artists, but the scientists they had sign were groundbreaking and they had 12 noble prices between them.

The issue now is that we dont have Scientists being political, we have propagandists playing scientists...
Nye is no Haber or Planck, he is just a guy who explained science to kids on TV, why would anybody listen to him?

Funny science man go "brrrrrrrrr".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst

This is the worst video I've ever watched, and I have seen some of the sex tapes from the idiots we follow here, so the competition is fierce.

This guy is one of the biggest anti-depressants haters I've ever encountered on the internet. I would even say he's probably a Scientologist, but I think even your average schizo scientologist couldn't be this harsh against psychiatric drugs.

He opens his video by saying all the science behind SSRIs is just wrong and that the scientific community considers all of that obscurantism from the past century. Of course, it couldn't be further from the truth, and he knows that. He chose his wording very carefully to deceive the viewer.

The idea behind SSRIs is to diminish the terrible symptoms of depression, and not depression itself. He only clarifies that after a long rambling saying that SSRIs are useless to cure depression and that all the foundation used to create these drugs was based on fraudulent and outdated data. He basically shits on those medicines for minutes on end, and he only shows what the scientific community actually believes after he puts the idea that these drugs are terrible and disgusting in the minds of his viewers. It's beyond dishonest.

But it gets worse. He wants to present his video in a very academic way, so he uses very credible sources like... Reddit posts.

That's right. To confirm his excessive bias against those drugs, he uses random Reddit posts, that could've been written by himself as far as I know. Every time he uses some published paper in his justifications, he never goes deep into the data and sometimes even contradicts himself, like the one graph that shows the placebo and the drug having the same effect (in this case, none) on patients, but just a few seconds before he said the drugs actually worsened the depression symptoms in the group who was treated with SSRIs.

When I thought shit couldn't get worse I was presented with an argument that made me double-take. According to this bastard, the reason why school shootings happen is, and I shit you not, antidepressants!

Seriously, if you don't believe me, just watch the video. I was flabbergasted. How can someone reach this conclusion? I have read many stupid takes on gun violence in my lifetime, but this one takes the cake. Do you know that tranny who shot those kids in the Christian school? That's right, fucking SSRIs. Like, seriously, what's wrong with this motherfucker?

And for a channel with such an edgy name - Dark Science - it's ironically very pozzed . Every mention of sex and suicide is censured in both audio and video. This guy not only did an enormous disservice against depression treatment, but he still finds himself worth getting ad revenue. What a piece of shit of a human being.

Toward the end of the video, he mentions most SSRIs are black boxes in the USA, heavily implying it's considered by the FDA almost as dangerous as cocaine and crack and one step closer to being outright banned. That's obviously not how the system works, but this guy really wants to scare as many people as possible. The wording used is very interesting, he uses every emotional trick to paint a terrible image of psychiatric drugs using what could be considered facts, but surrounded with distressing imagery, delivery, and carefully selected words.
 
I'm not going to make any claims about him as a person, I just thought it was funny that Kyle Hill among a greater number of people got trolled by tranny jokes into thinking a minor nuclear disaster had occurred.

KyleHill41percentpart2.png
KyleHill41percentpart1.png




 
it was funny that Kyle Hill among a greater number of people got trolled by tranny jokes
He oozes reddit atheist / The Big Bang Theory energy. I haven't watched anything of his beyond his video on fake science channels uploading random unverified shit (ironic when you think about it but it was good I'll give him that) but his entire schtick seems to be being a man of Science™ who's "raising awareness" by talking about random trivia shit that everyone would scroll past in the first place.

I apologize if he's a good guy but Science™ has gone beyond the realm of requiring fact checking or making sense. People on twitter will believe anything if people say scientists said it so it doesn't make much of a difference to explain right and wrong to them. They'll believe in either explanation just as blindly.
 
Crash Course

John Green talks about history from a Eurocentric view while shitting on white people and praising all other cultures. He tries to make History "cool" and down with the kids while ignoring crucial events that might make interfere with the narrative. His video on the Haitian Revolution is something to behold.

I've read the whole thread. I just wanted to say that I hate this guy and his retarded takes. I can't believe he actually has a degree. He makes US academia look like a laughing stock.
 
Back