Post your personal idiosyncratic moral values, the stranger the better. - Has the cat burglar earned what he's taken or is he just a glamorized thief?

[Core Theorist]

Physical misbehavior should have physical punishment. As a sidenote before I continue, this is the only acceptable use of physical force in disciplining children. E.G. Child misbehaves physically, they are corrected physically. I think it's niggerish to use physical discipline against a child for any other reason.

However, it should be used much more in criminal justice. Both immediate physical punishment and protracted confinement-punishment are important and should both be used for disciplining criminals. Extreme physical crimes should have extreme physical punishments, modest physical crimes should have modest physical punishment. As an example, stealing from an establishment (where nobody is specifically affected) should be something like a flogging. Stealing from a specific home and/or person should be punished with broken finger(s), as well as the flogging.

For more extreme examples, molesters and/or rapists would have their arms and hands broken, and/or be castrated. "People" who do that to children should as well be branded with a hot iron on their forehead telling the world they're undesirables. Similarly, unjustifiable murderers would also be branded with a different mark, with similar punishments.

I think that a sharp, physical negative stimulus on top of the protracted negative stimulus is a much more ideal deterrent and would go a long way in negating crime of all kinds.

This would all be on top of the pre-existing prison sentence and fines, of course.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

at this point choosing to have a kid is on average a net negative for the whole world, although obviously when you move to a local context of your family, your hometown, your ethnic group etc, it becomes a positive in that regard, so im not saying dont have kids, but its a fact. nothing short of a global decimation of the human populace will help resolve this

Having White children is an existential good.

We are in a Pride & Prejudice & Zombies genocidal war where it takes 18 years for us to replenish one of our soldiers while the gay race communism hordes send thousands of new monsters across our borders daily.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

I'll go with spicier one since it becomes the usual non woke popular opinion thread:

Pacifism is one of the greatest sicknesses of the last 2 centuries. Yeah you should strive to negotiate things peacefully first, but if you never use your power to show it exists, then might as well disband your army, since when a neighbour decides to attack you won't be able to defend yourself anyways.

 

[Lapsus of the bepsus]

Having White children is an existential good.

We are in a Pride & Prejudice & Zombies genocidal war where it takes 18 years for us to replenish one of our soldiers while the gay race communism hordes send thousands of new monsters across our borders daily.

i immediately knew someone would raise this point which is why i already addressed it in my post. having a white child is good for you as a white man and for your family, community and race, simply because it contributes to offsetting the rise in nigger population.
but in a vacuum, is it good for our society? no. the capacity of western society to sustain itself as a high trust society that is relatively resistant to moral corruption by internal and external influences has been depleted and you adding another member to it will not help. it doesnt have the space for the hordes of niggers trying to immigrate or gaining birthright citizenship, yes of course it doesnt. it also doesnt have the space for your white kid. it doesnt even have the space for you or me and we are already here..

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Pacifism is one of the greatest sicknesses of the last 2 centuries. Yeah you should strive to negotiate things peacefully first, but if you never use your power to show it exists, then might as well disband your army, since when a neighbour decides to attack you won't be able to defend yourself anyways.

My spicy stance is that it is unethical to place limits and restrictions on self-defense
If someone threatens to slap you in the face, I say you are within your rights to pour gasoline on that someone and light them on fire (provided you don't violate someone else's property rights by doing that, like, say, in a public bar)

 

[Apteryx Retardi]

Physical misbehavior should have physical punishment.

However, it should be used much more in criminal justice. Both immediate physical punishment and protracted confinement-punishment are important and should both be used for disciplining criminals.

I think that a sharp, physical negative stimulus on top of the protracted negative stimulus is a much more ideal deterrent and would go a long way in negating crime of all kinds.

A mild curbside beatdown (that doesn't even cause any actual bodily harm) is unironically a far more effective deterrant for a "normal" criminal than doing 5 to 10.

Normal prolonged legal process is completely ineffective as a deterrant for the average nigger (of any race). With how long and abstract it is, it's something that "just happens to them". Like beating a dog for chasing a car, in it's mind it's not for doing that, it's for finally coming back to you after you called.

Yet I absolutely fucking wouldn't trust any government with legally administering physical punishments, especially ones that can consider lasting harm.

Solution: adjust legalties to make crime more dangerous. Moar gunz, more lax criteria for self defense. Legalize boobytraps. Etc.

Won't EVER happen of course...

 

[オプセック]

No, you never have the right to steal from anyone. You also can't earn anything through theft. The only reward the thief should get is some lead.

The more important question is who gives anyone to right to own something?
The answer is people who are waving figurative and actual guns in front of you face - like thieves.

Owning shit, stealing shit? It's all memes. If I can just meme you into not taking my stuff, when you actually would like to, you are a sucker.
I respect people who dare to take my stuff - And on the chance I'm misunderstood: They still get the rack and red hot irons, ofc.

 

[GeekUSA]

I think hunting with your kid is less damaging than giving them an ipad and ignoring what they do. Maybe my family is a bunch of rednecks, but my extended family's kids are all way better off than most their age, and are a lot more involved socially with their family. Hunting also teaches the importance of preserving nature, patience, and cooperation, because it places an extreme responsibility on the part of the hunters to not fuck up while shooting and cruelly maim an animal.

 

[Meat Target]

I'll go with spicier one since it becomes the usual non woke popular opinion thread:

Pacifism is one of the greatest sicknesses of the last 2 centuries. Yeah you should strive to negotiate things peacefully first, but if you never use your power to show it exists, then might as well disband your army, since when a neighbour decides to attack you won't be able to defend yourself anyways.

Jordan Peterson once mused on this, how harmlessness is not peaceful. To be peaceful is to be capable of great violence, while having it under control and using it prudently.

 

[Nimbat Out Of Hell]

I believe in isolationism, but also think America should nuke the middle east and Beijing.

 

[Male Idiot]

Physical misbehavior should have physical punishment. As a sidenote before I continue, this is the only acceptable use of physical force in disciplining children. E.G. Child misbehaves physically, they are corrected physically. I think it's niggerish to use physical discipline against a child for any other reason.

However, it should be used much more in criminal justice. Both immediate physical punishment and protracted confinement-punishment are important and should both be used for disciplining criminals. Extreme physical crimes should have extreme physical punishments, modest physical crimes should have modest physical punishment. As an example, stealing from an establishment (where nobody is specifically affected) should be something like a flogging. Stealing from a specific home and/or person should be punished with broken finger(s), as well as the flogging.

For more extreme examples, molesters and/or rapists would have their arms and hands broken, and/or be castrated. "People" who do that to children should as well be branded with a hot iron on their forehead telling the world they're undesirables. Similarly, unjustifiable murderers would also be branded with a different mark, with similar punishments.

I think that a sharp, physical negative stimulus on top of the protracted negative stimulus is a much more ideal deterrent and would go a long way in negating crime of all kinds.

This would all be on top of the pre-existing prison sentence and fines, of course.

Workes for almost 900 years.

As Saint Laszlo put it: Should a thief take a chicken or less, let his hand be cut off. Should he take more than a chicken, let his head be taken off.

Worked.

 

[オプセック]

Jordan Peterson once mused on this, how harmlessness is not peaceful. To be peaceful is to be capable of great violence, while having it under control and using it prudently.

That "good" violence you are talking about, just exists in the other one's head tho. As soon as you apply it, your "morally superior" strategy failed.
Additionally, if you want people to have an realistic estimate on your power, to fear you, you need to show it, which puts you into the position of the perpetrator.
Spreading fear isn't morally "good". It may just be necessary for survival in the face of adversial conditions to that - neutral, if anything.
Like most things peterson says, it's just sophistry to bamboozle midwits.
To spell it out: I'm not saying you are a midwit, but the suckers who you manage to bullshit into trusting you with guns and other implements of violence, would be.
Which is sorta based, but no even self-preservation pilled, because threatening people can also backfire and destabilize situations, so it's def. not morally superior or anything by default. I really hope you don't actually have that J. P. brand, lone ranger savior complex he often rants about. Harmless people are peaceful, if they are peaceful. Very easy to discern, no sophistry needed. And you def. can't blame some nigger without a gun for starting a firefight, but only the people who brought the guns. J. P. is just a retard.

 

[Meat Target]

That "good" violence you are talking about, just exists in the other one's head tho. As soon as you apply it, your "morally superior" strategy failed.
Additionally, if you want people to have an realistic estimate on your power, to fear you, you need to show it, which puts you into the position of the perpetrator.
Spreading fear isn't morally "good". It may just be necessary for survival in the face of adversial conditions to that - neutral, if anything.
Like most things peterson says, it's just sophistry to bamboozle midwits.
To spell it out: I'm not saying you are a midwit, but the suckers who you manage to bullshit into trusting you with guns and other implements of violence, would be.
Which is sorta based, but no even self-preservation pilled, because threatening people can also backfire and destabilize situations, so it's def. not morally superior or anything by default. I really hope you don't actually have that J. P. brand, lone ranger savior complex he often rants about. Harmless people are peaceful, if they are peaceful. Very easy to discern, no sophistry needed. And you def. can't blame some nigger without a gun for starting a firefight, but only the people who brought the guns. J. P. is just a retard.

You're missing the point entirely.

True, to be peaceful means you don't start fights or actively go looking for trouble. Sometimes force is needed to repel an unjust aggressor. You are not a good person because you are a harmless pacifist; if anything pacifism is immoral, because it enables thugs and bullies.

There are cocksuckers in this world who have no regard for other people, and will do whatever they want until someone stops them by force.

 

[The Last Stand]

Police are a necessary evil for a just society. I say necessary evil as police are supposed to protect and serve their communities, not be a puppet for whatever government tyranny they demand. Sometimes when protecting and serving the people, bad things happen. If you're a cop trying to get by, a criminal gives you a hard time and threatens your life with force, you should have to right to enact force for the safety of yourself and your surroundings. Many times, those people create a situation where lethal force is necessary to null the threat. Themselves.

 

[NoReturn]

I've got a petty one:
If you business isn't open, you shouldn't be allowed to have your light on, and that includes the large signs on the outside of buildings.

 

[EatFatWomen]

Nothing wrong with cannibalism just murder

 

[redbeardeded]

If the government can't protect you, it's the governments responsibility to have a policy for you to have your own protection. Otherwise it's just them wanting you dead and you are free to call the government illegitimate.

If you get a weapon, train with it daily.

 

[Meat Target]

Police are a necessary evil for a just society. I say necessary evil as police are supposed to protect and serve their communities, not be a puppet for whatever government tyranny they demand. Sometimes when protecting and serving the people, bad things happen. If you're a cop trying to get by, a criminal gives you a hard time and threatens your life with force, you should have to right to enact force for the safety of yourself and your surroundings. Many times, those people create a situation where lethal force is necessary to null the threat. Themselves.

I've watched enough bodycam footage to realize cops are society's tardwranglers.

 

[Canard]

We should really bring back corporal punishment for minor crimes. And maybe shame.

Facial branding like tattoos could also be extremely effective for things like shop lifting, speeding or DUI. You are caught and you get symbol tattooed to your forehead or cheek. And couple lashes...

 

[Mnutu]

Actually, it does. The word "crap" has less severity than the swear "shit." You call somebody an asshole, it's a general profane term that can encompass a person's behavior. "Nigger" is a derogatory slur with a dark history used against a race. Some swears have less severity into them than others.

but without any societal context
but without any societal context
but without any societal context
but without any societal context