"Pride before Fall"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
If you want something easy, choose MongoDB. You can learn it in an hour and it's very forgiving. Kinda like perl in that you don't have to declare a variable type, it works it out from context.
Thanks! I worked out how I’d do it in a sheet but that’s useless unless someone takes the time to transfer it over. I’ll definitely look into MongoDB.

I’ll start now and either add to or share what I dig up.

@GenociderSyo blizzard are doing troon shit for Pride this year.
 
Dunno if it's been suggested yet, but I think it's worth adding a flag when you've got companies that do pride shit for western audiences, but refuse to do it for eastern audiences. Let's people know they're just doing it for the ESG.

1685295245992.png
 
Last edited:
Accepting logo suggestions.
Why not use the most obvious motif that comes to mind when you think "pride and fall", and that is, the myth of Icarus? It's a story of pride and hubris causing downfall (and a literal fall, at that), exactly what we're looking for. There's also a funny element of that hubris manifesting through modifications to the body, that is the man-made wings. YOU WILL NEVER BE A BIRD
There's a lot of symbolism that could be lifted from that myth. Something utilizing a sun or falling feathers motif would work really well for a logo I think.
1685298344142.png
Excuse my exquisite MS Paint skills, just wanted to get this idea out of my system. Might flesh this out properly later once I have the time.
 
Why not use the most obvious motif that comes to mind when you think "pride and fall", and that is, the myth of Icarus? It's a story of pride and hubris causing downfall (and a literal fall, at that), exactly what we're looking for. There's also a funny element of that hubris manifesting through modifications to the body, that is the man-made wings. YOU WILL NEVER BE A BIRD
There's a lot of symbolism that could be lifted from that myth. Something utilizing a sun or falling feathers motif would work really well for a logo I think.
View attachment 5140348
Excuse my exquisite MS Paint skills, just wanted to get this idea out of my system. Might flesh this out properly later once I have the time.
Good idea. I can't draw for shit otherwise I'd draw Icarus still wearing the wings falling from the sun, and the wings are rainbow coloured.
 
Google Chrome is rolling out a new version of their extension format which specifically kneecaps ad blockers. More to the point though, they have an official extensions marketplace. Average users aren't going to find an extension outside of that; those who do will be warned several times that installing it could make their computer spontaneously combust.
No one needs to make an extension. You can jump off ones that already exist, and tell users to use it to use yours.

Gays against groomers sounds about as realistic as Jews against compound interest. I sometimes feel like I'm going mad that everyone has forgotten that fags reproduce via molestation simply because trans want to actually butcher kids. Homos are still terrible for that shit and everyone knows it.

It's a classic gambit. Here's my favourite example of that.

Women only have power over other women and children, two women can't have a child without money or one of them being willing to fuck a man. Or turkey batter themselves up, I suppose.

They are probably trying to get the gay men on their side as well, which would be actual strength in numbers. They say Groomers, but I am pretty sure they're an anti trans group only, hence the flag snip.
The main point of my posting it was hopes a visual representation would help understanding. Not to add more faggot discussion to this site than the 38957634986 places we already have to do so :story:

tl;dr one monster at a time

ps- think a little harder about what person usually makes a man or a woman gay? spoiler, it's usually a man for both parties (underage rape, sexual assault)
 
I am going to be very busy this week but I have managed to get some bare bones ready.


Please don't just plug in random shit and expect me to pull it.

Basically my three criteria are:

- Most dangerous, brands that directly target children with gender ideology. (Scholastic, Target)
- Threatening, brands that seriously and directly push gender ideology but not really troon shit at kids. ("Always" tampons)
- Reckless, brands that push lgbt shit just because it's the new thing (Bud Light)

I am not looking for woke in terms of CRT or companies that tweet about Trump or whatever the fuck. There is a laser focus here. It's about boycotting the corporate sponsors of child predators and the ongoing abuse of women.
 
Do the browser devs have the ability to fuck with 3rd party extensions?
It's something that happened before. We had the experience with AdNauseam that was not only removed from the extension stores but also flagged as harmful, which necessitated to deactivate an option in the hidden about;config page IIRC.
On a lesser extent we also have Coincidence Detector that was disappeared from extension stores and dev platforms but can be installed with a simple click on the .crx/.xpi.

Since browsers won't have the excuse to say that it "executes harmful code", I do believe that PbF would be able to have a single "one click download/install" on the website if its use is only to highlights text or put an emoji next to it.
On browser extensions, I would like to add that for Firefox, it will allow auto-updates for third-party extensions (not hosted on addons.mozilla.org). For Chrome however, I believe the extensions can only be updated if they're hosted on the chrome web store; but there is a workaround through the Chromium Web Store extension.
 
Sorry if you're not looking for this detail here, but I thought I'd pop it in just in case.

Pizza Hut
BOOK IT! program (aims to encourage in grades Pre-K through 6) featured a book called Big Wig, for pride month '22, wherein a child dresses in drag for a neighbourhood costume competition (for grades Pre-K through 3).

"This wonderful read-aloud celebrates the universal childhood experience of dressing up and the confidence that comes with putting on a costume. And it goes further than that, acknowledging that sometimes dressing differently from what might be expected is how we become our truest and best selves."


Pantene
"For LGBTQ kids, hair is more than how you look." (YouTube)

Mattel
Smart Girls Guide to Body Image (encourages seeking out assistance to transition without parental consent, among many other things), Gender neutral dolls, tranny Barbie, etc. etc.

Of course, companies that support The Trevor Project (e.g. AT&T) are plentiful.

The Human Rights Campaign website ranks companies based on "Supporting an Inclusive Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility", and so could be a useful source. Here's Mattel's page for reference.

I also have a list of companies that have sponsored or partnered with Australian youth gender charity, Minus18 (our version of UK-based charity, Mermaids) left over from some work I was doing a while back. Minus18 basically function as an LGBT (mainly T) lobby group, with a central objective to push this shit into schools. It's a pretty long list, but companies from within the US context may be more relevant at this stage?
 
honestly you can take the same data, slime it up a bit, and make a strong 'pro trans' website that would be harder to attack

if you did it sneaky you'd even make it hilariously obvious to those in the know that it's a list of fucking stupid companies, but to the average journalist it's a list of perfect diversity
I like this idea. I know Null's original plan was to offer alternative brands for those looking to avoid those who suck the girldick, but by keeping the site completely neutral i.e. no editorialising whatsoever, it'll be much harder to convincingly attack.

All the site would contain is a list of publicly known information about a range of companies and how they support pro LGBTIQP+ stuff without any context or commentary whatsoever. (though I wouldn't refer to P on the website)
 
The suggestion can just be someone not on the fucking site (probably "yet").
 
I like this idea. I know Null's original plan was to offer alternative brands for those looking to avoid those who suck the girldick, but by keeping the site completely neutral i.e. no editorialising whatsoever, it'll be much harder to convincingly attack.

All the site would contain is a list of publicly known information about a range of companies and how they support pro LGBTIQP+ stuff without any context or commentary whatsoever. (though I wouldn't refer to P on the website)
Off topic, but this has been my daydream for a KF satellite site: simply a list of publicly available names/deadnames and addresses, presented without context or editorializing. If you feel threatened by that, then you have to feel equally threatened by white pages and your own social media accounts it was sourced from. Curious if globohomo would find a way to suppress such a site like they do KF.
 
I am going to be very busy this week but I have managed to get some bare bones ready.


Please don't just plug in random shit and expect me to pull it.

Basically my three criteria are:

- Most dangerous, brands that directly target children with gender ideology. (Scholastic, Target)
- Threatening, brands that seriously and directly push gender ideology but not really troon shit at kids. ("Always" tampons)
- Reckless, brands that push lgbt shit just because it's the new thing (Bud Light)

I am not looking for woke in terms of CRT or companies that tweet about Trump or whatever the fuck. There is a laser focus here. It's about boycotting the corporate sponsors of child predators and the ongoing abuse of women.
I have checked out some pages in the repository.
I would advise you to stop mentioning ESG scores in the context of these movements. You have a partially informed context on what ESG products are, but you are being mislead into thinking all of the aspects of the product are useless or related to SJW. For example ESG packages can be used to determine extranational associations between businesses and nations. They are often used to check if a company is associated with China or Russia or an enemy nation or government.
I have no doubt that in the next election cycle people against ESG will be painted as traitors and allies of enemy governments. Let's stay ahead of that ball.
 
I have checked out some pages in the repository.
I would advise you to stop mentioning ESG scores in the context of these movements. You have a partially informed context on what ESG products are, but you are being mislead into thinking all of the aspects of the product are useless or related to SJW. For example ESG packages can be used to determine extranational associations between businesses and nations. They are often used to check if a company is associated with China or Russia or an enemy nation or government.
I have no doubt that in the next election cycle people against ESG will be painted as traitors and allies of enemy governments. Let's stay ahead of that ball.
Counterpoint: I'd never even heard of ESG before it was posted here. Knew nothing about diversity funding. The media likes to keep it that way and never mentions it. Having a simple static page explaining what it is in simple terms (which they can verify with a quick Google if they have any brains) would peak a lot of normies this site is aimed at faster. Get ahead of the ball by having the first say.
 
This is a great idea, and doing it right before Pride month is genius.

Also seconding the people saying this shouldn't be editorialized. I think a sharp focus on the facts- which you seem to be going after- is ideal. "This brand is doing this thing, this is how much that thing may be directly harming children/natal women, this is some evidence for that thing"- something along those lines.

I'm also tempted to agree with the proposal of "sliming it up"; pretending to be viciously pro-trans while using horrifying imagery and such. Honestly though, that's a way riskier option that might backfire really badly (and if its ties to Kiwifarms are ever found out then it'll probably be DDOS'd to hell and back).

Using Kiwiflare to mitigate attacks would be a good idea if it didn't have Kiwi in the title. Directly tying the site to Kiwifarms in any way is too close to editorializing for comfort imo, but I'm not the one making the site so I'm not demanding you do what I say or anything lol.

Hopefully this site is up and out there by June 1st. Godspeed, Dear Feeder :semperfidelis:
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Marvin and Pee Cola
Counterpoint: I'd never even heard of ESG before it was posted here. Knew nothing about diversity funding. The media likes to keep it that way and never mentions it. Having a simple static page explaining what it is in simple terms (which they can verify with a quick Google if they have any brains) would peak a lot of normies this site is aimed at faster. Get ahead of the ball by having the first say.
One of the ways they try to stop normies from learning the truth about funding or agendas is to artificially boost fact-checkers or sites like Wikipedia, in which they would gaslight or try to make people think less about the root cause; making astroturf look like fresh grass. Specifically mentioning the CEI and ESG (and other things) would be better because it's hard to defend except "well bigot, this is done for our movement/agenda therefore it's good".
 
Counterpoint: I'd never even heard of ESG before it was posted here. Knew nothing about diversity funding. The media likes to keep it that way and never mentions it. Having a simple static page explaining what it is in simple terms (which they can verify with a quick Google if they have any brains) would peak a lot of normies this site is aimed at faster. Get ahead of the ball by having the first say.
And there is a time and a place for that. A site solely devoted to pointing out brands that support the gay agenda is fine. Having opponents of the site being able to point to ESG and gaslight people into thinking it's a conspiracy theory which the site believes in is not beneficial.

The site is designed to be viseral and simple. You don't need a complex explanation of the issue at hand. You just need a simple call to action that people can get behind to solve the problem. Everything else is distracting and inefficient.
 
And there is a time and a place for that. A site solely devoted to pointing out brands that support the gay agenda is fine. Having opponents of the site being able to point to ESG and gaslight people into thinking it's a conspiracy theory which the site believes in is not beneficial.

The site is designed to be viseral and simple. You don't need a complex explanation of the issue at hand. You just need a simple call to action that people can get behind to solve the problem. Everything else is distracting and inefficient.
I guess it depends on implementation more to be honest, like when you have people talk about certain things, they sperg out instantly at certain groups (which does discredit or doesn't sell it well to an average person); but at one point or another, there's gonna be confrontation of these facts after shoving it under the rug too many times, and not everyone is a brainrot twittertard who thinks for example, Jeffery Epstein normally committed suicide under stress, which is why they try to distort or memory-hole these stories and facts as fast as they can. But than again, I could be an optimist who believes in the Silent Majority theory.
 
Back