Post your personal idiosyncratic moral values, the stranger the better. - Has the cat burglar earned what he's taken or is he just a glamorized thief?

[ArnoldPalmer]

No, you never have the right to steal from anyone. You also can't earn anything through theft. The only reward the thief should get is some lead.

Guess you've never heard of Pentesting/Bug bounties before.

 

[Lapsus of the bepsus]

Guess you've never heard of Pentesting/Bug bounties before.

pentesting isnt theft. if you actually steal whatever data you manage to get to, only then your "pentesting" becomes theft and your "bounty" if any becomes a ransom.

 

[BradeRunna]

Guess you've never heard of Pentesting/Bug bounties before.

No, I had to google it.

I am talking about real life shit. Not stupid nerd fag shit.

 

[Welfare Bum]

Power is the most important thing you could ever have in relationships with other humans. With everyone. Family, friends, coworkers, acquaintances, and of course enemies. It is proper to maneuver yourself into a position where you have very clear leverage over other people in your life, and ensure that everyone knows that you're serious when you make threats. This doesn't require antagonizing anyone in your life. You are trying to make them come to the conclusion themselves that you and yours are not to be taken advantage of. This way you can keep people naturally in line without having to risk compromising your relationship. Surprisingly you won't make that many enemies this way. Enemies come from people who cross boundaries because they think they can get away with it. If you're too hard a target, you'll never make these enemies because they'll know better.

 

[PonderosaPete]

 

[Apteryx Retardi]

Power is the most important thing you could ever have in relationships with other humans. With everyone. Family, friends, coworkers, acquaintances, and of course enemies. It is proper to maneuver yourself into a position where you have very clear leverage over other people in your life, and ensure that everyone knows that you're serious when you make threats. This doesn't require antagonizing anyone in your life. You are trying to make them come to the conclusion themselves that you and yours are not to be taken advantage of. This way you can keep people naturally in line without having to risk compromising your relationship. Surprisingly you won't make that many enemies this way. Enemies come from people who cross boundaries because they think they can get away with it. If you're too hard a target, you'll never make these enemies because they'll know better.

Works 90% of time. 9% of time the other party (especially the more intelligent/competent/useful ones) will simply distance themself from such potentially risky relationship, and 1% will see you as a useful cat's paw to set up against their actual targets.

 

[Welfare Bum]

9% of time the other party (especially the more intelligent/competent/useful ones) will simply distance themself from such potentially risky relationship, and 1% will see you as a useful cat's paw to set up against their actual targets.

You are completely correct. In my case I typically set up things to where people are reliant on me for things. My skills, my connections, my wealth, or even just being emotionally reliant on me, rather than doing some weird Epstein's Island babyrape blackmail shit. Not that people don't admit things to me that they should never admit to anyone. But that's mostly how I set it up. It puts more in people's heads that they shouldn't bite the hand that feeds them, rather than staying in line because of dirty laundry they don't want aired. That 1% actually did happen once. But I'm not easy to manipulate. If you have power, you can't be a retard. Otherwise you lose it.

 

[soup peddler]

Women who go out into the world wearing like borderline pornographic clothes with like "yes daddy", or that looks like DDLG-themed, are fucking creeps. I don't care if you're like a cute woman or a fugly troon, if you're wearing like barely concealed fetish gear outside, you are a pervert weirdo who is like getting off on making people uncomfortable. The way some women make themselves so sexual isn't usually discussed like this because certain men like it, but it's creepy, sex-offender type behavior.

 

[オプセック]

True, to be peaceful means you don't start fights or actively go looking for trouble. Sometimes force is needed to repel an unjust aggressor. You are not a good person because you are a harmless pacifist; if anything pacifism is immoral, because it enables thugs and bullies.

Well, in the post before, you said - or quoted - that harmlessness isn't peaceful, that's just tautologically wrong.
It's quite frankly just a backhanded form of victim blaming. Harmless antelopes look pretty peaceful to me, lions - not so much. Very simple.
"Oh, he wasn't dangerous enough, his weakness is le ackshual moral bad!"
Since you are a bodycam and law affectionardo, I'm baffled how you never noticed perps coming up with innumerable variations of that exact line all the time...
Not allowing yourself to be weak - saying it's a moral obligation to be at your peal potential, as to enforce your code of conduct on others, is a different thing entirely.
Jordan Peterson could've left it at that, but he choose to link it with blaming the weak for whatever happens to them, that IS spiteful, something he often accuses others of being... High roading just means you tread softly and carry that big stick - no need for dunkin on the dweebs.

I know how you will tell me how I got him wrong and am misreading him on purpose, but I am not - J. P. is the one who's trying to slip a little more than you bargained for into his moral - he does it all the time. And he's smart with words, he knows what he's doing when he makes statements like that...

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

Grown men should not eat sweet food in view of other people, with certain exceptions. Sweets are for children and fat women. Eating sweets is a guilty pleasure like masturbating. Seeing a grown ass fat man in public eating donuts or candy or ice cream is disgusting.

 

[Apteryx Retardi]

Grown men should not eat sweet food in view of other people, with certain exceptions. Sweets are for children and fat women. Eating sweets is a guilty pleasure like masturbating. Seeing a grown ass fat man in public eating donuts or candy or ice cream is disgusting.

Fuck off.

Calories are necessary unless you're an already fat bitch. I often don't have time to go for three healthy meals during the day, drink my coffee black with no sugar, and you can pry my Mars/Snickers/whatever goyslop bars out of my cold, dead hands.

 

[Attempt Turd]

People who use uncommon synonyms of words just to sound smarter (in this case personal/peculiar -> idiosyncratic) should have their gob smacked.

You are double plus wrong.

 

[Welfare Bum]

I actually have another one. Always defend your trash when outsiders are involved. You should never let one of your own be handed over to the outgroup to face consequences for their actions. They are your tribe, and therefor you should have their back if any outsider comes for them, regardless of why. We humans are naturally tribalistic, and the forced eradication of tribalism has caused many issues in society. You should act tribal when confronted by those of other tribes. But then, in the privacy and safety of your own tribe, you should take care of the issue among yourselves. A member of your tribe steals? Don't turn them in. The police are an enemy tribe. Kick the shit out of the thief yourselves.

Families usually practice this. Where if you're a parent, and your child does something bad that could get them put in jail, you discipline your child yourself and not breath a word of it to anyone else, especially not the police. Parents who get the police involved to try and discipline their children for them need a serious curb stomping. Close-knit tough love is something that needs to be embraced by wider communities rather than being restricted to most families.

 

[DiscoRodeo]

Power is the most important thing you could ever have in relationships with other humans. With everyone. Family, friends, coworkers, acquaintances, and of course enemies. It is proper to maneuver yourself into a position where you have very clear leverage over other people in your life, and ensure that everyone knows that you're serious when you make threats. This doesn't require antagonizing anyone in your life. You are trying to make them come to the conclusion themselves that you and yours are not to be taken advantage of. This way you can keep people naturally in line without having to risk compromising your relationship. Surprisingly you won't make that many enemies this way. Enemies come from people who cross boundaries because they think they can get away with it. If you're too hard a target, you'll never make these enemies because they'll know better.

Id agree in some sense, but Id say it this way.

Justice without power is toothless.

Ive been maneuvering through life on the opposite side of the spectrum, in that Ive been avoiding power over others, been quick to diffuse my own power, to try to be more democratic in my approach, more even, etc.

There are too many people who take advantage of that, may push you down, or may abuse that privilege rather easily.

Thats not to say that its wrong to share power- but, be very, very careful with whom you're willing to share power.

If youre given power, hold on to it. Those who are reluctant to it because they know of the responsibilities it entails, and don't want power over others are probably the best to have it, and if you don't, someone else who doesn't have either trait may take it themselves.

I think you have a very dog eat dog kind of view, but youre not off either. You clearly said dont antagonize people, which I 100% get and am glad you highlighted. You do need your own power as well so people don't mess with you, plain and simple.

Power isn't an evil, basically. Its simply a tool. Keep power when you get it, exercise it and don't be afraid to exercise it, and not everything needs to be equal or diffused in society. Give up power to the wrong people, and people will abuse it or act unjustly in a void. 'Justice' without power is toothless and hollow. You may find yourself in an unfair situation where you want justice done, and those you have diffused power into simply don't care and never really did.

I actually have another one. Always defend your trash when outsiders are involved. You should never let one of your own be handed over to the outgroup to face consequences for their actions. They are your tribe, and therefor you should have their back if any outsider comes for them, regardless of why. We humans are naturally tribalistic, and the forced eradication of tribalism has caused many issues in society. You should act tribal when confronted by those of other tribes. But then, in the privacy and safety of your own tribe, you should take care of the issue among yourselves. A member of your tribe steals? Don't turn them in. The police are an enemy tribe. Kick the shit out of the thief yourselves.

This is one which I disagree with.

I will say that you know 'your tribe' best, but you also may be very biased. I think that maybe theres some ideal in self-policing, but the key thing with self-policing is you need to actually police your tribe. Gypsies, troons, and ghetto blacks follow this sort of logic, and it winds up destroying them. If you kick the shit out of a thief yourselves, thats fine- but most times, people don't do this. People don't solve problems in their own communities, they just let them metastasize. Power, and the power to police your own community, comes with responsibilities as well.

Troons, for example, want this right, yet never self-police the pedophiles among their own community till its too late. Even if you don't want to look at the pedos, literally look at the tranch. Privileges come with responsibilities, thats the difference with liberties, and 'self-policing' is a privilege that should rarely be evoked, yet everyone wants and few actually deserve with regards to their communities.

Self-policing rarely works out in practice, unless you have highly civic minded cultures- maybe something you'd find in a tight knit and pretty moral community in some Montana or Idaho backwater or something similar.

 

[Welfare Bum]

Self-policing rarely works out in practice, unless you have highly civic minded cultures- maybe something you'd find in a tight knit and pretty moral community in some Montana or Idaho backwater or something similar.

Subhumans like niggers and trannies only follow half the logic. But even so. Those groups have established a hugely disproportionate level of power and influence By doing so.

 

[thyme]

I hate littering.
No, I don't care about the environment. I don't recycle. I throw water bottles and aluminum cans in with everything else in the garbage. I just don't want to see that shit. Throw it away. Put it in your pocket until you can throw it away. It's no different than taking a shit in public, to me. 99% of the time, in my area, it's the immigrants littering, so it comes off as even more subhuman.
It's just ugly to look at, thats it