- Joined
- Jul 30, 2021
Imagine being @Android raptorBirds, dromaeosaurs, and a shitton of other theropods aren't dinosaurs?
Imagine being so fragile you get hysterical over feathered dinosaurs (or tacky rainbow shit that reminds you gay people exist).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Imagine being @Android raptorBirds, dromaeosaurs, and a shitton of other theropods aren't dinosaurs?
Imagine being so fragile you get hysterical over feathered dinosaurs (or tacky rainbow shit that reminds you gay people exist).
Imagine being a gay feathered dinosaurImagine being @Android raptor







It's like that one breeding fetishist autist couple that slaps their toddlers.IMDB was promoting this list:
View attachment 6068216
Does this mean there are asexual power couples?
What gets me is alike a lot of these couples look eerily alike:
View attachment 6068240
View attachment 6068243
View attachment 6068247
View attachment 6068248
View attachment 6068249
View attachment 6068251
I would have thought they were related without context.
"Hey, go fuck yourself!"What gets me is alike a lot of these couples look eerily alike:
hatingongodot said:I wrote a long thing about kink and pride and how people are trapping themselves in a closet of their own making and getting mad at everyone else for not similarly engaging in normative sexuality, but I deleted it. I deserve some kind of reward... dubloons perhaps.
...
Hahaha okay; I'll just say one brief thing.
*handing back some doubloons*
Queer people who happily engage in the whole "Eww! I hate these icky degenerate other queers! We're normal unlike them!", the gates of Heaven are closed to you, and you will never be happy defining yourself solely by the Aesthetic Du Jour and what you are not (the caricature of queerness that right wingers have crafted), and I think deep down you know that, too.
elecb0ogalo0 said:Call me crazy, but I don’t think the people that use Pride Month as an excuse to expose non-consenting adults and sometimes children to their fetishes and be gross in public are the arbiters of who goes to heaven and not.
hatingongodot said:I'm gonna be as polite as possible:
- You have almost entirely imagined this group of people. They do not exist. You have fallen for a specific caricature of gay people as sexual predators designed by homophobic right wingers. I would take a second to pause and take a step back and wonder what basis in reality your fears about exhibitionists exploiting kids at Pride have.
- "Gross" does not mean "harm". Part of living in a public space means learning to distinguish between the two. The temptation to conflate it in order to lend moral credence to your feelings of disgust is powerful, but it doesn't make it valid. People will see a gay couple chastely hold hands and be overwhelmed with feelings of disgust. They will see a gay couple give each other a peck on the cheek and think it's the grossest thing they've ever seen in their lives. Disgust alone can't be the sole measure of what is and isn't allowed in public spaces.
- Sorry to dig up old discourse, but unfortunately there is a difference between "performing" kink and engaging in kink. A person in a dog mask at Pride is, most likely, not necessarily titillated by the activity or feeling aroused in a particular way... same with people in leather. They're almost certainly just preoccupied with advertising their lifestyles to other queer kinksters in the same way that anyone in a rainbow tee is. Why do you think people wearing leather to Pride are secretly getting off to it? Have you ever spoken to them? ...because you'll find their primary emotion, at least in my experience, is largely variations on a theme of "It's so hot here and I wanna go home and shower and get a vodka soda." They're not like, secretly nutting. Seeing someone in leather gear is not "participating" in their kink any more than seeing someone in a rainbow shirt is participating in their gay relationship. You can't "not" consent to seeing someone in leather gear any more than you can "not" consent to seeing someone in a shirt that says like, "I love blowjobs."
- Pride isn't "for" kids. This isn't to say kids aren't welcome; rather, as an event, it did not originate as an activity or gathering catered towards kids. Its rules and goals were never formed with children in mind. I would again urge you to consider why you think Pride is an event that needs to cater to children and why you think a statistically significant number of them are attending Pride specifically with the children in attendance in mind.
theslowesthnery said:Thank you, OP! I love you!
elecb0ogalo0, you're going on the ol' block list! If we're going to start banning people from appearing in public because someone is disgusted by them, oh boy, do I have news for you... about how some people feel about fat or non-white or GNC or queer or disabled folks. You being grossed out is a "you" problem that you need to deal with – you're not actually being harmed. Grow up.
That's definitely a bit eerie. Maybe they aren't broadly gay, but like Narcissus, fell in love with themselves, but decided settling for a doppleganger would do.IMDB was promoting this list:
View attachment 6068216
Does this mean there are asexual power couples?
What gets me is alike a lot of these couples look eerily alike:
View attachment 6068240
View attachment 6068243
View attachment 6068247
View attachment 6068248
View attachment 6068249
View attachment 6068251
I would have thought they were related without context.

They must smell the lawsuits coming. Remember, organisations like this exist to protect their members first and foremost and not children.
ACP is a very small group, most pedoatricians are members of the AAP.
Is that the one that was formed by fundies butthurt AAP doesn't hate gay people?ACP is a very small group, most pedoatricians are members of the AAP.
I'll take tacky mass produced rainbow shit over my state limiting my rights even more than it already has.It is eerily quiet on the rainbow front.
I don't trust it.
They both hate gay people, the difference is the AAP gives them hormones and convinces them that they're trans.Is that the one that was formed by fundies butthurt AAP doesn't hate gay people?


The redditors have noticed too
So, gay people were their own worst enemy all along?View attachment 6070791
This is also a pretty good point imo
So, gay people were their own worst enemy all along?
Of course, we already know this, but nice to hear confirmation from one of the horses' mouths.