- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
Using intersex folks in this way is kind of a shitty thing to do.https://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943
Nature is a highly respected publication, you know, and includes the citations in the article. Have fun!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Using intersex folks in this way is kind of a shitty thing to do.https://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943
Nature is a highly respected publication, you know, and includes the citations in the article. Have fun!
https://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943
Nature is a highly respected publication, you know, and includes the citations in the article. Have fun!
https://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943
Nature is a highly respected publication, you know, and includes the citations in the article. Have fun!
And those reports cited have been ripped apart in the scientific realm. Shitpost elsewhere.
lol proof? I'd take Nature, a respected science journal over some rando on a tard cum forum
And now you're just trolling. Good day.
https://www.nature.com/news/sex-redefined-1.16943
Nature is a highly respected publication, you know, and includes the citations in the article. Have fun!
I will!
Let's see here... This review describes disorders of sex development, prevalent in about 1% of the population. It goes on to describe some of the genes involved in sex determination, followed by post-natal hypospadias. There's also XY mosaicism caused by nondisjunction and chimeraism. It concludes with some of the issues that go into determining what should be used to determine a person's sex; anatomy, hormones, cells or chromosomes.
This seems to support that 99+% of people are well-matched between their physiological sex and their gender. With regards to the topic concerning the Rat King, I see no evidence that links any of these conditions to being transgender, especially not with the rapid onset we see in most trenders. At the risk of triggering you, these conditions are still classified as genetic disorders. For most people with disorders of sex development, the worst the suffer is infertility.
But hey, if you'd like to get your genome sequenced, by all means do so, so you can prove how special you are.
Just leave the angry troon alone, kids. They hate their dick and want science not to tell them "yeah you might have mental issues".
Troon: intersex people don't have anything to do with the current trend of gender bending kids. We know when someone is intersex because they have fucked up genetic and medical problems across the board. And they've never been clamoring for a protected social class.
I’m a Pediatrician. How Transgender Ideology Has Infiltrated My Field and Produced Large-Scale Child Abuse.
Honking long article, so link only.
Here's a study within the article, on transgender being innately biological verses a psychological condition.
View attachment 245257
This is one of the weird things about academic studies - 70% or more of the subjects demonstrate that transgenderism is social and not biological? Better conclude the opposite, because at most 30% of subjects did indicate a biological root.
View attachment 245258
Seriously, they're one of the biggest arguments against a biological basis for transgenderism and given infuriatingly low coverage in anti-troon circles. I'm no scientist, but doesn't it make sense that identical mantwins, were they trans, would have similarly identical girlbrains? And this could not be altered by social conditioning, since it would be biologically innate? Again, so simple a fucking dental student (and trust me, we're dumb as shit) could understand it.
Of course the BEST argument against troons is JUST FUCKING LOOK AT THEM, GOD DAMN but we live in clown world where people refuse to accept the blatantly obvious, so hard science spelling this shit out is much appreciated.
Perhaps a better question to ask is: why? Why believe something that goes against the physical evidence in the mirror? Is it hormonal? Psychological? There are people out there who are "trans-abled", their dysphoria comes form having function limbs or eyes, and they want to be cured by maiming themselves. Their suffering is real, but where does it come from?
You do make a very good point though. I think the greatest tragedy here is that nobody is really interested in sussing out the cause of trannies, which could lead to actual treatments. Instead, most researchers on the subject focus on normalizing the self-destructive tendencies these people suffer from. We shouldn't enable people who think they're Napoleon, we should treat them, right?
There's also the question of how do we treat them. For whatever reason, their suffering is real. Throwing a bucket of cold water on them and saying, "No, you're wrong!" is inhumane. Right now, HRT is the best we've got. Maybe it's because looking at other options is politically unpopular. This isn't a situation with a good option, only poor ones.
What I do take exception to is the use of identity as a moral bludgeon, wielded by bullies who get their rocks off by shaming people for innocuous slips of the tongue--or keyboard, as the case may be. That needs to be nipped in the bud.
Seriously, they're one of the biggest arguments against a biological basis for transgenderism and given infuriatingly low coverage in anti-troon circles. I'm no scientist, but doesn't it make sense that identical mantwins, were they trans, would have similarly identical girlbrains?
Bailey and Pillard (1991): occurrence of homosexuality among brothers
52% of identical (monozygotic) twins of homosexual men were likewise homosexual
22% of fraternal (dizygotic) twins were likewise homosexual
11% of adoptive brothers of homosexual men were likewise homosexual
J.M. Bailey and R.C. Pillard, “A genetic study of male sexual orientation,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 48:1089-1096, December 1991.
Where we differ is I think HRT is inhumane as well. It's essentially a prescription for mentally ill people to mutilate themselves, which is pretty barbaric imo, especially given the large portion that regret it. Their suffering is very real but we need to cure it, not just acquiesce to what makes them feel good at the time. Lobotomy used to be the best option for violent schizophrenics, but I would prefer to salvage the human being in there rather than destroy it further.
Right now, HRT is the best we've got.