Post Ratings Discussion

Should we have a fish hook rating?

  • Yea

    Votes: 1,032 85.5%
  • Nay

    Votes: 175 14.5%

  • Total voters
    1,207
If a post is actually "really dumb", it will get multiple negative ratings, if it's just some sperg with an axe to grind, the one dumb to an agree or a like or whatever shouldn't make much of a difference.
Well I was just responding to the concern here that the rating system doesn't actually recognize depth. A kind-of-dumb post on the front page will get lots of dumb ratings, but a really retarded post on the second page won't get nearly as much.
 
Anyone think new members should have to have a certain amount of post or pass a time requirement before they're allowed to use the rating system? Frankly it's annoying to see people who never made a post on the board or just made their account a week ago being allowed to rate posts without even partaking in discussions with the community. The only people I can seeing this system fucking with is the lurkers which is why I purpose maybe using a time requirement.
 
I've also toyed with the idea that users who are banned before their 50th post should have their ratings removed from the system. But, I can see that having as many negative effects as positive ones.
 
What about a "Ween" rating?
Maybe even get it to play a sound like the "Nice Meme" rating. I'd be willing to record something.
I heard someone suggest a "Supreme Gentleman" rating for the Holden thread. Is there anyway to make certain ratings "Unlockable"? Like, replying x amount of times to a "Virgin Pride" thread lets you use the "Supreme Gentleman" rating?
Maybe make an SJW rating that works on the same principle.
And maybe make it based on the amount of positive ratings in the respective threads, to discourage shit posting.
Don't know if this is possible or not, just throwing stuff out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Count groudon
sometimes i'd also like a though-provoking rating. it'd be a little thinker statue, and i'd slap it on posts wondering about chris' shitty briefs.

I use "like" for this. It means I may not fully "agree" with the idea yet, but that it gives some new food for thought. Kind of like thinking, "Hmm. Yeah."

Apropos, admins please change "like" to "Hmm. Yeah." as it used to be.
 
Last edited:
Question (sorry if this has been asked before):
When do the Late, A-Log and Dumb ratings become available? Or are they donor ratings?
 
Top secret inner circle where only the dankest of memes are allowed.
T1HmvKA_Kgg1F1YZi7CV.png
 
The best thing to do with ratings is not give a crap.

Ratings bothered me at first, but I find that this really is the best way to think of them anymore if you're not inclined to always agree with popular opinion - or anyone's opinion. All they are is somebody's opinion, and there's no right or wrong to that, whether the "community" as a whole A-Logs the shit out of your post or not. Unless you're in it for a popularity contest, or want to waste the time and energy reporting everyone who rates you unfairly (for instance, living in a time zone where a popular post is made at 2am your time, then getting a Late rating because you weren't able to get to it within a few hours. Can't help that, but that won't stop someone from marking your comment Late.) it doesn't matter, so better to tune them out, I think.

Negative ratings can't always be relied on to shame everyone into behaving however the group, clique, inner circle, whoever, wants them to behave, either. If you have a different opinion, you have a different opinion, and expecting everyone to agree with you is unreasonable to start with. I think as long as you're not being uncivil to the rest of the forum, or going out of your way to cause disruption, it's better to say what's on your mind, rather than to keep quiet because someone or other might not appreciate your particular take on something. Breaking rules is another thing, but people get away with that all the time (especially talking directly to Chris comments). Nothing is done about it, so it's difficult to see some of them as much more than suggestions, enforced only by the whim of whichever mod is watching at any given moment.
 
Back