"Pride before Fall"

If the site is gonna happen, here's something to document. Osprey bagpacks chugging the soy: https://www.osprey.com/us/en/featured/pride/
Pride bags.jpg
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: Layton Mysteries, stupid frog, Cpt. Stud Beefpile and 2 others
Don't forget to include charities going beyond their remit in an effort to pander to troons. Oxfam is currently trying to blackhole a video they put out on social media. In one shot they've got themselves accused of misogyny, racism and antisemitism.

TOR/Clearnet
frap said:
Oxfam decided to use Pride Month as a reason to pull out all the stops with a now-deleted video on the poor twans. One still in particular caught the eye of TERF Twitter.

View attachment 5151970

Responses:
View attachment 5151974
Twitter (archive)

View attachment 5151971
Twitter (archive)

View attachment 5151975
Twitter (archive)
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Cheese, Flareanthia, fake farts and 5 others
A random.txt of tranny quotes is a good idea to add once the site is up and running. Really sets the tone to show the true face of the movement and exposes the actual insanity these people hide behind their fake smiles and overly wordy statements. Especially if they have links to the quotes.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Cheese, Kiwi2Shoes, Flareanthia and 12 others
Layton Mysteries said:
True, scratch that one I think then, I kind of thought that when I added it to my post but thought I would see what others thought.
Click to expand...
It requires pretty serious context, but you could still run with it, perhaps with a massive asterisk to an explanatory blurb. The question is whether it's worth mentioning given the context...

The first part of the context is that song has its roots in 2000s era LGBT community attitudes towards grooming accusations: to make a joke out of them, because in the 2000s the only people making such allegations couldn't really find evidence to support the allegations. Such a song would be hilarious back then, because there's no credible alternate interpretation for the majority of people at the time. This assumption about how things stood carried forward to when they released that song, not realizing trannies had been running buckwild over the last decade and destroying the foundations they thought they were standing on, and found themselves teetering upon a shakey foundation of used dilators and troonshine instead...

The second part of the context is that people started running records checks on those in the choir and they uh...they got some hits. This article https://archive.is/0iZsB lays out what they found, which isn't as conclusive as it could be, BUT it's telling that the choir scrubbed the member list with a quickness after they got word people were checking the sex offender registry...

stupid frog said:
Just mention in brackets it's short for Lolita, everyone knows that book.
Click to expand...
It'd probably be better to find a definition of "lolicon" somewhere that can be a hyperlink from the word "loli" in the quote (as long as the formatting makes it obvious there's a link that needs clicking). You could probably even use the wikipedia definition as the picture at the top of the page tells the story better than the wall of text below it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flareanthia
Hypervitaminosis said:
For this to really kick off it needs Boomer appeal.
Martha and George from Facebook need to be able to understand and share the site,
not only do they have some of the most purchasing power, but also time and an established offline social network.
Thus it needs to be factual, simple and shareable.
It does no good if the most accurate information is written by someone with some outrageous username,
or if it links to someplace not meant for frail boned elders, e.g. here.

Alongside calling out companies that promote this kind of open social manipulation needs to be a way to establish a permanent awareness as to how these mega corporations,
e.g. Anheuser-Busch function. When people look at Bud Light they need to permanently see the overarching corporation, not just the brand.

Establishing how these companies profit by promoting these current ideals might be important, the insane concept of ESG scores for example.
Having ecological impact alongside social relations in one scoring system is going to at best lead to an overcompensation and or manipulation in either category.
Having no or little standard between the different groups handing out these ratings creates no viable standard in the score itself.

People need to return to a business sense that forgoes social issues and focuses solely on the product or service, if possible on some ecological sensibility.
This bizarre façade of being social activists whilst having your warehouse workers pissing in bottles is disgusting.

Tl;dr: Get aunt Martha outraged the totalitarians are trooning out her grandson.
Click to expand...
This man says very actual things. His words should be considered.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Radion_Godiva, Megaton Punch, Gog & Magog and 5 others
Surfin' Biiird said:
Adding a sort of tag system would fix this. #beer #alcohol for AB, #website #livestream etc for Twitch. You see this pretty commonly on news sites.
Click to expand...
I tried adding this to tags. The results are just okay, because it brings back the tag first and doesn't roll up the weight to the brands. Click through and you get InBev and Dylan's horrifying face. I might not have the stomach for this.

Hugo doesn't supported nested taxonomy terms it seems? It might work as one less click (I want to find pozzed beer with "beer", results show "Shock Top", "Bud Light", "Stella Artois", etc...) if the brands were not taxonomy terms but I don't want to rebuild the whole schema.
 
Christopher Lasch said:
Looks like no one has made any pull requests to contribute anything. I think Josh might be deprioritizing the project for lack of community enthusiasm — more people giving him shit in the thread than helping document & write up articles.
Click to expand...
On MATI he's mentioned he doesn't know where it could be hosted, so that's a showstopper. (KF on clearnet is higher priority of course.)

I think there's plenty of enthusiasm, but this project needs a little management. A style guide would be useful, but more fundamental IMO is a content pipeline. There's just not enough natural overlap between good content writers and good Git wranglers.

There needs to be a bridge between the two groups. May I be struck down for this heresy, but one solution is to use WordPress.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pee Cola, Surfin' Biiird, Christopher Lasch and 3 others
I know this is probably haram to ask, but would cloudflare as a frontend be entirely forbidden?

I know they're spineless cowards, but their free speech ethos is still largely present. They were perforated for KF, but I think they'd hold for a simple static site.

And if we're using the free tier, for a simple static site, there's absolutely nothing they could complain about.

We'd be using the enemy's resources against the troons.

I understand if that's shameful, but it should at least be considered.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Pee Cola and TouchFluffyTail
Nitro! said:
On MATI he's mentioned he doesn't know where it could be hosted, so that's a showstopper.
Click to expand...
Yep. I actually had this exact idea years back when anti-white ideology was becoming overt, but I quickly came to two realizations:
  1. Anyone who runs such a thing will become immediately and permanently unpersoned. Expect your family harassed, infinite lawsuits against you by suspiciously well-funded "grassroots organizations", news articles essentially calling for you assassination, and much more.
  2. The only way to host it would be to own your own ISP.
1 isn't such a problem for Jersh beside he's already living the cyberpunk enemy of the state life. But for the other 99.999% of humanity, it's a sacrifice almost none of us would be willing to make.

2 is the real issue. It cannot be circumvented aside from TOR, which no normie would ever, ever use. Unless we actually Build Our Own Internet, we're at the mercy of the very hegemony we're trying to fight.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: always lurking and Layton Mysteries
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back